Skip to main content

Table 3 Effect size of NAFLD on incident diabetes in prespecified and exploratory subgroups

From: Association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and incident diabetes mellitus among Japanese: a retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching

Characteristic

No. of participants

HR (95% CI)

P value

P for interaction

Gender

0.2386

 Male

2048

2.04 (1.32, 3.15)

0.0013

 

 Female

246

4.34 (0.29, 64.28)

0.2853

 

BMI (kg/m2)

0.1157

  < 25

1538

1.59 (0.87, 2.92)

0.1353

 

  ≥ 25

662

3.40 (1.61, 7.17)

0.0013

 

Visceral fat obesity

0.0688

 NO

1996

1.67 (1.02, 2.73)

0.0410

 

 YES

272

4.75 (1.49, 15.11)

0.0083

 

FPG (mg/dL)

0.2901

 Low

758

5.31 (0.64, 44.16)

0.1221

 

 High

1056

1.88 (1.12, 3.15)

0.0172

 

HbA1c (%)

0.2688

 Low

494

11.99 (0.87, 164.39)

0.0629

 

 High

1258

1.95 (1.20, 3.20)

0.0076

 

TC (mg/dL)

0.9720

 Low

834

3.01 (1.33, 6.79)

0.0081

 

 High

852

2.82 (1.32, 6.04)

0.0076

 

TG (mg/dL)

0.1982

 Low

914

1.98 (0.76, 5.13)

0.1607

 

 High

938

4.10 (2.16, 7.77)

< 0.0001

 

HDL-C (mg/dL)

0.8977

 Low

892

1.96 (1.11, 3.46)

0.0197

 

 High

916

2.07 (0.86, 4.97)

0.1039

 

ALT (U/L)

0.0611

 Low

948

1.19 (0.55, 2.56)

0.6603

 

 High

968

2.82 (1.52, 5.25)

0.0011

 

AST (U/L)

0.2397

 Low

882

1.39 (0.63, 3.07)

0.4144

 

 High

902

2.65 (1.32, 5.32)

0.0060

 

GGT (U/L)

0.2994

 Low

880

1.97 (0.82, 4.73)

0.1294

 

 High

900

3.37 (1.80, 6.33)

0.0002

 

Propensity score

0.3788

 Low

1086

1.16 (0.36, 3.74)

0.8042

 

 Medium

1060

1.73 (0.88, 3.41)

0.1095

 

 High

1088

2.71 (1.68, 4.39)

< 0.0001

 
  1. Note 1: The above model has been adjusted for age, gender, BMI, waist circumference, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exerciser, SBP, DBP, ALT, AST, GGT, HbA1c, FPG, TC, TG, HDL-C
  2. Note 2 In each case, the model was not adjusted for the stratification variable