Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of independent associations between training types, baseline characteristics and the changes of body composition and metabolic profiles by multiple linear regression analysis.

From: Concurrent and aerobic exercise training promote similar benefits in body composition and metabolic profiles in obese adolescents

 

Unstandardized coefficients

  

Standardized Coefficients

Changes (end-baseline)/predictors

B

Std. error

Adjusted R square

t

Beta

p-value

% Body Fat

Type of training1

−1.825

0.442

0.267

−4.129

−0.53

<0.001

Constant

−0.180

0.597

 

−0.301

 

0.765

Hepatic steatosis2

Baseline hepatic steatosis 

−0.507

0.127

0.185

−3.999

−0.560

<0.001

Baseline IAAT3

0.107

0.046

0.265

2.336

0.327

0.025

Constant

−0.215

0.169

 

−1.274

 

0.210

VLDL4

Type of training

−5.297

1.562

0.359

−3.391

−0.445

0.002

Baseline VLDL

−0.511

0.169

0.477

−3.028

−0.397

0.005

Constant

18.18

4.467

 

4.070

 

<0.001

  1. 1Type of training: 0= control group, 1= concurrent training, 2= aerobic training; 2Degree Hepatic steatosis: 0= ausence of hepatic steatosis, 1= presence of hepatic steatosis; 3Intra-abdominal adiposity tissue (IAAT) (cm); 4Very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) (mg/dl); 5Variables did not reach statistical significance: age, gender, baseline BMI, baseline % body fat, baseline growth velocity