Open Access

Head fat is a novel method of measuring metabolic disorder in Chinese obese patients

Lipids in Health and Disease201413:113

DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-13-113

Received: 13 May 2014

Accepted: 8 July 2014

Published: 12 July 2014

Abstract

Background

Body adiposity, especially ectopic fat accumulation, has a range of metabolic and cardiovascular effects. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between head fat and metabolic values in Chinese obese patients.

Methods

Data of this cross-sectional study from 66 obese patients were collected. Fat distribution was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and data of body weight, body mass index (BMI), neck circumference (NC), waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), visceral index, basal metabolism (BM), glucose metabolism, lipid levels, uric acid (UA) had been collected.

Results

1) Head fat was significantly associated with BMI, WC, HC, visceral index, BM, total fat and total fat excluding head fat in both males and females (p < 0.05). Head fat was positively correlated with upper limb fat, trunk fat, weight, fasting plasma C peptide, fasting plasma insulin and UA in women(p < 0.05), and the association was not statistically significant in male (p > 0.05). Head fat was positively corrected with NC in males (p < 0.05) but not females (p > 0.05). There was no significant correlation between head fat and fasting plasma glucose, total choleslerolemia, triglyceridemia, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and free fat acid in either gender (p > 0.05). 2) Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that a head fat of 1925.6 g and a head fat of 1567.85 g were the best cut-off values to determine subjects with low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and hyperuricemia respectively.

Conclusions

Head fat accumulation was closely associated with increased body fat, hyperinsulinemia, hyperuricemia, and impared lipid profile, suggesting it might be used as an indicator for dyslipidemia and hyperuricemia.

Keywords

Obesity Head fat Regional fat Lipid profile Hyperuricemia

Background

Obesity is a public health problem that has become a global epidemic. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), there will be about 2.3 billion overweight people aged 15 years and above, and over 700 million obese people worldwide in 2015. Substantial literature has emerged to show that overweight and obesity are major causes of co-morbidities, including type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hyperlipidemia, hyperuricemia and cardiovascular disease. Body adiposity, especially ectopic fat accumulation, has a range of metabolic and cardiovascular effects.

Previous studies have already shown that overweight or obese patients who have the same amount of total body fat may have different risk factor profiles [1]. Therefore, regional fat distribution is better than the total fat in the prediction of cardiovascular disease and metabolic disease. As we know, the accumulation of abdominal fat also called central obesity is strongly associated with metabolic syndrome, T2DM, and cardiovascular disease [24]. Excess abdominal visceral adiposity is the key correlate of metabolic syndrome and upper body fat distribution is commonly associated with increased visceral fat and an abnormal metabolic profile [58]. In addition, previous data also suggest that fat accumulation peripherally such as in the lower extremities is inversely associated with adiposity-related biological factors and risk of metabolic syndrome [9]. The regional obesity also relates to obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) as neck fat is one of risk factors of OSAS, and a predictor of the severity of OSAS [10]. Additionally, neck circumference (NC), which mainly reflects the fat deposit around respiratory tract or subcutaneous fat in the neck, is a proxy for upper-body fat and a reliable screening measure for the identification of patients with abnormal fat distribution. NC can be used as a marker to reflect central obesity and cardio-metabolic syndrome [1113].

The relationship between regional fat accumulation of head fat and metabolic risks in obese patients remains unknown. Thus, we conducted this study to investigate whether head fat is related to regional fat distribution,metabolic values, and whether head fat can as used as a predictor for dyslipidemia, impaired fasting glucose, hyperinsulinemia and hyperuricemia in obese Chinese patients.

Results

Baseline characteristics of patients

The study sample consisted of 66 patients, 20 (30.3%) male and 44 (69.7%) female, with a mean age of 30.78 ± 9.66 years and a mean head fat of 1696.01 ± 336.10 g. The main characteristics of the study populations were shown in Table 1. There were significant differences in body weight, waist circumference (WC), visceral index, basic metabolism (BM) and total fat% between men and women (p < 0.01). Other anthropometry and metabolic variables were not significantly different between the genders (p > 0.05).
Table 1

Baseline study sample characteristics according to genders

Parameters

Men

Women

p-value

Number

20

46

 

Age, years old

29.45 ± 8.65

31.37 ± 10.10

0.463

Head fat, g

1829.43 ± 337.66

1638.01 ± 321.99

0.032

Body weight, kg

102.13 ± 19.74

83.37 ± 12.07

0.001

BMI, kg/m 2

33.24 ± 4.46

31.85 ± 4.25

0.234

NC, cm

42.01 ± 4.66

38.30 ± 9.54

0.133

WC, cm

109.58 ± 14.69

99.50 ± 8.59

0.002

HC, cm

112.79 ± 11.13

107.48 ± 8.25

0.049

Visceral index

17.64 ± 6.37

12.19 ± 5.73

0.002

BM, kcal

2062.22 ± 339.91

1623.66 ± 189.49

<0.001

FPG, mmol/l

5.80 ± 1.75

5.43 ± 1.40

0.397

Fasting insulin, uU/ml

24.42 ± 13.78

23.75 ± 11.32

0.841

Fasting CP, ng/ml

3.85 ± 1.38

3.51 ± 1.26

0.358

TCH, mmol/L

4.90 ± 1.29

4.97 ± 0.96

0.824

TG, mmol/L

1.79 ± 0.78

1.75 ± 1.59

0.925

HDL-C, mmol/L

1.06 ± 0.26

1.24 ± 0.31

0.053

LDL-C, mmol/L

2.86 ± 1.22

2.84 ± 0.68

0.939

FFA, mmol/L

0.61 ± 0.22

0.61 ± 0.28

0.977

UA, umol/L

442.64 ± 92.08

368.43 ± 103.09

0.014

Upper limbs fat, g

5328.93 ± 1274.17

5493.33 ± 1304.78

0.637

Lower limbs fat, g

9843.77 ± 2838.54

10430.69 ± 2948.71

0.455

Total limbs fat, g

15172.70 ± 3746.38

15924.02 ± 3891.50

0.469

Trunk fat, g

17554.45 ± 3782.72

16420.15 ± 3596.75

0.251

Total fat except head, g

32731.45 ± 6787.01

32347.40 ± 6747.21

0.833

Total fat, g

34516.35 ± 6987.79

33989.90 ± 6875.77

0.758

Total fat, %

34.72 ± 4.41

41.30 ± 4.28

<0.001

BMI, body mass index; NC, neck circumference; WC, waist circumference; HC, hip circumference; BM, basic metabolism; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; TCH, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; FFA, free fat acid; UA, uric acid.

Continuous data were described as means ± standard deviation.

p- values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Correlation of head fat with anthropological and metabolic variables

Head fat was significantly associated with body mass index (BMI), WC, HC, visceral index, BM, total fat and total fat excluding head fat in both male and female (Table 2). Head fat was positively correlated with upper limbs fat, trunk fat, weight, fasting plasma C peptide, fasting plasma insulin in women, and the association was not statistically significant in male (Table 2). Head fat was positively corrected with NC in male (r = 0.667, p < 0.05) but not female. There was not significant correlation between head fat and fasting plasma glucose (FPG), total cholesterol (TCH), triglyceride (TG), high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and free fat acid (FFA) in both genders (p > 0.05) (Table 2).
Table 2

Correlation of head fat with anthropological metabolic variables and fat distribution

 

Head fat

Men

Women

r

p-value

r

p-value

Body weight, kg

0.540

0.014

0.607

<0.001

BMI, kg/m 2

0.605

0.005

0.500

<0.001

NC, cm

0.667

0.003

−0.026

0.874

WC, cm

0.636

0.005

0.557

<0.001

HC, cm

0.637

0.004

0.415

0.008

Visceral index

0.699

0.001

0.568

<0.001

BM, kcal

0.599

0.007

0.623

<0.001

FPG, mmol/l

0.183

0.468

0.201

0.191

Fasting insulin, uU/ml

0.303

0.236

0.397

0.008

Fasting CP, ng/ml

0.496

0.051

0.396

0.010

TCH, mmol/l

−0.034

0.904

0.178

0.265

TG, mmol/l

0.264

0.341

0.153

0.225

HDL-C, mmol/l

−0.517

0.071

−0.235

0.138

LDL-C, mmol/l

0.346

0.298

0.200

0.211

FFA, mmol/l

−0.349

0.222

0.064

0.689

UA, umol/L

0.635

0.036

0.455

0.003

Upper limbs fat, g

0.502

0.024

0.533

<0.001

Trunk fat, g

0.546

0.013

0.420

0.004

Lower limbs fat, g

0.436

0.055

0.133

0.387

Total limbs fat, g

0.501

0.024

0.280

0.060

Total fat except head, g

0.581

0.007

0.386

0.008

Total fat, g

0.612

0.004

0.425

0.003

For list of abbreviations, see Table 1.

p-values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Optimal cut-off points of head fat for abnormal lipid metabolism

The prevalence of high TG was 61.82%. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was 0.641 for predicting high TG (p = 0.077). The prevalence of high LDL-C was 48.07% and area under the ROC curve was 0.493 for predicting high LDL-C (p = 0.941). The prevalence of high TCH was 32.14% and area under the ROC curve was 0.473 for predicting high TCH (p > 0.05). The prevalence of low HDL-C was 38.89%. 1925.6 g emerged as the optimal cut-off point of head fat for low HDL-C with a sensitivity of 57.1%, a specificity of 93.9% and the area under the ROC curve was 0.752 (p = 0.002, 95%CI: 0.613 ~ 0.890) (Table 3).
Table 3

Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, Youden index of high density lipoprotein cholesterol with different head fat point

Head fat (g)

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

Youden index

1409.65

95.2

18.2

0.134

1577

90.5

48.5

0.39

1607.65

85.7

51.5

0.372

1644.55

76.2

57.6

0338

1668.25

66.7

63.6

0.303

1822.1

61.9

84.8

0.467

1925.6

57.1

93.9

0.51

Optimal cut-off points of head fat for IFG and hyperinsulinemia

The prevalence of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) was 22.95% in this obese population. Area under ROC curve is 0.553 (p = 0.548). The prevalence of hyperinsulinemia was 71.67% and area under ROC curve is 0.605 (p = 0.209).

Optimal cut-off points of head fat for hyperuricemia

The prevalence of hyperuricemia was 67.74% in females. 1572.75 g was an optimal cut-off point of head fat for hyperuricemia with a sensitivity of 71.4%, a specificity of 80% and the area under the ROC curve was 0.738 (p = 0.035, 95%CI: 0.557 ~ 0.919) (Table 4). The prevalence of hyperuricemia was 38.89% in males and area under the ROC curve was 0.390 (p = 0.441).
Table 4

Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, Youden index of uric acid with different head fat point

Head fat (g)

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

Youden index

1402.10

90.5

20.0

0.105

1528.00

81.0

60.0

0.410

1550.05

76.2

70.0

0.462

1572.75

71.4

80.0

0.515

1829.80

38.1

100.0

0.381

Discussion

Obesity is a public health problem that has raised concern worldwide. Accumulating evidence shows that regional fat distribution is a clinical indicator for the risk of T2DM and cardiovascular disease. Few articles focus on the association between head fat accumulation and metabolic disorders. In this study, we demonstrated that the regional accumulation of fat around the head was associated with classic obesity markers such as BMI, WC, HC, visceral index and BM in both genders. Head fat was also positively correlated with total fat, total fat excluding head fat, upper limb fat and trunk fat in females. Additionally, head fat correlated positively with fasting insulin, fasting C peptide and UA in female. We further revealed head fat might be a predictor for metabolic abnormalities including low HDL-C and hyperuricemia. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that a head fat of 1925.6 g was the best cut-off point to determine subjects with low HDL-C and a head fat of 1567.85 g was the best cut-off point to determine subjects with hyperuricemia in female. These results not only further confirmed the clinical significance of NC but also the metabolic impact of regional fat accumulation in the head.

Previous studies have shown that NC which represents neck fat deposit is a reliable anthropometric index to indicate central obesity [14]. In this study, we showed that head fat correlated positively with total fat and total fat excluding head fat in both genders. Additionally, head fat is closely related to upper limb fat and trunk fat in females. These results showed that head fat might also be associated with central obesity and upper body fat. The association between head fat and other regional fat was not significantly in males, probably because of the limited sample size.

The association between head fat and other regional fat indicated the importance of the head fat in predicting upper body fat, thus head fat might be used as a contributor to cardiometabolic risk. As we known, increased regional lipid content in the liver and muscle are associated with insulin resistance [15, 16]. NC is not only associated with obesity and regional fat distribution, but also can be used for clinical screening of insulin resistance in high risk populations [17, 18]. The analysis of our study revealed head fat was correlated positively with fasting insulin and fasting C peptide in females, suggesting head fat deposit might be a key feature of hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance.

Elevated UA is a strong risk factor for cardiovascular disease and it plays an important role in the development of metabolic syndrome [1921]. Studies indicate that weight gain is a risk factor for hyperuricemia while weight loss reduces the risk [22]. Hyperuricemia may be affected by differences in body fat distribution in obesity [23]. A previous study showed visceral fat may have a greater adverse effect on the metabolism of UA than BMI or subcutaneous fat [24]. Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) thickness in children is associated with hyperuricaemia [25]. Similarly, our study also showed head fat was correlated with UA in female and 1572.75 gs is optimal cut-off point of head fat for hyperuricemia in females.

In addition, previous studies have shown that visceral fat mass is associated with elevated TG in obese women [26]. Visceral fat area has high positive correlations with TG level and a negative correlation with the HDL-C level in both genders [27]. Peripheral fat accumulation such as leg fat mass is favorably associated with cardiometablic risks factors [28, 29]. NC what presents for peripheral fat of neck fat is associated with serum TCH, TG, increased LDL-C and decreased HDL-C in healthy adults [30]. Studies have also shown that NC is corrected with decreased HDL–C and increased TG [3133]. Additionally, other studies reported that increased upper body subcutaneous fat is associated with increased LDL-C and decreased HDL-C [34]. The association between head fat and lipid levels in our study was not obvious. However, data analysis on lipid levels showed the prevalence of high TG, high LDL-C and high TCH were 61.82%, 48.07% and 32.14% respectively. The prevalence of low HDL-C was 38.89% and 1925.6 g emerged as optimal cut-off point of head fat for low HDL-C.

There were some limitations in this study. Firstly, the primary limitation of this study was the use of a cross-sectional design. Therefore, we cannot infer causality from our results. Secondly, the sample of the present study was relatively small. Finally, our result might not be applied to other racial or age groups because the studied subjects were predominantly Chinese adults. Therefore, further studies are necessary to prove these conclusions in larger sample size and with longitudinal studies.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that head fat was significantly associated with metabolic values among Chinese adults. Besides, receiver operating characteristic analysis showed the cut-off point of head fat to determine subjects with low HDL-C and hyperuricemia. Our findings might provide new insight into the role of head fat accumulation in the development of obesity-related diseases.

Methods

Sample population

A cross-sectional survey based on data from outpatient of Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital was conducted among obese patients with BMI over 28 kg/m2 who had been seen in clinic between September 2011 and December 2013. The inclusion criteria included: 1) patients diagnosed with obesity (Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2) and 2) patients aged from 18–60 years old. People with medical illnesses such as clinical or laboratory evidence of cardiac, renal, liver or severe systemic diseases (e.g., cancer and heart failure) were excluded. A total of 229 obese subjects with measurement of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were enrolled for analysis. In addition to DEXA measurement, physical examination, including NC, WC, HC, and body weight, BMI, viscera index, BM, all subjects also underwent lab testing including fasting plasma glucose, fasting insulin, fasting C peptide, TCH, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, FFA and UA. We excluded those patients lacking appropriate data (n = 163). After the appropriate exclusions, data of 66 patients were included in our analysis. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital and written informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Anthropometry

Weight, BMI, visceral index and BM were measured with light clothes and without shoes by Omron HBF-358 (Q40102010L01322F, Japan). WC was measured at the level midway between the lower rib margin and the iliac crest. NC was measured with head erect and eyes facing forward, horizontally at the upper margin of laryngeal prominence (Adam’s apple). HC was measured at the fullest point around the buttocks. These parameters were measured twice and the average was used for analysis.

DEXA measurement

Body composition was measured using DEXA (Hologic QDR4500, USA). DEXA is a method for testing body composition and has high accuracy and good reproducibility, and is especially accurate for the determination of fat content and fat distribution [35]. DEXA was measured with the patient in the supine position. DEXA data including total fat%, upper limbs fat, lower limbs fat, trunk fat, total fat except the head, total fat, head fat. We calculated total fat in each limb.

Lab testing

Blood samples were obtained after fasting over 8 hours for the measurement of lab testing including fasting plasma glucose, fasting insulin, fasting C peptide, TCH, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, FFA and UA.

Definition of dyslipidemia, impaired fasting glucose tolerance hyperinsulinemia and hyperuricemia

In this study, high TG was defined as fasting plasma TG ≥ 1.7 mmol/L, low HDL-C was defined as fasting HDL-C < 1.04 mmol/L,high LDL-C was defined as LDL-C ≥ 3.37 and high TCH was defined as TCH ≥ 5.18 mmol/L [36]. IFG was defined as fasting plasma glucose ≥ 5.6 mmol/l [37]. Hyperinsulinemia was defined as fasting plasma insulin ≥15 mU/L [38]. Hyperuricemia was defined as serum uric acid concentration ≥ 7 mg/dl (≥417 umol/L) in men, and ≥ 6 mg/dl (≥357 umol/L) in women [39].

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using SPSS 17.0 software. All continuous data are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD). Quantitative data were analyzed by t-test between the two groups, the correlation between different variables were assessed using correlation analysis. ROC analyses was performed to assess the accuracy of head fat as diagnostic tests for dyslipidemia, IFG, hyperinsulinemia and hyperuricemia to determine optimal head fat cut-off in relation to dyslipidemia and hyperuricemia. Youden index (sensitivity + specificity −1) was used for determining the head fat cut-off point. All tests of significance were two tailed with a value of p < 0.05.

Abbreviations

BMI: 

Body mass index

NC: 

Neck circumference

WC: 

Waist circumference

HC: 

Hip circumference

BM: 

Basal metabolism

UA: 

Uric acid

WHO: 

World Health Organization

T2DM: 

Type II diabetes mellitus

OSAS: 

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

DEXA: 

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

TCH: 

Total cholesterol

TG: 

Triglyceride

HDL-C: 

High density lipoprotein cholesterol

LDL-C: 

Low density lipoprotein cholesterol

FFA: 

Free fatty acid

IFG: 

Impaired fasting glucose

SD: 

Means ± standard deviation

ROC: 

Receiver operating characteristic

FPG: 

Fasting plasma glucose

CP: 

C-peptide.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial from the Shanghai Shenkang Prevention Prog of Disease (No. SHDC12012303) and Chinese Medical Association Fund (No. 12020550355). No conflict of interest exists.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University
(2)
Department of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University

References

  1. Despres JP, Moorjani S, Lupien PJ, Tremblay A, Nadeau A, Bouchard C: Regional distribution of body fat, plasma lipoproteins, and cardiovascular disease. Arteriosclerosis. 1990, 10: 497-511. 10.1161/01.ATV.10.4.497View ArticlePubMed
  2. Despres JP, Lemieux I: Abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome. Nature. 2006, 444: 881-887. 10.1038/nature05488View ArticlePubMed
  3. Carey VJ, Walters EE, Colditz GA, Solomon CG, Willett WC, Rosner BA, Speizer FE, Manson JE: Body fat distribution and risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. The Nurses’ Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1997, 145: 614-619. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009158View ArticlePubMed
  4. Fox KA, Despres JP, Richard AJ, Brette S, Deanfield JE: Does abdominal obesity have a similar impact on cardiovascular disease and diabetes? A study of 91, 246 ambulant patients in 27 European countries. Eur Heart J. 2009, 30: 3055-3063. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp371View ArticlePubMed
  5. Carr MC, Brunzell JD: Abdominal obesity and dyslipidemia in the metabolic syndrome: importance of type 2 diabetes and familial combined hyperlipidemia in coronary artery disease risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 89: 2601-2607. 10.1210/jc.2004-0432View ArticlePubMed
  6. Despres JP: Is visceral obesity the cause of the metabolic syndrome?. Ann Med. 2006, 38: 52-63. 10.1080/07853890500383895View ArticlePubMed
  7. Kissebah AH, Krakower GR: Regional adiposity and morbidity. Physiol Rev. 1994, 74: 761-811.PubMed
  8. Bjorntorp P: Metabolic implications of body fat distribution. Diabetes Care. 1991, 14: 1132-1143. 10.2337/diacare.14.12.1132View ArticlePubMed
  9. Zhang X, Hu EA, Wu H, Malik V, Sun Q: Associations of leg fat accumulation with adiposity-related biological factors and risk of metabolic syndrome. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013, 21: 824-830. 10.1002/oby.20028View Article
  10. Bruno E, Alessandrini M, Napolitano B, De Padova A, Di Daniele N, De Lorenzo A: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry analysis of body composition in patients affected by OSAS. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009, 266: 1285-1290. 10.1007/s00405-008-0844-0View ArticlePubMed
  11. Ben-Noun L, Sohar E, Laor A: Neck circumference as a simple screening measure for identifying overweight and obese patients. Obes Res. 2001, 9: 470-477. 10.1038/oby.2001.61View ArticlePubMed
  12. Ben-Noun L, Laor A: Relationship of neck circumference to cardiovascular risk factors. Obes Res. 2003, 11: 226-231. 10.1038/oby.2003.35View ArticlePubMed
  13. Zhou JY, Ge H, Zhu MF, Wang LJ, Chen L, Tan YZ, Chen YM, Zhu HL: Neck circumference as an independent predictive contributor to cardio-metabolic syndrome. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013, 12: 76- 10.1186/1475-2840-12-76PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  14. LaBerge RC, Vaccani JP, Gow RM, Gaboury I, Hoey L, Katz SL: Inter- and intra-rater reliability of neck circumference measurements in children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2009, 44: 64-69. 10.1002/ppul.20944View ArticlePubMed
  15. Koska J, Stefan N, Permana PA, Weyer C, Sonoda M, Bogardus C, Smith SR, Joanisse DR, Funahashi T, Krakoff J, Bunt JC: Increased fat accumulation in liver may link insulin resistance with subcutaneous abdominal adipocyte enlargement, visceral adiposity, and hypoadiponectinemia in obese individuals. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008, 87: 295-302.PubMed
  16. Yoshimura E, Kumahara H, Tobina T, Matono S, Kiyonaga A, Kimura M, Tsukikawa H, Kono S, Etou T, Irie S, Anzai K, Tanaka H: Relationships between fat deposition in the liver and skeletal muscle and insulin sensitivity in Japanese individuals: a pilot study. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2011, 4: 35-43.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  17. Laakso M, Matilainen V, Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi S: Association of neck circumference with insulin resistance-related factors. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002, 26: 873-875.View ArticlePubMed
  18. Yang L, Samarasinghe YP, Kane P, Amiel SA, Aylwin SJ: Visceral adiposity is closely correlated with neck circumference and represents a significant indicator of insulin resistance in WHO grade III obesity. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2010, 73: 197-200.
  19. Fang J, Alderman MH: Serum uric acid and cardiovascular mortality the NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study, 1971–1992. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Jama. 2000, 283: 2404-2410. 10.1001/jama.283.18.2404View ArticlePubMed
  20. Chien KL, Chen MF, Hsu HC, Chang WT, Su TC, Lee YT, Hu FB: Plasma uric acid and the risk of type 2 diabetes in a Chinese community. Clin Chem. 2008, 54: 310-316. 10.1373/clinchem.2007.095190View ArticlePubMed
  21. Heinig M, Johnson RJ: Role of uric acid in hypertension, renal disease, and metabolic syndrome. Cleve Clin J Med. 2006, 73: 1059-1064. 10.3949/ccjm.73.12.1059View ArticlePubMed
  22. Choi HK, Atkinson K, Karlson EW, Curhan G: Obesity, weight change, hypertension, diuretic use, and risk of gout in men: the health professionals follow-up study. Arch Intern Med. 2005, 165: 742-748. 10.1001/archinte.165.7.742View ArticlePubMed
  23. Matsuura F, Yamashita S, Nakamura T, Nishida M, Nozaki S, Funahashi T, Matsuzawa Y: Effect of visceral fat accumulation on uric acid metabolism in male obese subjects: visceral fat obesity is linked more closely to overproduction of uric acid than subcutaneous fat obesity. Metabolism. 1998, 47: 929-933. 10.1016/S0026-0495(98)90346-8View ArticlePubMed
  24. Takahashi S, Yamamoto T, Tsutsumi Z, Moriwaki Y, Yamakita J, Higashino K: Close correlation between visceral fat accumulation and uric acid metabolism in healthy men. Metabolism. 1997, 46: 1162-1165. 10.1016/S0026-0495(97)90210-9View ArticlePubMed
  25. Schusterova I, Leenen FH, Jurko A, Sabol F, Takacova J: Epicardial adipose tissue and cardiometabolic risk factors in overweight and obese children and adolescents. Pediatr Obes. 2014, 9: 63-70. 10.1111/j.2047-6310.2012.00134.xView ArticlePubMed
  26. Marcus MA, Murphy L, Pi-Sunyer FX, Albu JB: Insulin sensitivity and serum triglyceride level in obese white and black women: relationship to visceral and truncal subcutaneous fat. Metabolism. 1999, 48: 194-199. 10.1016/S0026-0495(99)90033-1View ArticlePubMed
  27. Shiina Y, Homma Y: Relationships between the visceral fat area on CT and coronary risk factor markers. Intern Med. 2013, 52: 1775-1780. 10.2169/internalmedicine.52.9190View ArticlePubMed
  28. Wu H, Qi Q, Yu Z, Sun Q, Wang J, Franco OH, Sun L, Li H, Liu Y, Hu FB, Lin X: Independent and opposite associations of trunk and leg fat depots with adipokines, inflammatory markers, and metabolic syndrome in middle-aged and older Chinese men and women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010, 95: 4389-4398. 10.1210/jc.2010-0181View ArticlePubMed
  29. Sakai Y, Ito H, Egami Y, Ohoto N, Hijii C, Yanagawa M, Satoh S, Jingu S: Favourable association of leg fat with cardiovascular risk factors. J Intern Med. 2005, 257: 194-200. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01432.xView ArticlePubMed
  30. Ben-Noun LL, Laor A: Relationship between changes in neck circumference and cardiovascular risk factors. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2006, 11: 14-20.PubMed
  31. Fitch KV, Stanley TL, Looby SE, Rope AM, Grinspoon SK: Relationship between neck circumference and cardiometabolic parameters in HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected adults. Diabetes Care. 2011, 34: 1026-1031. 10.2337/dc10-1983PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  32. Preis SR, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, D’Agostino RB, Levy D, Robins SJ, Meigs JB, Vasan RS, O’Donnell CJ, Fox CS: Neck circumference as a novel measure of cardiometabolic risk: the Framingham Heart study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010, 95: 3701-3710. 10.1210/jc.2009-1779PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  33. Preis SR, Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB, Meigs JB, Vasan RS, Fox CS: Neck circumference and the development of cardiovascular disease risk factors in the Framingham Heart Study. Diabetes Care. 2013, 36: e3-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  34. Wohl D, Scherzer R, Heymsfield S, Simberkoff M, Sidney S, Bacchetti P, Grunfeld C: The associations of regional adipose tissue with lipid and lipoprotein levels in HIV-infected men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008, 48: 44-52. 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31816d9ba1PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  35. Eston RG, Rowlands AV, Charlesworth S, Davies A, Hoppitt T: Prediction of DXA-determined whole body fat from skinfolds: importance of including skinfolds from the thigh and calf in young, healthy men and women. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005, 59: 695-702. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602131View ArticlePubMed
  36. Onat A, Hergenc G, Yuksel H, Can G, Ayhan E, Kaya Z, Dursunoglu D: Neck circumference as a measure of central obesity: associations with metabolic syndrome and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome beyond waist circumference. Clin Nutr. 2009, 28: 46-51. 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.10.006View ArticlePubMed
  37. Genuth S, Alberti KG, Bennett P, Buse J, Defronzo R, Kahn R, Kitzmiller J, Knowler WC, Lebovitz H, Lernmark A, Nathan D, Palmer J, Rizza R, Saudex C, Shaw J, Steffes M, Stern M, Tuomilehto J, Zimmet P: Follow-up report on the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2003, 26: 3160-3167.View ArticlePubMed
  38. Back Giuliano Ide C, Caramelli B, Pellanda L, Duncan B, Mattos S, Fonseca FH: [I guidelines of prevention of atherosclerosis in childhood and adolescence]. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2005, 85 Suppl 6: 4-36.PubMed
  39. Ryu KA, Kang HH, Kim SY, Yoo MK, Kim JS, Lee CH, Wie GA: Comparison of nutrient intake and diet quality between hyperuricemia subjects and controls in Korea. Clin Nutr Res. 2014, 3: 56-63. 10.7762/cnr.2014.3.1.56PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed

Copyright

© Wang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement