Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinical and laboratory characteristics of the study population

From: Main differences between two highly effective lipid-lowering therapies in subclasses of lipoproteins in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Parameter

Simvastatin plus ezetimibe

N = 50

Rosuvastatin

N = 51

P value

Age (years),

59 (52–65)

58 (55–64)

0.78

Males, n (%)

39 (76)

36 (72)

0.77

Smokers, n (%)

34 (67)

37 (74)

0.56

Hypertensives, n (%)

36 (71)

36 (72)

0.77

Diabetes, n (%)

16 (31)

19 (38)

0.62

BMI, kg/m2

26.9 (24.0–31.4)

25.3 (24.2–27.8)

0.47

HbA1c (%)

6.0 (5.5–6.7)

6.0 (5.6–6.7)

0.60

Glucose, mg/dL

129 (99–169)

121 (105–167)

0.78

hsTNT, ng/L

5881 (2273–12,231)

5985 (2409–10,020)

0.55

Creatinine, mg/dL

0.90 (0.79–1.11)

0.89 (0.77–1.00)

0.35

GFR, mL/min/m2

86 (70–93)

86 (73–98)

0.79

SBP, mm Hg

125 (110–137)

126 (111–137)

0.64

DBP, mm Hg

80 (67–83)

78 (71–89)

0.48

Culprit coronary artery

 Left anterior descending, n (%)

25 (50)

26 (51)

0.92

 Right coronary artery, n (%)

18 (36)

19 (37)

0.90

 Left circumflex artery, n (%)

7 (14)

6 (12)

0.74

  1. Continuous variables are medians (IQRs). LAD left anterior descending artery, RCA right coronary artery, LCX left circumflex, hsTNT high-sensitivity troponin T. Categorical variables were compared by Pearson’s chi-square test, and continuous variables were compared by the Mann–Whitney U test