Table 4 Association between TyG-BMI and NAFLD risk in different models

 TyG-BMI

(1-SD increase)

4.170 (3.692, 4.709)

< 0.001

4.166 (3.688, 4.705)

< 0.001

3.583 (2.796, 4.593)

< 0.001

 Q1

1

1

1

 Q2

3.237 (1.186, 8.836)

0.022

3.237 (1.186, 8.836)

0.022

3.164 (0.669, 14.958)

0.146

 Q3

19.206 (7.800, 47.293)

< 0.001

19.200 (7.797, 47.279)

< 0.001

10.716 (2.566, 44.744)

0.001

 Q4

77.980 (32.206, 188.810)

< 0.001

77.920 (32.173, 188.713)

< 0.001

30.978 (7.427, 129.208)

< 0.001

P for trend

5.689 (4.762, 6.797)

< 0.001

5.687 (4.759, 6.797)

< 0.001

3.648 (2.733, 4.870)

< 0.001

 TyG-BMI

(1-SD increase)

3.954 (3.513, 4.451)

< 0.001

3.945 (3.504, 4.440)

< 0.001

2.849 (2.298, 3.532)

 Q1

1

1

1

 Q2

9.985 (2.326, 42.868)

0.002

9.964 (2.321, 42.778)

0.002

8.338 (1.057, 65.749)

0.044

 Q3

49.743 (12.264, 201.752)

< 0.001

49.323 (12.160, 200.065)

< 0.001

24.649 (3.369, 180.346)

0.002

 Q4

171.006 (42.585, 686.699)

< 0.001

169.762 (42.273, 681.737)

< 0.001

56.284 (7.712, 410.750)

< 0.001

P for trend

5.098 (4.298, 6.047)

< 0.001

5.090 (4.291, 6.038)

< 0.001

3.098 (2.387, 4.020)

< 0.001

TyG-BMI

(1-SD increase)

4.053 (3.724, 4.412)

< 0.001

4.046 (3.717, 4.405)

< 0.001

3.089 (2.628, 3.631)

< 0.001

 Q1

1

1

1

 Q2

5.164 (2.294, 11.626)

< 0.001

5.161 (2.292, 11.618)

< 0.001

4.718 (1.387, 16.040)

0.013

 Q3

27.953 (13.142, 59.456)

< 0.001

27.832 (13.085, 59.202)

< 0.001

15.062 (4.743, 47.835)

< 0.001

 Q4

104.387 (49.549, 219.914)

< 0.001

103.788 (49.261, 218.670)

< 0.001

38.242 (12.065, 121.213)

< 0.001

P for trend

5.387 (4.762, 6.094)

< 0.001

5.373 (4.749, 6.079)

< 0.001

3.336 (2.750, 4.047)

< 0.001