Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies

From: Prognostic value of lipid profiles after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Year

Country

Design

Size

Operation

Median Follow-Up (Month)

Mean Age

Statin Use

Cofactors

Post

2011

USA

Retrospective

383

RP

49

60.9

/

Age, Race, Preoperative PSA, Gleason Score, Tumor Stage, Surgical Margin Status, Smoking, and Other Metabolic Syndrome Components

Allott

2014

USA

Retrospective

843

RP

74.3

60.4

427 (50.7%)

Age, Race, Pre-Operative PSA, Year of Surgery, BMI, Surgical Center, Statin Use, Pathological Gleason Score, Prostate Weight, Positive Surgical Margins, Extracapsular Extension, and Seminal Vesicle Invasion

Shiota

2014

Japan

Prospective

283

Open (27.2%); LRP (14.8%); RALP (58.0%)

14.8

65 (49–78) a

48 (20.2%)

Age, Pre-Operative PSA, Clinical T Stage, Pathological Stage, Biopsy Gleason Score, Surgical Approach, Surgical Margin, Pathological Gleason Score, Alteration of Gleason Score, Perineural Invasion, Angiolymphatic Invasion, Lymph Node Status

Jeannette

2015

Puerto Rico

Retrospective

199

RP

/

58.82

0

Age, BMI

Zhang

2015

China

Retrospective

322

RP + PLD

/

68

14 (4.3%)

Age, BMI, Hypertension, Diabetes, Smoking Status, Statin Usage, Preoperative PSA, Biopsy Gleason Score, Clinical Stage

Kang

2015

China

Retrospective

663

RP

21

68 (62–72) a

/

Biopsy Gleason Score, Pathological Gleason Score, Preoperative PSA, Pathological T Stage, Lymph Node Metastasis, Surgical Margin

Yoshio

2016

Japan

Retrospective

562

Open (56.2%); RALP (43.8%)

54

65.9

69 (12.3%)

Age, Pre-Operative PSA, BMI, Statin Use, Clinical T Stage, Gleason Score, Extracapsular Extension, Seminal Vesicle Invasion, Surgical Margin, Lympho-Vascular Invasion, Perineural Invasion, Lymph Node Metastases

Bhindi

2016

Canada

Prospective

1939

Open (76%); LRP (6.1%); RALP (17.9%)

31

61.5

611 (31.5%)

Age, Year Of RP, And Statin Use, Disease Parameters (PSA At Surgery, Final Grade, Pathological Stage, Surgical Margin Status), Surgical Approach of RP And Type of Nerve Sparing

Wettstein

2017

Switzerland

Prospective

371

RP

28

63

61 (16.4%)

Age, PSA, Extra-prostatic disease (> = pT3), High-risk disease (> = Gleason 8), Positive nodal status (pN1), Positive surgical margins, Statin use

Colicchia

2017

USA

Prospective

3662

Open (69.4%); RALP (30.4%)

102

/

/

Age at Surgery, Total Number of Positive Cores, Max % Of Tumor in The Core, Clinical Stage, And Log 2 Pre-Surgery PSA.

Lebdai

2017

France

Retrospective

567

Open (13.6%) LRP (6.2%); RALP (78.1%)

/

64 (45–79) a

/

BMI, Abdominal Perimeter, Glycemia, High Blood Pressure

Rantaniemi

2018

Finland

Retrospective

1314

RP

134.4

/

467 (35.5%)

Age, Preoperative PSA Level, Pathological T Stage and Gleason Score, Use of Antihypertensive and Antidiabetic Medication, Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Allopurinol, and Surgical Marginal Positivity

  1. RP radical prostatectomy, LRP laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, RALP robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, PLD pelvic lymphadenectomy, PSA prostate-specific antigen, BMI body mass index; /: data not available; a = median age