Skip to main content

Table 6 Food indices consumption data (g) during treated period for male and female

From: Irvingia gabonensis fat: nutritional properties and effect of increasing amounts on the growth and lipid metabolism of young rats wistar sp

Diets

Weeks

 
 

S1

S2

S3

M ± SEM

Male (n = 5)

IG0

1.11 ± 0.65

1.00 ± 0.34

0.72 ± 0.10

1.00 ± 0.52

IG1

1.32 ± 0.80a

0.89 ± 0.23a

0.56 ± 0.23a

1.04 ± 0.66a

IG2

1.44 ± 1.15a

0.93 ± 0.31a

0.69 ± 0.13a

1.14 ± 0.88a

IG3

1.82 ± 1.71a*

0.95 ± 0.38a

0.61 ± 0.19a

1.32 ± 1.33a

Female (n = 5)

IG0

1.25 ± 0.61

0.83 ± 0.16

0.77 ± 0.22

1.02 ± 0.50

IG1

1.58 ± .19a

0.94 ± 0.24a

0.87 ± 0.27a

1.26 ± 0.92a

IG2

1.83 ± 1.14a**

1.04 ± 0.54a

0.77 ± 0.17a

1.38 ± 0.97a**

IG3

1.49 ± 1.01a

0.87 ± 0.25a

0.70 ± 0.13a

1.15 ± 0.80a

  1. In the columns, the values affected of the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05) and the value with different letter are significantly different (P < 0.05). (Bonferroni between treated animals).
  2. * Significantly different from fat control in the same sex (P < 0.05). (Dunnett's)
  3. **significantly different from fat control in the same sex (p < 0.01). (Dunnett's)