Skip to main content

Table 3 HR and 95%CI for multivariate-adjusted Analysis of the ApoB/apoA1 ratio, TC/HDL-c or Framingham Risk Score to Long-term Clinical Outcomes

From: Comparison of Apolipoprotein B/A1 ratio, Framingham risk score and TC/HDL-c for predicting clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Quartiles of plasma apoB/apoAI ratios

1-SD Increasing of Variablea

ApoB/apoA1 ratio

Q1(n = 567)

Q2(n = 568)

Q3(n = 565)

Q4(n = 562)

 Model 1

1

1.14 (0.66–1.88)

1.12 (0.65–1.94)

1.75 (1.09–2.95)

1.55 (0.26–1.91)

 Model 2

1

1.15 (0.68–1.97)

1.13 (0.65–1.97)

1.91 (1.09–2.89)

1.57 (1.28–1.93)

 Model 3

1

1.25 (0.69–2.23)

1.31 (0.73–2.35)

1.92 (1.10–3.13)

1.59 (1.29–1.96)

Quartiles of TC/HDL-c

TC/HDL-c

Q1(n = 566)

Q2(n = 568)

Q3(n = 563)

Q4(n = 565)

 

 Model 1

1

0.82 (0.52–1.32)

1.09 (0.70–1.69)

1.21 (0.78–1.87)

1.04 (0.89–1.23)

 Model 2

1

0.78 (0.48–1.25)

1.03 (0.67–1.60)

1.17 (0.76–1.81)

1.03 (0.87–1.23)

 Model 3

1

0.90 (0.52–1.56)

1.16 (0.64–2.11)

1.27 (0.56–2.89)

1.02 (0.85–1.22)

Quartiles of Framingham Risk Score

Framingham Risk Score

Q1(n = 457)

Q2(n = 721)

Q3(n = 603)

Q4(n = 481)

 

 Model 1

1

1.04 (0.63–1.70)

1.00 (0.60–1.67)

1.60 (0.98–2.59)

1.04 (0.98–1.09)

 Model 2

1

1.37 (0.80–2.36)

1.56 (0.84–2.56)

2.12 (1.06–3.02)

1.11 (1.04–1.18)

 Model 3

1

1.34 (0.75–2.4)

1.31 (0.67–2.57)

2.20 (1.08–3.56)

1.08 (1.01–1.15)

  1. HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval. Model 1, without adjustment; Model 2, adjusted for age, sex; Model 3, adjusted for Model 2, BMI, Diabetes, Hypertension, Smoking, Drinking. aHR indicates hazard ratio for per each SD increase of ApoB/apoA1 ratio, TC/HDL-c or Framingham Risk Score