Skip to main content

Table 4 Logistic regression analysis of association between FMR and the risk of dyslipidaemia

From: Fat-to-muscle ratio as a predictor for dyslipidaemia in transitional-age youth

Sex

Quintile of the FMR

Crude

Age adjusted

Multivariable a

Men (n = 558)

 

Q1 (n = 112)

Reference

Reference

Reference

 

Q2 (n = 112)

1.56 (0.61–3.98)

1.57 (0.61–4.00)

1.57 (0.61–4.03)

 

Q3 (n = 111)

2.35 (0.97–5.70)

2.35 (0.97–5.71)

2.22 (0.90–5.46)

 

Q4 (n = 112)

3.36 (1.43–7.88)

3.38 (1.44–7.95)

3.29 (1.39–7.81)

 

Q5 (n = 111)

7.91 (3.50–17.88)

7.94 (3.51–17.94)

7.56 (3.29–17.38)

 

χ2 trend

43.049

43.315

51.445

 

P trend

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

Women (n = 1102)

 

Q1 (n = 221)

Reference

Reference

Reference

 

Q2 (n = 220)

0.94 (0.45–1.95)

0.92 (0.44–1.92)

0.74 (0.34–1.60)

 

Q3 (n = 221)

1.35 (0.68–2.65)

1.33 (0.68–2.63)

1.26 (0.63–2.52)

 

Q4 (n = 220)

1.64 (0.85–3.17)

1.62 (0.84–3.13)

1.45 (0.74–2.88)

 

Q5 (n = 220)

3.20 (1.75–5.88)

3.16 (1.72–5.81)

3.04 (1.63–5.67)

 

χ2 trend

25.901

26.148

62.248

 

P trend

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

  1. a Multivariable: age, smoking, drinking, physical activity, level of education, and ethnicity were taken into account
  2. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant