Skip to main content

Table 1 LDL and HDL particle size and distribution at baseline and post-treatment

From: Comparison of effects of diet versus exercise weight loss regimens on LDL and HDL particle size in obese adults

 

Group

Week 1 a

Week 12

P-value within group b

P-value between groups c

  

Mean

SEM

Mean

SEM

  

LDL integrated particle size (Å)

ADF

261

± 1

265

± 2

0.01

0.20

 

CR

260

± 2

264

± 2

0.01

 
 

Exercise

260

± 2

261

± 1

0.70

 
 

Control

260

± 2

260

± 2

0.49

 

% Large LDL particles

ADF

40

± 4

48

± 5

0.04

0.43

 

CR

47

± 5

52

± 5

0.07

 
 

Exercise

49

± 4

49

± 4

0.49

 
 

Control

42

± 4

41

± 4

0.53

 

% Medium LDL particles

ADF

35

± 2

34

± 2

0.75

0.49

 

CR

36

± 3

34

± 3

0.57

 
 

Exercise

35

± 2

34

± 2

0.48

 
 

Control

39

± 2

39

± 2

0.87

 

% Small LDL particles

ADF

25

± 3

18

± 3

0.04

0.75

 

CR

18

± 3

14

± 4

0.29

 
 

Exercise

17

± 3

17

± 3

0.89

 
 

Control

19

± 4

20

± 4

0.50

 

% Large HDL particles

ADF

34

± 3

34

± 3

0.93

0.98

 

CR

34

± 4

36

± 5

0.67

 
 

Exercise

28

± 3

34

± 3

0.04

 
 

Control

34

± 4

34

± 5

0.98

 

% Medium HDL particles

ADF

49

± 3

46

± 3

0.39

0.31

 

CR

43

± 4

44

± 4

0.85

 
 

Exercise

52

± 3

52

± 3

0.80

 
 

Control

45

± 3

44

± 4

0.64

 

% Small HDL particles

ADF

18

± 3

20

± 3

0.61

0.53

 

CR

22

± 4

20

± 6

0.57

 
 

Exercise

21

± 4

14

± 3

0.03

 
 

Control

21

± 3

22

± 3

0.60

 
  1. Values reported as mean ± SEM.
  2. Alternate day fasting (ADF), n = 13; Calorie restriction (CR), n = 12; Exercise, n = 12; Control, n = 12.
  3. a Baseline values were not significantly different between intervention groups: One-way ANOVA.
  4. b P-value within group: Student's paired t-test comparing week 1 to week 12 values.
  5. c P-value between groups: One-way ANOVA between groups for week 12 values.