Skip to main content

Table 3 Effects of HCHF diet on body weight, food and water intake and organ weight

From: Cardamom powder supplementation prevents obesity, improves glucose intolerance, inflammation and oxidative stress in liver of high carbohydrate high fat diet induced obese rats

Parameters

Control

Control + Cardamom

HCHF

HCHFF+ Cardamom

Initial body weight (g)

194.25 ± 1.68

197.23 ± 2.95

195.18 ± 1.31

195.55 ± 3.39

Final body weight (g)

220.68 ± 7.14

230.83 ± 3.65

266.40±4.33

258.15 ± 1.58

Food intake /d (g)

14.60 ± 0.70

15.92 ± 0.74

14.81 ± 0.28

12.93 ± 1.55

Water intake/ d(g)

19.53 ± 0.85

18.14 ± 1.71

15.00 ± 1.00

15.76 ± 0.78

Calorie Intake (kj/day)

307.6 ± 7.3a

305.1 ± 3.5a

412.9 ± 7.5b

385.3 ± 6.0b,c

Liver wet weight (g/ 100 g of body weight)

3.51 ± 0.05

2.74 ± 0.23

3.63 ± 0.09

2.70 ± 0.06

Heart wet weight

(g/ 100 g of body weight)

0.28 ± 0.01

0.26 ± .00

0.30 ± 0.01

0.27 ± 0.01

Pancreas wet weight

(g/ 100 g of body weight)

0.32 ± 0.01

0.37 ± 0.02

0.34 ± 0.02

0.34 ± 0.03

Fat deposition

 Paritoneal fat (g/ 100 g of body weight)

1.12 ± 0.12a

0.91 ± 0.08a

2.37 ± 0.16b

1.65 ± 0.15a

 Epididymal fat (g/ 100 g of body weight)

0.91 ± 0.08

1.05 ± 0.15

1.14 ± 0.09

1.06 ± 0.09

 Mesenteric (g/ 100 g of body weight)

0.69 ± 0.19

0.45 ± 0.07

0.63 ± 0.09

0.83 ± 0.07

  1. Values are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 7. One way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test were done for statistical comparison. Values are considered significance at p < 0.05. a vs b, control vs HCHF or HCHF vs tretment which are different at p < 0.05