Skip to main content

Table 2 Association of NAFLD with the level of lipid-related parameters

From: Utility of traditional and non-traditional lipid indicators in the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a Japanese population

 

OR (95%CI)

 

Model I

Model II

Model II

TC

1.35 (1.27, 1.43)

1.32 (1.24, 1.41)

1.15 (1.07, 1.23)

HDL-C

0.29 (0.24, 0.35)

0.29 (0.24, 0.35)

0.33 (0.27, 0.40)

LDL-C

1.51 (1.40, 1.62)

1.46 (1.35, 1.57)

1.24 (1.14, 1.34)

TG

2.14 (1.97, 2.32)

2.15 (1.98, 2.34)

1.88 (1.72, 2.05)

Non-HDL-C

1.57 (1.47, 1.67)

1.53 (1.44, 1.64)

1.32 (1.23, 1.41)

RC

14.54 (11.09, 19.06)

14.27 (10.84, 18.78)

8.19 (6.12, 10.94)

TC/HDL-C ratio

1.50 (1.43, 1.58)

1.50 (1.43, 1.57)

1.36 (1.29, 1.43)

TG/HDL-C ratio

1.83 (1.70, 1.97)

1.84 (1.71, 1.98)

1.64 (1.52, 1.77)

LDL-C/HDL-C ratio

1.58 (1.49, 1.68)

1.57 (1.48, 1.67)

1.39 (1.31, 1.49)

Non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio

1.50 (1.43, 1.58)

1.50 (1.43, 1.57)

1.36 (1.29, 1.43)

RC/HDL-C ratio

6.61 (5.38, 8.12)

6.68 (5.41, 8.25)

4.53 (3.63, 5.64)

  1. Abbreviations: OR: Odds ratios; other abbreviations as in Table ​1
  2. Model I adjusted sex, age, height, BMI and WC.
  3. Model II adjusted model I + SBP, DBP, exercise habits, smoking status and Drinking status
  4. Model III adjusted model II + ALT, AST, GGT, FPG and HbA1c.