The application of visceral adiposity index in identifying type 2 diabetes risks based on a prospective cohort in China
- Chen Chen†1, 2,
- Yan Xu†3,
- Zhi-rong Guo4,
- Jie Yang2,
- Ming Wu1, 2, 6Email author and
- Xiao-shu Hu1, 5, 6Email author
© Chen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 9 March 2014
Accepted: 1 July 2014
Published: 8 July 2014
Visceral adiposity index (VAI), a novel sex-specific index for visceral fat measurement, has been proposed recently. We evaluate the efficacy of VAI in identifying diabetes risk in Chinese people, and compare the predictive ability between VAI and other body fatness indices, i.e., waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI) and waist- to- height ratio (WHtR).
Participants (n = 3,461) were recruited from an ongoing cohort study in Jiangsu Province, China. Hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) between diabetes risk and different body fatness indices were evaluated by Cox proportional hazard regression model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under curve (AUC) were applied to compare the ability of identifying diabetes risk between VAI, WC, WHtR and BMI.
A total number of 160 new diabetic cases occurred during the follow-up, with an incidence of 4.6%. Significant positive associations were observed for VAI with blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose, triglyceride, WC, BMI and WHtR. Moreover, increased VAI was observed to be associated with higher diabetes risk with a positive dose–response trend (p for trend < 0.001). As compared to individuals with the lowest VAI, those who had the highest VAI were at 2.55-fold risk of diabetes (95% CI: 1.58-4.11). The largest AUC was observed for VAI, following by WC, WHtR and BMI.
VAI is positively associated with the risk of diabetes. Compared to other indices for body fatness measurements, VAI is a better and convenience surrogate marker for visceral adipose measurement and could be used in identifying the risk of diabetes in large-scale epidemiologic studies.
KeywordsDiabetes Visceral adiposity index Body mass index Waist circumference Waist-to-height ratio
Diabetes has become a worldwide public health problem seriously threatening human health. There was a rapid rising trend in the prevalence of diabetes in China during the past decades. The results of 2007–2008 National Diabetic Epidemiological Survey showed that the prevalence of diabetes in China was 9.7%, and estimated that the number of Chinese diabetic patients is 92.4 million, which indicates that China is not only a region with the fastest growing speed of diabetes, but also is the country with the largest diabetes population.
Many studies have confirmed that obesity plays an important role in the development of diabetes. Excess fat may lead to insulin resistance (IR) and abnormal glucose metabolism[4, 5]. Oti et al. found that obesity is closely related to high blood glucose particularly among African women. Matsuda summarized that adipose tissue is a main source of reactive oxygen species, which may contribute to the development of obesity-associated IR and cause type 2 diabetes as a consequence. However, obese people may vary in their body fat distribution and disease risk, and regional adipose tissue distribution was found as a key role in explaining the relationship between adiposity and glycometabolism. It is reported that individuals with high visceral adiposity are associated with increased risks of IR and metabolic disorders, and are more likely to suffer from diabetes[8, 9]. Bu et al. found that average IR in visceral obesity group was significant higher than that in non-obese group.
In most studies, body fat was measured by waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), but these indices are not able to distinguish between subcutaneous fat and visceral fat. For instance, even with BMI in normal range, individuals may still have high level of visceral adipose tissue (VAT). For measuring the volume of visceral fat, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) has been recognized as the gold standard for quantitative detection, however, these two methods are inconvenience and expensive, and are obviously not suitable for large-scale epidemiological studies. Recently, Amato et al. proposed a novel sex-specific index for visceral fat measurement, which is calculated on the basis of WC, BMI, triglyceride (TG) and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and is termed as visceral adiposity index (VAI). They observed that VAI was highly correlated with body visceral adiposity measured by MRI. VAI combined both physical and metabolic parameters to evaluate body fatness, which may reflect visceral adiposity better than other indices. Bozorgmanesh et al. found that VAI has good prediction effect on diabetes in Tehran people. Although VAI has been suggested as a useful and convince surrogate marker for visceral adiposity, it’s efficacy in predicting diabetes risk still needs to be further confirmed, moreover, no previous studies have been conducted among Chinese population. In this study, we took advantage of an ongoing prospective study in Jiangsu Province, China; it aims to further evaluate the efficacy of using VAI to identify diabetes risk in Chinese people, and to compare the risk predictive ability between VAI and other body fatness indices, i.e., WC, BMI and WHtR.
Materials and methods
The study of Prevention of Multiple Metabolic Disorders and Metabolic Syndrome in Jiangsu Province is an ongoing prospective cohort study aimed to estimate the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS) and the incidence of type 2 diabetes in Jiangsu Province, China. The study design has been previously described in detail[15–18]. Briefly, this cohort has been established since early 2000s in Jiangsu. A total number of 6,400 participants aged 35–74 years was randomly selected for the baseline survey by a multi-stage sampling method, and 92% of them (n = 5,888) completed the first round survey.
During 2006–2009, subjects (n = 4,582) who had already been followed up for more than 5 years were invited for the second round survey and 3,847 subjects participated. As the primary endpoint of this study was the occurrence of diabetes, we excluded subjects who have been diagnosed with diabetes at baseline. In total, 3,461 subjects completed the follow-up and were involved in the present analysis. The study was approved by the ethical committee of Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention.
With written informed consent, a pre-tested questionnaire was used to collect epidemiologic information by trained interviewers. The information obtained including demographic information, lifestyle risk factors, personal medical history and family history of diabetes (DM-FH).
Anthropometric measurements were conducted at the time of interview including weight, height, WC and blood pressure. Body weight and height were measured by standard methods, and recorded to the nearest 0.1 kg and 0.1 cm, respectively. BMI was calculated as the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters. WC was measured two times at 1 cm above the umbilicus level at minimal respiration. WHtR was calculated as dividing WC by height. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were examined 3 times at 30-second intervals by trained doctors, using a standardized mercury sphygmomanometer on the right arm after resting for 5 minutes in a sitting position.
Blood samples were collected in the morning after at least 8 hours of overnight fasting. All plasma and serum samples were frozen at -80°C until laboratory test was performed. Laboratory tests were conducted in qualified labs in Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, including fasting plasma glucose (FPG), TG, HDL-C. FPG was measured by an enzymatic colorimetric method with glucose oxidize. HDL-C and TG were assessed enzymatically using an automatic biochemistry analyzer (Hitachi Inc, Tokyo, Japan) and commercial reagents.
Diabetes diagnostic criteria
All newly occurred diabetes patients during the follow-up period were diagnosed according to the criteria of WHO, 1999: FPG no less than 7 mmol/L (or 126 mg/dL), or have been diagnosed as diabetes by a county level hospital or above.
Data were entered into the computer double parallel using Epidata 3.0, cleaned and analyzed using SPSS 17.0. The start of follow-up was defined as the date of first round survey; for newly occurred diabetic patients, follow-up ended at the time of diabetes occurrence. Mean and standard deviation (SD) were calculated for continuous variables. Analysis of variance was used for comparison between groups if they were in normal distribution. For variables in skewed distribution, we calculated their medians and inter-quartile ranges, and used rank sum test for the comparison between groups. Categorical variables were calculated for percentages and chi-square test was used for statistical analysis.
Confounders were selected based on previous knowledge on diabetes risk factors and our preliminary analysis, including age, gender, smoking, alcohol drinking, SBP, DBP and DM-FH.
VAI = 1 stands for subjects are healthy, non-obese, with normal adipose distribution and normal TG and HDL-C levels.
In the present analysis, VAI was grouped by quartiles (the cut-off point was selected from general population without diabetes). According to Cooperative Meta-analysis Group of China Obesity Task Force, BMI were divided into three groups, normal (<24 kg/m2), overweight (24–27.9 kg/m2) and obesity (≥28 kg/m2). Cut-off point of WC for men and women were 85 cm and 80 cm, respectively. WHtR less than 0.5 was considered as normal. Hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by Cox proportional hazard regression model to evaluate the associations between different body fatness indices and diabetes risk. Dummy variables were used to calculate HR for each categorical variable. The trend test was performed by assigning scores to different categorical variables and treated the categorical variables as continuous variables in the Cox regression model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied to compare the predictive effect between VAI, WC, WHtR and BMI for diabetes risk. The area under curve (AUC) was calculated for comparison between four body fatness indices. Significant level for statistics analysis was set as p < 0.05.
The epidemiologic characteristic of study participants by gender
(N = 1,406)
(N = 2,055)
(N = 3,461)
Mean ± SD
50.60 ± 9.80
49.95 ± 10.07
50.21 ± 9.97
45 ~ 54
Mean ± SD
126.61 ± 19.57
124.84 ± 19.92
125.56 ± 19.79
Mean ± SD
81.39 ± 11.26
78.63 ± 10.46
79.75 ± 10.87
Mean ± SD
5.11 ± 0.63
5.17 ± 0.64
5.15 ± 0.63
Characteristics of metabolic variables in different VAI groups
p for trend
125.08 ± 19.95
125.43 ± 19.08
127.04 ± 18.90
131.29 ± 19.56
119.58 ± 17.50
122.85 ± 18.38
125.06 ± 19.95
128.76 ± 21.32
123.00 ± 19.24
123.97 ± 18.72
125.67 ± 19.65
129.45 ± 20.87
79.52 ± 11.35
80.70 ± 11.10
82.22 ± 10.85
85.59 ± 10.58
75.13 ± 9.80
77.46 ± 9.65
79.23 ± 10.29
80.68 ± 10.97
77.86 ± 10.99
78.87 ± 10.43
80.14 ± 10.55
82.02 ± 11.08
5.10 ± 0.63
5.02 ± 0.58
5.14 ± 0.65
5.26 ± 0.67
5.18 ± 0.66
5.10 ± 0.61
5.13 ± 0.63
5.27 ± 0.65
5.12 ± 0.63
5.07 ± 0.60
5.13 ± 0.63
5.26 ± 0.65
1.54 ± 0.37
1.21 ± 0.23
1.09 ± 0.25
0.95 ± 0.27
1.65 ± 0.32
1.39 ± 0.26
1.22 ± 0.23
1.01 ± 0.20
1.58 ± 0.36
1.31 ± 0.26
1.18 ± 0.24
0.99 ± 0.23
72.76 ± 7.20
77.23 ± 8.26
81.11 ± 8.69
84.47 ± 8.52
69.40 ± 6.87
72.87 ± 7.85
76.57 ± 8.65
80.51 ± 8.80
71.50 ± 7.26
74.76 ± 8.31
77.95 ± 8.91
81.59 ± 8.90
BMI (kg/m 2 )
21.15 ± 2.49
22.40 ± 2.84
23.47 ± 2.83
24.77 ± 3.06
21.61 ± 2.86
22.37 ± 3.08
23.38 ± 3.37
24.54 ± 3.17
21.32 ± 2.64
22.38 ± 2.98
23.41 ± 3.22
24.60 ± 3.14
0.44 ± 0.04
0.47 ± 0.05
0.49 ± 0.05
0.51 ± 0.05
0.45 ± 0.04
0.47 ± 0.05
0.49 ± 0.05
0.52 ± 0.06
0.44 ± 0.04
0.47 ± 0.05
0.49 ± 0.05
0.52 ± 0.06
The incidence and HR (95% CI) of diabetes risk with different body fatness indices groups
HRcru (95% CI)
HRadj* (95% CI)
1.26 (0.73- 2.18)
HR for trend
( p < 0.001)
BMI (kg/m 2 )
HR for trend
( p = 0.102)
For BMI, WC and WHtR, significant association was observed between diabetes and WC (HRadj = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.04-2.10) and WHtR (HRadj = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.03-1.97); however, an insignificant relationship was observed for diabetes with BMI (HRadj = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.83-1.36).
Comparison of AUC and corresponding 95% CI between VAI, WC, WHtR and BMI
AUC (95% CI)
In this prospective cohort study, we confirmed that obesity is an important risk factor of type 2 diabetes among a Chinese population, and found the increase of visceral adiposity was positively associated with metabolic disorders and diabetes risk with clear dose–response relationships. Compared to other body fatness indices, VAI was observed to be better in identifying the risk of diabetes than BMI, WC and WHtR.
The strong relationship between obesity and diabetes has been reported by many studies. Some researchers even use the term “diabesity” to describe their close associations. Yang SL et al. found that people with large WC has 3.79-fold risk of diabetes than those whose WC were normal. Yang WY et al. reported that the prevalence of diabetes in overweight group was 43% higher than that of normal people, and about 70% diabetes patients whose BMI were more than 25 kg/m2. Clinical trials showed that even 5% weight loss was sufficient to prevent most obese subjects from impaired glucose tolerance and developing diabetes, especially for abdominal obesity.
The main harm caused by obesity is visceral adipose accumulation. He et al. found that among men with normal WC, the incidence of MS in visceral obese people was significantly higher than that of normal group. Fox et al. reported that both subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue (SAT) and VAT were associated with increased odds ratio (OR) of MS. In women, the OR for VAT (OR = 4.7) was stronger than that for SAT (OR = 3.0); similar difference was shown for men (OR for VAT = 4.2; OR for SAT = 2.5). The molecular mechanism underlying this is unclear yet. It has been suggested that compared with subcutaneous fat, high visceral fat produces more free fatty acid, thus will increase the risk of IR and diabetes[8, 28]. Fontana et al. reported that visceral adipose can secrete a large number of inflammatory cytokines, cells and adipokines, which may play important roles in the occurrence of IR and diabetes. Liu et al. observed that visfatin, an adipokine which mainly produced by visceral adipose had the insulin-like effect, and has been proved to aggravate IR. Moreover, as Masuzaki found in transgenic animals experiments, when 11 beta hydroxysteroid dehy-drogenase type 1(11βHSD-1) excessively expressed in fat cells, it would cause visceral adiposity and a series of metabolic disorders, which indicates that 11βHSD- 1 enzyme may have the same molecular basis with visceral obesity and metabolic disorders. However, the mechanism between visceral adiposity and metabolic disorders still needs to be further elucidated.
Although visceral fat has been found independently associated with IR and diabetes, and could be used to estimate the risk of diabetes, it’s not easy to measure body VAT volumes. MRI and CT have been considered as the gold standard for VAT measurements, but it is obviously they are not suitable for large epidemiological studies because of the high cost and inconvenience. Different from direct VAT determination, VAI could be easily conducted in large-scale epidemiological studies and has been suggested as a useful surrogate marker of VAT. VAI includes physical (BMI and WC) and metabolic (TG and HDL-C) parameters, it may indirectly reflects other non-classical risk factors, i.e. altered production of adipokine, increased lipolytic activity and plasma-free fatty acids. Recently reported by Al-Daghri et al., VAI was negatively related with adiponectin value, this was the first report for the direct relations of VAI with adipose tissue secretion. Some researches have proved that VAI could be used to predictive individual risk of IR, MS, acromegaly, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes[14, 32–34]. Consistent with previous researches[14, 31], our study also indicated that VAI is a useful surrogate marker to identify the risk of diabetes; individuals with high VAI were accompanied with increased risk of metabolic disorders and diabetes. The risk of getting diabetes at the highest VAI group was 2.55 folds higher as compared to the lowest VAI group.
According to the results of ROC analysis, the largest AUC was observed for VAI (AUC = 0.620, p < 0.001), following by WC, WHtR and BMI. Except VAI, AUC for other body fatness indices were all close to 0.5, which means the relatively lower predictive discriminatory power. Moreover, we observed positive trends between diabetes risk and VAI levels (HR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.19-1.60), similar association was observed for WC (HRadj = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.04-2.10) and WHtR (HRadj = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.03-1.97), whereas only an insignificant adjusted HR was observed for BMI (HRadj = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.83-1.36). These findings suggested that VAI may be better in identifying diabetes risk. However, the ability of VAI in identifying diabetes risk was not found to be superior to WHtR in previous research which conducted among Tehran people. This difference might be attributed to different study populations. It has reported that compared with Caucasians, Asians may have significantly higher risk of type 2 diabetes and CVDs despite substantially lower BMI. Wang et al. found that Chinese men tend to have higher levels of FPG and DBP and significantly lower levels of HDL-C than Europeans. Similar result was also found for Chinese women by Lear et al.. In additional, several researches have proved that Chinese people may have higher VAT levels than European with a given body size[38, 39]. Variations in lifestyle may also have effect on the relationship between VAT and diabetes risk among different populations besides hereditary factors. To date, few published studies have explored relationship between VAI and diabetes risk and compared different body fatness indices with diabetes risk. Thus, the efficiency of VAI in predicting the risk of chronic diseases including diabetes still needs further verification from studies in different areas and different ethnicities.
Some limitations of our study need to be discussed. Firstly, because of the relative short time of follow-up and hence the relatively small number of new diabetes cases, the statistical power to examine the associations between VAI and diabetes may be insufficient. Secondly, IR was not measured in the present analysis therefore we were not able to directly examine the associations between VAI and IR. Thirdly, we did not examine 2-hour postprandial glucose, which may lead to the under diagnosis of some diabetic patients. Finally, residual confounders, an innate limitation of observational studies, could not be eliminated thus may increase the possibility that uncontrolled or inadequately measured confounders affected our results.
Despite these limitations, our study confirmed that obesity is an important risk factor of diabetes among Chinese population and found visceral adiposity is more important in disease occurrence. Compared to other indices for body fatness measurements, VAI is a good and convenience surrogate marker for visceral adipose measurement and could be used in identifying the risk of diabetes in large-scale epidemiologic studies.
Area under curve
Body mass index
Diastolic blood pressure
Family history of diabetes
Fasting plasma glucose
High density lipoprotein cholesterol
Magnetic resonance imaging
Receiver operating characteristic
Subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue
Systolic blood pressure
Visceral adiposity index
Visceral adipose tissue
11 beta hydroxysteroid dehy-drogenase type 1.
This project has funding support from Jiangsu Medical Innovation Group (K201105) and Scientific Research Fund of National Ministry of Health (WKJ 2004-2-014). We appreciate the investigators and staffs of coordinating centers, including CDC of Nanjing, Xuzhou, Suzhou, Changshu, Jintan, Jiangyin, Taicang, Haimen, Jurong, Suining, Sihong and Ganyu. The authors also would like to thank the participants for their voluntary participation.
Jiangsu Medical Innovation Group (K201105) and Scientific Research Fund of National Ministry of Health (WKJ 2004-2-014).
- Herman WH: Diabetes epidemiology: guiding clinical and public health practice, the Kelly West Award Lecture, 2006. Diabetes Care. 2007, 30: 1912-1919.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harati H, Hadaegh F, Saadat N, Azizi F: Population-based incidence of Type 2 diabetes and its associated risk factors: results from a six-year cohort study in Iran. BMC Public Health. 2009, 9: 186-194.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang WY, Lu JM, Weng JP, Jia WP, Ji LN, Xiao JZ, Shan ZY, Liu J, Tian HM, Ji QH, Zhu DL, Ge JP, Lin LX, Chen L, Guo XH, Zhao ZG, Li Q, Zhou ZG, Shan GL, He J, : Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China. New Engl J Med. 2010, 362: 1090-1101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hunter GR, Chandler-Laney PC, Brock DW, Lara-Castro C, Fernandez JR, Gower BA: Fat distribution, aerobic fitness, blood lipids, and insulin sensitivity in African-American and European-American women. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010, 18: 274-281.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leite SA, Anderson RL, Kendall DM, Monk AM, Bergenstal RM: A1C predicts type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in a population at risk: the community diabetes prevention project. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2009, 1: 5-11.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oti SO, Van de Vijver SJ, Agyemang C, Kyobutunqi C: The magnitude of diabetes and its association with obesity in the slum of Nairobi, Kenya: results from a cross-sectional survey. Trop Med Int Health. 2013, 18: 1520-1530.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matsuda M, Shimomura I: Increased oxidative stress in obesity: implications for metabolic syndrome, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, atherosclerosis, and cancer. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2013, 7: e330-e341.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fox CS, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, Pou KM, Maurovich-Horvat P, Liu CY, Vasan RS, Murabito JM, Meiqs JB, Cupples LA, D’Aqostino RB, O’Donnell CJ: Abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue compartments: association with metabolic risk factors in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2007, 116: 39-48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- DeNino WF, Tchernof A, Dionne IJ, Toth MJ, Ades PA, Sites CK, Poehlman ET: Contribution of abdominal adiposity to age-related differences in insulin sensitivity and plasma lipids in healthy nonobese women. Diabetes Care. 2001, 24: 925-932.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bu J, Zhang Y, Chen H, Liang YP, Huang JL: Relationship between visceral fat volume by CT and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes [Article in Chinese]. Shi Yong Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009, 25: 2278-2279.Google Scholar
- Haslam DW, James WP: Obesity. Lancet. 2005, 366: 1197-1209.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- National Institutes of Health: Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults-the evidence report. Obes Res. 1998, 6: 51S-209S.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Amato MC, Giordano C, Galia M, Criscimanna A, Vitabile S, Midiri M, Galluzzo A, : Visceral adiposity index: a reliable indicator of visceral fat function associated with cardiometabolic risk. Diabetes Care. 2010, 33: 920-922.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bozorgmanesh M, Hadaegh F, Azizi F: Predictive performance of the visceral adiposity index for a visceral adiposity-related risk: type 2 diabetes. Lipids Health Dis. 2011, 10: 88-97.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hu XS, Guo ZR, Zhou H, Shi ZM, Wu M, Zhang J, Sun GX, Zhou ZY, Pan XQ, Yao CL: Study on the prevalence of metabolic syndrome among 35–74 year-olds in Jiangsu province [Article in Chinese]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2006, 27: 751-756.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guo ZR, Hu XS, Wu M, Zhou MH, Zhou ZY: A prospective study on the association between dyslipidemia and hypertension [Article in Chinese]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2009, 30: 554-558.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luo WS, Guo ZR, Hu XS, Zhou ZY, Wu M, Zhang LJ, Liu JC: 2 years change of waist circumference and body mass index and associations with type 2 diabetes mellitus in cohort populations. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2013, 7: e290-e296.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luo WS, Guo ZR, Hu XS, Zhou ZY, Wu M, Zhang LJ, Liu JC: A prospective study on association between 2 years change of waist circumference and incident hypertension in Han Chinese. Int J Cardiol. 2013, 167: 2781-2785.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grundy SM, Brewer HB, Cleeman JI, Smith SC, Lenfant C: Definition of metabolic syndrome: report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Heart Association Conference on scientific issues related to definition. Circulation. 2004, 109: 433-438.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Genuth S, Alberti KG, Bennett P, Buse J, Defronzo R, Kahn R, Kitzmiller J, Knowler WC, Lebovitz H, Lernmark A, Nathan D, Palmer J, Rizza R, Saudek C, Shaw J, Steffes M, Stern M, Tuomilehto J, Zimmet P: Follow-up report on the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2003, 26: 3160-3167.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cooperative Mata-analysis Group of China Obesity Task Force: Predictive values of body mass index and waist circumference to risk factors of related diseases in Chinese adult population [Article in Chinese]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2002, 23: 5-10.Google Scholar
- Ashwell M, Lejeune S, McPherson K: Ratio of waist circumference to height may be better indicator of need for weight management. BMJ. 1996, 312: 377-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- National Institutes of Health: Successful diet and exercise therapy is conducted in Vermont for “diabesity”. JAMA. 1980, 243: 519-520.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang SL, Zhu LY, Hu LY, Wang GY, Ma LC, Li XL, Shan W: The relationship between obesity phenotype and type 2diabetes[Article in Chinese]. Yi Nan Bing Za Zhi. 2010, 9: 191-193.Google Scholar
- Astrup A, Finer N: Redefining type 2 diabetes: ‘diabesity’ or ‘obesity dependent diabetes mellitus’?. Obes Rev. 2000, 1: 57-59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fontana L, Eagon JC, Trujillo ME, Scherer PE, Klein S: Visceral fat adipokine secretion is associated with systemic inflammation in obese humans. Diabetes. 2007, 56: 1010-1013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- He HB, Zhao ZG, Pu YF, Chen J, Ni YX, Zhong J, Liu HY, Li YS, Yan ZC, Liu DY, Zhu ZM: Relationship of different types of abdominal obesity to risk of metabolic syndrome [Article in Chinese]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008, 88: 1251-1254.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boden G, Shulman GI: Free fatty acids in obesity and type 2 diabetes: defining their role in the development of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction. Eur J Clin Invest. 2002, 32 (Suppl 3): 14-23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu J, Cao L, Tian LM, Zhong JT, Guo Q: The correlation of plasma visfatin and leptin with insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes [Article in Chinese]. Chin J Diab. 2008, 16: 521-523.Google Scholar
- Masuzaki H, Paterson J, Shinyama H, Morton NM, Mullins JJ, Seckl JR, Flier JS: A transgenic model of visceral obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Science. 2001, 294: 2166-2170.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Al-Daghri NM, Al-Attas OS, Alokail MS, Alkharfy KM, Charalampidis P, Livadas S, Kollias A, Sabico SL, Chrousos GP: Visceral adiposity index is highly associated with adiponectin values and glycaemic disturbances. Eur J Clin Invest. 2013, 43: 183-189.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oh JY, Sung YA, Lee HJ: The visceral adiposity index as a predictor of insulin resistance in young women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Obesity(Silver Spring). 2013, 21: 1690-1694.Google Scholar
- Elisha B, Messier V, Karelis A, Coderre L, Bernard S, Prud’homme D, Rabasa-Lhoret R: The visceral adiposity index: Relationship with cardiometabolic risk factors in obese and overweight postmenopausal women – A MONET group study. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2013, 38: 892-899.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ciresi A, Amato MC, Pizzolanti G, Giordano Galluzzo C: Visceral adiposity index is associated with insulin sensitivity and adipocytokine levels in newly diagnosed acromegalic patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012, 97: 2907-2915.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee JW, Brancati FL, Yeh HC: Trends in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes in Asians versus Whites. Diabetes Care. 2011, 34: 353-357.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang D, Li Y, Lee SG, Wang L, Fan J, Zhang G, Wu J, Ji Y, Li S: Ethnic differences in body composition and obesity related risk factors: study in Chinese and white males living in China. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e19835-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lear SA, Chen MM, Frohlich JJ, Birmingham CL: The relationship between waist circumference and metabolic risk factors: cohorts of European and Chinese descent. Metabolism. 2002, 51: 1427-1432.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lear SA, Humphries KH, Kohli S, Birmingham CL: The use of BMI and waist circumference as surrogates of body fat differs by ethnicity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007, 15: 2817-2824.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lear SA, Humphries KH, Kohli S, Chockalingam A, Frohlich JJ, Birmingham CL: Visceral adipose tissue accumulation differs according to ethnic background: results of the multicultural community health assessment trial (M-CHAT). Am J Clin Nutr. 2007, 86: 353-359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lesser IA, Gasevic D, Lear SA: The effect of body fat distribution on ethnic differences in cardiometabolic risk factors of Chinese and Europeans. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2013, 38: 701-706.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.