Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies

From: Lipid accumulation product (LAP) index for the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author, year

Country

Study design

Total case (Female to male ratio)

LAP index in cases; Mean (SD)

Total control

LAP index in control; Mean (SD)

Important inclusion/exclusion criteria

NAFLDdiagnostic method

Sensitivity

Specificity

Cutoff value

NOSscore

Age range (Age mean)

Ching-Lung Cheung [44], 2014

America

LS

1067 (46/54)

91.71 (89.24)

4117

39.74 (54.34)

NR

Ultrasonography

NR

NR

NR

8

20 to 74 (41.42)

DUAN Shaojie [43], 2022

China

CS

426 (24/76)

61.3 (35.29)

282

26.02 (18.88)

NR

Ultrasonography

Men: 63.7 Women: 79.8

Men: 81.1 Women: 85.0

Men: 50.88 Women: 50.91

6

 ≥ 18 (39.16)

EDITH M. KOEHLER [42], 2013

Netherlands

LS

925 (61/39)

58 (30.37)

1727

31 (18.52)

conducted among elderly inhabitants

Ultrasonography

NR

NR

NR

7

NR (76.3)

Evangeline Vassilatou [41], 2018

Greece

CS

132 (100/0-Only female)

61.1 (39.3)

158

23.7 (15.2)

premenopausal women aged 18–45 years

Ultrasonography

NR

NR

NR

6

18–45 (29.8)

Guotai Sheng [22], 2021

Japan

CS

2507 (19/81)

26.96 (18.24)

11,744

7.88 (7.56)

NR

Ultrasonography

83.13

74.04

NR

6

 ≥ 18 (43.53)

Haijiang Dai [45], 2017

China

CS

12,150 (34/66)

58.03 (54.19)

28,309

19.17 (18.12)

NR

Ultrasonography

Men: 77% Women: 82%

Men: 75% Women: 79%

Men: 30.5 Women: 23

6

 ≥ 18 (43.72)

I-Ting Lin [40], 2021

Taiwan

CS

826 (57/43)

51.06 (43.62)

1143

24.62 (22.78)

NR

Ultrasonography

NR

NR

NR

6

NR (54.9)

Kartik Balankhe [27], 2021

India

CS

18 (NR)

53.67 (21.26)

37

45.43 (19.2)

nonobese (BMI < 25 kg/1.76 m2), less than sixty years of age individuals

Ultrasonography

NR

NR

NR

5

 < 60 (43.4)

Katarzyna Kozłowska-Petriczko [39], 2021

Poland

LS

109 (61/39)

76.3 (49.2)

58

24.6 (15.2)

NR

Ultrasonography

93

62

23 (Female) 30.5 (Male)

8

 ≥ 18 (52.6)

Naiade Silveira Almeida [38], 2021

Brazil

CS

50 (68/32)

61.10 (33.40)

57

14.1 (11.11)

NR

Ultrasonography

91

82

26.7

6

18–60 (39.71)

Raika Jamali [26], 2020

Iran

LS

126 (46/54)

110.67 (80.05)

94

103.65 (65.81)

NR

Ultrasonography

NR

NR

NR

8

NR (51.6)

Yan Zhang [37], 2021

China

CS

1573 (68/32)

79.91 (61.7205)

3412

39.36 (38.2212)

Study screened subjects over 65 years

Chinese Diagnostic Criteria

71(F) 79.8(M)

67(F) 70.4 (M)

49.17(Female) 36.15 (Male)

6

66–115 (73.8)

Yiting Liu [36], 2022

China

CS

6293 (32/68)

38.25 (27.57)

8114

12.57 (10.83)

NR

Ultrasonography

82(F) 69 (M)

74(F) 79 (M)

19.2(Female) 27.86 (Male)

6

NR (47)

Liuxin Zhang [35], 2022

China

CS

1169 (14/86)

40.59 (25.55)

2090

16.45 (11.71)

NR

Ultrasonography

75.6 84.4(F) 77 (M)

77.7 77.9(F) 73 (M)

26.9 19.7(Female) 26.9 (Male)

7

NR (40.59)

Xueyu Chen [34], 2022

China

LS

3194 (39/61)

47.0 (32.0)

4044

17.9 (13.64)

NR

Ultrasonography

NR

NR

NR

7

NR (41.6)

Moustafa Abd El Hamid Ali [33], 2022

Egypt

CS

100 (59/41)

113.77 (61.90)

50

18.76 (7.23)

NR

Ultrasonography

100

100

33.2

5

18–75 (42.72)

  1. NOS Newcastle‒Ottawa Scale, LS longitudinal study, CS cross-sectional study, NR not reported