Skip to main content

Table 3 Significant differences of AUC, AUIC and RR in the studied groups

From: A reduction of CETP activity, not an increase, is associated with modestly impaired postprandial lipemia and increased HDL-Cholesterol in adult asymptomatic women

Variables/groups

CETPd (n = 8)

CETPi(n = 6)

CTL (n = 14)

RR TG

- 5.1 ± 24.0

59.6 ± 33.3 a

15.1 ± 13.0 b

AUC TRL-TG

1632.0 ± 711.2 c

373.2 ± 112.3 d

1102.2 ± 462.1

AUIC TRL-TG

454.3 ± 262.1 e

196.6 ± 114.3 f

217.9 ± 115.2

RR TRL-TG

-14.4 ± 17.8 g

11.2 ± 6.6 h

-19.2 ± 25.3 i

AUC TRL-C

143.2 ± 67.9 j

53.7 ± 17.7 l

63.2 ± 29.0 m

AUIC NEFA

-0.2 ± 1.7 n

-1.6 ± 0.2 n

-2.5 ± 1.6°

  1. Data as mean ± SD. AUC (mg/dL h), areas under curves; AUIC(mg/dL h), area under the incremental curve; AR (mg/dL), acquisition rate, RR (mg/dL), removal rate; AR (mg/dL), acquisition rate: not shown, NS; TG, triglycerides; TRL-C or TRL-TG, cholesterol or triglyceride in triglyceride-rich lipoproteins; NEFA, non-esterified fatty acids. Mann-Whitney and ANCOVA for corrections for age; CETPi vs CTL: a vs b, p ≤ 0.001; CETPd vs CETPi: c vs d, p ≤ 0.040; e vs f, p ≤ 0.048; g vs h, p ≤ 0.004; j vs l, p ≤ 0.021 and CETPd vs CTL: g vs i, p ≤ 0.045; j vs m, p ≤ 0.040; n vs o, p ≤ 0.043. Significant differences are shown in bold