Skip to main content

Table 3 Logistic regression analysis assessing the associations between the HTGW phenotype and NAFLD

From: Association between hypertriglyceridemic-waist phenotype and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a general population-based study

 

Odds ratios (95% confidence interval)

NTNW

ETNW

NTEW

HTGW

All

 Model 1

Ref*

3.11 (2.66, 3.65)*

1.42 (1.18, 1.70)*

3.81 (2.79, 5.20)

 Model 2

Ref*

3.09 (2.63, 3.62)*

1.45 (1.20, 1.74)*

3.88 (2.84, 5.32)

 Model 3

Ref*

3.12 (2.66, 3.67)*

1.47 (1.22, 1.77)*

4.04 (2.94, 5.54)

 Model 4

Ref*

1.96 (1.65, 2.33)*

1.39 (1.15, 1.68)*

2.60 (1.88, 3.58)

Women

 Model 1

Ref*

3.75 (2.07, 6.79)*

1.86 (1.38, 2.50)*

9.48 (5.38, 16.71)

 Model 2

Ref*

3.73 (2.06, 6.76)*

1.94 (1.43, 2.63)*

9.81 (5.55, 17.34)

 Model 3

Ref*

3.55 (1.95, 6.47)*

1.91 (1.41, 2.60)*

9.64 (5.43, 17.10)

 Model 4

Ref*

1.74 (0.94, 3.22)*

1.42 (1.09, 1.84)*

4.49 (2.52, 8.01)

Men

 Model 1

Ref*

3.03 (2.57, 3.58)*

1.26 (0.99, 1.59)*

2.46 (1.73, 3.49)

 Model 2

Ref*

3.00 (2.54, 3.54)*

1.27 (1.00, 1.62)*

2.47 (1.73, 3.51)

 Model 3

Ref*

3.05 (2.58, 3.61)*

1.32 (1.03, 1.69)*

2.64 (1.84, 3.79)

 Model 4

Ref*

1.94 (1.62, 2.34)*

1.26 (0.98, 1.62)*

1.85 (1.28, 2.69)

  1. Abbreviations as in Table 2; Model 1 adjusted for sex, age and BMI; Model 2 adjusted for model 1 plus habit of exercise and height. Model 3 adjusted for model 2 plus SBP, smoking status and drinking status. Model 4 adjusted for model 3 plus HbA1c, FPG, TC and HDL-C
  2. *P < 0.05 compared with HTGW phenotype
  3. In the sex subgroup, the sex was not adjusted in the model