Open Access

Sphingomyelin synthase overexpression increases cholesterol accumulation and decreases cholesterol secretion in liver cells

Lipids in Health and Disease201110:46

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-10-46

Received: 1 March 2011

Accepted: 21 March 2011

Published: 21 March 2011

Abstract

Background

Studies have shown that plasma high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels are negatively correlated with the development of atherosclerosis, whereas epidemiological studies have also shown that plasma sphingomyelin level is an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis.

Methods

To evaluate the relationship between cellular sphingomyelin level and cholesterol metabolism, we created two cell lines that overexpressed sphingomyelin synthase 1 or 2 (SMS1 or SMS2), using the Tet-off expression system.

Results

We found that SMS1 or SMS2 overexpression in Huh7 cells, a human hepatoma cell line, significantly increased the levels of intracellular sphingomyelin, cholesterol, and apolipoprotein A-I and decreased levels of apolipoprotein A-I and cholesterol in the cell culture medium, implying a defect in both processes.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that the manipulation of sphingomyelin synthase activity could influence the metabolism of sphingomyelin, cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I.

Background

Atherosclerosis (AS) is the main cause of cardiovascular disease and stroke and a prevalent chronic disease. The metabolism of cholesterol in vivo is tightly associated with AS [1]. Studies have shown that levels of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in the plasma were negatively correlated with atherosclerosis, whereas increasing plasma HDL-C levels could reduce the development of AS [2]. The mechanism of this effect may be due to high density lipoprotein (HDL) mediated reverse cholesterol transport (RCT), a process used to remove excess cholesterol from peripheral tissues to the liver for excretion. Many lipids and protein molecules are involved in RCT [3], of which Apolipoprotein A-I (Apo A-I) and membrane sphingomyelin are two.

Apo A-I is synthesized in the liver and intestine and is a major protein component of HDL. Apo A-I can serves as an acceptor for phospholipids and cholesterol effluxed from peripheral tissues through the ATP binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) to form nascent HDL particles [4, 5]. The nascent particles continue to accept the cholesterol effluxed through ATP binding cassette transporter G1 (ABCG1) to form mature HDL [3, 6]. Scavenger receptor BI (SR-BI), an HDL receptor on liver cell membranes, can mediate selective uptake of HDL lipid, and cholesterol can be taken up into the liver and excreted into bile [3, 7].

Significant evidence has been presented to confirm the existence of lipid rafts in membranes enriched with sphingolipids and cholesterol in the liquid-ordered phase. Sphingomyelin (SM) is a major component of sphingolipids [8]. Studies have shown that ABCA1, ABCG1 and SR-BI are associated with lipid rafts [911]. Therefore, changes in SM biosynthesis could have an impact on lipoprotein metabolism and membrane proteins (ABCA1, ABCG1 and SR-BI), thus influencing lipoprotein and cholesterol levels in the circulation.

Epidemiological investigations have shown that an increased plasma SM levels is an independent risk factor for AS. Recent studies have found that SM accumulates in atherosclerotic plaques [12, 13]. Because SM might affect the activity of lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) and lipoprotein lipase (LPL), the inhibition of SM biosynthesis might reduce lipoprotein SM content and improve cholesterol distribution in lipoproteins by enhancing RCT [14].

Serine palmitoyltransferase (SPT) and sphingomyelin synthase (SMS) are two critical enzymes that play important roles in the multienzymatic steps of SM biosynthesis. Pharmacologic inhibition of SPT caused a significant decrease of plasma SM levels and AS plague size in mice [15, 16]. SMS is the last critical enzyme for SM biosynthesis and has two isoforms (SMS1 and SMS2). SMS1 is located on the cis-, medial-Golgi apparatus, and SMS2 is found in plasma membranes [17, 18]. Our laboratory has found that SMS overexpression increased SM levels in cells and animals [19, 20].

In this study, we investigated the effect of SMS overexpression on cholesterol accumulation and secretion in Huh7 cells.

Materials and methods

Preparation of cell lines stably overexpressing SMS1 or SMS2

A Tet-off system was used to establish the Huh7 cell lines overexpressing SMS1 or SMS2. Briefly, Huh7 cells were transfected with the regulator plasmid of pTet-Off Vector (Clontech) (to express the tTA protein), using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. G418 (250 μg/ml) was used to select positive clones (named as Huh7-tTA), which were further transfected with Tet-Off-SMS1-FLAG or Tet-Off-SMS2-FLAG (SMS1 and SMS2 expression vectors were purchased from Open Biosystems, USA). The cells were screened under the pressure of Hygromycin B (250 μg/ml, Amresco) and G418 (250 μg/ml). The monoclonal cell lines that survived under the pressure selection were chosen and named SMS1 or SMS2 cells.

RT-PCR analysis

Total RNA was isolated from cells with Trizol (Takara). Two μg of total RNA was reverse-transcribed and the cDNA was amplified by PCR using a kit (Fermentas). The PCR products were visualized by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gels. β-Actin RNA was used as an internal control. The primers (Invitrogen) used for the analyses were the following:

SMS1 sense (5' - GGCTTCTCAGCGTAGTTGGA -3');

SMS2 sense (5'-TATTCGCCTCGTCACTTCTGG-3');

common antisense is FLAG (5'-TCATCGTCATCCTTGTAATCG-3');

β-actin sense (5'-GGGTCACCCACACTGTGCCCATCTA-3');

β-actin antisense (5'- GCATTTGCGGTGGACGATGGAGG-3');

Apo A-I sense (5'-CTCTTCCTGACGGGGAGC-3');

Apo A-I antisense (5'- TCACCTCCTCCAGATCCTTG -3');

ABCA1 sense (5'-AGTACCCCAGCCTGGAACTT-3');

ABCA1 antisense (5'-CTGTCCTTGGCCAGCTTTAG-3');

ABCG1 sense (5'-GAAGGTCTTGAGCAACTCCG-3');

ABCG1 antisense (5'-CAGTAGGCCACTGGGAACAT-3');

SR-BI sense (5'-CAACAACTCCGACTCTGGGCTCT-3');

SR-BI antisense (5'-GTCAGCGTTGAGGAAGTGAGGAT-3');

HMG-CoA reductase sense (5'- GGAGTGGCAGGACCCCTTTGC -3');

HMG-CoA reductase antisense (5'- CCAGCCATGGCAGAGCCCAC -3').

The product lengths of SMS1, SMS2, β-actin, Apo A-I, ABCA1, ABCG1, SR-BI and HMG-CoA reductase are 367 bp, 431 bp, 650 bp, 310 bp, 586 bp, 207 bp, 421 bp and 617 bp, respectively.

Western blot analysis

Equal amounts of cell homogenates (20 μg protein/lane) were separated on 10% polyacrylamide gels under denaturing conditions. Proteins were electroblotted to a nitrocellulose membrane that had been incubated with respective antibodies: FLAG (CST), Apo A-I (Epitomics), ABCA1 (Boster), ABCG1 (Boster), or SR-BI (Epitomics). The loading control was glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. The Super Signal West detection kit (Pierce) was used for the detection step. The maximum intensity of each band was measured using Image-Pro Plus version 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Inc.).

Sphingomyelin synthase activity assay

Cells were homogenized in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, 5% sucrose, and protease inhibitors. The homogenate was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 min, and the supernatant was used to analyze SMS activity. The reaction system contained 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 25 mM KCl, C6-NBD-ceramide (0.1 mg/mL) (Invitrogen-MP), and PC (0.01 mg/mL). The mixture was incubated at 37°C for 2 hours. Lipids were extracted in chloroform:methanol (2:1), dried under nitrogen gas, and separated using thin layer chromatography (TLC) [21]. The plate was scanned with a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics; Sunnyvale, CA) and the intensity of each band was measured using Image-Pro Plus version 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Inc.).

Lysenin treatment and cell mortality measurement

Cells were washed twice in PBS and incubated with lysenin (200 ng/ml) for 1 hr. Cell viability was measured using the WST-1 cell proliferation reagent according to the manufacturer's instructions (Roche) [22]

Analysis of Apo A- I in the medium by ELISA

ELISA analysis of the Apo A-I in the cell culture medium was done as previously reported [23].

Sphingomyelin and cholesterol measurement

The cell monolayer was washed twice with PBS, and cellular lipids were extracted using n-hexane-2/propanol (3:2). Aliquots of the extracted lipids were subjected to analysis. The SM content was measured by a method previously described [15], and cholesterol was measured using a commercial available kit (Rongshen).

Statistical Analysis

Data are reported as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test and one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.

Results

To investigate the ex vivo role of SMS1 and SMS2, we utilized the Tet-off system to express SMS1-FLAG and SMS2-FLAG in Huh 7 cells. RT-PCR of RNA prepared from the cells indicated that both SMS1-FLAG and SMS2-FLAG were expressed (Figure 1A), and this expression was confirmed by Western blot analysis (Figure 1B). Furthermore, SMS overexpression caused a significant increase in total SMS activity compared to controls (Figure 2; P < 0.001).
Figure 1

Detection of SMS-FLAG in control (Huh7-tTA), SMS1 and SMS2 overexpressing cells by RT-PCR (A) and Western blot (B).

Figure 2

SMS activity assay. Values shown are means ± SD (n = 6), ** P < 0.001 compared to control (Huh7-tTA).

As shown in Figure 3, SMS overexpression significantly increased intracellular levels of SM (P < 0.001). Because cellular SM levels represent SM levels in all cellular membranes, including the plasma membrane, endoplasmic reticulum, and Golgi complex, we still do not know whether SMS1 or SMS2 overexpression has an effect on SM levels specifically in the plasma membrane. Lysenin is a recently discovered SM-specific cytotoxin that recognizes SM only when it forms aggregates or microdomains [24]. To investigate the effect of SMS1 or SMS2 overexpression on the formation of these microdomains, we tested both SMS overexpression cell lines for their sensitivity to lysenin-mediated cytolysis. As indicated in Figure 4, both cells showed significantly more sensitive to lysenin-mediated cytolysis than control cells (P < 0.001).
Figure 3

Determination of the cellular SM and cholesterol content. Values shown are means ± SD (n = 3), *P < 0.05; **P < 0.001 compared to control (Huh7-tTA).

Figure 4

Lysenin-mediated cytotoxicity. Values shown are means ± SD (n = 4), *P < 0.001 compared to control (Huh7-tTA).

There is evidence to suggest that sphingomyelin and cholesterol are linked inside the cells [25]. We therefore reasoned that the accumulation of SM in the cells might increase cellular cholesterol levels. To test this hypothesis, we measured cellular cholesterol levels and found that they were significantly increased in both SMS1 and SMS2 cells compared to control cells (Figure 3; P < 0.05).

We next sought to determine whether overexpression of SMS would decrease cholesterol secretion. The results showed that the contents of cholesterol in the cell culture medium were significantly decreased in both SMS1 and SMS2 overexpressing cells (Figure 5; P < 0.05). We then measured ABCA1, ABCG1, SR-BI mRNA and protein levels, as well as HMG-CoA reductase mRNA levels. As shown in Figure 6, SMS1 and SMS2 overexpression can upregulate ABCA1, ABCG1, and SR-BI mRNA and protein levels and downregulate HMG-CoA reductase mRNA levels, as compared with controls (Figure 6, 7; P < 0.05 and 0.001, respectively).
Figure 5

Determination of the cholesterol concentrations in the medium. Values shown are means ± SD (n = 3), *P < 0.05 compared to control (Huh7-tTA).

Figure 6

The expression of ABCA1, ABCG1 and SR-BI. A. RT-PCR analysis; B. Western blot analysis. Values shown are means ± SD (n = 3), *P < 0.05; **P < 0.001 compared to control (Huh7-tTA).

Figure 7

mRNA analysis of HMG-CoA reductase by RT-PCR. Values shown are means ± SD (n = 3), **P < 0.001 compared to control (Huh7-tTA).

To investigate the relationship between SMS overexpression and lipoprotein metabolism, we measured Apo A-I levels inside the cells and in the cell culture medium. As shown in Figure 8, SMS overexpression significantly increased cellular Apo A-I content (Figure 8B; P < 0.001), which might be due to decreasing Apo A-I secretion (Figure 8C; P < 0.001). Apo A-I mRNA expression between SMS cells and control cells were not significantly different (Figure 8A; P > 0.05).
Figure 8

Analysis of Apo A-I in the cells and medium. A. Apo A-I analysis in the cells by RT-PCR; B. Apo A-I analysis in the cell by Western blot; C. Apo A-I analysis in the medium by ELISA. Values shown are means ± SD (n = 3). **P < 0.001 compared to control (Huh7-tTA).

Discussion

Previously, we had confirmed that overexression SMS1 or SMS2 can accelerate development of atherosclerosis in mice. But the studies were in mice[20], to further investigate the effect of SM on the atherosclerosis in human cells, in the present study, we demonstrated that Huh7 cells with higher SMS activity 1) had increased cellular SM and cholesterol content and decreased cholesterol secretion; 2) had increased cellular Apo A-I content and decreased Apo A-I secretion, but normal Apo A-I mRNA expression; and 3) had increased expression of ABCA1, ABCG1 and SR-BI mRNA and protein levels as well as decreased expression of HMG-CoA reductase mRNA. Thus, SMS activity is closely related to cholesterol metabolism.

In this study, we demonstrated an interesting phenomenon: SMS overexpression-mediated SM content changes paralleled the cholesterol content changes in the cells. The interaction of SM, cholesterol, and glycosphingolipid drives the formation of plasma membrane rafts [8]. Rafts are formed in the Golgi apparatus and are targeted to plasma membranes, where they are thought to exist as floating islands within the sea of bulk membrane [26]. Up to 70% of membrane SM is found in rafts [27]. The relative proportions of both SM and cholesterol appear critical for raft stability because depletion of cholesterol or supplementation of the SM pool abolishes or (re)establishes, respectively, the detergent insolubility of the domains and their sorting capacity [2830]. As demonstrated in artificial membrane systems, cholesterol facilitates the formation of sphingolipid-containing microdomains [31]. Ito et al. [25] reported that the digestion of membrane by extracellular sphingomyelinase (SMase, a SM hydrolase) increased the incorporation of cellular cholesterol into generated HDL and that this increase was diminished by supplement of endogenous or exogenous SM to the cells. Patients with Niemann-Pick disease (NPD-B) can not hydrolyze SM because of defective SMase, which results in the deposition of a large number of SM and cholesterol in the liver and nervous system [32]. Our results imply that SM and cholesterol in the rafts might closely interact with or anchor one other.

Our results also showed that SMS overexpression-mediated cholesterol accumulation (Figure 3) was not related to increased production, because HMG-CoA reductase mRNA expression was downregulated (Figure 7). A reasonable explanation for this result follows: 1) elevated SM can increase cholesterol sequestration; 2) Apo A-I is the acceptor of cellular cholesterol efflux, so decreasing the secretion of Apo A-I might result in reduction of cholesterol efflux; and 3) as an HDL receptor, SR-BI in hepatic cells involves selective HDL cholesterol ester uptake and cholesterol efflux[3, 7] and increasing SR-BI expression (Figure 6) might promote cholesterol uptake and cholesterol efflux, but the mass of upake were more than the efflux, Probably, cholesterol in Golgi complex or endoplasmic reticulum (ER) was increased along with SM. Our previous study also showed that SMS overexpression led to upregulation of SR-BI in vivo [20]. Apo A-I plays an important role in anti-atherosclerosis. There is a negative relationship between plasma HDL-C levels and atherosclerosis, and Apo A-I is a major protein component of HDL [2, 4]. Because Apo A-I mRNA expression had no change, increased cellular Apo A-I content in SMS-overexpressing Huh7 cells might be due to decreased Apo A-I secretion (Figure 8).

Downregulation of HMG-CoA reductase expression in SMS overexpressed cells reflects a feedback inhibition mechanism by elevating cellular cholesterol content (Figures 3 and 7). Upregulation of ABCA1 and ABCG1 expression in SMS overexpressing cells might be a self-protective positive feedback mechanism (Figure 6), consistent with a reported study that showed that in epoxycholesterol treated macrophages, where an increase in cholesterol synthesis led to the upregulation of ABCA1 and ABCG1 [33].

The deposition of cholesterol in plaques is one of the characteristics of atherosclerosis. Our previous studies showed that SMS overexpression resulted in changes in plasma lipid and lipoprotein metabolism and increased the atherogenic potential in mice [20]. All evidence indicates that the inhibition of SM biosynthesis might be a new pathway for the treatment of AS and that SMS might become a potential target for AS treatment.

Conclusions

Cellular SM levels are positively related to cellular cholesterol levels and SMS overexpression-mediated cellular SM content changes are related to cellular Apo A-I content and secretion. SMS might be a potential target for the treatment of AS.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Pharmacy, Fudan University

References

  1. Williams KJ, Tabas I: The response-to-retention hypothesis of early atherogenesis. Arteriosc Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995, 15 (5): 551-561.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Gordon DJ , Rifkind BM: High-density lipoprotein: the clinical implications of recent studies. N Engl J Med. 1989, 321: 1311-1316. 10.1056/NEJM198911093211907View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lewis GF, Rader DJ: New insights into the regulation of HDL metabolism and reverse cholesterol transport. Circ Res. 2005, 96: 1221-1232. 10.1161/01.RES.0000170946.56981.5cView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Rader DJ: High-density lipoproteins and atherosclerosis. Am J Cardiol. 2002, 90: 62-70. 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02635-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Segrest JP, Jones MK, De Loof H, Brouillette CG, Venkatachalapathi YV, Anantharamaiah GM: The amphipathic helix in the exchangeable apolipoproteins: a review of secondary structure and function. J Lipid Res. 1992, 33: 141-166.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Curtiss LK, Volenta DT, Hime NJ, Rye KA: What is so special about apolipoprotein AI in reverse cholesterol transport?. Arteriosc Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006, 26: 12-19. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000194291.94269.5a.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Meyers CD, Kashyap ML: Pharmacologic elevation of high-density lipoproteins: recent insights on mechanism of action and ASprotection. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2004, 19: 366-373. 10.1097/01.hco.0000126582.27767.87View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Simons K, Ikonen E: Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature. 1997, 387: 569-572. 10.1038/42408View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Subbaiah PV, Gesquiere LR, Wang K: Regulation of the selective uptake of cholesteryl esters from high density lipoproteins by sphingomyelin. J Lipid Res. 2005, 46: 2699-2705. 10.1194/jlr.M500263-JLR200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jessup W, Gelissen IC, Gaus K, Kritharides L: Roles of ATP binding cassette transporters A1 and G1, scavenger receptor BI and membrane lipid domains in cholesterol export from macrophages. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2006, 17: 247-257. 10.1097/01.mol.0000226116.35555.ebView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fitzgerald ML, Mujawar Z, Tamehiro N: ABC transporters, ASand inflammation. Atherosclerosis. 2010, 211: 361-370. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.01.011PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Nilsson A, Duan RD: Absorption and lipoprotein transport of sphingomyelin. J Lipid Res. 2006, 47: 154-171. 10.1194/jlr.M500357-JLR200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Schlitt A, Blankenberg S, Yan D, Von Gizycki H, Buerke M, Werdan K, Bickel C, Lackner KJ, Meyer J, Rupprecht HJ, Jiang XC: Further evaluation of plasma sphingomyelin levels as a risk factor for coronary artery disease. Nutr Metab. 2006, 3: 5-12. 10.1186/1743-7075-3-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Park TS, Panek RL, Rekhter MD, Mueller SB, Rosebury WS, Robertson A, Hanselman JC, Kindt E, Homan R, Karathanasis SK: Modulation of lipoprotein metabolism by inhibition of sphingomyelin synthesis in ApoE knockout mice. Atherosclerosis. 2006, 189: 264-272. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.12.029View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hojjati MR, Li Z, Zhou H, Tang S, Huan C, Ooi E, Lu S, Jiang XC: Effect of myriocin on plasma sphingolipid metabolism and ASin apoE-deficient mice. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 10284-10289. 10.1074/jbc.M412348200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Park TS, Panek RL, Mueller SB, Hanselman JC , Rosebury WS , Robertson AW, Kindt EK, Homan R, Karathanasis SK , Rekhter MD: Inhibition of sphingomyelin synthesis reduces atherogenesis in apolipoprotein E-knockout mice. Circulation. 2004, 110: 3465-3471. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000148370.60535.22View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Futerman AH , Stieger B, Hubbard AL , Pagano RE: Sphingomyelin synthesis in rat liver occurs predominantly at the cis and medial cisternae of the Golgi apparatus. J Biol Chem. 1990, 265: 8650-8657.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Huitema K, van den Dikkenberg J, Brouwers JF, Holthuis JC: Identification of a family of animal sphingomyelin synthases. EMBO J. 2004, 23: 33-44. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600034PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ding TB, Li ZQ , Hailemariam T, Mukherjee S, Maxfield FR, Wu MP, Jiang XC: SMS overexpression and knockdown: impact on cellular sphingomyelin and diacylglycerol metabolism, and cell apoptosis. J Lipid Res. 2008, 49: 376-385. 10.1194/jlr.M700401-JLR200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Dong JB, Wu MP, Jiang XC: Adenovirus-mediated overexpression of sphingomyelin synthase 1 and 2 increases the atherogenic potential in mice. J Lipid Res. 2006, 47: 1307-1314. 10.1194/jlr.M600040-JLR200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Meng AC, Luberto C, Bai A, Yang X, Hannun YA , Zhou D: Sphingomyelin synthase as a potential target for D609-induced apoptosis in U937 human monocytic leukemia cells. Exp Cell Res. 2004, 292: 385-392. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2003.10.001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu J, Huan C, Chakraborty M, Zhang H, Lu D, Kuo MS, Cao G, Jiang XC: Macrophage sphingomyelin synthase 2 deficiency decreases ASin mice. Circ Res. 2009, 105: 295-303. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.194613PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jin FY, Kamanna VS, Kashyap ML: Niacin decreases removal of high density lipoprotein A-I but not cholesterol ester by HepG2 cells. Arteriosc Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997, 17: 2020-2028.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Ishitsuka R, Yamaji-Hasegawa A, Makino A, Hirabayashi Y, Kobayashi T: A lipid-specific toxin reveals heterogeneity of sphingomyelin-containing membranes. Biophys J. 2004, 86: 296-307. 10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74105-3PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ito JI, Nagayasu Y , Yokoyamal S: Cholesterol-sphingomyelin interaction in membrane and apolipoprotein-mediated cellular cholesterol efflux. J Lipid Res. 2000, 41: 894-904.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Simons K, Ehehalt R: Cholesterol, lipid rafts, and disease. J Clin Invest. 2002, 110: 597-603.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Li Z, Hailemariam TK, Zhou H, Li Y, Duckworth DC, Peake DA, Zhang Y, Kuo MS, Cao G, Jiang XC: Inhibition of sphingomyelin synthase (SMS) affects intracellular sphingomyelin accumulation and plasma membrane lipid organization. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2007, 1771: 1186-1194.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Prinetti A, Chigorno V, Prioni S, Loberto N, Marano N, Tettamanti G, Sonnino S: Changes in the lipid turnover, composition, and organization, as sphingolipid-enriched membrane domains, in rat cerebellar granule cells developing in vitro. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 21136-21145. 10.1074/jbc.M010666200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Brown DA, London E: Structure and function of sphingolipid- and cholesterol-rich membrane rafts. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 17221-17224. 10.1074/jbc.R000005200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Keller P, Simons K: Cholesterol is required for surface transport of influenza virus hemagglutinin. J Cell Biol. 1998, 140: 1357-1367. 10.1083/jcb.140.6.1357PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Brown RE: Sphingolipid organization in biomembranes: what physical studies of model membranes reveal. J Cell Sci. 1998, 111: 1-9.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee CY, Lesimple A, Denis M, Vincent J, Larsen A, Mamer O, Krimbou L, Genest J, Marcil M: Increased sphingomyelin content impairs HDL biogenesis and maturation in human Niemann-Pick disease type B. J Lipid Res. 2006, 47: 622-632. 10.1194/jlr.M500487-JLR200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ouimet M, Wang MD, Cadotte N, Ho K, Marcel YL: Epoxycholesterol Impairs Cholesteryl Ester Hydrolysis in Macrophage Foam Cells, Resulting in Decreased Cholesterol Efflux. Arteriosc Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008, 28: 1144-1150. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.157115.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Yan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.