Table 3 Relationship between GGT and the incident NAFLD in different models
Variable | Crude model (HR, 95%CI, P) | Model I (HR, 95% CI, P) | Model II (HR, 95% CI, P) | GAM (HR, 95% CI, P) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GGT | 1.020 (1.018–1.022)<0.001 | 1.013 (1.011, 1.015) <0.001 | 1.010 (1.007, 1.012)<0.001 | 1.004 (1.002, 1.007) <0.001 |
GGT (quartile) | ||||
Q1 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Q2 | 2.176 (1.717, 2.757)<0.001 | 1.809 (1.427, 2.293)<0.001 | 1.661 (1.308, 2.108)<0.001 | 1.402 (1.100, 1.785) <0.001 |
Q3 | 5.066 (4.075, 6.298)<0.001 | 3.335 (2.678, 4.154)<0.001 | 2.888 (2.310, 3.609)<0.001 | 2.103 (1.671, 2.648) <0.001 |
Q4 | 8.202 (6.625, 10.156)<0.001 | 4.548 (3.661, 5.650)<0.001 | 3.653 (2.915, 4.579)<0.001 | 2.347 (1.853, 2.973)<0.001 |
P for trend | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |