Skip to main content

Table 3 Odds ratios of abnormal apolipoprotein profiles in the extreme sex-specific quartiles of iron status

From: Associations of iron status with apolipoproteins and lipid ratios: a cross-sectional study from the China Health and Nutrition Survey

 

ApoB

ApoA1

ApoB/ApoA1

ORa (95% CI)

ORb (95% CI)

ORc (95% CI)

ORa (95% CI)

ORb (95% CI)

ORc (95% CI)

ORa (95% CI)

ORb (95% CI)

ORc (95% CI)

Men

 SF

2.54 (1.94, 3.33)

2.04 (1.54, 2.71)

1.97 (1.50, 2.62)

1.52 (1.18, 1.95)

1.22 (0.93, 1.59)

1.19 (0.91, 1.55)

2.78 (2.12, 3.65)

2.08 (1.56, 2.78)

2.00 (1.50, 2.66)

 TRF

2.11 (1.61, 2.75)

2.10 (1.58, 2.78)

2.00 (1.50, 2.66)

0.99 (0.76, 1.30)

0.77 (0.58, 1.03)

0.74 (0.56, 0.99)

1.93 (1.47, 2.52)

1.73 (1.29, 2.30)

1.62 (1.21, 2.16)

 sTfR

1.27 (0.98, 1.64)

1.32 (1.01, 1.72)

1.28 (0.97, 1.67)

0.74 (0.57, 0.96)

0.77 (0.59, 1.00)

0.75 (0.57, 0.99)

0.93 (0.72, 1.20)

0.96 (0.74, 1.26)

0.92 (0.70, 1.21)

 Hb

2.18 (1.66, 2.87)

2.14 (1.59, 2.87)

2.04 (1.51, 2.74)

1.18 (0.90, 1.55)

0.84 (0.62, 1.12)

0.81 (0.61, 1.09)

1.78 (1.36, 2.35)

1.47 (1.09, 1.98)

1.39 (1.03, 1.87)

Women

 SF

5.59 (4.17, 7.50)

2.27 (1.64, 3.16)

2.13 (1.53, 2.97)

0.86 (0.67, 1.09)

0.97 (0.72, 1.30)

0.96 (0.72, 1.29)

3.21 (2.46, 4.19)

1.49 (1.10, 2.03)

1.41 (1.04, 1.92)

 TRF

1.10 (0.86, 1.41)

1.72 (1.31, 2.25)

1.55 (1.18, 2.04)

0.93 (0.72, 1.19)

0.75 (0.57, 0.97)

0.73 (0.56, 0.95)

0.99 (0.77, 1.27)

1.31 (1.00, 1.71)

1.21 (0.92, 1.59)

 sTfR

1.12 (0.87, 1.44)

1.28 (0.98, 1.68)

1.26 (0.96, 1.66)

0.72 (0.56, 0.91)

0.72 (0.56, 0.92)

0.71 (0.55, 0.91)

0.79 (0.61, 1.01)

0.88 (0.68, 1.15)

0.87 (0.67, 1.13)

 Hb

1.95 (1.52, 2.50)

1.86 (1.42, 2.43)

1.71 (1.31, 2.25)

0.90 (0.71, 1.15)

0.73 (0.56, 0.94)

0.70 (0.54, 0.91)

1.88 (1.47, 2.41)

1.64 (1.26, 2.14)

1.55 (1.18, 2.02)

  1. ApoB apolipoprotein B, ApoA1 apolipoprotein A1, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, SF serum ferritin, TRF transferrin, sTfR soluble transferrin receptor, Hb hemoglobin
  2. aOriginal model without any adjustments. bAdjusted for age, nationality, regional area, education level, smoking status, alcohol frequency, physical activity, energy intake, fat% intake, protein% intake, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio and hypersensitive C-reactive protein. cAdjusted for all the variables in model 2 plus the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance. Likelihood ratio Chi-square testing was implemented for models comparison in multivariable logistic regression (P < 0.001)