Skip to main content

Table 2 Levels of serum sphingomyelins

From: Early postoperative changes of sphingomyelins and ceramides after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Control Group (n = 15)

Sleeve Gastrectomy Group (n = 20)

Sphingolipids (μg/ml)

Preop

Po Day 1

Po Day 30

Preop

Po Day 1

Po Day 30

16:0 SM (d18:1/16:0)

217,16 ± 19,10

225,40 ± 27,36

267,25 ± 24,50

279,88 ± 19,43a

223,68 ± 20,34b,c

262,14 ± 17,85

18:0 SM (d18:1/18:0)

100,24 ± 9,67

113,84 ± 13,51

103,51 ± 14,02

131,97 ± 11,91a

126,93 ± 11,10

154,90 ± 9,83d

24:0 SM (d18:1/24:0)

75,94 ± 7,19

88,93 ± 12,62

113,06 ± 9,16e

98,64 ± 10,59

60,57 ± 8,14f

58,54 ± 6,84f,d

  1. Values are mean ± SEM. Preop, preoperation; Po, postoperation. 16:0 SM (d18:1/16:0), N-palmitoyl-D-erythrosphingosylphosphorylcholine; 18:0 SM (d18:1/18:0), N-stearoyl-D-erythro-sphingosylphosphorylcholine; 24:0 SM (d18:1/24:0), N-lignoceroyl-D-erythro-sphingosylphosphorylcholine
  2. a, p < 0,05 vs. control Preop. Statistical analysis was done by t-test
  3. b, p = 0,015 vs. sleeve gastrectomy Preop. Statistical analysis was done by paired t-test
  4. c, p = 0,006 vs. sleeve gastrectomy Po day 30. Statistical analysis was done by paired t-test
  5. d, p < 0,01 vs. control Po day 30. Statistical analysis was done by t-test
  6. e, p < 0,001 vs. control Preop. Statistical analysis was done by paired t-test
  7. f, p < 0,001 vs. sleeve gastrectomy Preop. Statistical analysis was done by paired t-test