Open Access

Short-term duodenal seal oil administration normalised n-6 to n-3 fatty acid ratio in rectal mucosa and ameliorated bodily pain in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

  • Tormod Bjørkkjær1, 2Email author,
  • Johan G Brun3,
  • Merete Valen3,
  • Gülen Arslan1, 4,
  • Ragna Lind4,
  • Linn A Brunborg1,
  • Arnold Berstad4 and
  • Livar Frøyland1
Lipids in Health and Disease20065:6

DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-5-6

Received: 30 December 2005

Accepted: 20 March 2006

Published: 20 March 2006

Abstract

Background

A high dietary intake of n-6 compared to n-3 fatty acids (FAs) may promote the production of pro-inflammatory eicosanoids and cytokines. In two recent studies, short-term (10-day) duodenal administration of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid rich seal oil ameliorated joint pain in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Using unpublished data from these two studies we here investigated whether normalisation of the n-6 to n-3 FA ratio in blood and tissues by seal oil administration was associated with improved health related quality of life (HRQOL) as assessed by the generic short-form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire.

Results

In the first pilot study, baseline n-6 to n-3 FA ratio in rectal mucosal biopsies from 10 patients with IBD (9 of those had joint pain) was significantly increased compared with that in 10 control patients without IBD or joint pain. Following seal oil administration, the n-6 to n-3 FA ratio of the IBD-patients was significantly lowered to the level seen in untreated controls. In the subsequent, randomized controlled study (n = 19), seal oil administration reduced the n-6 to n-3 FA ratio in blood similarly and also the SF-36 assessed bodily pain, while n-6 FA rich soy oil administration had no such effect.

Conclusion

In these two separate studies, short-term duodenal administration of seal oil normalised the n-6 to n-3 FA ratio in rectal mucosa and improved the bodily pain dimension of HRQOL of patients with IBD-related joint pain. The possibility of a causal relationship between n-6 to n-3 FA ratio in rectal mucosa and bodily pain in IBD-patients warrants further investigations.

Background

Most of our dietary fat is derived from vegetable oils, particularly soy oil, which is rich in the n-6 fatty acid (FA) linoleic acid (18:2n-6, LA). LA is the precursor of arachidonic acid (20:4n-6, AA). Especially linseed oil, and to a less extent rapeseed oil and soy oil contain substantial amounts of the n-3 FA α-linolenic acid (18:3n-3, ALA). However, in humans the in vivo conversion of ALA to the n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5n-3, EPA), and particularly docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n-3, DHA), is limited [1]. Thus, fatty fish and n-3 PUFA supplements are important sources of the 'marine' n-3 PUFAs EPA and DHA [2]. These long chain n-3 PUFAs decrease the production of pro-inflammatory eicosanoids and cytokines, directly by replacing AA in blood and tissues and inhibiting AA metabolism or indirectly by altering gene transcription [3]. The current Western diet with excessive n-6 FAs compared with n-3 FAs yields a high ratio of n-6 to n-3 FAs, especially AA to EPA, e.g. in the cell membrane phospholipids. This may promote chronic inflammatory diseases like inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and rheumatic disorders [46].

IBD includes Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), both chronic inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, causing abdominal pain and bloody diarrhoea. Musculoskeletal (rheumatic) complications, including joint pain with or without objective signs of arthritis, are common extraintestinal manifestations [79], contributing to the generally poor health related quality of life (HRQOL) of IBD-patients [10]. Also, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are poorly tolerated by these patients. IBD-patients with joint pain therefore often call for a safe and effective alternative treatment. In a short-term (10-day) pilot study we found a beneficial effect on IBD-related joint pain of duodenally administrated n-3 PUFA rich seal oil (10 ml three times daily) [11]. The promising results were supported in a recent randomized controlled study comparing the effects of seal oil and soy oil on IBD-related joint pain [12]. The joint pain ameliorating effect of seal oil persisted for several months after the 10-day treatment period, while soy oil had no such effect.

Using unpublished data from these two studies [11, 12] we here investigated whether normalisation of the n-6 to n-3 FA ratio in blood and tissues by seal oil administration was associated with improved HRQOL as assessed by the generic short-form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire.

Methods

Patients and controls

In the pilot study, 10 patients with IBD (9 of those had joint pain) went through a gut lavage fluid procedure before and after seal oil treatment [11]. Immediately after emptying their bowels, sigmoidoscopy was performed with a videoendoscope. Mucosal biopsies were taken from the rectum, 20–30 cm above the anus, collected on ice and stored at -80°Celsius. The control patients consisted of 10 males (range 50–67 years, mean 67 years) with prostate cancer, but without IBD or joint pain, routinely assessed before radiation therapy. Mucosal biopsies were taken without prior emptying of the bowels, by rectoscopy from the posterior rectal wall, 10 cm from the anal verge, collected on ice and stored at -80°Celsius. Fatty acid composition in biopsies was analysed by gas liquid chromatography as previously described [11]. In the controlled study, seventeen of the nineteen patients with IBD-related joint pain [12] filled in a translated and validated Norwegian version of the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) SF-36 health survey questionnaire [1315] before and after seal oil (n = 9) or soy oil (n = 8) administration, in addition to 1, 2, 4 and 6 months post-treatment. SF-36 is a generic self-administrated HRQOL questionnaire consisting of 36 questions, assessing eight health concepts (physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, social functioning, bodily pain, general mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, vitality and general health perceptions). Final values from the SF-36 questionnaire ranged from 0 (very poor) to 100 (very well). The regional committee for medical research ethics approved these studies and all patients gave written informed consent before inclusion.

Statistics

Data were analysed and displayed using the GraphPad Prism 4 (GraphPad Software Inc, San Diego, USA) statistical software package or SPSS Release 9.0.0 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). All values were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Effect of treatment was calculated as change (in absolute values) from baseline. Area under the curve (AUC, area between the curve and baseline, zero) for the entire period from start of treatment until 6 months post-treatment was calculated using the trapezoid method. Group differences were compared by unpaired Student's t test (two-sided). Differences from baseline to end of treatment were evaluated by paired t-test. P values < 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.

Results

Biopsy fatty acid composition

Compared with controls, higher ratios of n-6 to n-3 FAs (P = 0.001) and AA to EPA (8.5 ± 1.1 vs 2.9 ± 0.7, P = 0.0004) were found in baseline rectal mucosa from the patients with IBD-related joint pain (Table 1, Figure 1). These differences vanished after seal oil treatment (Table 1, Figure 1). Also a higher Σ n-6 FAs (P = 0.04), LA (P = 0.02) and 18:1n-9 (P = 0.004) and lower Σ n-3 FAs (P = 0.0004), EPA (P = 0.0003), DHA (P = 0.0006), Σ saturated (P = 0.01) and 17:0 (P = 0.02) were found in rectal mucosa from the patients with IBD-related joint pain before treatment with seal oil (Table 1). These differences also vanished after seal oil treatment (Table1). Seal oil treatment reduced Σ monoenes in rectal mucosa from the IBD-patients to a significantly lower level (P = 0.003) than that seen in untreated controls.
Table 1

Biopsy fatty acid-profiles from IBD-patients before and after seal oil treatment compared with controls

Fatty acid

Controls

IBD before

IBD after

P-value before

P-value after

Σ Saturated

36.9 ± 2.1

32 ± 1

31 ± 3

0.01

n.s.

14:0

2.9 ± 0.6

1.4 ± 0.3

1.2 ± 0.3

0.02

0.01

16:0

20.2 ± 0.4

17.9 ± 0.9

17 ± 1

0.008

0.02

17:0

0.90 ± 0.01

0.61 ± 0.08

0.7 ± 0.1

0.02

n.s.

18:0

11.1 ± 0.7

11 ± 1

12 ± 1

n.s.

n.s.

Σ Monoenes

31 ± 4

31 ± 2

24 ± 2

n.s.

0.003

16:1 n-7

1.9 ± 0.2

2.0 ± 0.5

1.5 ± 0.3

n.s.

n.s.

16:1 n-9

0.50 ± 0.01

0.40 ± 0.04

0.37 ± 0.05

n.s.

n.s.

18:1 n-7

2.3 ± 0.1

2.4 ± 0.2

2.0 ± 0.2

n.s.

n.s.

18:1 n-9

19 ± 1

25 ± 1

19 ± 1

0.004

n.s.

20:1 n-9

2.9 ± 0.6

0.13 ± 0.07

0.4 ± 0.3

0.0008

0.003

Σ n-6

17 ± 2

24 ± 2

19 ± 1

0.04

n.s.

18:2 n-6

11 ± 2

16 ± 1

12.1 ± 0.6

0.02

n.s.

20:3 n-6

tr.

1.5 ± 0.2

1.0 ± 0.1

< 0.0001

0.0004

20:4 n-6

5.7 ± 0.9

6 ± 1

6 ± 1

n.s.

n.s.

Σ n-3

9 ± 1

4.1 ± 0.5

9 ± 1

0.0004

n.s.

18:3 n-3

0.5 ± 0.1

0.4 ± 0.1

0.24 ± 0.08

n.s.

n.s.

20:5 n-3

2.6 ± 0.3

0.81 ± 0.05

3.4 ± 0.4

0.0003

n.s.

22:5 n-3

0.7 ± 0.1

0.6 ± 0.2

0.9 ± 0.2

n.s.

n.s.

22:6 n-3

4.6 ± 0.4

2.2 ± 0.3

4.3 ± 0.6

0.0006

n.s.

n-6/n-3

2.2 ± 0.4

6.6 ± 1.1

2.2 ± 0.2

0.001

n.s.

Data from the pilot study [11], IBD-group (n = 10) and control group (n = 10). Data presented as percentage of fatty acids, mean ± SEM. Identified fatty acids ranged from 94–98 %. tr. = trace. n.s. = not significant (p > 0.05). P-value before = controls versus IBD-patients before seal oil treatment. P-value after = controls versus IBD-patients after seal oil treatment.

Figure 1

Biopsy AA to EPA ratio in IBD-patients before and after seal oil compared with controls. Normalisation of individual ratios of arachidonic acid (20:4n-6, AA) to eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5n-3, EPA) in rectal mucosal biopsies from nine of the ten IBD-patients (data from the pilot study [11]) after seal oil (SO) treatment compared with rectal mucosal biopsies from ten controls.

Health related quality of life

Compared with soy oil, seal oil administration significantly reduced the SF-36 assessed bodily pain (Table 2). SF-36 also revealed significant within group improvements in bodily pain (P = 0.004), mental health (P = 0.03) and physical component score (P = 0.002), and a significant aggravation in emotional role functioning (P = 0.02) after seal oil treatment (Table 2). No significant group differences in AUC for the period from before treatment until 6 months post-treatment were found. However significant with-in group improvements were found in AUC for the period from before treatment until 6 months post-treatment; in the seal oil group for bodily pain (P = 0.04), mental health (P = 0.0009) and mental component score (P = 0.02) and in the soy oil group for mental health (P = 0.049). Generally both groups improved in the physical dimensions of SF-36 after oil administration, with more profound effects in the seal oil group. Also, there were no changes in the psychometric dimensions of SF-36, except for an aggravation in role limitations due to emotional problems during and soon after oil treatments, but not during follow-up (data not shown).
Table 2

SF-36 scores before and after treatment with seal oil or soy oil in IBD-patients

 

Before seal oil

After seal oil

Before soy oil

After soy oil

P-value

Physical functioning

72.8 ± 6.0

80.0 ± 3.5

68.8 ± 8.3

70.4 ± 9.7

0.36

Role physical

30.6 ± 12.3

34.3 ± 12.5

25.0 ± 14.2

31.3 ± 15.5

0.80

Role emotional

66.7 ± 14.1

41.7 ± 15.1

54.2 ± 17.7

45.8 ± 16.6

0.24

Bodily pain

36.3 ± 6.4

57.7 ± 8.5

35.9 ± 6.3

46.7 ± 10.4

0.01

Social functioning

51.4 ± 3.3

51.4 ± 2.5

54.7 ± 2.3

50.0 ± 2.4

0.36

Mental health

67.1 ± 7.1

73.8 ± 6.2

63.0 ± 8.1

65 ± 6

0.31

Vitality

30.0 ± 3.1

38.3 ± 5.7

41.9 ± 8.2

43.8 ± 9.2

0.35

General health

43.3 ± 6.1

51.2 ± 4.9

40.4 ± 5.4

43.6 ± 5.5

0.50

Physical component score

36.7 ± 2.0

42.8 ± 1.9

34.6 ± 2.9

37.0 ± 3.6

0.15

Mental component score

39.5 ± 2.7

37.0 ± 3.5

38.1 ± 4.1

36.7 ± 3.4

0.63

Data from the controlled study [12], seal oil group (n = 9) and soy oil group (n = 8). No significant group differences at baseline. Boldface numbers = significantly group difference after treatment.

Discussion

Fatty acid composition

During the last 50 to 100 years the typical Western diet has contained increasing amounts of n-6 FAs and decreasing amounts of n-3 FAs [6]. Vegetable oils containing much n-6 FAs, especially soy oil, are widely used in foodstuffs and as spreads, mainly due to its low cost. In an evolutionary aspect our ancestors evolved on a diet with a n-6 to n-3 FA ratio close to 1:1, while today this ratio is probably 5–15:1 [6].

The importance of the n-6 to n-3 FA ratio for development of disease was demonstrated in a recent transgenic mouse model [16]. In this study an approximately 1:1 ratio of n-6 to n-3 FAs was achieved in different cells and tissues of fat-1 mice compared with a ratio of 20–50: 1 in wild type mice. This protected against cancer growth, cardiac arrhythmia and had most probably collateral health benefits in fat-1 mice compared with wild type mice. Similarly, a seal oil-induced lowering of n-6 to n-3 FA ratio, especially AA to EPA, may have health benefits in humans. E.g. by reducing the production of highly pro-inflammatory eicosanoids and cytokines both locally in the intestine and systemically, and possibly thereby also influence joint pain. However, whether amelioration of bodily pain was causally related to the normalisation of the n-6 to n-3 FA ratio in rectal mucosa is not known.

A possible limitation of our biopsy FA comparison was the use of elderly men with prostate cancer as a control group. Elderly people normally eat more n-3 PUFA rich fish than younger people and may have a lower blood and tissue ratio of n-6 to n-3 FAs in general, however we did not assess the diet in this study.

Health related quality of life

For assessing subjective aspects of a patients' health, i.e. HRQOL, it is important to use a generic HRQOL questionnaire, e.g. the widely used SF-36, together with a disease specific questionnaire as used in our former studies [1012]. HRQOL is particularly important when objective clinical findings are scarce as often is the case in IBD-related joint pain. In a recent population based cohort study, sixteen percent of 521 IBD-patients had non-inflammatory joint pain with a considerable negative impact on HRQOL [17]. The even more pronounced reduction of HRQOL in our patients might be due to the fact that 10 of our 19 IBD-patients had objective arthritis [12].

The aggravation in role limitations due to emotional problems after both oil treatments may be attributed to anxiety using the nasoduodenal feeding tube, which in some patients resulted in emotional problems and work-related inconvenience.

A limitation with using SF-36 questionnaire in our study was that the SF-36 is designed to assess health status over the last 4 weeks. We used the SF-36 questionnaire just before and after oil administration (10 days) and then at 1, 2, 4 and 6 months post-treatment. Thus we may have lost a further positive (for physical dimensions) or negative (especially for role limitations due to emotional problems) treatment effect when we applied the SF-36 with only a 10-day interval.

Seal oil versus fish oil

Traditionally, cod liver oil or other fish oils have been used in clinical studies of n-3 PUFAs. However, the initial studies of n-3 PUFAs were performed in Greenland Eskimos known to eat substantial amounts of sea mammals, i.e. seal and whale meat and blubber [18, 19]. Greenland Eskimos had a low prevalence of common westernized diseases like myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, bronchial asthma, multiple sclerosis and psoriasis [20], notably before the Western diet became more common in the larger communities of Greenland.

Seal oil contains slightly less EPA and DHA than fish oil, but approximately 3 to 4 fold more DPA, giving an equivalent total n-3 fatty acid level [21]. The n-3 PUFAs in fish oil are mainly located in sn-2 position of the triacylglycerol (TAG) molecule, while they are located almost exclusively in sn-1 or sn-3 position of TAG from seal oil [22, 23]. Chylomicrons resulting from TAG digestion are designated for lymphatic transport [24]. They reflect the dietary TAGs with respect to both fatty acid profile and molecular position of the n-3 PUFAs [23, 25]. However, in a recent review focusing mainly on metabolism of structured TAGs, the molecular position of n-3 PUFAs on TAG did not seem to play a critical role [26]. Whether this also applies for natural TAGs with complex fatty acid compositions remains to be elucidated, particularly in specific cells and tissues, not only in total plasma. Anyway, seal oil is an interesting alternative source of n-3 PUFAs.

Duodenal administration of dietary oils

During gastric emptying only a few ml of gastric content is passed through to the duodenum per minute. Acute administration of 10 ml of oil directly into the duodenum is clearly unphysiological and might yield a higher bolus of n-3 PUFAs into the circulation as compared to oral administration [12]. However our unpublished data showed comparable plasma incorporation of n-3 PUFAs from seal oil (10 ml × 3 per day) during duodenal versus oral administration in healthy volunteers (n = 16), and a tendency to abnormally high faecal fat levels. Thus malabsorbed n-3 PUFAs may have passed to the colon where it can potentially reinforce the mucus as seen with retarded release phosphatidylcholine in UC [27, 28]. Studies of n-3 PUFA administrations in IBD have showed inconsistent findings [29], possibly due to variations in study design. One of the studies showing most beneficial effect (reduced relapses in CD), applied fish oil capsules which contained free fatty acids, coated in order to resist gastric acid [30]. I.e. delivery to the distal gut may be important in order to achieve beneficial effects of n-3 PUFA administrations.

Recently, high fat enteral nutrition [31, 32] was shown to activate a 'nicotinic anti-inflammatory pathway', mediated by the vagus nerve, being able to inhibit pro-inflammatory cytokine production [33, 34]. Duodenal administration of seal oil to the principal site of lipid digestion yields free long chain n-3 PUFAs known to stimulate cholecystokinin (CCK) release [35]. CCK is an important neuro-transmitter of the afferent vagus nerve. Hence, duodenal administration of bolus doses of 10 ml seal oil three times daily may strongly activate the vago-vagal, anti-inflammatory reflex and partly explain the rapid amelioration of bodily pain. By similar mechanisms trauma and surgery patients may benefit from early enteral nutrition [32]. However, further studies of the effects of these forms of fat administrations are needed.

Conclusion

In these two separate studies, short-term duodenal administration of seal oil normalised the n-6 to n-3 FA ratio in rectal mucosa and improved the bodily pain dimension of HRQOL of patients with IBD-related joint pain. The possibility of a causal relationship between n-6 to n-3 FA ratio in rectal mucosa and bodily pain in IBD patients warrants further investigations.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Till Uhlig and Petter Mowinckel for designing the SPSS-syntax for calculating the SF-36 indexes. Thanks to Nils Hovdenak and Bente Iren Nordlie for control biopsies. Thanks to Beate Klementsen at NIFES for help with data collection. The authors would once again like to acknowledge funding parts, participating patients/controls and skilful technicians as described in our two recent articles [11, 12].

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research (NIFES)
(2)
Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen
(3)
Division of Rheumatology, Institute of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital
(4)
Division of Gastroenterology, Institute of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital

References

  1. Burdge GC, Calder PC: Conversion of alpha-linolenic acid to longer-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in human adults. Reprod Nutr Dev. 2005, 45: 581-597. 10.1051/rnd:2005047View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ruxton CHS, Calder PC, Reed SC, Simpson MJA: The impact of long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on human health. Nutrition Research Reviews. 2005, 18: 113-129. 10.1079/NRR200497.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Calder PC: n-3 fatty acids, inflammation, and immunity--relevance to postsurgical and critically ill patients. Lipids. 2004, 39: 1147-1161.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gil A: Polyunsaturated fatty acids and inflammatory diseases. Biomed Pharmacother. 2002, 56: 388-396. 10.1016/S0753-3322(02)00256-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Simopoulos AP: Omega-3 fatty acids in inflammation and autoimmune diseases. J Am Coll Nutr. 2002, 21: 495-505.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Simopoulos AP: The importance of the ratio of omega-6/omega-3 essential fatty acids. Biomed Pharmacother. 2002, 56: 365-379. 10.1016/S0753-3322(02)00253-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Holden W, Orchard T, Wordsworth P: Enteropathic arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2003, 29: 513-530, viii. 10.1016/S0889-857X(03)00043-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Orchard T: Extraintestinal complications of inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2003, 5: 512-517.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Orchard TR, Wordsworth BP, Jewell DP: Peripheral arthropathies in inflammatory bowel disease: their articular distribution and natural history. Gut. 1998, 42: 387-391.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Glise H, Wiklund I: Health-related quality of life and gastrointestinal disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002, 17 Suppl: S72-84. 10.1046/j.1440-1746.17.s1.6.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Arslan G, Brunborg LA, Froyland L, Brun JG, Valen M, Berstad A: Effects of duodenal seal oil administration in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Lipids. 2002, 37: 935-940.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bjorkkjaer T, Brunborg LA, Arslan G, Lind RA, Brun JG, Valen M, Klementsen B, Berstad A, Froyland L: Reduced joint pain after short-term duodenal administration of seal oil in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: comparison with soy oil. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004, 39: 1088-1094. 10.1080/00365520410009429View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ware Jr. JE, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992, 30: 473-483.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Loge JH, Kaasa S, Hjermstad MJ, Kvien TK: Translation and performance of the Norwegian SF-36 Health Survey in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. I. Data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability, and construct validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998, 51: 1069-1076. 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00098-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ware Jr. JE, Gandek B, Kosinski M, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Brazier J, Bullinger M, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Prieto L, Sullivan M, Thunedborg K: The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998, 51: 1167-1170. 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00108-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kang JX, Wang J, Wu L, Kang ZB: Transgenic mice: fat-1 mice convert n-6 to n-3 fatty acids. Nature. 2004, 427: 504- 10.1038/427504aView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Palm O, Bernklev T, Moum B, Gran JT: Non-inflammatory joint pain in patients with inflammatory bowel disease is prevalent and has a significant impact on health related quality of life. J Rheumatol. 2005, 32: 1755-1759.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Dyerberg J, Bang HO, Stoffersen E, Moncada S, Vane JR: Eicosapentaenoic acid and prevention of thrombosis and atherosclerosis?. Lancet. 1978, 2: 117-119. 10.1016/S0140-6736(78)91505-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bang HO, Dyerberg J, Hjoorne N: The composition of food consumed by Greenland Eskimos. Acta Med Scand. 1976, 200: 69-73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kromann N, Green A: Epidemiological studies in the Upernavik district, Greenland. Incidence of some chronic diseases 1950-1974. Acta Med Scand. 1980, 208: 401-406.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Brox J, Olaussen K, Osterud B, Elvevoll EO, Bjornstad E, Brattebog G, Iversen H: A long-term seal- and cod-liver-oil supplementation in hypercholesterolemic subjects. Lipids. 2001, 36: 7-13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Brockerhoff H, Hoyle RJ, Hwang PC, Litchfield C: Positional Distribution of Fatty Acids in Depot Triglycerides of Aquatic Animals. Lipids. 1968, 3: 24-29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Yoshida H, Kumamaru J, Mawatari M, Ikeda I, Imaizumi K, Tsuji H, Seto A: Lymphatic absorption of seal and fish oils and their effect on lipid metabolism and eicosanoid production in rats. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1996, 60: 1293-1298.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mu H, Hoy CE: The digestion of dietary triacylglycerols. Prog Lipid Res. 2004, 43: 105-133. 10.1016/S0163-7827(03)00050-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Christensen MS, Hoy CE: Effects of dietary triacylglycerol structure on triacylglycerols of resultant chylomicrons from fish oil- and seal oil-fed rats. Lipids. 1996, 31: 341-344.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mu H, Porsgaard T: The metabolism of structured triacylglycerols. Prog Lipid Res. 2005, 44: 430-448. 10.1016/j.plipres.2005.09.002View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Gibson PR, Muir JG: Reinforcing the mucus: a new therapeutic approach for ulcerative colitis?. Gut. 2005, 54: 900-903. 10.1136/gut.2004.058453PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Stremmel W, Merle U, Zahn A, Autschbach F, Hinz U, Ehehalt R: Retarded release phosphatidylcholine benefits patients with chronic active ulcerative colitis. Gut. 2005, 54: 966-971. 10.1136/gut.2004.052316PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Maclean CH, Mojica WA, Newberry SJ, Pencharz J, Garland RH, Tu W, Hilton LG, Gralnek IM, Rhodes S, Khanna P, Morton SC: Systematic review of the effects of n-3 fatty acids in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005, 82: 611-619.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Belluzzi A, Brignola C, Campieri M, Pera A, Boschi S, Miglioli M: Effect of an enteric-coated fish-oil preparation on relapses in Crohn's disease. N Engl J Med. 1996, 334: 1557-1560. 10.1056/NEJM199606133342401View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Luyer MD, Greve JW, Hadfoune M, Jacobs JA, Dejong CH, Buurman WA: Nutritional stimulation of cholecystokinin receptors inhibits inflammation via the vagus nerve. J Exp Med. 2005, 202: 1023-1029. 10.1084/jem.20042397PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Tracey KJ: Fat meets the cholinergic antiinflammatory pathway. J Exp Med. 2005, 202: 1017-1021. 10.1084/jem.20051760PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Tracey KJ: The inflammatory reflex. Nature. 2002, 420: 853-859. 10.1038/nature01321View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ulloa L: The vagus nerve and the nicotinic anti-inflammatory pathway. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005, 4: 673-684. 10.1038/nrd1797View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Raybould HE: Nutrient tasting and signaling mechanisms in the gut. I. Sensing of lipid by the intestinal mucosa. Am J Physiol. 1999, 277: G751-755.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Bjørkkjær et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement