Skip to main content

Table 4 Protective effects of MEM on liver antioxidant status

From: Phytochemical analysis and Evaluation of hepatoprotective effect of Maytenus royleanus leaves extract against anti-tuberculosis drug induced liver injury in mice

Treatments

CAT (U/min)

POD (U/min)

SOD

(U/mg protein)

GSH (nM/g tissue)

GST (μM/mg protein)

GPx (nM/

min/mg

protein)

GSR (nM

/min/mg

protein)

γ-GT (nM

/min/mg

protein)

Control

1.93 ± 0.16

1.99 ± 0.11

9.23 ± 0.21

40.82 ± 2.07

6.84 ± 0.41

123.20 ± 4.22

211.31 ± 5.22

82.36 ± 3.26

RIPE

0.54 ± 0.11****

1.11 ± 0.14****

4.15 ± 0.23 ****

32.18 ± 1.88****

3.58 ± 0.45****

59.28 ± 2.22****

153.17 ± 4.13****

61.42 ± 3.45****

MEM (200 mg/kg) + RIPE

1.83 ± 0.10++++

1.52 ± 0.13****+++

6.54 ± 0.17 ****++++####

35.51 ± 2.13**

5.35 ± 0.47****++++

89.70 ± 3.15****++++####

177.12 ± 4.03****++++####

68.74 ± 3.87**** + #

MEM (400 mg/kg) + RIPE

1.89 ± 0.12++++

1.72 ± 0.14*++++

8.35 ± 0.19 ****++++

37.71 ± 2.26+++

5.56 ± 0.34***++++

102.07 ± 3.03****++++

199.29 ± 6.20**++++

76.38 ± 4.21++++

Vit B6 + RIPE

2.08 ± 0.12++++

2.04 ± 0.13++++

8.12 ± 0.24 ****++++

36.51 ± 2.05*+

6.19 ± 0.67++++

99.24 ± 3.40****++++

187.30 ± 5.01****++++

73.54 ± 3.17**++++

Vit B6

1.88 ± 0.14++++

2.18 ± 0.15++++

11.32 ± 0.18****++++

41.46 ± 2.20++++

6.36 ± 0.46++++

118.50 ± 3.21++++

209.40 ± 6.05a++++

84.26 ± 4.12a++++

MEM (400 mg/kg)

2.42 ± 0.17**++++

1.83 ± 0.17++++

10.36 ± 0.23 **++++

42.39 ± 1.67++++

5.62 ± 0.48**++++

119.25 ± 3.59++++

201.33 ± 5.02*++++

85.65 ± 4.65a++++

  1. Values are Mean ± SD (06 number). RIPE, Rifampicin (13.5 mg/kg), Isoniazid (6.75 mg/kg), Pyrazinamide (36.0 mg/kg) and Ethambutol (24.8 mg/kg). MEM, M. royleanus leaves methanol extract. Vit B6, Vitamin B6. *, **, *** indicate significance from the control group at p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.0001 probability level, +, ++, +++ indicate significance from the RIPE group at p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.0001, while ### indicate significance of MEM (400 mg/kg) + RIPE group vs MEM (200 mg/kg) + RIPE group at p < 0.0001 probability level (One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests)