Skip to main content

Table 5 Binary logistic regression analysis of anthropometric indicators and HOMA-index in predicting MAFLD (n = 2355)

From: Waist-to-height ratio, an optimal anthropometric indicator for metabolic dysfunction associated fatty liver disease in the Western Chinese male population

Variable

Non-adjusted

Model I

Model II

Model III

OR(95% CI)

P-value

OR(95% CI)

P-value

OR(95% CI)

P-value

OR(95% CI)

P-value

BMI

13.722 (10.620–17.729)

< 0.001

12.768 (9.866–16.525)

< 0.001

7.431 (5.635–9.800)

< 0.001

5.019 (3.751–6.715)

< 0.001

WHtR

22.181 (16.216–30.340)

< 0.001

21.441 (15.575–29.516)

< 0.001

12.454 (8.880–17.466)

< 0.001

7.795 (5.492–11.064)

< 0.001

WHR

10.050 (7.773–12.994)

< 0.001

9.583 (7.335–12.521)

< 0.001

5.468 (4.107–7.280)

< 0.001

3.924 (2.912–5.287)

< 0.001

BAI

6.663 (5.362–8.280)

< 0.001

6.248 (5.013–7.786)

< 0.001

4.014 (3.159–5.099)

< 0.001

2.922 (2.267–3.767)

< 0.001

CMI

10.081 (7.894–12.874)

< 0.001

9.459 (7.394–12.101)

< 0.001

4.969 (3.589–6.880)

< 0.001

3.288 (2.339–4.621)

< 0.001

LAP

16.856 (12.825–22.155)

< 0.001

15.734 (11.952–20.714)

< 0.001

9.029 (6.560–12.426)

< 0.001

6.077 (4.345–8.501)

< 0.001

VAI

8.818 (6.927–11.226)

< 0.001

8.331 (6.532–10.627)

< 0.001

3.933 (2.855–5.417)

< 0.001

2.685 (1.917–3.759)

< 0.001

AVI

19.275 (14.266–26.041)

< 0.001

18.107 (13.352–24.555)

< 0.001

10.359 (7.498–14.311)

< 0.001

6.537 (4.676–9.138)

< 0.001

HOMA-IR

9.675 (7.590–12.334)

< 0.001

9.761 (7.634–12.481)

< 0.001

6.149 (4.689–8.064)

< 0.001

4.384 (3.298–5.828)

< 0.001

HOMA-β

4.281 (3.425–5.352)

< 0.001

4.710 (3.748–5.918)

< 0.001

3.594 (2.768–4.666)

< 0.001

2.792 (2.110–3.694)

< 0.001

  1. Abbreviations: MAFLD Metabolic-dysfunction associated fatty liver disease, BMI Body mass index, WHtR Waist to height ratio, WHR Waist to hip ratio, BAI Body adiposity index, CMI Cardiometabolic index, LAP Lipid accumulation product, VAI Visceral adiposity index, AVI Abdominal volume index, HOMA Homeostatic model assessment, OR Odds ratio, CI Confidence interval. P < 0.05 was accepted statistically significant
  2. Model I:Adjusted for age
  3. Model II:Adjusted for age, blood glucose, blood pressure, plasma uric acid, lipid parameters (TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C)
  4. Model III:Adjusted for age, blood glucose, blood pressure, plasma uric acid, lipid profile and sex hormone parameters (FSH, LH, E2, TT, SHBG)