Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies regarding n-3 PUFA from any source and inflammation markers in T2DM

From: What is the impact of n-3 PUFAs on inflammation markers in Type 2 diabetic mellitus populations?: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

 

Intervention arm

Control arm

Author/year [reference number]

Study type

Type of patient

Location of study

Number included/Number completed

Age (y)

(Mean ± SD)

Duration (wk)

N-3 PUFA source

Dose (g/d)

Placebo

Quality

Brinton 2013 [21]

RCT

T2DM

USA

513/501

>18

12

Icosapent ethyl (EPA)

4, 2

placebo

A

Azizi-Soleiman 2013 [16]

RCT

T2DM

Iran

60/45

59.4 ± 8.2

12

EPA or DHA

1

Canola oil

B

Lee 2014 [17]

RCT

Early-stage T2DM or MetS

USA

80/59

57.9

8

EPA + DHA

6

Corn oil

B

Malekshahi Moghadam 2012 [18]

RCT

T2DM

Iran

84/NA

45–85 (mean 54.2)

8

EPA + DHA

2.7

Sunflower oil

B

Mori 2003 [19]

RCT

Treated-hypertensive T2DM

Australia

59/51

61.2 ± 1.2

6

EPA or DHA

4

Olive oil

C

Pooya 2008 [20]

RCT

T2DM

Iran

90/81

45–85 (mean 54.5)

8

EPA + DHA

2.2

Sunflower oil

B

Soleimani 2015 [23]

RCT

T2DM with diabetic nephropathy (DN)

Iran

60/60

45–85 (mean 62.6)

12

Flaxseed oil (ALA)

1

placebo

B

Wong 2015 [22]

RCT

T2DM without prior cardiovasular disease

China

97/91

60 ± 9 (Mean 60.1)

12

Fish oil (42 % EPA +25 % DHA)

4

Olive oil

A

  1. MetS metabolic syndrome, RCT randomized controlled trial, T2DM type 2 diabetes mellitus, NA not given, ALA alpha-linolenic acid