Open Access

Small and dense LDL in familial combined hyperlipidemia and N291S polymorphism of the lipoprotein lipase gene

  • Antonio López-Ruiz1Email author,
  • María M Jarabo1,
  • María L Martínez-Triguero2,
  • Maria Morales-Suárez-Varela3,
  • Eva Solá1, 4,
  • Celia Bañuls1, 3,
  • Marta Casado5 and
  • Antonio Hernández-Mijares1, 3, 4
Lipids in Health and Disease20098:12

DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-8-12

Received: 12 January 2009

Accepted: 31 March 2009

Published: 31 March 2009

Abstract

There is a predominance of small and dense LDL cholesterol particles in familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCH). The lipoprotein lipase gene could exert an influence in these circumstances.

To study the relationship of pattern B LDL and lipids with N291S polymorphism of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) in FCH patients.

Lipid profile, apolipoproteins, diameter of LDL and N291S polymorphism were determined in 93 patients with FCH and 286 individuals from the general population.

FCH patients with N291S polymorphism showed a lower mean diameter of LDL. FCH patients with pattern B LDL showed higher concentrations of triglycerides, VLDLc, non-HDLc and apo B100 and lower levels of HDLc than those with pattern A. Of FCH patients with polymorphism 87.5% presented pattern B and 12.5% pattern A, while patients without polymorphism presented pattern A in 69.2% cases and pattern B in 30.8% cases, with differences being statistically significant (p < 0.004). The prevalence of this mutation in our FCH patients was 9.7%.

The prevalence of N291S mutation in our FCH patients was similar to the 9.3% described in Dutch FCHL patients but clearly higher than the 2–5% described for other Caucasian populations. No polymorphism was found in our general population sample. FCH patients with phenotype B of LDL possessed an atherogenic lipid profile. The relationship between small and dense LDL and the presence of the N291S mutation may identify patients with high cardiovascular risk.

Background

A common form of dyslipemia associated with insulin resistance (obesity, diabetes mellitus, familial combined hyperlipidemia) is constituted by the presence of the atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype, characterized by elevated levels of triglycerides, small LDL particles and reduced HDL cholesterol [1]. This lipid triad frequently occurs in patients with premature coronary disease [2]. Small and dense LDL particles are formed largely as a response to high levels of triglycerides, and increase the risk of coronary heart disease [3]. LDL particles show a bimodal distribution in peak size and can be separated into two phenotypes; pattern A, in which larger, more buoyant LDL predominate, and pattern B, in which smaller, more dense LDL predominate. The National Cholesterol Education Program (ATP III) considers small and dense LDL as a lipid risk factor.

Familial Combined Hyperlipidemia (FCH; MIM 144250) is the most frequent genetic hyperlipemia. It is characterized by a tendency towards the appearance of coronary disease before 60 years of age [4]. The prevalence of this disease is 1–2% in the general population [5] and 10–20% among patients with premature coronary disease [6]. FCH presents a complex phenotype that is not completely understood, and which can vary between the patient and affected relatives [7]. Therefore, it is difficult to diagnose. It is also characterized by the presence of the atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype and an increase in apolipoprotein B100 [8].

Several genes have been studied in relation with FCH, which is a polygenic disease. One of the genes involved in FCH is lipoprotein lipase (LPL, E.C. 3.1.1.34) [9], a glycoproteic enzyme that plays a key role in the catabolism of lipoproteins rich in triglycerides, such as chylomicrons, and very low density lipoproteins (VLDL). LPL action takes place in endothelial cells surrounding the lumen of capillary vessels, where it adheres to heparan sulphate proteoglycans [10].

More than 80 structural mutations have been detected within the LPL gene. The frequency of these mutations in the general population is estimated to be at least 1/500. These heterozygous mutations are the main cause of some lipid disorders. One of these mutations is N291S localized in exon 6 of LPL [1113].

The aim of our study was to analyze the relationship of the atherogenic lipoprotein profile, especially the predominance of small and dense LDL, with the prevalence of N291S LPL polymorphism in Spanish patients with FCH from the Community of Valencia with respect to with the general population.

Materials and methods

Our study sample consisted of 33 families with Familial Combined Hyperlipidemia (FCH), with a mean of 4.4 individuals per family, all of them living in the Autonomous Community of Valencia (SE of Spain). From a total of 146 subjects, 93 were diagnosed with FCH according to the criteria of Bredie SJ et al. [14]. Total cholesterol and triglycerides levels superior to the 90th percentile (adjusted to age and gender) and apo B100 values superior to 1.2 g/L represented a diagnosis of FCH in 43 men and 50 women, aged from 15 to 75 years. In order to assess polymorphism in the general population, 286 genetically independent healthy controls of similar gender and age were randomly selected.

Venous blood was collected for biochemical measurements. Total cholesterol (TC) and triglycerides (TG) were measured through enzymatic methods and high density lipoproteins cholesterol (HDLc) using a direct method in a Beckman LX20 auto analyzer. The intraserial variation coefficient was < 3.5% for all these determinations. When TG values were under 400 mg/dL, LDL cholesterol concentration was calculated using Friedewald's formule [15]. Non-HDL cholesterol was obtained from the difference between total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol. Apolipoproteins AI and B100 were determined by immunonephelometry in a Dade Behring BNII (intra-assay variation coefficient < 5.5%).

LDL B phenotype was measured by polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis (2–16%) using the methodology described by Nichols et al. [16]. The assignment of LDL subclass phenotypes was based on particle diameter: pattern A, mean diameter > 25.5 nm, and pattern B, predominance of small and dense particles with a mean diameter ≤ 25.5 nm [17].

Approval was obtained from the relevant institutional review board, and all participants gave their informed consent.

DNA analysis for RFLP detection in LPL

DNA was extracted from tubes of 15 mL of blood with EDTA-K3, according to the method of Miller et al. [18], and was conserved at 4°C until analysis was performed.

N291S was identified after PCR amplification of a 238 bp fragment using the following oligonucleotides: forward 5' GCCGAGATACAATCTTGGTG 3' and reverse 5' CTGCTTCTTTTGGCTCTGACTGT 3'. Such a polymorphism adds a restriction site for the Ava II enzyme. PCR reaction was performed in 25 μl total volume containing 0.3 mM of each primer, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 1× Taq buffer, 2 mM MgCl2, 100 ng of genomic DNA and 2.5 U Taq polymerase (Netzyme) in a Master-Cycler thermocycler (Eppendorf). PCR was performed by means of a touchdown protocol [19] according to the following conditions: an initial denaturation step of 10 minutes at 94°C was followed by 4 cycles of 30 seconds at 94°C, 30 seconds at 60°C and 45 seconds at 72°C. This was followed by 20 cycles of 30 seconds at 94°C, 30 seconds at 60°C minus 0.5°C in each cycle and 45 seconds at 72°C, and then 10 cycles of 30 seconds at 94°C, 30 seconds at 50°C and 45 seconds at 72°C. The final extension consisted of 10 minutes at 72°C. The PCR product was digested for 4 hours at 37°C with Ava II and then analyzed with an 8% polyacrylamide gel. If the polymorphism was present, two fragments of 215 and 23 bp (HT+) appeared; if not, the site was destructed in the normal chain, which remained non-digested (238 bp: WT).

Study design

The study was conducted based on a case-control design. Ninety-three FCHL patients were recruited and matched according to sex and age with a control group of 286 subjects from the general population.

Statistics

Between-groups comparison was performed using an ANOVA followed by a parametric t-test. Due to skewed distribution of TG, TG analyses were performed on logarithmically transformed values. Statistical analyses were carried out using the Microsoft Excel Data Analysis Package (Microsoft, Inc.).

The Mann-Whitney nonparametric test was used to compare lipid concentrations in FCH patients with pattern A and those with pattern B. To test differences in triglycerides levels, values were logarithmically transformed prior to statistical analysis.

χ2 was performed in order to determine whether populations were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and in order to compare different phenotypes. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

Statistic analyses were carried out using the SSPS-15.0 program for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

A total of 93 patients, all diagnosed with FCH, were studied: 43 men (46.3%) and 50 women (53.7%), aged between 15 and 75. 286 subjects from the general population were also studied. Lipid parameters are expressed in Table 1. Significant differences were observed between the two groups in all the variables studied. FCH patients showed higher levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDLc, non-HDLc and apo B100, and lower levels of HDLc, apo A and a smaller LDL diameter.
Table 1

Lipid concentrations in cases (FCH patients) and controls.

 

FCH Patients

Controls

P value*

Total cholesterol

238.67 ± 50.10

185.13 ± 28.30

0.001

Triglycerides

204.71 ± 192.16

88.27 ± 42.45

0.001

LDLc

156.85 ± 39.97

113.50 ± 25.20

0.001

HDLc

47.77 ± 17.18

53.93 ± 14.48

0.001

VLDLc

40.28 ± 36.52

17.65 ± 8.49

0.001

Non-HDLc

192.94 ± 48.68

131.50 ± 29.09

0.001

Apo AI

133.55 ± 32.52

152.79 ± 29.03

0.001

Apo B100

125.80 ± 28.11

95.25 ± 21.15

0.001

LDL diameter

25.45 ± 0.78

26.14 ± 0.74

0.001

* ANOVA Test

Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Units are mg/dL in all parameters except LDL diameter (nm).

When non-mutated wild-type (WT) and heterozygote (HT) patients were compared, a smaller average diameter of LDL particles was observed among the latter, with the difference being statistically significant. Table 2 shows the lipid values of pattern A patients compared to those of pattern B patients. FCH patients with pattern B LDL displayed higher concentrations of triglycerides, VLDLc, non-HDLc and apo B100 and lower levels of HDLc than FCH patients with pattern A.
Table 2

Lipid concentrations in FCH patients with pattern A and pattern B

 

Pattern A (n = 26)

Pattern B (n = 27)

P-value*

Total cholesterol

227.88 ± 41.86

238.03 ± 50.86

0.450

Triglycerides

127.80 ± 65.77

344.55 ± 234.40

0.001

HDLc

55.00 ± 18.54

35.59 ± 7.94

0.001

LDLc

147.50 ± 34.64

149.06 ± 53.11

0.569

VLDLc

25.53 ± 13.11

65.34 ± 43.71

0.001

Non-HDLc

172.88 ± 32.40

202.44 ± 50.71

0.022

Apo AI

144.00 ± 39.87

121.33 ± 20.49

0.029

Apo B100

118.13 ± 22.22

133.69 ± 30.21

0.042

ApoB/ApoA

0.90 ± 0.29

1.50 ± 0.35

0.022

Diameter

26.06 ± 0.57

24.86 ± 0.42

0.001

* Mann-Whitney test

Values expressed as mean ± Standard Deviation. Units are mg/dL in all parameters

Patients with polymorphism presented pattern B in 87.5% of cases and pattern A in 12.5% of cases, while patients without polymorphism presented pattern A in 69.2% of cases and pattern B in 30.8% of cases. These differences were statistically significant (p < 0.004).

N291S polymorphism of LPL occurred in 9.7% of FCH patients, while no individual in the study sample from the general population presented this mutation. Both samples were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, as the patients showed a χ2 = 0.216 and 2p = 0.6423 and the general population a χ2 = 0 and 2p = 1.

Discussion

FCH is a disease with a complex phenotype that is not completely understood, and remains difficult to diagnose. This dyslipemic syndrome is associated with disturbances in all lipoprotein fractions. The key underlying abnormality of this condition is elevation of VLDL due to overproduction or defective catabolism [20]. Small and dense LDL is the final expression of this catabolism. These particles are more easily oxidized and display a higher affinity for the extracellular matrix and a higher degree of retention in arterial wall than their larger, normal-sized counterparts [21]. Small and dense LDL has been accepted as an emergent cardiovascular risk factor by the National Cholesterol Education Programme (Adult Treatment Panel III) [22], as many studies have demonstrated that the predominance of these particles is associated with an increase in cardiovascular risk more than classic lipid variables [23, 24]. FCH patients with phenotype B of LDL show a clearly atherogenic lipid profile. There is evidence that hypolipidemic treatment can modify the distribution of LDL subclasses [25]. Very high risk patients, including those with this atherogenic lipoprotein profile, may benefit from more potent lipid-lowering therapies [26].

It has been suggested that FCH is a heterogeneous and oligogenic disease [27]. One of the genes likely to exert an influence in this disease is the lipoprotein lipase gene. Many codon polymorphisms of the LPL gene have been described, some of them associated with alterations of the metabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins [28]. One of the most frequent polymorphisms is located in exon 6 (rs268, c. 1128 A>G; N291S) [29]. The prevalence of this mutation in our FCH patients was 9.7%, which is similar to the 9.3% described for Dutch FCH patients [5] but considerably higher than the 2–5% described for other Caucasian populations [30]. No polymorphism was detected in the sample from the general population, which reflects findings in other populations [5] in which no carriers were found, suggesting that the N291S mutation is more frequent among FCH patients. The mutation is likely to affect postprandial lipemia by altering its enzymatic activity [31], resulting in an increase of VLDL particles and high concentrations of apo B100 and leading to the appearance of a greater number of small and dense LDL particles as the final and most important expression of the catabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoprotein particles [32]. In this way, the FCH phenotype of patients with the polymorphism is negatively affected, with altered postprandial responses to fat-rich meals being described, even in patients that were initially normolipemic [33].

These previously published data coincide with our results; polymorphism-carrier patients have been reported to present a smaller LDL diameter, suggesting a clearly atherogenic alteration of the metabolism of triglyceride-rich particles [34]. In fact, in some studies regarding FCH, this polymorphism has been related to patients who had previously presented an ischemic cardiopathy [11].

In our study, patients with the N291S polymorphism showed a smaller average LDL diameter, corresponding with pattern B and constituting the final expression of the alteration of the metabolism of triglyceride-rich particles. This represents a higher cardiovascular risk among such patients. On the other hand, most patients without this polymorphism had pattern A, constituting a clear difference between both groups. We are aware of the limitations of this study in relation to the number of patients with the polymorphism. Unfortunately, its low prevalence among the general population makes it difficult to conduct a genetic study with a large number of patients that would permit us to draw more solid conclusions. That said, our data show important differences between the two patterns.

In conclusion, FCH patients with pattern B of LDL show a clearly atherogenic lipid profile. The relationship between small and dense LDL and the presence of the allele encoding for N291S mutation of the LPL gene, present in a high percentage of our FCH patients, could disrupt the phenotype of the disease by altering the clearance of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. Such phenotype expression is the basis for a more atherogenic profile. Therefore, based on our results in FCH patients in the Autonomous Community of Valencia, the cardiovascular risk of those with pattern B of LDL who carry this polymorphism could be considerably reduced through rigorous treatment of Hyperlipemia.

Acknowledgements

MC was supported by grant SAF2006-06760 from CICYT, Spain and by a grant from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Red de Centros FIS-RECAVA RD06/0014/0025).

Abbreviations

FCH: 

Familial combined hypermipidemia

LPL: 

lipoprotein lipase

WT: 

non-mutated wil-type

HT: 

Heterzygote.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Service of Endocrinology, University Hospital Dr Peset
(2)
Service of Clinical Analysis, University Hospital La Fe
(3)
CIBER CB/06/02/0045 research group, CIBER Actions in Epidemiology and Public Health
(4)
Medicine Department, University of Valencia
(5)
Institute of Biomedicina of Valencia (CSIC), CIBERehd

References

  1. Grundy SM: Hypertriglyceridemia, atherogenic dyslipidemia and the metabolic syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 1998, 81 (4A): 18B-25B.View ArticlePubMed
  2. Austin MA, King MC, Vranizan KM, Krauss RM: Atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype. A proposed genetic marker for coronary heart disease risk. Circulation. 1990, 82: 495-506.View ArticlePubMed
  3. St-Pierre AC, Cantin B, Dagenais GR, Mauriège P, Bernard PM, Després JP, Lamarche B: Low-density lipoprotein subfractions and the long-term risk of ischemic heart disease in men: 13-year follow-up data from the Quebec Cardiovascular Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005, 25: 553-559.View ArticlePubMed
  4. Eurlings PM, Kallen van der CJ, Geurts JM, van Greevenbroek MM, de Bruin TW: Genetic dissection of familial combined hyperlipidemia. Mol Genet Metab. 2001, 74: 98-104.View ArticlePubMed
  5. Hoffer MJV, Bredie SJH, Boomsma DI, Reymer PWA, Kastelein JJP, de Knijff P, Demacker PNM, Stalenhoef AFH, Havekes LM, Frants RR: The lipoprotein lipase (Asn291-Ser) mutation associated with elevated lipid level families with familial combined hyperlipidaemia. Atherosclerosis. 1996, 119: 159-167.View ArticlePubMed
  6. Goldstein JL, Schrott HG, Hazzard WR, Bierman EL, Motulsky AG: Hyperlipidemia in coronary heart disease II. Genetic analysis of lipid levels in 176 families and delineation of a new inherited disorder, combined hyperlipidemia. J Clin Invest. 1973, 52: 1544-1568.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  7. Porkka KV, Nuotio I, Pajukanta P, Ehnholm C, Suurinkeroinen L, Syvänne M, Lehtimäki T, Lahdenkari AT, Lahdenperä S, Ylitalo K, Antikainen M, Perola M, Raitakari OT, Kovanen P, Viikari JS, Peltonen L, Taskinen MR: Phenotype expression in familial combined hyperlipidemia. Atherosclerosis. 1997, 133: 245-253.View ArticlePubMed
  8. Ayyobi AF, McGladdery SH, McNeely MJ, Austin MA, Motulsky AG, Brunzell JD: Small, dense LDL and elevated apolipoprotein B are the common characteristics for the three major lipid phenotypes of familial combined hyperlipidemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003, 23: 1289-1294.View ArticlePubMed
  9. Hu Y, Liu W, Huang R, Zhang X: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between lipoprotein lipase Asn291Ser variant and diseases. J Lipid Res. 2006, 47: 1908-1914.View ArticlePubMed
  10. Enerback S, Gimble JM: Lipoprotein lipase gene expression: physiological regulator at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional level. Biochem Biophys Acta. 1993, 1169: 107-125.View ArticlePubMed
  11. Gerdes C, Fisher RM, Nicaud V, Boer J, Humphries SE, Talmud PJ, Faergeman O: Lipoprotein lipase variants D9N and N291S are associated with increased plasma triglyceride and lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations: studies in the fasting and postprandial states: the European Atherosclerosis Research Studies. Circulation. 1997, 96: 733-740.View ArticlePubMed
  12. Wittrup HH, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Abildgaard S, Steffensen R, Schnohr P, Nordestgaard BG: A common substitution (Asn291Ser) in Lipoprotein Lipase is associated with increased risk of ischemic heart disease. J Clin Invest. 1997, 99: 1606-1613.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  13. Reymer PW, Groenemeyer BE, Gagné E, Miao L, Appelman EE, Seidel JC, Kromhout D, Bijvoet SM, Oever van de K, Bruin T, Hayden MR, Kastelein JJP: A frequently occurring mutation in the lipoprotein lipase gene (Asn291Ser) contributes to the expression of familial combined hyperlipidemia. Hum Mol Genet. 1995, 4: 1543-1549.View ArticlePubMed
  14. Bredie SJ, Demacker PN, Stalenhoef AF: Metabolic and genetic aspects of familial combined hyperlipidaemia with emphasis on low-density lipoprotein heterogeneity. Eur J Clin Invest. 1997, 27: 802-811.View ArticlePubMed
  15. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS: Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma without use of preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972, 18: 499-502.PubMed
  16. Nichols AV, Krauss RM, Musliner TA: Nondenaturing polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis. Methods Enzymol. 1986, 128: 417-431.View ArticlePubMed
  17. Austin MA, Hokanson JE, Brunzell JD: Characterization of low-density lipoprotein subclasses: methodologic approaches and clinical relevance. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1994, 5: 395-403.View ArticlePubMed
  18. Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF: A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 16 (3): 1215-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  19. Hecker KH, Roux KH: High and low annealing temperatures increase both specificity and yield in touchdown and step-down PCR. Biotechniques. 1996, 20: 478-485.PubMed
  20. Adiels M, Olofsson SO, Taskinen MR, Borén J: Overproduction of very low-density lipoproteins is the hallmark of the dyslipidemia in the metabolic syndrome. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008, 28: 1225-1236.View ArticlePubMed
  21. Packard CJ: Small dense low-density lipoprotein and its role as an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2006, 17: 412-417.View ArticlePubMed
  22. Rajman I, Eacho PI, Chowienczyk PJ, Ritter JM: LDL particle size: an important drug target?. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999, 48: 125-133.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  23. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CN, Brewer HB, Clark LT, Hunninghake DB, Pasternak RC, Smith SC, Stone NJ, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association: Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines. Circulation. 2004, 110: 227-239.View ArticlePubMed
  24. Jarvik GP, Brunzell JD, Austin MA, Krauss RM, Motulsky AG, Wijsman E: Genetic predictors of FCH in four large pedigrees. Influence of ApoB level major locus predicted genotype and LDL subclass phenotype. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994, 14: 1687-1694.View ArticlePubMed
  25. Nevin DN, Brunzell JD, Deeb SS: The LPL gene in individuals with familial combined hyperlipidemia and decreased LPL activity. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994, 14: 869-873.View ArticlePubMed
  26. Van Bockxmeer FM, Liu Q, Mamotte C, Burke U, Taylor R: Lipoprotein lipase D9N, N291S and S447X polymorphisms: their influence on premature coronary heart disease and plasma lipids. Atherosclerosis. 2001, 157: 123-129.View ArticlePubMed
  27. Wittekoek ME, Pimstone SN, Reymer PW, Feuth L, Botma GJ, Defesche JC, Prins M, Hayden MR, Kastelein JJ: A common mutation in the lipoprotein lipase (N291S) alters the lipoprotein phenotype and risk for cardiovascular disease in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Circulation. 1998, 97: 729-735.View ArticlePubMed
  28. Razzaghi H, Day BW, McClure RJ, Kamboh MI: Structure-function analysis of D9N and N291S mutations in human lipoprotein lipase using molecular modelling. J Mol Graph Model. 2001, 19: 487–494, 587–590.
  29. Georgieva AM, van Greevenbroek MM, Krauss RM, Brouwers MC, Vermeulen VM, Robertus-Teunissen MG, Kallen van der CJ, de Bruin TW: Subclasses of low-density lipoprotein and very low-density lipoprotein in familial combined hyperlipidemia: relationship to multiple lipoprotein phenotype. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004, 24: 744-749.View ArticlePubMed
  30. Pimstone SN, Clee SM, Gagne SE, Miao L, Zhang H, Stein EA, Hayden MR: A frequently occurring mutation in the lipoprotein lipase gene (Asn291Ser) results in altered postprandial chylomicron triglyceride and retinyl palmitate response in normolipidemic carriers. J Lipid Res. 1996, 37: 1675-1684.PubMed
  31. Hopkins PN, Heiss G, Ellison RC, Province MA, Pankow JS, Eckfeldt JH, Hunt SC: Coronary artery disease risk in familial combined hyperlipidemia and familial hypertriglyceridemia: a case-control comparison from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study. Circulation. 2003, 108: 519-523.View ArticlePubMed
  32. National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP): Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adults Treatment Panel III) : Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP): Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adults Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation. 2002, 106: 3143-3421.
  33. Vakkilainen J, Steiner G, Ansquer JC, Aubin F, Rattier S, Foucher Ch, Hamsten A, Taskinen MR, DAIS Group: Relationships between low-density lipoprotein particle size, plasma lipoproteins, and progression of coronary artery disease: the Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study (DAIS). Circulation. 2003, 107: 1733-1737.View ArticlePubMed
  34. Hurt-Camejo E, Camejo G, Sartipy P: Phospholipase A2 and small, dense low-density lipoprotein. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2000, 11: 465-471.View ArticlePubMed

Copyright

© López-Ruiz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement