Skip to main content

Table 2 Relationship between the FG/HDL-C ratio and short-term outcomes in different models

From: Association of fasting blood glucose to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio with short-term outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome

MACEs

Exposure

Non-adjusted a

Minor-adjusted b

Fully adjusted c

FG/HDL-C ratio

1.09 (1.05, 1.13), P < 0.01

1.10 (1.06, 1.15), P < 0.01

1.09 (1.04, 1.14), P < 0.01

FG/HDL-C ratio grouping

 Q1

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Q2

0.93 (0.70, 1.22), P = 0.58

0.95 (0.72, 1.26), P = 0.75

0.98 (0.73, 1.30), P = 0.88

 Q3

0.89 (0.68, 1.18), P = 0.43

1.00 (0.76, 1.33), P = 0.98

1.03 (0.76, 1.38), P = 0.86

 Q4

1.42 (1.10, 1.82), P < 0.01

1.57 (1.21, 2.03), P < 0.01

1.49 (1.11, 1.99), P < 0.01

CV death

Exposure

Non-adjusted a

Minor-adjusted b

Fully adjusted d

FG/HDL-C ratio

1.11 (1.07, 1.16), P < 0.01

1.13 (1.08, 1.18), P < 0.01

1.11 (1.04, 1.19), P < 0.01

FG/HDL-C ratio grouping

 Q1

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Q2

0.95 (0.68, 1.31), P = 0.74

0.98 (0.70, 1.38), P = 0.92

1.01 (0.59, 1.71), P = 0.98

 Q3

0.82 (0.58, 1.15), P = 0.26

0.94 (0.66, 1.33), P = 0.71

0.83 (0.48, 1.46), P = 0.53

 Q4

1.56 (1.16, 2.10), P < 0.01

1.77 (1.30, 2.39), P < 0.01

1.69 (1.01, 1.41), P = 0.04

  1. Co-linearity analysis showed that FG, cardiac arrest, PCI, CABG and FG/HDL-C ratio had high co-linearity. Therefore, FG, cardiac arrest, PCI, and CABG weren’t included in multivariate model
  2. aNo adjustment
  3. bAdjusted for cohort, intervention, age, and sex
  4. cAdjusted for cohort, intervention, age, sex, heart rate, weight, SBP, hemoglobin, TRIG, smoking or tobacco, hypertension, prior TIA or stroke, diabetes, heart failure, cardiac shock, Killip class, LVEF category
  5. dAdjusted for cohort, intervention, age, sex, weight, heart rate, troponin, TRIG, smoking or tobacco, hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, cardiac shock, Killip class, LVEF category, symptom onset to arrival