Skip to main content

Table 3 Sensitivity analysis of association between ApoE alleles and diabetic nephropathy

From: ε2 allele and ε2-involved genotypes (ε2/ε2, ε2/ε3, and ε2/ε4) may confer the association of APOE genetic polymorphism with risks of nephropathy in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis

Study

ε2

ε4

Horita et al. [17]

1.84 (1.46, 2.33)

0.96 (0.76, 1.22)

Eto et al. [18]

1.86 (1.47, 2.36)

0.97 (0.76, 1.23)

Kimura et al. [19]

1.94 (1.53, 2.45)

1.00 (0.79, 1.25)

Zhang et al. [20]

1.86 (1.47, 2.37)

0.97 (0.77, 1.23)

Xiang et al. [21]

1.87 (1.47, 2.37)

0.98 (0.77, 1.23)

Ha et al. [22]

1.86 (1.46, 2.35)

0.97 (0.77, 1.22)

Akarsu et al. [23]

1.86 (1.47, 2.35)

0.98 (0.78, 1.23)

Dai et al. [24]

1.92 (1.51, 2.43)

0.96 (0.76, 1.21)

Shen et al. [25]

1.86 (1.47, 2.37)

0.96 (0.76, 1.21)

Zhang et al. [26]

1.84 (1.46, 2.33)

0.97 (0.77, 1.22)

Liu et al. [27]

1.92 (1.51, 2.44)

0.96 (0.76, 1.21)

Park et al. [28]

1.84 (1.46, 2.32)

0.98 (0.78, 1.24)

Liu et al. [29]

1.86 (1.47, 2.35)

0.97 (0.77, 1.22)

Xiong et al. [30]

1.92 (1.52, 2.43)

0.96 (0.76, 1.21)

Hua et al. [31]

1.89 (1.48, 2.40)

0.99 (0.78, 1.25)

Guo et al. [32]

1.85 (1.46, 2.33)

0.97 (0.77, 1.22)

Ng et al. [33]

1.92 (1.50, 2.46)

0.96 (0.76, 1.22)

Zhang et al. [34]

1.86 (1.47, 2.34)

0.95 (0.76, 1.20)

Pan et al. [35]

1.95 (1.54, 2.46)

0.93 (0.75, 1.16)

Ilhan et al. [36]

1.94 (1.55, 2.45)

0.96 (0.76, 1.21)

Kwon et al. [37]

1.91 (1.51, 2.42)

0.99 (0.79, 1.24)

Leiva et al. [38]

1.90 (1.51, 2.40)

1.01 (0.81, 1.26)

Rouzi et al. [39]

1.88 (1.49, 2.39)

0.98 (0.78, 1.23)

Erdogan et al. [40]

1.90 (1.50, 2.40)

0.98 (0.78, 1.23)

Xiang et al. [41]

1.87 (1.48, 2.38)

0.99 (0.78, 1.24)

Reis et al. [42]

1.99 (1.62, 2.45)

0.99 (0.79, 1.25)

Sun et al. [43]

1.92 (1.51, 2.46)

0.93 (0.75, 1.16)

Satirapoj et al. [44]

1.91 (1.50, 2.43)

1.00 (0.80, 1.26)

Wang et al. [45]

1.83 (1.45, 2.31)

0.98 (0.77, 1.23)

Luo et al. [46]

1.82 (1.45, 2.29)

0.91 (0.75, 1.12)

Atta et al. [47]

1.85 (1.46, 2.34)

0.96 (0.76, 1.21)

Jiang et al. [48]

1.87 (1.47, 2.40)

0.98 (0.77, 1.25)

Karimoei et al. [49]

1.91 (1.51, 2.43)

1.00 (0.80, 1.25)

  1. ApoE alleles (ε2 and ε4) were compared with ε3