Skip to main content

Table 7 Intensity of association between fecal bacteria load and lipid profiles and hepatic HMG CoA/Mevalonate ratio in the animals

From: Tissue dyslipidemia in salmonella-infected rats treated with amoxillin and pefloxacin

Parameters

Correlation coefficient

Fecal Bacteria load vs. Weight change

−0.609a

Fecal Bacteria load vs. Plasma Cholesterol

0.456a

Fecal Bacteria load vs. Plasma Triacylglycerols

0.485a

Fecal Bacteria load vs. Plasma Phospholipid

0.414a

Fecal Bacteria load vs. Plasma free fatty acids

0.485a

Fecal Bacteria load vs. HDL Cholesterol

−0.485a

Fecal Bacteria load vs. LDL-VLDL Triacylglycerols

0.313b

Fecal Bacteria load vs. Erythrocyte Triacylglycerols

−0.318b

Fecal Bacteria load vs. Liver Cholesterol

0.464a

Fecal Bacteria load vs. Liver Triacylglycerols

0.546a

Fecal Bacteria load vs. Liver Phospholipid

0.680a

Fecal Bacteria load vs. Kidney Triacylglycerols

0.445a

Fecal Bacteria load vs. Kidney Phospholipid

0.459a

Fecal Bacteria load vs. Brain Triacylglycerols

0.785a

Fecal Bacteria load vs. Brain Phospholipid

0.343b

Fecal Bacteria load vs. Spleen Phospholipid

−0.419a

Fecal Bacteria load vs. Heart Cholesterol

0.488a

Fecal Bacteria load vs. Heart Phospholipid

−0.415a

Fecal Bacteria load vs. Erythrocyte ghost Phospholipid

0.359b

Fecal Bacteria load vs. HMG CoA/Mevalonate

−0.501a

  1. a Correlation is significant at p< 0.01.
  2. b Correlation is significant at p< 0.05.