Skip to main content

Table 3 Association between the DII levels and all-cause mortality among patients with hyperlipidaemia, NHANES 2001ā€“2010

From: Correlation between dietary inflammation and mortality among hyperlipidemics

Ā 

Model 1Ā h (95% CI)

P value

Model 2Ā h (95% CI)

P value

Model 3Ā h (95% CI)

P value

Continuous

1.11 (1.08,1.13)ā€‰<ā€‰0.001

1.13 (1.11,1.16)ā€‰<ā€‰0.001

1.06 (1.04,1.08)ā€‰<ā€‰0.001

DII tertile

Ā Ā Ā 

1st tertile

refā€‰=ā€‰1.00

refā€‰=ā€‰1.00

refā€‰=ā€‰1.00

2nd tertile

1.34 (1.22,1.47)ā€‰<ā€‰0.001

1.37 (1.26,1.50)ā€‰<ā€‰0.001

1.19 (1.08,1.30)ā€‰<ā€‰0.001

3rd tertile

1.51 (1.38,1.66)ā€‰<ā€‰0.001

1.61 (1.48,1.76)ā€‰<ā€‰0.001

1.22 (1.11,1.33)ā€‰<ā€‰0.001

P for trend

<ā€‰0.001

<ā€‰0.001

<ā€‰0.001

  1. Complex sampling weights were considered for all analyses in NHANES.
  2. Abbreviations: DII: Dietary Inflammatory Index; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; ref, reference
  3. Model 1: Unadjusted model
  4. Model 2: Adjusted for sex, age and race
  5. Model 3: Confounders such as body mass index, educational level, poverty income ratio, smoker, drinker, estimated glomerular filtration rate, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, anti-diabetic drugs, and anti-hypertensive drugs were further adjusted on the basis of Model 2