Skip to main content

Table 5 The overview of the prediction equations created in Tables 3 and 4 by cross-validation

From: Assessment of whole-body and regional body fat using abdominal quantitative computed tomography in Chinese women and men

Independent variable

Regression analysis

 

Bland–Altman

Intercept

Slope

Adjusted R2

SEE

Mean difference

95% LoA

Predicted TBF%

Male (L1/L2)

-5.00

1.145

0.87

2.68

1.31

-4.08 to 6.71

Male (L2/L3)

-4.32

1.122

0.86

2.71

1.22

-4.14 to 6.58

Female (L5/S1)

0.33

1.002

0.81

3.08

-0.37

-6.29 to 5.54

Predicted Android %fat

Male (L1/L2)

-3.90

1.060

0.87

4.48

2.00

-6.58 to 10.58

Female (L3/L4)

-0.95

1.013

0.91

3.62

0.47

-6.43 to 7.38

Predicted Gynoid %fat

Male (L5/S1)

0.48

0.991

0.75

3.20

-0.27

-6.36 to 5.82

Female (L5/S1)

2.98

0.884

0.56

3.94

1.10

-6.51 to 8.72

  1. TBF% total body fat percentage, adjusted R2 adjusted coefficient of determination, SEE standard error of the estimate, LoA limits of agreement