Skip to main content

Table 3 Relationship between FPG and NAFLD in different models

From: Association between fasting plasma glucose and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a nonobese Chinese population with normal blood lipid levels: a prospective cohort study

Variable

Crude Model

Model I

Model II

HR (95%CI) P-value

HR (95%CI) P-value

HR (95%CI) P-value

FPG

1.32 (1.28, 1.37) < 0.0001

1.25 (1.19, 1.30) < 0.0001

1.21 (1.15, 1.28) < 0.0001

FPG (quartile)

 Q1

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Q2

1.80 (1.40, 2.31) < 0.0001

1.46 (1.14, 1.87) 0.0031

1.29 (1.01, 1.66) 0.0450

 Q3

2.35 (1.86, 2.98) < 0.0001

1.72 (1.35, 2.18) < 0.0001

1.41 (1.11, 1.79) 0.0054

 Q4

4.45 (3.57, 5.54) < 0.0001

2.70 (2.17, 3.38) < 0.0001

2.25 (1.79, 2.82) < 0.0001

P for trend

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

  1. The crude model adjusts for: None Model I adjust for: sex, age, and BMI. Model II adjusts for sex, age, Cr, UA, TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, Height, BMI, ALP, GGT, ALT, AST, ALB, GLB, DBIL, SBP, and DBP
  2. Abbreviations: CI Confidence, HR Hazard ratios, Ref Reference
Back to article page

Lipids in Health and Disease

ISSN: 1476-511X