Skip to main content

Table 2 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the correlation between CVAI and decreased renal function

From: A novel clinical diagnostic marker predicting the relationship between visceral adiposity and renal function evaluated by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in the Chinese physical examination population

CVAI

N

Cases (%)

Crude

Model I

Model II

OR (95%CI)

P value

OR (95%CI)

P value

OR (95%CI)

P value

PerIQR = 59.6

5355

1858 (34.70)

1.95 (1.80,2.11)

< 0.001

1.82 (1.67,1.98)

< 0.001

1.58 (1.43,1.74)

< 0.001

Quartiles

 Q1(≤70.59)

1338

239 (17.90)

1.00 (1.00,1.00)

Ref.

1.00 (1.00,1.00)

Ref.

1.00 (1.00,1.00)

Ref.

 Q2(≤101.93)

1339

435 (32.50)

2.21 (1.85,2.65)

< 0.001

2.05 (1.70,2.46)

< 0.001

1.69 (1.38,2.06)

< 0.001

 Q3(≤130.23)

1339

528 (39.40)

2.99 (2.51,3.58)

< 0.001

2.64 (2.19,3.17)

< 0.001

2.05 (1.67,2.52)

< 0.001

 Q4(≤273.94)

1339

656 (49.00)

4.42 (3.70,5.27)

< 0.001

3.75 (3.10,4.54)

< 0.001

2.77 (2.23,3.44)

< 0.001

Trend test

   

< 0.001

 

< 0.001

 

< 0.001

CVAI < =100

 Yes

2589

648 (25.00)

1.00 (1.00,1.00)

Ref.

1.00 (1.00,1.00)

Ref.

1.00 (1.00,1.00)

Ref.

 No

2766

1210 (43.70)

2.33 (2.07,2.62)

< 0.001

2.00 (1.76,2.26)

< 0.001

1.64 (1.42,1.89)

< 0.001

  1. Abbreviation: 95% CI 95% confidence interval, OR odds ratio, N numbers of subjects in each stratum, Case (%) numbers with 60 ≤ eGFR< 90 and percentage. Model I: adjusted for SBP, FPG, TC, and hs-CRP; Model II: Model I, BUN, uric acid, SCC, SG, CEA, CA211, albumin, and TT3