Open Access

The I405V and Taq1B polymorphisms of the CETP gene differentially affect sub-clinical carotid atherosclerosis

  • Eliane Soler Parra1,
  • Natália Baratella Panzoldo1,
  • Denise Kaplan1,
  • Helena Coutinho Franco de Oliveira2,
  • José Ernesto dos Santos3,
  • Luiz Sérgio Fernandes de Carvalho4,
  • Andrei Carvalho Sposito4,
  • Magnus Gidlund5,
  • Ruy Tsutomu Nakamura6,
  • Vanessa Helena de Souza Zago1,
  • Edna Regina Nakandakare7,
  • Eder Carlos Rocha Quintão7 and
  • Eliana Cotta de Faria1, 8Email author
Lipids in Health and Disease201211:130

DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-11-130

Received: 26 July 2012

Accepted: 29 September 2012

Published: 5 October 2012

Abstract

Background

Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) plays a major role in lipid metabolism, but studies on the association of CETP polymorphisms with risks of cardiovascular disease are inconsistent. This study investigated whether the CETP gene I405V and Taq1B polymorphisms modified subclinical atherosclerosis in an asymptomatic Brazilian population sample.

Methods

The polymorphisms were analyzed using polymerase chain reaction in 207 adult volunteers. Serum lipid profiles, oxLDL Ab titers, C-reactive protein and tumor necrosis factor-α concentrations and CETP and phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP) activities were determined, and common carotid artery intima-media thickness (cIMT) was measured using ultrasonography.

Results

No differences in cIMT were observed between the presence or absence of the minor B2 and V alleles in either polymorphism. However, inverse correlations between mean cIMT and CETP activity in the presence of these polymorphisms were observed, and positive correlations of these polymorphisms with PLTP activity and oxLDL Ab titers were identified. Moreover, logistic multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of the B2 allele was associated with a 5.1-fold (CI 95%, OR: 1.26 – 21.06) increased risk for cIMT, which was equal and above the 66th percentile and positively interacted with age. However, no associations with the V allele or CETP and PLTP activities were observed.

Conclusions

None of the studied parameters, including CETP activity, explained the different relationships between these polymorphisms and cIMT, suggesting that other non-determined factors were affected by the genotypes and related to carotid atherosclerotic disease.

Keywords

Carotid atherosclerosis Carotid intima-media thickness Cholesteryl ester transfer protein Genetic polymorphism

Background

Atherosclerotic disease is a complex multifactorial process that leads to the deposition and accumulation of cholesterol along the arterial wall[1]. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) plays a major role in cholesterol metabolism[2], and polymorphisms within this gene may underlie the susceptibility to atherosclerosis[3].

The I405V (rs5882) and Taq1B (rs708272) polymorphisms and their respective minor alleles, V and B2, are associated with decreased CETP activity and increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels[4]. However, studies on the association of these polymorphisms with risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD) are inconsistent[5], and their association with subclinical CVD are less well characterized.

Therefore, this study investigated whether I405V and Taq1B polymorphisms modified subclinical atherosclerosis in an asymptomatic Brazilian adult sample population.

Methods

Study subjects

A total of 207 asymptomatic volunteers of both sexes (20–75 years) were recruited at the Lipid Outpatient Clinic at the State University (Unicamp) Hospital in Campinas, SP, Brazil.

The following exclusion criteria were used: body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2; a diagnosis of endocrinological, liver or kidney disease; use of drugs that alter the lipid profile; excessive use of alcohol (>75 g/day)[6]; meeting the “present CVD” criteria (acute myocardial infarction and angina pectoris, as established by electrocardiogram, cardiac-specific enzyme levels, coronary angiography and/or a history of coronary angioplasty or myocardial revascularization).

The local Medical School Ethics Committee approved this study, and all participants signed an informed consent form.

Biochemical analysis

The following blood measurements were performed using Roche Diagnostics (Mannheim, Germany) reagents in an automated system: total cholesterol (CHOD-PAP), triglycerides (TG, GPO-PAP), HDL-C (HDL-C plus 3rd generation), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C plus 2nd generation for TG >400 mg/dL and Friedewald’s equation for TG ≤ 400 mg/dL). Apolipoproteins AI (NAS-ApoA1), B100 (NAS-ApoB) and lipoprotein (a) were obtained from Siemens (USA). C-reactive protein (CRP) was measured using the Tina-quant® CRP (latex) high sensitivity assay (Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland). Plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) were measured using ELISA (Cayman Chemical, USA).

HDL2 and HDL3 sub-fractions were obtained using sequential micro-ultracentrifugation[7].

CETP[8] and phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP) activities[9] in plasma were determined using radioassays with exogenous substrates.

Antibodies against oxidized LDL (oxLDL Ab) titers were determined using an in-house ELISA[10].

Polymorphism detection

Genomic DNA was extracted[11] and amplified using polymerase chain reaction to identify the Taq1B[12] and I405V[13] polymorphisms.

Measurement of cIMT

A single trained sonographer, who was blind to the subject’s identity, performed high-resolution B-mode common carotid ultrasonography using a 6–9 MHz linear array ultrasound imaging system (ATL HDI 1500 Ultrasound System, Advanced Technology Laboratories Ultrasound, USA). Longitudinal measurements of segments of the common carotid arteries at the distal wall and 1 cm from the bifurcation were performed according to a standardized method[14]. The mean common carotid artery intima-media thickness (cIMT) was calculated as the average of five measurements on each side (right and left) and expressed in millimeters.

Statistical analysis

Mann–Whitney U and Chi-Squared tests compared variables, and the Spearman test was performed for correlations. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, with stepwise criteria of the variables of interest, the presence of the V and B2 allele, gender, age, HDL-C, BMI and systolic blood pressure (SBP), were performed to verify the relationships of these variables with higher cIMT values, which was defined as above or below the established cutoff value of 0.795 mm and corresponding to cIMT equal and above the 66th percentile values of the studied population.

All the analyses were performed using the SAS®, version 9.1.3 and SPSS 11.5 for Windows. Haploview, v 4.2© was used for the linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis[15].

Results

The frequencies of I405V and Taq1B genotypes in our population sample, represented by the presence (VV, IV) and absence (II) of the V allele and the presence (B2B2, B1B2) and absence (B1B1) of the B2 allele, are presented in Table 1. The frequencies of the II, IV and VV genotypes were 28%, 53% and 19%, respectively, and the frequencies of the B1B1, B1B2 and B2B2 were 33%, 41% and 26%, respectively.
Table 1

Biochemical parameters in the presence and absence of minor alleles

Parameters

A. I405V Genotypes

 

II

V carriers

p value ≤

 

(n=32-59)

(n=70-148)

 

Frequency (%)

29

71

 

CETP (%)

14.5 ± 9.0

11.0 ± 7.2

0.015

HDL-C (mg/dL)

72 ± 24

74 ± 18

0.192

HDL 2 -C (mg/dL)

15 ± 6

17 ± 6

0.030

PLTP (%)

22.3 ± 11.9

15.8 ± 9.9

0.001

Lipoprotein (a) (mg/dL)

27 ± 30

32 ± 36

0.477

OxLDL Ab (OD)

0.33 ± 0.16

0.38 ± 0.19

0.405

Parameters

B. Taq1B Genotypes

 

B1B1

B2 carriers

p value ≤

 

(n=32-68)

(n=70-139)

 

Frequency (%)

33

67

 

CETP (%)

13.4 ± 8.2

11.3 ± 7.7

0.103

HDL-C (mg/dL)

74 ± 26

73 ± 16

0.584

HDL2-C (mg/dL)

17 ± 6

17 ± 5

0.657

PLTP (%)

17 ± 11

18 ± 11

0.860

Lipoprotein (a) (mg/dL)

24 ± 30

33 ± 36

0.014

oxLDL Ab (OD)

0.33 ± 0.17

0.38 ± 0.18

0.230

Data are presented as means ± standard deviation; (sample number): n = minimum and maximum of subjects with determined parameters; p values: Mann–Whitney U test for comparisons between the presence and absence of the minor alleles (V and B2). Significant differences: p≤0.05 in bold. CETP (%) = activity of cholesterol ester transfer protein; HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; PLTP (%) = activity of phospholipid transfer protein; oxLDL Ab = antibodies against oxidized LDL titers; (OD)= optical density.

Allele frequencies were consistent with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium for the I405V polymorphism (p=0.36) but not the Taq1B (p=0.02), and the MAFs (minor allele frequency) were <45% and <46%, respectively. The linkage disequilibrium between the two polymorphisms was very weak, as evidenced by the D`=0.17.

Clinical and anthropometric characteristics and biochemical data of the investigated population are presented in Tables 2 and1.
Table 2

Clinical and anthropometric characteristics in the presence and absence of minor alleles

Parameters

A. I405V Genotypes

 

II

V carriers

p value ≤

 

(n=34-59)

(n=83-148)

 

Age (years)

47 ± 14

49 ± 15

NS

Male (%)

24

26

NS

BMI (kg/m 2 )

25 ± 6

25 ± 5

NS

WC (cm)

76 ± 11

81 ± 12

0.008

SBP (mmHg)

120 ± 13

127 ± 16

0.002

DBP (mmHg)

77 ± 10

82 ± 10

0.001

Mean cIMT (mm)

0.74 ± 0.19

0.79 ± 0.23

NS

Parameters

B. Taq1B genotypes

 

B1B1

B2 carriers

p value ≤

 

(n=37-68)

(n=80-139)

 

Age (years)

49 ± 15

48 ± 14

NS

Male (%)

35

21

0.026

BMI (kg/m 2 )

25 ± 4

25 ± 6

NS

WC (cm)

81 ± 12

79 ± 12

NS

SBP (mmHg)

127 ± 14

124 ± 16

NS

DBP (mmHg)

82 ± 11

79 ± 10

NS

Mean cIMT (mm)

0.73 ± 0.20

0.79 ± 0.23

NS

Data presented as means ± standard deviation; (sample number): n = minimum and maximum of subjects with determined parameters; p values = Mann–Whitney U test for comparisons between the presence and absence of the alleles (V and B2); gender comparisons, Chi-Square test. Significant differences: p≤0.05 in bold. BMI= Body Mass Index; WC= waist circumference; SBP= systolic blood pressure; DBP= diastolic blood pressure; cIMT= carotid intima-media thickness.

Table 3 presents the significant correlations between mean cIMT, oxLDL Ab titers and CETP and PLTP activities.
Table 3

Significant correlations between cIMT, oxLDL Ab, CETP (%) and PLTP (%) in the presence of minor alleles

cIMT versus

V carriers

cIMT versus

B2 carriers

 

r

p value ≤

 

r

p value ≤

CETP (%) n=88

−0.363

0.0001

CETP (%) n=87

−0.427

0.0001

oxLDL Ab (OD) n=54

0.409

0.002

oxLDL Ab (OD) n=51

0.432

0.002

PLTP (%) n=85

0.322

0.003

PLTP (%) n=84

0.315

0.004

r= Spearman´s coefficient; Significant differences: p≤0.05 in bold. cIMT= carotid intima-media thickness; oxLDL Ab= antibodies against oxidized LDL titers; (OD) = optical density; CETP(%) = activity of cholesteryl ester transfer protein; PLTP (%) = activity of phospholipid transfer protein.

The univariate analyses (Table 4) indicated that the female gender, age, HDL-C, BMI and SBP were significantly associated (p value ≤0.05) with higher cIMT.
Table 4

Univariate Logistic Regression analyses for higher cIMT (above 66 percentile) ( n= 118)

Variables

Categories

p value ≤

OR

CI 95% OR

Presence of V allele

No (ref).

0.303

1.00

Yes

 

1.57

0.67 – 3.69

Presence of B2 allele

No (ref).

0.150

1.00

Yes

 

1.87

0.80 – 4.36

Gender

Male (ref.)

 

1.00

 

Female

0.048

2.48

1.01 – 6.10

Age (years)

(cont).

0.001

1.195

1.116 – 1.279

HDL-C (mg/dL)

(cont).

0.035

1.024

1.002 – 1.047

BMI (kg/m 2 )

(cont).

0.009

1.105

1.025 – 1.191

SBP (mmHg)

(cont).

0.003

1.043

1.014 – 1.072

cIMT below and above the 66th percentile, <0.795 (n=76) and >0.795 (n=42), respectively. (ref).=reference level. (cont).= continue variable. OR= Odds ratio for higher cIMT, above the 66th percentile value (0.795 mm), CI 95% OR= Confidence interval of 95% for the Odds ratio. Significant differences: p≤0.05 in bold; B2 = minor allele of Taq1B polymorphism, V = minor allele of I405V polymorphism, HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, BMI: body mass index, SBP: systolic blood pressure.

The multivariate analysis (Table 5) demonstrated that age and the presence of the B2 allele were positively related to higher cIMT. Individuals with increased risk exhibited the B2 allele (5.1-fold increase) and higher age (21.2% increase/each year of age).
Table 5

Multivariate Logistic Regression* analyses for higher cIMT (above 66 th percentile) ( n= 114)

Variables

Categories

p value ≤

OR

CI 95% OR

Age (years)

(cont).

0.001

1.212

1.126 – 1.304

Presence of B2 allele

No (ref).

0.023

1.00

 

Yes

 

5.14

1.26 – 21.06

*Stepwise criteria for selection of variables. cIMT below and above 66th percentile, <0.795 (n=73) and >0.795 (n=41), respectively. (ref).= reference level; (cont).=continue variable. OR= Odds ratio for higher cIMT above the 66th percentile value (0.795 mm), CI 95% OR= Confidence interval of 95% for Odds ratio. Significant differences: p≤0.05 in bold; B2 = minor allele of Taq1B polymorphism.

A Chi-Square analysis indicated an interaction between the presence of the B2 allele and age. The combination between age, categorized in ≥ and <50 years (median value), and the presence or absence B2 allele formed 4 groups of individuals who were crossed with cIMTs above and below 0.795 mm (data not shown).

Discussion

This study investigated whether the I405V and Taq1B polymorphisms modify subclinical atherosclerosis in an asymptomatic population sample.

Previous studies present controversial data on the role of Taq1B and I405V in atherosclerosis and CVD. The B2 allele is associated with lower internal carotid artery IMT in men[16], but other studies do not identify associations between the Taq1B polymorphism and cIMT[17, 18]. The present study demonstrated that cIMT did not differ between either allele of the polymorphisms. However, inverse correlations between cIMT and CETP activity were demonstrated in both polymorphisms (Table 3), which suggest a potential atheroprotective role for CETP in these individuals. A potential anti-inflammatory role for CETP was demonstrated previously[19] wherein the induction of acute inflammation produced lower mortality due to sepsis and lower cytokine circulation in mice that express human CETP. Reductions in CETP concentrations in human patients with sepsis are more pronounced in non-survivors[20].

We identified positive correlations between cIMT and PLTP and oxLDL Ab in the presence of the V and B2 alleles. Previous studies have suggested that PLTP increases the risk of cardiovascular disease in humans[21], and the balance of evidence suggests a pro-atherogenic role for oxLDL Ab titers[22] in the development of atherosclerosis. These positive correlations and the lack of correlations of these variables in both common B1B1 and II allele homozygotes (CETP p≤0.318 and 0.091, oxLDL Ab p≤ 0.709 and 0.386 and PLTP p≤0.823 and 0.470, respectively) (data not shown) suggest a possible pro-atherogenic role of these markers associated with the polymorphisms. Our sample size was relatively small and different between groups. Therefore, further studies are underway in our lab to further confirm these correlations.

The presence of the V allele was associated with lower CETP (24%) and PLTP (29%) activities and higher HDL2-C (13%) concentrations. Patients with coronary disease typically exhibit fewer large HDL particles (HDL2), and the concentration of these large particles is a better predictor of future cardiovascular events than HDL-C concentration[23].

Lipoprotein (a) plasma levels were also significantly increased in the presence of the B2 allele. High levels of lipoprotein (a) are significantly associated with the presence, severity and extent of carotid atherosclerosis[24], but this increase was not observed as a possible pro-atherogenic factor.

No significant differences in CETP activity and HDL-C levels were observed in Taq1B polymorphism, despite a 15.4% reduction in CETP activity in presence of the B2 allele. These results are consistent with a previous study in another Brazilian population, in which no association between Taq1B genotypes and HDL-C levels was observed[25].

A univariate analysis (Table 4) followed by a multivariate logistic stepwise analysis (Table 5) demonstrated that the presence of the B2 allele was independently associated with a mean 5.1-fold increased risk for higher cIMT and age interacted with the allele effect. The presence of the B2 allele in the ≥ 50 years age group exhibited the highest risk of higher cIMT in the Chi-Square analysis (data not shown).

The effects of the Taq1B variant on circulating plasma lipids may be related to other functional mutations within the CETP gene locus that are in LD[26], which may explain the association in our study. However, other factors than the CETP activity may exert different atherosclerotic repercussions in Taq1B and I405V polymorphisms. A multivariate analysis was performed to verify the independence of the associations between the qualitative binary variable cIMT above or below 66th percentile (0.795mm), CETP and PLTP plasma activities and the potential confounding factors, including gender, age, BMI, SBP and HDL-C. Only age exhibited a significant statistical association (OR: 1.247, CI 95%OR: 1.129 – 1.377), which was a strong determinant of cIMT (data not shown). The absence of interactions of other tested parameters with higher cIMT in this study suggests that other non-determined factors were affected by the genotypes and related to carotid atherosclerotic disease.

Our results focused on several biomarkers that were assessed for the first time in the Brazilian population, and the results were partially based on the correlations between a relatively small numbers of individuals. These results merit further exploration due to the high frequency of the investigated polymorphisms in the present Brazilian sample. Identifying the impact of these polymorphisms is an ongoing aim of our research group.

Conclusions

The I405V and Taq1B polymorphisms were differently associated with subclinical atherosclerosis because only the presence of the minor B2 allele, but not the V allele, was independently associated with higher cIMT. We demonstrated that none of the studied parameters explained the different relationships between these polymorphisms and cIMT, which leads us to speculate that the association between the B2 allele and cIMT is due to other non-studied factors. Ongoing studies are underway in our laboratory to determine the modulation factors that are involved.

Misc

Eliane Soler Parra and Natália Baratella Panzoldo contributed equally to this manuscript.

Abbreviations

CETP: 

Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein

HDL-C: 

High-Density Lipoproteins Cholesterol

CVD: 

Cardiovascular Disease

BMI: 

Body Mass Index

TG: 

TriGlycerides

LDL-C: 

Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Apo: 

Apolipoprotein

CRP: 

C-Reactive Protein

TNF-α: 

Tumor Necrosis Factor-α

PLTP: 

Phospholipid Transfer Protein

oxLDL Ab: 

Antibodies titers against oxidized LDL

cIMT: 

common Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness

SBP: 

Systolic Blood Pressure

LD: 

Linkage Disequilibrium

MAF: 

Minor Allele Frequency.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors thank “Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo- FAPESP” (grant number 2006/60585-9) and “Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior- CAPES” for the financial support; Mirian Danelon, from the Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory, and Aparecida Sousa from the Lipids Laboratory/Núcleo de Medicina e Cirurgia Experimental of the School of Medical Sciences (FCM)/Unicamp for the technical support; Helymar Machado from FCM´s Research Chamber for the statistical analysis.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Lipids Laboratory, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas
(2)
Lipids Laboratory, Biology Institute, State University of Campinas
(3)
Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo
(4)
Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas
(5)
Imunology Department, University of São Paulo
(6)
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas
(7)
Lipids Laboratory (LIM 10), Faculty of Medical Sciences of the University of São Paulo
(8)
Departamento de Patologia Clínica, FCM-UNICAMP

References

  1. Glass CK, Witztum JL: Atherosclerosis the road ahead. Cell. 2001, 104: 503-516. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00238-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Parra ES, Urban A, Panzoldo NB, Nakamura RT, Oliveira R, De Faria EC: A reduction of CETP activity, not an increase, is associated with modestly impaired postprandial lipemia and increased HDL-cholesterol in adult asymptomatic women. Lipids Health Dis. 2011, 10: 87- 10.1186/1476-511X-10-87PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kolovou G, Vasiliadis I, Kolovou V, Karakosta A, Mavrogeni S, Papadopoulou E, Papamentzelopoulos S, Giannakopoulou V, Marvaki A, Degiannis D, Bilianou H: The role of common variants of the cholesteryl ester transfer protein gene in left main coronary artery disease. Lipids Health Dis. 2011, 10: 156- 10.1186/1476-511X-10-156PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boekholdt SM, Thompson JF: Natural genetic variation as a tool in understanding the role of CETP in lipid levels and disease. J Lipid Res. 2003, 44: 1080-1093. 10.1194/jlr.R200018-JLR200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Oliveira HC, De Faria EC: Cholesteryl ester transfer protein: the controversial relation to atherosclerosis and emerging new biological roles. IUBMB Life. 2011, 63: 248-257. 10.1002/iub.448View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Savolainen MJ, Hannuksela M, Seppanen S, Kervinen K, Kesaniemi YA: Increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration in alcoholics is related to low cholesteryl ester transfer protein activity. Eur J Clin Invest. 1990, 20: 593-599.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Eyre J, Hammett F, Miller NE: A micro-method for the rapid ultracentrifugal separation of human plasma high density lipoprotein subfractions, HDL2 and HDL3. Clin Chim Acta. 1981, 114: 225-231. 10.1016/0009-8981(81)90395-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lagrost L: Determination of the mass concentration and the activity of the plasma cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP). Methods Mol Biol. 1998, 110: 231-241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Damen J, Regts J, Scherphof G: Transfer of [14C]phosphatidylcholine between liposomes and human plasma high density lipoprotein. Partial purification of a transfer-stimulating plasma factor using a rapid transfer assay. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1982, 712: 444-452. 10.1016/0005-2760(82)90271-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gidlund M, Damasceno NR, Lindoso JA, Abdalla DS, Goto H: Monoclonal antibodies against low density lipoprotein with various degrees of oxidative modifications. Braz J Med Biol Res. 1996, 29: 1625-1628.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Salazar LA, Melo CE, Cavalli SA, Hinuy HM, Hirata MH, Hirata RDC: Micrométodo para extraçäo de DNA genômico útil no diagnóstico molecular da Hipercolesterolemia Familial. Rev bras anal clin. 2001, 33: 111-116.Google Scholar
  12. Fumeron F, Betoulle D, Luc G, Behague I, Ricard S, Poirier O, Jemaa R, Evans A, Arveiler D, Marques-Vidal P: Alcohol intake modulates the effect of a polymorphism of the cholesteryl ester transfer protein gene on plasma high density lipoprotein and the risk of myocardial infarction. J Clin Invest. 1995, 96: 1664-1671. 10.1172/JCI118207PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gudnason V, Kakko S, Nicaud V, Savolainen MJ, Kesaniemi YA, Tahvanainen E, Humphries S: Cholesteryl ester transfer protein gene effect on CETP activity and plasma high-density lipoprotein in European populations. The EARS Group. Eur J Clin Invest. 1999, 29: 116-128. 10.1046/j.1365-2362.1999.00412.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Simons PC, Algra A, Bots ML, Grobbee DE, Van der Graaf Y: Common carotid intima-media thickness and arterial stiffness: indicators of cardiovascular risk in high-risk patients. The SMART Study (Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease). Circulation. 1999, 100: 951-957. 10.1161/01.CIR.100.9.951View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ: Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21: 263-265. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Elosua R, Cupples LA, Fox CS, Polak JF, D'Agostino RA, Wolf PA, O'Donnell CJ, Ordovas JM: Association between well-characterized lipoprotein-related genetic variants and carotid intimal medial thickness and stenosis: The Framingham Heart Study. Atherosclerosis. 2006, 189: 222-228. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.12.005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Soyal SM, Sandhofer A, Hahne P, Oberkofler H, Felder T, Iglseder B, Miller K, Krempler F, Patsch JR, Paulweber B, Patsch W: Cholesteryl ester transfer protein and hepatic lipase gene polymorphisms: Effects on hepatic mRNA levels, plasma lipids and carotid atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2011, 216: 374-380. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.01.052View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Tsai MY, Johnson C, Kao WH, Sharrett AR, Arends VL, Kronmal R, Jenny NS, Jacobs DR, Arnett D, O' Leary D, Post W: Cholesteryl ester transfer protein genetic polymorphisms, HDL cholesterol, and subclinical cardiovascular disease in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2008, 200: 359-367. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.12.038PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cazita PM, Barbeiro DF, Moretti AI, Quintao EC, Soriano FG: Human cholesteryl ester transfer protein expression enhances the mouse survival rate in an experimental systemic inflammation model: a novel role for CETP. Shock. 2008, 30: 590-595. 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31816e30fdView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Grion CM, Cardoso LT, Perazolo TF, Garcia AS, Barbosa DS, Morimoto HK, Matsuo T, Carrilho AJ: Lipoproteins and CETP levels as risk factors for severe sepsis in hospitalized patients. Eur J Clin Invest. 2010, 40: 330-338. 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2010.02269.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jarvik GP, Rajagopalan R, Rosenthal EA, Wolfbauer G, McKinstry L, Vaze A, Brunzell J, Motulsky AG, Nickerson DA, Heagerty PJ: Genetic and nongenetic sources of variation in phospholipid transfer protein activity. J Lipid Res. 2010, 51: 983-990. 10.1194/jlr.M000125PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen HW, Kuo CL, Huang CS, Kuo SJ, Liu CS: Oxidized low-density lipoproteins, autoantibodies against oxidized low-density lipoproteins and carotid intima media thickness in a clinically healthy population. Cardiology. 2008, 110: 252-259. 10.1159/000112409View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Asztalos BF, Collins D, Cupples LA, Demissie S, Horvath KV, Bloomfield HE, Robins SJ, Schaefer EJ: Value of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) subpopulations in predicting recurrent cardiovascular events in the Veterans Affairs HDL Intervention Trial. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005, 25: 2185-2191. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000183727.90611.4fView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim BS, Jung HS, Bang OY, Chung CS, Lee KH, Kim GM: Elevated serum lipoprotein(a) as a potential predictor for combined intracranial and extracranial artery stenosis in patients with ischemic stroke. Atherosclerosis. 2010, 212: 682-688. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.07.007View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Relvas WG, Izar MC, Helfenstein T, Fonseca MI, Colovati M, Oliveira A, Ihara SS, Han SW, Las Casas AA, Fonseca FA: Relationship between gene polymorphisms and prevalence of myocardial infarction among diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. Atherosclerosis. 2005, 178: 101-105. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2004.05.025View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Klerkx AH, Tanck MW, Kastelein JJ, Molhuizen HO, Jukema JW, Zwinderman AH, Kuivenhoven JA: Haplotype analysis of the CETP gene: not TaqIB, but the closely linked -629C–>A polymorphism and a novel promoter variant are independently associated with CETP concentration. Hum Mol Genet. 2003, 12: 111-123. 10.1093/hmg/ddg013View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Parra et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement