Lipids in Health and Disease

Table 5 The hazard ratio (95% CI) of MetS for Hyper-CEA in subcohort B by stratified analysis

From: Bidirectional association between serum carcinoembryonic antigen and metabolic syndrome among the Chinese male population: two cohort studies

Characteristics	Model 1^a			Model 2^b
Characteristics	β	Hazard ratio (95% CI)	P	β	Hazard ratio (95% CI)	P
Age ≤ 45 y, nonsmoking (n = 3052)
MetS	−0.081	0.92 (0.59, 1.44)	0.72	−0.165	0.85 (0.53, 1.35)	0.489
Non-MetS		1			1
Age > 45 y and ≤ 65 y, nonsmoking (n = 1660)
MetS	0.274	1.31 (0.92, 1.89)	0.137	0.338	1.40 (0.96, 2.05)	0.083
Non-MetS		1			1
Age > 65 y, nonsmoking (n = 523)
MetS	0.576	1.78 (1.08, 2.92)	0.023	0.626	1.87 (1.09, 3.20)	0.022
Non-MetS		1			1
Age ≤ 45 y, smoking (n = 2000)
MetS	−0.018	0.98 (0.66, 1.45)	0.929	−0.106	0.90 (0.59, 1.36)	0.616
Non-MetS		1			1
Age > 45 y and ≤ 65 y, smoking (n = 1147)
MetS	−0.332	0.72 (0.49, 1.06)	0.095	−0.316	0.73 (0.49, 1.09)	0.119
Non-MetS		1			1
Age > 65 y, smoking (n = 104)
MetS	−0.178	0.84 (0.3, 2.33)	0.733	−0.604	0.55 (0.14, 2.11)	0.38
Non-MetS		1			1

^a: Model 1 was the unadjusted hazard ratio; ^b: Model 2 was adjusted for alanine aminotransferase, serum creatinine and white blood cell count. CEA Carcinoembryonic antigen; Hyper-CEA Elevated serum CEA level above the reference range; MetS Metabolic syndrome; Non-MetS Without metabolic syndrome

Back to article page

ISSN: 1476-511X

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com