Skip to main content

Table 5 Adjusted ORs and 95% CIs for dyslipidemia according the cutoff value of BMI-SDS at 1.22 and BMI at 21.67 in boys

From: Glycolipid metabolic status of overweight/obese adolescents aged 9- to 15-year-old and the BMI-SDS/BMI cut-off value of predicting dyslipidemiain boys, Shanghai, China: a cross-sectional study

 

BMI-SDS level

BMI

 

≤1.22

>1.22

≤21.67

>21.67

 

(Reference)

 

(Reference)

 

High TC

3 (1.69%)

21 (13.64%)a***

2 (1.18%)

22 (12.79%)a§§§

Prevalencen (%)

Adjusted OR

1

8.27 (2.42–28.30)b**

1

12.78 (2.95–55.40)b§§

High TG

2 (1.13%)

20 (12.20%)a***

1 (0.59%)

21 (12.21%)a§§§

Prevalence n (%)

Adjusted OR

1

11.97 (2.75–52.07)b**

1

23.82 (3.16–179.39)b§§

High LDL-C

2 (1.13%)

19 (11.59%)a***

1 (0.59%)

20 (11.63%) a§§§

prevalence n (%)

adjusted OR

1

11.28 (2.59–49.24)b**

1

22.56 (2.99–170.23) b§§

Low HDL-C

1 (0.56%)

12 (7.32%)a**

1 (0.59%)

12 (6.78%)a§§

prevalence n (%)

Adjusted OR

1

14.70 (1.88–114.85)b*

1

12.20 (1.57–94.92)b§

Dyslipidemia

5 (2.82%)

38 (23.17%) a***

4 (2.37%)

39 (22.67%) a§§§

Prevalence n (%)

Adjusted OR

1

10.27 (3.93–26.84)b***

1

12.30 (4.28–35.34)b§§§

  1. OR Odds ratio, CI Confidence interval, BMI-SDS Body mass index standard deviation score, a, chi-square test; b, logistic regression analysis adjusted for age.
  2. Differences between groups with BMI-SDS higher and lower than 1.22: **p < 0.005, ***p < 0.001.
  3. Differences between groups with BMI higher and lower than 21.67: §p < 0.05, §§p < 0.005, §§§p < 0.001.