Skip to main content

Table 2 Meta-analysis of the association between rs2569190 (C-260T) polymorphism and CVD risk

From: Effect of CD14 polymorphisms on the risk of cardiovascular disease: evidence from a meta-analysis

Sub-group analysis

No of data sets

No of cases/controls

Allele model (T VS.C)

Dominant model (CC VS.TT + CT)

Recessive model (TT VS.CC + CT)

Cases

Controls

OR (95% CI)

POR

PH

OR (95% CI)

POR

PH

OR (95% CI)

POR

PH

Overall

24

9413

7337

1.169(1.087–1.257)

2.44 × 10−5*

0.001

1.233(1.110–1.370)

3.79 × 10−5*

0.02

1.195(1.062–1.345)

0.003*

0.002

Ethnicity

 East Asian

7

1503

1597

1.370(1.226–1.531)

2.86 × 10−8*

0.308

1.574(1.278–1.938)

9.11 × 10−7*

0.217

1.492(1.236–1.801)

3.05 × 10−5*

0.22

 European

16

7403

5353

1.100(1.019–1.189)

0.015

0.047

1.113(1.006–1.232)

0.039

0.237

1.112(0.975–1.269)

0.113

0.04

 America

1

387

387

1.000(0.819–1.221)

1

–

1.142(0.830–1.571)

0.416

–

0.827(0.584–1.173)

0.287

–

Endpoint

 CHD

7

1019

1005

1.357(1.157–1.592)

2.47 × 10−7*

0.074

1.669(1.388–2.007)

2.48 × 10−6*

0.433

1.342(1.011–1.781)

0.042

0.035

 AMI

7

762

1244

1.152(1.036–1.281)

0.009

0.143

1.186(0.997–1.412)

0.054

0.131

1.162(1.030–1.310)

0.015

0.483

 MI

10

4641

3915

1.077(0.976–1.188)

0.139

0.072

1.061(0.949–1.186)

0.297

0.799

1.118(0.907–1.378)

0.297

0.002

  1. OR odd ratio, 95%CI 95% confidence interval, PORP value for the test of association, PHP value for heterogeneity analysis
  2. ∗Significant P-value