Skip to main content

Table 3 Relationship between the prevalence of T2DM and TP

From: Epidemiological characteristics and risk factors of T2DM in Chinese premenopausal and postmenopausal women

TP(g/L)

Q1, n = 810

Q2, n = 816

Q3, n = 786

Q4, n = 815

69.9

(59.3–71.6)

73.0

(71.7–74.0)

75.1

(74.1–76.3)

78.2

(76.4–90.9)

Models

T2DM

Reference

OR (95% CI)

P-value

OR (95% CI)

P-value

OR (95% CI)

P-value

Model1

1

1.19 (0.92 1.56)

0.186

1.24 (0.95 1.61)

0.116

1.46 (1.13 1.89)

0.004

Model2

1

1.19 (0.91 1.56)

0.203

1.22 (0.95 1.60)

0.142

1.41 (1.09 1.83)

0.010

Model3

1

1.19 (0.90 1.54)

0.240

1.21 (0.92 1.59)

0.176

1.42 (1.09 1.85)

0.011

  1. The four groups of TP are expressed as Q1 (59.3–71.6), Q2 (71.7–74.0), Q3 (74.1–76.3) and Q4 (76.4–90.9). TP is presented as the median (range)
  2. Model 1: adjustment for age and WC;
  3. Model 2: adjustment for TC, TG, LDL-C and HDL-C + Model 1;
  4. Model 3: adjustment for SBP, DBP, ALT, AST, BUN, TBIL, eGFR + Model 2
Back to article page

Lipids in Health and Disease

ISSN: 1476-511X