Open Access

Associations of non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol and traditional blood lipid profiles with hyperuricemia among middle-aged and elderly Chinese people: a community-based cross-sectional study

  • Juan Xu1,
  • Hao Peng1,
  • Qinghua Ma1, 2,
  • Xiaohua Zhou2,
  • Wenxin Xu2,
  • Liang Huang2,
  • Jiarong Hu2 and
  • Yonghong Zhang1Email author
Contributed equally
Lipids in Health and Disease201413:117

DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-13-117

Received: 11 April 2014

Accepted: 17 July 2014

Published: 23 July 2014

Abstract

Background

Increased serum uric acid (SUA) is associated with dyslipidemia. However, there are conflicting data about the role of single lipid species including non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) in promoting SUA accumulation. Here, we aimed to compare non-HDL-C with other traditional blood lipid profiles in relation to hyperuricemia in a middle-aged and elderly Chinese population.

Methods

Data was collected from 9580 participants undergoing routine physical examinations in Xiangcheng district of Suzhou. SUA, total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were examined for all participants. Non-HDL-C was calculated by subtracting HDL-C from TC. The associations of blood lipid profiles with hyperuricemia were examined in men and women, respectively. The areas under Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs) were compared to assess the discriminatory value of blood lipid parameters for predicting hyperuricemia.

Results

All blood lipid parameters significantly correlated with SUA (all P values <0.001). The correlation coefficient between SUA and TG was the highest in both genders. The correlation coefficient of non-HDL-C was higher than HDL-C in males and was higher than TC and LDL-C but followed HDL-C in females. In male group, AUC of TG (0.659) was greater than that of non-HDL-C (0.595) (P values <0.001). The AUC values of HDL-C, TC and LDL-C were lower; respectively 0.581, 0.559 and 0.552. In female group, AUC was highest for TG (0.678) followed by HDL-C (0.616), non-HDL-C (0.610), LDL-C (0.559) and TC (0.557) (all P values < 0.001).

Conclusions

In both genders, serum TG has the strongest association with hyperuricemia among blood lipid parameters. Non-HDL-C is also significantly associated with hyperuricemia.

Keywords

Hyperuricemia Blood lipids Non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol

Introduction

Serum uric acid (SUA) is the final oxidation product of purine metabolism in the circulation. SUA may accumulate in the body due to increased production or decreased elimination [1]. High SUA is a prerequisite for gout [2] and is also associated with the metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components [3] and consequently risk factors for hypertension, stroke and other cardiovascular diseases (CVD) [46]. Lipid profiles have been found to have a stronger association with SUA than other MetS components [3]. Though it is well established that SUA is closely associated with dyslipidemia, there are conflicting data about the role of single lipid species in promoting SUA accumulation [5, 79]. A recent study in the Nigerians revealed that total cholesterol (TC) and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were significantly associated with SUA [9], but such associations were not found in the Iranians [5]. Apparently, the relationship between lipids and SUA varied in different populations. In addition, a study has demonstrated that non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) is more closely associated with CVD, compared with other lipid parameters [10]. However, there are no reports on relationship between non-HDL-C and SUA as well as comparison of the relationships between several lipid parameters and SUA level or hyperuricemia in Chinese population. In present study, we analyzed the associations of blood lipids including non-HDL-C with hyperuricemia, and compared the associations of the lipid profiles with hyperuricemia in a middle-aged and elderly Chinese population.

Materials and methods

Study participants

All residents aged over 45 years in ten communities located in Xiangcheng district in the suburb of Suzhou City were examined from June, 2012 to April, 2013. Totally, there were 9642 individuals who underwent a physical examination. The exclusion criteria were to meet one of the followings: (1) having clinical suspicion of chronic renal diseases or tumors; (2) history of chronic liver disease; and (3) self-reported gout. After the exclusions, 9580 participants (4246 male and 5334 female) were included in the final analysis. This study was approved by Soochow University Ethics Committee. All participants provided written informed consents.

Data collection

All the examinations were performed by trained medical staff. Data on demographic, personal medical history were obtained using a standardized questionnaire. Standing height and body weight were measured with participants wearing light clothing and without shoes. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the ratio of weight in kilograms to height in meters squared. Three consecutive sitting blood pressure measurements (30 seconds between each) were taken by trained staff using a mercury sphygmomanometer according to a standard protocol, after the subjects had been resting for at least 5 minutes. The first and fifth Korotkoff sounds were recorded as systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), respectively. The mean of the three records was used in analysis. All blood samples were obtained from the antecubital vein in the morning after a requested overnight fast (at least 8 hours). All laboratory tests were done immediately after sampling. All the blood samples were processed and analyzed using Roche Modular automatic biochemical analyzer (Roche Diagnostics Ltd, Mannheim, Germany). SUA was determined by the uricase method (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). We defined hyperuricemia as SUA > 416 μmol/L (7 mg/dL) for men and > 357 μmol/L (6 mg/dL) for women [11]. TC and triglyceride (TG) were measured by standard enzymatic colorimetric methods (CHOD-PAP and GPO-PAP; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). High density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and LDL-C were measured by an enzymatic test (HDL-C-Plus and LDL-C-Plus; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Non-HDL-C was calculated by subtracting HDL-C from TC. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was examined using a standardized reference technique (GOD-PAP method; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The intra-coefficients of variation values were less than 5.0% and the inter-assay values were less than 9.5% for all examinations. In order to take knowledge of the liver and renal function of our study participants, some important biomarkers such as aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and serum creatinine (SCr) were also tested using commercial reagents.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were carried out separately by sex because of the varied level of SUA between genders [5]. Baseline characteristics of participants were presented and compared between participants with and without hyperuricemia. Comparisons in the means of continuous variables with a normal distribution were performed by using Student’s t-test. Comparisons in medians of continuous variables with a skewed distribution were performed by using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. As blood lipids including TC, TG, LDL-C, HDL-C, and non-HDL-C and SUA values were not normally distributed, correlations between SUA and lipids were determined using Spearman’s rank correlation test. The associations of various blood lipids with hyperuricemia were evaluated using univariate and multivariate non-conditional logistic regression models. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for hyperuricemia were calculated. In the multivariate models, variables that differ between participants with and without hyperuricemia, including age, FPG, BMI, SBP, DBP, SCr, BUN, ALT, AST were included as covariates. Lastly, we assessed the relation of the five lipid indexes with hyperuricemia by computing Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and comparing the areas under ROC curves (AUCs) with the Z-statistic [12]. All reported probability values (P-values) were based on two-sided tests and P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was conducted using SAS statistical software (version 9.1, Cary, North Carolona, USA).

Results

Baseline characteristics

A total of 9580 participants (4246 men and 5334 women) with an average age of 60.9 years were included in the analysis. Among them, 1270 (13.26%) participants had hyperuricemia. The prevalence was significantly higher in males than that in females (16.23% vs 10.89%, P < 0.001). The baseline characteristics of participants with and without hyperuricemia in both genders are shown in Table 1. The participants with hyperuricemia tended to be older and have higher FPG, BMI, SBP, DBP, SCr, BUN, ALT and AST compared with those without hyperuricemia in both genders (all P < 0.05). Participants with hyperuricemia had higher serum TC, TG, LDL-C, non-HDL-C and lower HDL-C compared with those without hyperuricemia in male and female groups (all P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in heart rate between the two groups in either males or females.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of participants by serum uric acid levels in genders

Characteristics

Men

 

Women

≤ 416 μmol/L

> 416 μmol/L

P-value

≤ 357 μmol/L

> 357 μmol/L

P-value

N

3557

689

-

4753

581

-

Age, years, mean ± SD

60.55 ± 9.78

62.10 ± 10.66

<0.001

60.34 ± 9.81

66.12 ± 10.74

<0.001

SBP, mmHg, mean ± SD

136.59 ± 18.86

140.18 ± 20.00

<0.001

140.46 ± 19.37

148.99 ± 19.75

<0.001

DBP, mmHg, mean ± SD

85.87 ± 11.61

87.98 ± 11.47

<0.001

83.74 ± 11.48

86.36±11.68

<0.001

BMI, kg/m2, mean±SD

23.33±2.89

24.53±3.14

<0.001

23.53±3.14

25.26±3.67

<0.001

FPG, mmol/L

5.68(5.33-6.16)

5.78(5.42-6.22)

0.002

5.68(5.36-6.12)

5.96(5.58-6.46)

<0.001

SCr, μmol/L

71(65-78)

80(72-89)

<0.001

54(49-60)

63(56-74)

<0.001

BNU, mmol/L

5.2(4.4-6.2)

5.5(4.7-6.4)

<0.001

5.1(4.3-6.1)

5.7(4.8-7.0)

<0.001

ALT, μ/L

18(14-25)

21(16-29)

<0.001

16(13-22)

18(14-27)

<0.001

AST, μ/L

22(19-26)

24(20-29)

<0.001

21(18-25)

23(19-29)

<0.001

Heart rate, bpm

75(67-83)

74(67-84)

0.478

78(71-85)

77(70-86)

0.940

TC, mmol/L

4.58(4.06-5.16)

4.75(4.18-5.39)

<0.001

4.80(4.26-5.40)

4.96(4.40-5.65)

<0.001

TG, mmol/L

0.94(0.70-1.36)

1.29(0.92-1.92)

<0.001

1.09(0.80-1.49)

1.51(1.06-2.06)

<0.001

HDL-C, mmol/L

1.43(1.19-1.73)

1.31(1.10-1.60)

<0.001

1.51(1.27-1.77)

1.36(1.14-1.59)

<0.001

LDL-C, mmol/L

2.49(2.08-2.94)

2.66(2.18-3.09)

<0.001

2.66(2.23-3.12)

2.82(2.35-3.33)

<0.001

Non-HDL-C, mmol/L

3.06(2.54-3.65)

3.38(2.80-3.97)

<0.001

3.24(2.73-3.85)

3.60(3.01-4.23)

<0.001

SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; BMI: body mass index; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; SCr: serum creatinine; BUN: blood urea nitrogen; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglycerides; HDL-C: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: low density lipoprotein cholesterol; non-HDL-C: non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Correlation between blood lipids and SUA

A Spearman correlation analysis was used to estimate correlation between lipids and SUA in males and females. As shown in Table 2, in male group, SUA positively correlated to TC (r = 0.101, P < 0.001), TG (r = 0.272, P < 0.001), LDL-C (r = 0.107, P < 0.001), and non-HDL-C (r = 0.176, P < 0.001) and negatively correlated to HDL-C (r = -0.166, P < 0.001). The correlations between blood lipids and SUA were similar in female group. SUA also correlated to TC (r = 0.114, P < 0.001), TG (r = 0.322, P < 0.001), LDL-C (r = 0.144; P < 0.001), non-HDL-C (r = 0.220; P < 0.001), and HDL-C (r = -0.233, P < 0.001). The Spearman correlation coefficient between SUA and TG was the highest in both males and females. The Spearman correlation coefficient of non-HDL-C was higher than HDL-C in males and was higher than TC and LDL-C but followed HDL-C in females.
Table 2

Spearman correlations between lipid profiles and serum uric acid by genders

Lipid indexes

Men

Women

Correlation coefficient

P-value

Correlation coefficient

P-value

Total cholesterol

0.101

<0.001

0.114

<0.001

Triglyceride

0.272

<0.001

0.322

<0.001

HDL-C

-0.166

<0.001

-0.233

<0.001

LDL-C

0.107

<0.001

0.144

<0.001

Non-HDL-C

0.176

<0.001

0.220

<0.001

HDL-C: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: low density lipoprotein cholesterol; non-HDL-C: non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Association between blood lipids and hyperuricemia

As shown in Table 3, univariate logistic regression analysis showed that ORs for hyperuricemia were significantly associated with higher TC, TG, LDL-C, non-HDL-C and lower HDL-C (all P < 0.05) in male group. After adjustment for age, FPG, BMI, SBP, DBP, SCr, BUN, ALT, and AST, hyperuricemia was also associated with TC, TG, HDL-C, and non-HDL-C (all P < 0.05). We did not observe a significant association between hyperuricemia and LDL-C after multivariate adjustment. In female group, univariate logistic regression analysis showed that ORs for hyperuricemia were significantly associated with higher TC, TG, LDL-C and non-HDL-C and lower HDL-C (all P < 0.05). In multivariate models, hyperuricemia remained significantly associated with higher TG, non-HDL-C and lower HDL-C (all P < 0.05). We failed to observe significant associations of hyperuricemia with TC and LDL-C.
Table 3

Odds ratio and 95% confidence interval of hyperuricemia associated with blood lipid levels in both genders.

Lipid profiles (mmol/L)

Odds ratio of hyperuricemia associated with higher lipid

Un-adjusted

P-value

Adjusted*

P-value

Men

Total cholesterol

1.29(1.18-1.41)

<0.001

1.17(1.06-1.29)

0.002

Triglyceride

1.41(1.31-1.52)

<0.001

1.35(1.25-1.46)

<0.001

HDL-C

0.54(0.44-0.66)

<0.001

0.70(0.55-0.89)

0.004

LDL-C

1.30(1.15-1.46)

<0.001

1.08(0.95-1.23)

0.257

Non-HDL-C

1.46(1.33-1.59)

<0.001

1.26(1.14-1.40)

<0.001

Women

Total cholesterol

1.26(1.15-1.38)

<0.001

1.06(0.95-1.18)

0.271

Triglyceride

1.68(1.54-1.84)

<0.001

1.50(1.36-1.65)

<0.001

HDL-C

0.29(0.22-0.38)

<0.001

0.33(0.24-0.44)

<0.001

LDL-C

1.35(1.20 -1.53)

<0.001

1.11(0.96-1.27)

0.150

Non-HDL-C

1.53(1.39-1.68)

<0.001

1.26(1.13-1.41)

<0.001

*Covariates for adjustment including age, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, body mass index, fasting plasma glucose, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase. HDL-C: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: low density lipoprotein cholesterol; non-HDL-C: non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Comparison in AUCs between non-HDL-C and traditional lipid profiles related to hyperuricemia

Graphical comparisons of ROC curves of various blood lipids related to hyperuricemia in males (Figure A) and in females (Figure B) are presented in Figure 1. Figure A shows the discriminatory values of the five lipids related to hyperuricemia in men. AUC values for various lipids were as follows: 0.659 for TG, 0.595 for non-HDL-C, 0.581 for HDL-C, 0.559 for TC, and 0.552 for LDL-C. AUC was significantly greater for TG than other lipid profiles including non-HDL-C (all P < 0.001). Non-HDL-C was also found to have a larger AUC value than TC (P < 0.001) and LDL-C (P <0.001). There was no significant difference between non-HDL-C and HDL-C in AUC value (P = 0.333). There was no significant difference in the AUC value among HDL-C, TC and LDL-C. Figure B shows the discriminatory value of the five lipids related to hyperuricemia in women. The AUC values were 0.678, 0.616, 0.610, 0.559, and 0.557 for TG, HDL-C, non-HDL-C, LDL-C and TC, respectively. TG had the largest AUC value, and non-HDL-C had higher AUC value related to hyperuricemia than LDL-C or TC (all P < 0.001).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1476-511X-13-117/MediaObjects/12944_2014_Article_1109_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Discriminatory powers of TG, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C and non-HDL-C for hyperuricemia by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves in males (A) and females (B). AUC: areas under the curve; CI: confidence interval; TG: triglyceride; TC: total cholesterol; HDL-C: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: low density lipoprotein cholesterol; non-HDL-C: non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Discussion

In this study, we found that TG was the best lipid index associated with hyperuricemia. Following TG, non-HDL-C was also significantly associated with hyperuricemia in both genders. Previous studies have examined the associations of lipid profiles such as TG, TC, LDL-C and HDL-C with hyperuricemia [13, 14]. Recently, non-HDL-C was demonstrated to be more powerful in predicting CVD events [10] and highlighted as a key secondary target of therapy in patients with an increased TG [15, 16], which implied that there may be a stronger association between non-HDL-C and CVD risks compared with other lipids. Some studies [17, 18] have showed that non-HDL-C is associated with other risk factors of CVD including hypertension, diabetes, and overweight. However, no study has compared non-HDL-C with other lipid profiles in relation to hyperuricemia to date. Therefore, in addition to the relationship between non-HDL-C and hyperuricemia, we compared the discriminatory values of these lipid profiles in relation to hyperuricemia. We found that TG and Non-HDL-C had larger AUCs related to hyperuricemia compared with LDL-C and TC in males and females.

Our findings are consistent with other studies [19, 20] that have reported a close link between serum TG and SUA in some groups. Conen and colleagues conducted a study in a population ongoing healthy examination, which demonstrated that TG was more strongly associated with SUA than HDL-C and TC [21]. Russo and colleagues reported that TG had a more closely relation to SUA than other lipids even in the healthy people [22]. The correlation coefficient between TG and SUA was higher than that between TC or LDL-C and SUA in the Verona Young men, even after adjustment for other potential covariates [23].

Non-HDL-C includes all lipoproteins that contain apolipoprotein B i.e. very low density lipoprotein, LDL-C, intermediate-density lipoprotein, chylomicrons and lipoprotein (a). Erdogan’s study showed that correlation coefficient of non-HDL-C to SUA (r = 0.382, P < 0.001) was slightly higher than that of TG (r = 0.379, P < 0.001) and obviously higher than those of TC, HDL-C and LDL-C in the healthy adults [24]. It is worthwhile to note that non-HDL-C can be accurately calculated based on all routine lipid profiles, fasting or non-fasting, at no further expense to the patient. Importantly, high non-HDL-C is treatable and has already been assimilated into current treatment guidelines.

Some previous studies found that treatment for hypertriglyceridemia with fenofibrate or atorvastatin reduced SUA levels [25, 26]. In addition, an animal experiment study demonstrated that lowering uric acid with allopurinol prophylactically prevented fructose-induced hyperuricemia and hypertriglyceridemia [27]. All these studies indicated that TG and SUA might share a common metabolic mechanism so that some drugs can reduce TG as well as SUA levels. Keenan et al.’s study also suggested that increased uric acid via increased systematic inflammation predict insulin resistance, followed by dyslipidemia and hepatic steatosis [28]. In addition, some investigators tend to conclude that both hyperuricemia and dyslipidemia reflect the common lifestyles and dietary habits such as excessive alcohol consumption, high fat diet and physical inactivity [21, 29]. Reduction of TG intake in diet has been shown to increase uric acid elimination. However, the effect was minimal and transient [30]. Thus, a combination of anti-hyperlipidemia and anti-hyperuricemia agents is a good option for the treatment of hyperuricemic patients with hypertriglyceridemia [31]. Some remedy drugs with dual effects of lowering both TG and SUA levels are needed to control the combined syndrome with hyperuricemia and hyperlipidemia.

This study has some strength that should be mentioned. This is a large-scale survey research in a middle-aged and elderly Chinese population and we firstly compared various blood lipid profiles including non-HDL-C in relation to hyperuricemia. Since men had a higher prevalence of SUA compared with women in current study, we studied the relations of blood lipids to hyperuricemia in men and women separately. The important co-variables such as hepatorenal indexes were also measured and evaluated in our study [32, 33]. To some extent, these could control potential influence of some confounding factors including hepatorenal indexes on the relations of blood lipid profiles to hyperuricemia. However, the results of ROC analysis suggested that lipid indexes including TG and non-HDL-C were not good discriminate predictors for hyperuricemia in this study. Therefore, some additional factors besides lipid indexes should be considered in treating and preventing hyperuricemia, such as control of purine-rich foods, obesity or drinking [29].

There were several limitations in this study. First, this was a cross-sectional study and therefore a causal relationship between blood lipid profiles including non-HDL-C and risk of hyperuricemia could not be established. Secondly, data on other confounding factors such as diet, alcohol consumption and physical activity were not considered in this study, although the hepatorenal indexes can reflect accumulation of diet and alcohol consumption to some extent.

In summary, our results show that serum TG and non-HDL-C have stronger relations to hyperuricemia compared with other lipid indexes. Considering the increasing prevalence of hyperuricemia and its potential links with blood lipids, it is necessary to pay more attention to TG and non-HDL-C levels in these people with hyperuricemia.

Author’s information

Juan Xu, Hao Peng and Qinghua Ma are co-first authors.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by a Project of the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China and the Suzhou Science and Technology Project (NO. SS0910 and NO. SS201333). We are deeply appreciative of the participants in this study, and would like to thank all staffs for their support and assistance.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Medical College of Soochow
(2)
The Third People’s Hospital of Xiangcheng District

References

  1. Storhaug HM, Norvik JV, Toft I, Eriksen BO, Løchen ML, Zykova S, Solbu M, White S, Chadban S, Jenssen T: Uric acid is a risk factor for ischemic stroke and all-cause mortality in the general population: a gender specific analysis from The Tromsø Study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2013, 13: 115- 10.1186/1471-2261-13-115PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  2. Neogi T: Clinical practice. Gout. N Engl J Med. 2011, 364: 443-452. 10.1056/NEJMcp1001124View ArticlePubMed
  3. Lu W, Song K, Wang Y, Zhang Q, Li W, Jiao H, Wang G, Huang G: Relationship between serum uric acid and metabolic syndrome: an analysis by structural equation modeling. J Clin Lipidol. 2012, 6: 159-167. 10.1016/j.jacl.2011.11.006View ArticlePubMed
  4. Tsai WC, Huang YY, Lin CC, Li WT, Lee CH, Chen JY, Chen JH: Uric acid is an independent predictor of arterial stiffness in hypertensive patients. Heart Vessels. 2009, 24: 371-375. 10.1007/s00380-008-1127-9View ArticlePubMed
  5. Mehrpour M, Khuzan M, Najimi N, Motamed MR, Fereshtehnejad SM: Serum uric acid level in acute stroke patients. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2012, 26: 66-72.PubMed CentralPubMed
  6. Fang J, Alderman MH: Serum uric acid and cardiovascular mortality the NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study, 1971-1992. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA. 2000, 283: 2404-2410. 10.1001/jama.283.18.2404View ArticlePubMed
  7. Qiu L, Cheng XQ, Wu J, Liu JT, Xu T, Ding HT, Liu YH, Ge ZM, Wang YJ, Han HJ, Liu J, Zhu GJ: Prevalence of hyperuricemia and its related risk factors in healthy adults from Northern and Northeastern Chinese provinces. BMC Public Health. 2013, 13: 664- 10.1186/1471-2458-13-664PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  8. Lippi G, Montagnana M, Luca Salvagno G, Targher G, Cesare Guidi G: Epidemiological association between uric acid concentration in plasma, lipoprotein(a), and the traditional lipid profile. Clin Cardio. 2010, 33: E76-80.View Article
  9. Alikor CA, Emem-Chioma PC, Odia OJ: Prevalence of hyperuricaemia in a rural population of Nigerian Niger Delta region. Niger J Med. 2013, 22: 187-192.PubMed
  10. Blaha MJ, Blumenthal RS, Brinton EA, Jacobson TA: The importance of non–HDL cholesterol reporting in lipid management. J Clin Lipidol. 2008, 2: 267-273. 10.1016/j.jacl.2008.06.013View ArticlePubMed
  11. Yang J, Liu Z, Zhang C, Zhao Y, Sun S, Wang S, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Li J, Lu F: The prevalence of hyperuricemia and its correlates in an inland Chinese adult population, urban and rural of Jinan. Rheumatol Int. 2013, 33: 1511-1517. 10.1007/s00296-012-2589-8View ArticlePubMed
  12. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ: A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983, 148: 839-843. 10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708View ArticlePubMed
  13. Kačkov S, Šimundić AM, Nikolac N, Bilušić M: The association of uric acid with glucose and lipids in general population: Croatian cross-sectional study. Coll Antropol. 2011, 35: 1055-1059.PubMed
  14. Liu PW, Chang TY, Chen JD: Serum uric acid and metabolic syndrome in Taiwanese adults. Metabolism. 2010, 59: 802-807. 10.1016/j.metabol.2009.09.027View ArticlePubMed
  15. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP): Circulation. 2002, 106: 3143-3421.
  16. Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, Goldberg AC, Gordon D, Levy D, Lloyd-Jones DM, McBride P, Schwartz JS, Shero ST, Smith SC, Watson K, Wilson PW: ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013, 2014 (63): 2889-2934.
  17. Ramjee V, Sperling LS, Jacobson TA: Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol versus apolipoprotein B in cardiovascular risk stratification: do the math. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011, 58: 457-463. 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.05.009View ArticlePubMed
  18. Li C, Ford ES, McBride PE, Kwiterovich PO, McCrindle BW, Gidding SS: Non–High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Concentration is Associated with the Metabolic Syndrome among US Youth Aged 12-19 Years. J Pediatr. 2011, 158: 201-207. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.07.050View ArticlePubMed
  19. Matsubara K, Matsuzawa Y, Jiao S, Takama T, Kubo M, Tarui S: Relationship between hypertriglyceridemia and uric acid production in primary gout. Metabolism. 1989, 38: 698-701. 10.1016/0026-0495(89)90110-8View ArticlePubMed
  20. Chamorro Á, Obach V, Cervera Á, Revilla M, Deulofeu R, Aponte JH: Prognostic significance of uric acid serum concentration in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2002, 33: 1048-1052. 10.1161/hs0402.105927View ArticlePubMed
  21. Conen D, Wietlisbach V, Bovet P, Shamlaye C, Riesen W, Paccaud F, Burnier M: Prevalence of hyperuricemia and relation of serum uric acid with cardiovascular risk factors in a developing country. BMC Public Health. 2004, 4: 9- 10.1186/1471-2458-4-9PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  22. Russo C, Olivieri O, Girelli D, Guarini P, Corrocher R: Relationships between serum uric acid and lipids in healthy subjects. Prev Med. 1996, 25: 611-616. 10.1006/pmed.1996.0096View ArticlePubMed
  23. Bonora E, Targher G, Zenere MB, Saggiani F, Cacciatori V, Tosi F, Travia D, Zenti MG, Branzi P, Santi L, Muggeo M: Relationship of uric acid concentration to cardiovascular risk factors in young men. Role of obesity and central fat distribution. The Verona Young Men Atherosclerosis Risk Factors Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1996, 20: 975-980.PubMed
  24. Erdogan D, Gullu H, Caliskan M, Yildirim E, Bilgi M, Ulus T, Sezgin N, Muderrisoglu H: Relationship of serum uric acid to measures of endothelial function and atherosclerosis in healthy adults. Int J Clin Pract. 2005, 59: 1276-1282. 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2005.00621.xView ArticlePubMed
  25. Milionis HJ, Kakafika AI, Tsouli SG, Athyros VG, Bairaktari ET, Seferiadis KI, Elisaf MS: Effects of statin treatment on uric acid homeostasis in patients with primary hyperlipidemia. Am Heart J. 2004, 148: 635-640. 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.04.005View ArticlePubMed
  26. Athyros VG, Elisaf M, Papageorgiou AA, Symeonidis AN, Pehlivanidis AN, Bouloukos VI, Milionis HJ, Mikhailidis DP: Effect of statins versus untreated dyslipidemia on serum uric acid levels in patients with coronary heart disease: a subgroup analysis of the GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary-heart-disease Evaluation (GREACE) study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004, 43: 589-599. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2003.12.023View ArticlePubMed
  27. Nakagawa T, Hu H, Zharikov S, Tuttle KR, Short RA, Glushakova O, Ouyang X, Feig DI, Block ER, Herrera-Acosta J, Patel JM, Johnson RJ: A causal role for uric acid in fructose-induced metabolic syndrome. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006, 290: F625-631.View ArticlePubMed
  28. Keenan T, Blaha MJ, Nasir K, Silverman MG, Tota-Maharaj R, Carvalho JA, Conceição RD, Blumenthal RS, Santos RD: Relation of uric acid to serum levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and to hepatic steatosis. Am J Cardiol. 2012, 110: 1787-1792. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.08.012PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  29. Saag KG, Choi H: Epidemiology, risk factors, and lifestyle modifications for gout. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006, 8 (Suppl 1): S2-10.1186/ar1907.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  30. Tinahones JF, Perez-Lindon G, C-Soriguer FJ, Pareja A, Sanchez-Guijo P, Collantes E: Dietary alterations in plasma very low density lipoprotein levels modify renal excretion of urates in hyperuricemic-hypertriglyceridemic patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997, 82: 1188-1191.PubMed
  31. Takahashi S, Moriwaki Y, Yamamoto T, Tsutsumi Z, Ka T, Fukuchi M: Effects of combination treatment using anti-hyperuricaemic agents with fenofibrate and/or losartan on uric acid metabolism. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003, 62: 572-575. 10.1136/ard.62.6.572PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  32. Alvarez-Lario B, Macarrón-Vicente J: Uric acid and evolution. Rheumatology. 2010, 49: 2010-2015. 10.1093/rheumatology/keq204View ArticlePubMed
  33. Li Y, Xu C, Yu C, Xu L, Miao M: Association of serum uric acid level with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a cross-sectional study. J Hepatol. 2009, 50: 1029-1034. 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.11.021View ArticlePubMed

Copyright

© Xu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement