Skip to main content

Table 2 Multivariate logistic regression analysis exploring association between quartiles of plasma lipid levels and the risk of MCI after adjustment for demographics, vascular disorders

From: Relationship between plasma lipids and mild cognitive impairment in the elderly Chinese: a case-control study

Lipid, Quartile (Range, mg/dl) No. (%) of subjects Basic Modela Final Modelb
MCI group (n = 112) Control group (n = 115)
TC
 1 (≤172.00) 31 (27.7) 28 (24.3) 1.00 1.00
 2 (172.01–197.00) 33 (29.5) 29 (25.2) 1.52 (1.08–2.32) 1.39 (1.07–2.11)
 3 (197.01–225.00) 25 (22.3) 27 (23.5) 1.99 (1.47–2.81) 1.79 (1.33–2.54)
 4 (≥225.01) 23 (20.5) 31 (27.0) 2.72 (1.82–3.81) 2.65 (2.13–3.39)
 Trend test    P = 0.042 P = 0.031
HDL-C
 1 (≤37.00) 34 (30.3) 27 (23.5) 1.00 1.00
 2 (37.01–45.00) 22 (19.6) 31 (27.0) 0.62 (0.45–0.91) 0.66 (0.41–1.08)
 3 (45.01–55.00) 24 (21.4) 28 (24.3) 0.56 (0.45–0.97) 0.61 (0.38–0.98)
 4 (≥55.01) 32 (28.6) 29 (25.2) 0.48 (0.23–0.73) 0.56 (0.37–0.83)
 Trend test    P = 0.040 P = 0.033
TG
 1 (≤98.25) 33 (29.9) 30 (26.1) 1.00 1.00
 2 (98.26–142.50) 30 (26.6) 28 (24.3) 0.85 (0.57–1.27) 0.95 (0.58–1.56)
 3 (142.51–197.50) 25 (22.3) 32 (27.8) 0.82 (0.54–1.26) 0.93 (0.58–1.50)
 4 (≥197.51) 27 (24.1) 25 (21.7) 0.65 (0.43–0.91) 0.76 (0.48–0.97)
 Trend test    P = 0.047 P = 0.039
LDL-C
 1 (≤98.25) 33 (29.9) 28 (24.3) 1.00 1.00
 2 (98.26–116.00) 28 (25.0) 31 (27.0) 1.10 (0.74–1.66) 0.87 (0.54–1.40)
 3 (116.01–141.75) 27 (24.1) 29 (25.2) 0.91 (0.60–1.37) 0.84 (0.52–1.35)
 4 (≥141.76) 29 (25.9) 27 (23.5) 1.02 (0.68–1.53) 1.02 (0.63–1.65)
 Trend test    P =0.832 P = 0.991
  1. Data in the table are adjusted OR and 95 % CI
  2. aAdjusted for potential confounders including age, gender, education level
  3. bAdjusted for age, gender, education level, BMI, hypertension, T2DM, and heart disease