Skip to main content

Table 5 Protective effects of MEM on liver protein and oxidative stress markers

From: Phytochemical analysis and Evaluation of hepatoprotective effect of Maytenus royleanus leaves extract against anti-tuberculosis drug induced liver injury in mice

Treatments

Protein (μg/mg tissue)

TBARS (nM of MDA/mg protein)

H2O2 (nM/min

/mg tissue)

Control

1.32 ± 0.16

6.09 ± 1.30

5.38 ± 0.42

RIPE

0.73 ± 0.12****

18.65 ± 3.72****

8.88 ± 1.04****

MEM (200 mg/kg) + RIPE

1.10 ± 0.15++

13.65 ± 1.82****++#

6.98 ± 0.80**+++

MEM (400 mg/kg) + RIPE

1.21 ± 0.13++++

9.78 ± 1.31*++++

5.78 ± 0.58++++

Vit B6+ RIPE

1.16 ± 0.18+++

9.43 ± 1.55c++++

6.54 ± 0.66++++

Vit B6

1.41 ± 0.18++++

5.80 ± 0.80e++++

4.95 ± 0.60++++

MEM (400 mg/kg) alone

1.38 ± 0.15++++

7.07 ± 1.79d++++

5.44 ± 0.52++++

  1. Values are Mean ± SD (06 number). RIPE, Rifampicin (13.5 mg/kg), Isoniazid (6.75 mg/kg), Pyrazinamide (36.0 mg/kg) and Ethambutol (24.8 mg/kg). MEM, M. royleanus leaves methanol extract. Vit B6, Vitamin B6. *, **, *** indicate significance from the control group at p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.0001 probability level, +, ++, +++ indicate significance from the RIPE group at p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.0001, while ### indicate significance of MEM (400 mg/kg) + RIPE group vs MEM (200 mg/kg) + RIPE group at p < 0.0001 probability level (One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests)