Skip to main content

Table 6 Food indices consumption data (g) during treated period for male and female

From: Irvingia gabonensis fat: nutritional properties and effect of increasing amounts on the growth and lipid metabolism of young rats wistar sp

Diets Weeks  
  S1 S2 S3 M ± SEM
Male (n = 5)
IG0 1.11 ± 0.65 1.00 ± 0.34 0.72 ± 0.10 1.00 ± 0.52
IG1 1.32 ± 0.80a 0.89 ± 0.23a 0.56 ± 0.23a 1.04 ± 0.66a
IG2 1.44 ± 1.15a 0.93 ± 0.31a 0.69 ± 0.13a 1.14 ± 0.88a
IG3 1.82 ± 1.71a* 0.95 ± 0.38a 0.61 ± 0.19a 1.32 ± 1.33a
Female (n = 5)
IG0 1.25 ± 0.61 0.83 ± 0.16 0.77 ± 0.22 1.02 ± 0.50
IG1 1.58 ± .19a 0.94 ± 0.24a 0.87 ± 0.27a 1.26 ± 0.92a
IG2 1.83 ± 1.14a** 1.04 ± 0.54a 0.77 ± 0.17a 1.38 ± 0.97a**
IG3 1.49 ± 1.01a 0.87 ± 0.25a 0.70 ± 0.13a 1.15 ± 0.80a
  1. In the columns, the values affected of the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05) and the value with different letter are significantly different (P < 0.05). (Bonferroni between treated animals).
  2. * Significantly different from fat control in the same sex (P < 0.05). (Dunnett's)
  3. **significantly different from fat control in the same sex (p < 0.01). (Dunnett's)