Skip to main content

Table 2 Logistic regression analyses for the association between TyG-BMI and incident NAFLD in different models

From: Usefulness of the triglyceride glucose-body mass index in evaluating nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: insights from a general population

 

Odds ratios (95% confidence interval)

 

Crude model

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

TyG-BMI(per SD increase)

6.17 (5.75, 6.62)

5.40 (5.01, 5.83)

3.87 (3.51, 4.26)

3.90 (3.54, 4.29)

TyG-BMI (Quintile)

 Quintile 1

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Quintile 2

5.17 (2.70, 9.89)

4.25 (2.22, 8.15)

4.04 (2.03, 8.03)

4.03 (2.03, 8.01)

 Quintile 3

19.26 (10.47, 35.43)

13.33 (7.22, 24.60)

10.72 (5.58, 20.62)

10.81 (5.63, 20.75)

 Quintile 4

70.61 (38.80,128.51)

42.25 (23.09, 77.30)

25.09 (13.11,47.99)

25.52 (13.36, 48.74)

 Quintile 5

344.54 (189.71,625.75)

186.82 (102.20,341.51)

72.84 (37.82,140.30)

74.76 (38.86,143.79)

P-trend

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

  1. Abbreviations: TyG-BMI: triglyceride glucose-body mass index;
  2. Model 1 adjusted for sex, age, habits of exercise, drinking status. Smoking status, SBP, and height;
  3. Model 2 adjusted for sex, age, ALT, AST, habits of exercise, GGT; HDL-C, TC, TG, FPG, HbA1c, smoking status, SBP and height;
  4. Model 3 adjusted for sex, age, ALT, AST, habits of exercise, GGT; HDL-C, TC, TG, FPG, HbA1c, smoking status, drinking status, SBP and height
Back to article page

Lipids in Health and Disease

ISSN: 1476-511X