Open Access

Allelic drop-out may occur with a primer binding site polymorphism for the commonly used RFLP assay for the -1131T>C polymorphism of the Apolipoprotein AV gene

  • Kirsten J Ward1,
  • Sian Ellard1,
  • Chittaranjan S Yajnik2,
  • Timothy M Frayling1,
  • Andrew T Hattersley1Email author,
  • Prathyusha NS Venigalla3 and
  • Giriraj R Chandak3
Lipids in Health and Disease20065:11

DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-5-11

Received: 09 March 2006

Accepted: 02 May 2006

Published: 02 May 2006

Abstract

Apolipoprotein AV (ApoAV) gene variant, -1131T>C, is associated with increased triglyceride concentrations in all ethnic groups studied. An MseI based RFLP analysis is the most commonly used method for genotyping this SNP. We genotyped a large cohort comprising 1185 Asian Indians and 173 UK Caucasians for -1131T>C using an ARMS-PCR based tetra-primer method. For quality control, we re-genotyped approximately 10% random samples from this cohort utilizing the MseI RFLP, which showed a 2.9% (3/102) genotyping error rate between the two methods. To investigate further, we sequenced the 900 bp region around the -1131T>C polymorphism in 25 Asian Indians and 15 UK Caucasians and found a number of polymorphisms including the -987C>T polymorphism. Further analysis of the -987C>T SNP showed a higher rare allele frequency of 0.23 in Asian Indians (n = 158) compared to 0.09 in the UK Caucasians (n = 157). This SNP is located 4 bp from the 3' end of the RFLP forward primer and is in weak linkage disequilibrium with -1131T>C variant (r2 = 0.084 and D' = 1). Repeated RFLP analysis of seven subjects heterozygous for -987C>T (seven times), showed discordant results with the sequence at -1131T>C SNP nearly one third (15/49) of the time. We conclude that presence of -987C>T polymorphism in the forward primer of the MseI RFLP assay may lead to allelic drop-out and generate unforeseen errors in genotyping the -1131T>C polymorphism. Our results also emphasise the need for careful quality control in all molecular genetic studies, particularly while transferring genotyping methods between various ethnic groups.

Introduction

Apolipoprotein AV is an important regulator of triglycerides concentrations. The ApoAV gene was identified adjacent to the Apolipoprotein cluster (consisting of ApoAI, ApoAIV and ApoCIII genes) [1, 2]. The gene encodes a protein that is thought to be fundamental in the transport of triglyceride rich lipoproteins from the liver [3]. Its hepatic expression has been shown to influence post-prandial triglyceride concentrations [3] and has the potential to act as an intracellular break in the very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) assembly [4]. In addition, ApoAV also enhances VLDL metabolism through physical interaction with lipoprotein lipase [5].

Polymorphisms in APOAV are known to influence the circulating triglyceride concentrations. These variants are split into 3 common haplotypes, of which 2 are associated with increased triglyceride concentrations irrespective of age, gender, ethnicity, pregnancy, lipid profile, and dietary fat intake and are tagged by two SNPs, -1131T>C and S19W [1, 69]. In keeping with this, the prevalence of the rare allele for these polymorphisms is higher among subjects with diseases associated with a raised triglyceride concentration such as Familial Hypercholesterolemia, Familial Combined Hyperlipidaemia and Hypertriglyceridaemia [1015]. The rare allele at -1131T>C polymorphism is also associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease [1618].

The rare allele frequency varies between different ethnic groups and populations of Chinese and Japanese descent have a higher prevalence of the -1131C allele and a lower prevalence of the W19 allele when compared to Caucasian populations [1, 7, 8, 19, 20].

This paper concentrates on a potential pitfall in the most widely used method (>65% publications) for genotyping the -1131T>C polymorphism using the abolition of a restriction site for MseI enzyme [1]. We detected an unacceptable error rate using our standard quality control checks (a random 10% of samples re-genotyped using a second method). Investigation of the discordant results between the RFLP and the tetra-primer methods for genotyping -1131T>C polymorphism led to identification of a polymorphism within the primer binding site of the RFLP forward primer resulting in allelic drop-out. To alleviate these problems, we propose alternative methods for genotyping -1131T>C polymorphism in the APOAV gene.

Results

Discordant results in samples typed by two methods

One thousand, one hundred and eighty five Asian Indian and 173 UK Caucasian subjects were initially genotyped for the -1131T>C polymorphism using the tetra-primer ARMS-PCR method. In keeping with our standard laboratory protocol, 102 of these subjects were re-genotyped using the MseI RFLP as a quality control check. In 2.9% (3/102) of samples the results for the two methods were discordant. This high rate of discordant samples could not be explained by sample mix-up or by failed or partial digestion. Sequencing suggested that the erroneous results were due to the RFLP method.

Polymorphisms present in the primer binding sites

As the discordant results could most plausibly be explained by allelic drop-out, we sequenced the 900 bp region covering the primer sequences for both the methods in 40 subjects (25 Asian Indians and 15 Caucasians). Sequence analysis identified several polymorphisms (Fig. 1) of which three were located in the primer binding sites and may potentially alter primer binding. The -987C>T (rs17120035) polymorphism was situated 4 bp from the 3' end of the forward primer for RFLP analysis (Fig. 2). Two other polymorphisms were identified in the tetra-primer inner primer regions; -1108C>G (rs1729411) was 5 bp from the 5' region of the forward primer and a novel SNP -1148G>A that was located 9 bp from the 5' end of the reverse primer (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

Schematic of the ApoAV gene, its variants and primer positions.

Figure 2

This shows the -987C>T polymorphism which potentially alters primer binding for the RFLP method of genotyping (primer sequence is placed within the boxed area, with the site of the polymorphism in capital letter).

Since no polymorphisms were identified in the region of the outer primers used for the tetra-primer assay, we used them for sequencing to assess the prevalence of the identified polymorphisms in 158 unrelated Asian Indian adults and 157 unrelated UK Caucasian adults (table 1). The -987C>T polymorphism located within the RFLP forward primer was fairly common with a rare allele frequency of 0.23 in Asian Indian subjects and 0.09 within UK Caucasian subjects. While the -1108C>T SNP was not observed in the Asian Indian subjects and only in the UK Caucasian subjects (rare allele frequency = 0.10), the -1148C>T polymorphism situated within the tetra-primer inner reverse primer was observed in the Asian Indian samples only (rare allele frequency = 0.01). The polymorphisms studied were in Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) and linkage disequilibrium was observed between -987C>T and -1131T>C both in Asian Indians and UK Caucasians (D' = 1.00, r2 = 0.084 and D' = 0.998, r2 = 0.001, respectively).
Table 1

Rare allele frequencies for the polymorphisms in the ApoAV gene found through initial sequencing

Polymorphism

Refseq number

Asian Indian

UK Caucasian

-798G>A

rs10750097

0.27

0.27

-872A>G

rs7103224

0.20

0.07

-987C>T

rs17120035

0.23

0.09

-1026G>A

Not on databases

0.35

0.00

-1108C>G

rs4938312

0.00

0.10

-1131T>C

rs662799

0.22

0.05

-1148C>T

Not on databases

0.01

0.00

-1163C>T

rs1729411

0.05

0.02

-1242C>T

Not on databases

0.004

0.01

Heterozygosity in the primer polymorphism -987C>T is associated with errors in genotyping -1131T>C using the RFLP assay

We performed the MseI RFLP assay for -1131T>C on two separate occasions in 82 Asian Indians of known genotype (by sequencing the SNP). This showed at least one discordant result between the sequencing and the RFLP in 13 subjects (14%), with three being discordant on both occasions. Eight of the 13 (62%) discordant samples were heterozygous for both the -1131T>C and the -987C>T polymorphisms compared to 1 of the 69 (1.4%) who did not show discordant results (p < 0.001). As heterozygosity at the -987C>T polymorphism was associated with discordant results, this suggests that this polymorphisms altered primer binding resulting in allelic drop-out on RFLP assay for -1131T>C. To substantiate the role of -987C>T SNP further, we identified 7 subjects heterozygous for both -1131T>C and -987C>T and re-genotyped them using the RFLP assay 7 times. Results for the RFLP differed with sequencing (gold standard) results for 15 out of a total of 49 genotypes (31%) with each subject being discordant on at least one occasion. No individual showed a genotype that was different from that determined by sequencing on all 7 occasions (range 1/7 – 4/7). These results suggest that -987C>T SNP causes allelic drop-out on some but not all occasions.

Discussion

Our study shows that presence of a polymorphism-987C>T in the ApoAV gene can produce allelic drop-out resulting in an incorrect genotype at SNP -1131T>C when genotyping by the widely used MseI RFLP assay. The error occurs in the background of heterozygosity both at -987C>T and -1131T>C and only on some occasions on the same sample. This potential source of error was probably detected in an Asian Indian cohort because both -987C>T and -1131T>C are over 3 times more prevalent than UK Caucasians. There is evidence in the literature that common polymorphisms within primer binding sites [2123] can result in allelic drop-out which may be due to preferential amplification of one allele or through other mechanisms [24]. The degree of allelic drop-out may also result in a relative lack of heterozygous subjects within a population and deviation from Hardy Weinberg equilibrium [23]. Many such polymorphisms are known to be race-specific [25]. As the majority of data on -1131T>C exists on European Caucasian subjects with very limited data available on other ethnic groups such as Asian Indians and Sub-Saharan Africans, our observations prompt for more caution while initiating similar analysis in new populations.

The -987C>T polymorphism is likely to contribute to genotyping error especially in Asian Indian samples if the previously described primers are used. Therefore it is wise to use another assay to define the genotype at -1131T>C such as the ARMS-PCR based tetra-primer assay we used [9]. This is based on a method first described by Ye et al, in 2001 [26] with primers designed using the Tetra-primer ARMS-PCR website[27]. Although we did find SNPs that are present in primers used in this method, these are considerably less common, are not close to the 3' end of the primer and no errors were seen compared to sequencing. Therefore the tetra-primer method is our preferred alternative.

We have developed a new restriction assay for the -1131T>C polymorphism that avoids all known polymorphisms in primer binding sites. This uses the tetra-primer outer forward primer (5'-CAAGGTGACAGACAACTGGTGCAATGAT-3') and the RFLP reverse primer (5'- CCCCAGGAACTGGAGCGAAATT-3') to amplify a fragment of 239 bp. In the presence of the rare C allele, MseI digestion will result in fragments of 217 bp and 22 bp. The PCR was performed in 10 μl reactions with standard reagents using 2.5 mM MgCl2 and 0.5U of Amplitaq Gold (Applied Biosystems, UK) using cycling conditions as initial denaturation at 94°C for 12 minutes followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 45 seconds, annealing at 63°C for 45 seconds and extension at 72°C for 45 seconds, with a final extension of 72°C for 10 minutes. The MseI digestion was performed as previously described by Pennacchio et al, 2001 [1]. This new PCR RFLP assay worked in 96 samples with no discrepancies and no errors when compared to the original genotyping results for the tetra-primer assay.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the -987C>T polymorphism is present in UK Caucasians and Asian Indians and can result in allelic drop-out within the widely used MseI RFLP assay for genotyping the triglyceride associated polymorphism -1131T>C. This is especially important in the Asian Indian population as both -987C>T and -1131T>C polymorphisms are more prevalent. Our result stresses the importance of checking and repeatedly checking SNP databases for polymorphisms in the primer binding sites (the -987C>T polymorphism was not reported when we started out studies on the -1131T>C polymorphism). It also emphasises the need to use a second genotyping method as a quality control. This type of check is particularly important when studying new populations as allele frequencies of the same polymorphism can vary greatly between populations meaning a primer binding site polymorphism may be of much greater significance in some populations than others.

Materials and methods

Genomic DNA samples from 1185 Asian Indian subjects from 395 Asian Indian family trios (mother, father and child) from the Pune Children Study [28, 29] and 173 unrelated UK Caucasians from the EFS and Plymouth EarlyBird study [9, 30] were initially genotyped for -1131T>C variant using an ARMS based tetra-primer method. The design of primers would amplify a control product of 404 bp while the PCR products of 250 bp and 242 bp would identify T and C alleles respectively.

The primer sequences used are as follows:

Tetra-primer Outer Forward: 5'-CAAGGTGACAGACAACTGGTGCAATGAT-3'

Tetra-primer Outer Reverse: 5'-AGCCCCTGAAAGCTTCACTACAGGTTCC-3'

Tetra-primer Inner Forward: 5'-TTCAGCTTTTCCTCATGGGGCAAATATC-3'

Tetra-primer Inner Reverse: 5'-GAGCCCCAGGAACTGGAGCGAAATTA-3'

The PCR was performed using cycling conditions of initial denaturation at 95°C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 1 min, annealing at 59°C for 1 min and extension at 72°C for 1 min, with a final 2 min extension at 72°C. PCR products were run on a 3% agarose gel at 200 V for 90 minutes and scored by two independent workers (KW and GRC). Subsequently, ~10% of these samples (n = 102) were analysed by PCR-RFLP using 2U of MseI enzyme [1] for the quality control check.

In an attempt to investigate the discordant results between the RFLP based and tetra-primer based genotyping, primers were designed to amplify a 900 bp region encompassing both tetra-primers and RFLP primers (Fig. 1). Finally, tetra-primer outer primer pair was utilised as the gold standard for confirmation of individual sequence since this region did not show any polymorphism on sequence analysis of the 900 bp region. All the PCR products were purified using post-PCR purification plates from Millipore and sequenced individually on both the strands using Big Dye terminator cycle sequencing ready kit (Version 1.1, Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK) on ABI 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems).

Abbreviations

ApoAV: 

Apolipoprotein AV

ApoAI: 

Apolipoprotein AI

ApoAIV: 

Apolipoprotein AIV

ApoCIII: 

Apolipoprotein CIII

VLDL: 

Very Low Density Lipoprotein

SNPs: 

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms

RFLP: 

Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism

PCS: 

Pune Children Study

EFS: 

Exeter Family Study of Childhood Health

PEB: 

Plymouth EarlyBird study

HWE: 

Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium

LD: 

Linkage Disequilibrium

PCR: 

Polymerase Chain Reaction

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Michael Weedon, Peninsula Medical School, Exeter for his help with statistical analysis and Terry Wilkin, Peninsula Medical School, Plymouth for providing the DNA samples from the Plymouth EarlyBird Study.

This work was funded by the Wellcome Trust and through a studentship for KJW by Diabetes Research and Education Trust (DIRECT) and The University of Exeter, UK. ATH is a Wellcome Trust Career Leave Research Fellow. PNSV and GRC are funded by the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, Peninsula Medical School
(2)
Diabetes Unit, King Edward Memorial Hospital and Research Centre
(3)
Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Genome Research Group

References

  1. Pennacchio LA, Olivier M, Hubacek JA, Cohen JC, Cox DR, Fruchart JC, Krauss RM, Rubin EM: An apolipoprotein influencing triglycerides in humans and mice revealed by comparative sequencing. Science. 2001, 294 (5540): 169-173. 10.1126/science.1064852View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. van der Vliet HN, Sammels MG, Leegwater AC, Levels JH, Reitsma PH, Boers W, Chamuleau RA: Apolipoprotein A-V: a novel apolipoprotein associated with an early phase of liver regeneration. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276 (48): 44512-44520. 10.1074/jbc.M106888200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Martin S, Nicaud V, Humphries SE, Talmud PJ: Contribution of APOA5 gene variants to plasma triglyceride determination and to the response to both fat and glucose tolerance challenges. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003, 1637 (3): 217-225.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Weinberg RB, Cook VR, Beckstead JA, Martin DD, Gallagher JW, Shelness GS, Ryan RO: Structure and interfacial properties of human apolipoprotein A-V. J Biol Chem. 2003Google Scholar
  5. Fruchart-Najib J, Bauge E, Niculescu LS, Pham T, Thomas B, Rommens C, Majd Z, Brewer B, Pennacchio LA, Fruchart JC: Mechanism of triglyceride lowering in mice expressing human apolipoprotein A5. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004, 319 (2): 397-404. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.05.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Endo K, Yanagi H, Araki J, Hirano C, Yamakawa-Kobayashi K, Tomura S: Association found between the promoter region polymorphism in the apolipoprotein A-V gene and the serum triglyceride level in Japanese schoolchildren. Hum Genet. 2002, 111 (6): 570-572. 10.1007/s00439-002-0825-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Nabika T, Nasreen S, Kobayashi S, Masuda J: The genetic effect of the apoprotein AV gene on the serum triglyceride level in Japanese. Atherosclerosis. 2002, 165 (2): 201-204. 10.1016/S0021-9150(02)00252-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pennacchio LA, Olivier M, Hubacek JA, Krauss RM, Rubin EM, Cohen JC: Two independent apolipoprotein A5 haplotypes influence human plasma triglyceride levels. Hum Mol Genet. 2002, 11 (24): 3031-3038. 10.1093/hmg/11.24.3031View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ward KJ, Shields B, Knight B, Salzmann MB, Hattersley AT, Frayling TM: Genetic variants in Apolipoprotein AV alter triglyceride concentrations in pregnancy. Lipids Health Dis. 2003, 2: 9- 10.1186/1476-511X-2-9PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bertolini S, Pisciotta L, Di Scala L, Langheim S, Bellocchio A, Masturzo P, Cantafora A, Martini S, Averna M, Pes G: Genetic polymorphisms affecting the phenotypic expression of familial hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis. 2004, 174 (1): 57-65. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2003.12.037View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Charlton-Menys V, Durrington PN: Apolipoprotein A5 and hypertriglyceridemia. Clin Chem. 2005, 51 (2): 295-297. 10.1373/clinchem.2004.044826View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Horinek A, Vrablik M, Ceska R, Adamkova V, Poledne R, Hubacek JA: T-1131–>C polymorphism within the apolipoprotein AV gene in hypertriglyceridemic individuals. Atherosclerosis. 2003, 167 (2): 369-370. 10.1016/S0021-9150(03)00022-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kao JT, Wen HC, Chien KL, Hsu HC, Lin SW: A novel genetic variant in the apolipoprotein A5 gene is associated with hypertriglyceridemia. Hum Mol Genet. 2003, 12 (19): 2533-2539. 10.1093/hmg/ddg255View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Schaefer JR, Sattler AM, Hackler B, Kurt B, Hackler R, Maisch B, Soufi M: Hyperlipidemia in patients with apolipoprotein E 2/2 phenotype: apolipoprotein A5 S19W mutation as a cofactor. Clin Chem. 2004, 50 (11): 2214- 10.1373/clinchem.2004.037689View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Vrablik M, Horinek A, Ceska R, Adamkova V, Poledne R, Hubacek JA: Ser19–>Trp polymorphism within the apolipoprotein AV gene in hypertriglyceridaemic people. J Med Genet. 2003, 40 (8): e105- 10.1136/jmg.40.8.e105PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bi N, Yan SK, Li GP, Yin ZN, Chen BS: A single nucleotide polymorphism -1131T>C in the apolipoprotein A5 gene is associated with an increased risk of coronary artery disease and alters triglyceride metabolism in Chinese. Mol Genet Metab. 2004, 83 (3): 280-286. 10.1016/j.ymgme.2004.06.017View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Charlton-Menys V, Durrington PN: Apolipoprotein a5 and hypertriglyceridemia. Clin Chem. 2005, 51 (2): 295-297. 10.1373/clinchem.2004.044826View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu HK, Wang CT, Zhang SZ, Xiao CY, Li XF, Zhang KL, Zhang L, Su ZG, Ma YX, Zhou B: Association of APOA5 gene single nucleotide polymorphism with levels of lipids and coronary heart disease in Chinese. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chaun Xue Za Zhi. 2004, 21 (4): 335-338.Google Scholar
  19. Baum L, Tomlinson B, Thomas GN: APOA5-1131T>C polymorphism is associated with triglyceride levels in Chinese men. Clin Genet. 2003, 63 (5): 377-379. 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2003.00063.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Klos KL, Hamon S, Clark AG, Boerwinkle E, Liu K, Sing CF: APOA5 polymorphisms influence plasma triglycerides in young, healthy African Americans and whites of the CARDIA Study. J Lipid Res. 2005, 46 (3): 564-571. 10.1194/jlr.M400437-JLR200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ellard S, Bulman MP, Frayling TM, Allen LIS, Dronsfield MJ, Tack CJ, Hattersley AT: Allelic Drop-Out in Exon 2 of the Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor-1 alpha Gene Hinders the Identification of Mutations in Three Families With Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young. Diabetes. 1999, 48: 921-923.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Heinrich M, Muller M, Rand S, Brinkmann B, Hohoff C: Allelic drop-out in the STR system ACTBP2 (SE33) as a result of mutations in the primer binding region. Int J Legal Med. 2004, 118 (6): 361-363. 10.1007/s00414-004-0473-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Zajickova K, Krepelova A, Zofkova I: A single nucleotide polymorphism under the reverse primer binding site may lead to BsmI mis-genotyping in the vitamin D receptor gene. J Bone Miner Res. 2003, 18 (10): 1754-1757. 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.10.1754View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Findlay I, Ray P, Quirke P, Rutherford A, Lilford R: Allelic drop-out and preferential amplification in single cells and human blastomeres: implications for preimplantation diagnosis of sex and cystic fibrosis. Hum Reprod. 1995, 10 (6): 1609-1618.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nelson MS, Levedakou EN, Matthews JR, Early BE, Freeman DA, Kuhn CA, Sprecher CJ, Amin AS, McElfresh KC, Schumm JW: Detection of a primer-binding site polymorphism for the STR locus D16S539 using the Powerplex 1.1 system and validation of a degenerate primer to correct for the polymorphism. J Forensic Sci. 2002, 47 (2): 345-349.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ye S, Humphries S, Green F: Allele specific amplification by tetra-primer PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20 (5): 1152-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. [http://cedar.genetics.soton.ac.uk/public_html/primer1.html]
  28. Bavdekar A, Yajnik CS, Fall CH, Bapat S, Pandit AN, Deshpande V, Bhave S, Kellingray SD, Joglekar C: Insulin resistance syndrome in 8-year-old PCS children: small at birth, big at 8 years, or both?. Diabetes. 1999, 48: 2422-2429.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Yajnik CS, Fall CH, Vaidya U, Pandit AN, Bavdekar A, Bhat DS, Osmond C, Hales CN, Barker DJ: Fetal growth and glucose and insulin metabolism in four-year-old PCS children. Diabetic Medicine. 1995, 12: 330-336.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Wilkin TJ, Metcalf BS, Murphy MJ, Kirkby J, Jeffery AN, Voss LD: The relative contributions of birth weight, weight change, and current weight to insulin resistance in contemporary 5-year-olds: the EarlyBird Study. Diabetes. 2002, 51 (12): 3468-3472.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ward et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.