Open Access

Clinical significance of serum lipids in idiopathic pulmonary alveolar proteinosis

  • Cun S Fang1,
  • Ying C Wang1,
  • Tao H Zhang1,
  • Jing Wu1,
  • Wei Wang1,
  • Chun Wang1 and
  • Ming Y Zhang1Email author
Lipids in Health and Disease201211:12

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-11-12

Received: 27 November 2011

Accepted: 17 January 2012

Published: 17 January 2012

Abstract

Background

It is well known that pulmonary alveolar proteinosis(PAP) is characterised by accumulation of surfactant lipids and proteins within airspaces. However, few previous data describe the serum lipid levels associated with PAP.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed 25 patients with idiopathic PAP(iPAP). The serum lipid levels of patients with idiopathic PAP were compared with those of the healthy volunteers. In patients and healthy subjects, the LDL-C/HDL-C ratios were 2.94 ± 1.21 and 1.60 ± 0.70, respectively (p < 0.001), HDL-C were 1.11 ± 0.27 and 1.71 ± 0.71 respectively (p < 0.001). The values of LDL-C correlated significantly with those of PaO2 and PA-aO2 (r = -0.685, p = 0.003, and r = 0.688, p = 0.003, respectively). The values of LDL-C/HDL-C ratios also correlated with PaO2 levels and PA-aO2 levels (r = -0.698, p = 0.003, and r = 0.653, p = 0.006, respectively). 11 and 13 patients experienced respectively a decline in TC and LDL-C levels following whole lung lavage(WLL), the median decline was 0.71 mmol/L(p < 0.009) and 0.47 mmol/L(p < 0.003), respectively.

Conclusions

the serum lipid levels, especially the levels of LDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C, may reflect the severity of the disease in PAP patients, and predict the therapeutic effect of WLL.

Keywords

pulmonary alveolar proteinosis high-density lipoprotein cholesterol lipid low-density lipoprotein cholesterol whole lung lavage

Background

Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis(PAP) is a rare disease characterized by the accumulation of lipoproteinaceous material in the alveoli[1]. Clinically, Three forms of PAP have been described: congenital, secondary, and idiopathic. More than 90% of patients are idiopathic PAP(iPAP), is specifically associated with the presence of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor(GM-CSF) autoantibodies that are thought to mediate pathogenesis by eliminating GM-CSF bioactivity, thereby this loss of functional GM-CSF results in a filling of the alveolar spaces of the lungs with the lipoproteinaceous material called pulmonary surfactant[2, 3].

Pulmonary surfactant is comprised of 90% lipid, 10% protein, and less than 1% carbohydrate. Cholesterol is the major neutral lipid (up to 90%) in pulmonary surfactant. At least 80% of the cholesterol present in the lung[4], and virtually all that in surfactant, is derived from circulating lipoproteins, with very low-density lipoprotein believed to be the major vehicle of delivery to the lung [5]. Therefore, impaired lipid metabolism may play an important role in the development of iPAP.

It has been reported[6] that serum levels of triglyceride were higher in patients with idiopathic PAP, while HDL-C levels were lower in patients. Similarly, serum levels of cholestenoic acid were also significantly increased in the PAP patients[7]. Elevated serum cholesterol levels have been confirmed in 19% of PAP patients[1].

Based on these findings, the clinical relevance of lipid metabolism in iPAP deserves further study. The current study investigated these relationships to determine whether serum lipid levels would provide valuable clinical information to assess and monitor disease progression. We measured serum lipid levels from iPAP patients and investigated their relation to severity markers for iPAP including serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), arterial blood gases. We also assessed variations of these lipids before and after whole lung lavage(WLL).

Materials and methods

Patients

We retrospectively reviewed 25 patients with idiopathic PAP that were diagnosed by cytological examination of BAL fluid and pathological examination of the lung tissues. The aetiologies associated with secondary PAP were not found in these patients. Data for the iPAP patients were collected from Nanjing Chest Hospital (Bronchalveolar Lavage Center) between 2006 and 2011. Patients were excluded from the study if they had a history of diabetes mellitus, chronic liver or kidney disease, cancer, or use of corticosteroids or lipid-lowing drugs.

Control groups

Using a case-controlled study design, data from healthy volunteers(HA) were obtained from persons who were examined in the Nanjing Chest Hospital between April 2010 and May 2011. All healthy volunteers were free of symptoms and not taking any medications. The study protocol was approved by the Human Ethics Review Committees of Nanjing Chest Hospital and all study participants provided written informed consent.

Assays

Pulmonary function testing(YLS9-HI-101, Japan) including spirometry, plethysmography, carbon monoxide lung transfer factor (TLCO), and analyses of arterial blood gases(BJ05-400, Germany) were performed in most of patients. Blood samples for PaO2 and PaCO2 values were analysed at room air. PAO2 (alveolar oxygen tension) is calculated by the following equation. PAO2 = (barometric pressure - 47) × FiO2 -PaCO2/R. R, an exchange ratio, is assumed as 0.8 in this study. The alveolar arterial PO2 difference (PA-aO2) is calculated by subtracting PaO2 from PAO2. Laboratory examinations were performed on blood samples obtained after an overnight fasting. The levels of serum lipid levels (total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)), apolipoprotein-A1 (Apo-A1) and apolipoprotein-B (Apo-B), Lipoprotein(a)), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were measured with commercial kits using an automated chemistry analyzer (OI Analytical, American).

Criteria of WLL

Whole lung lavage, the current standard of care for treating autoimmune PAP, is effective in physically removing the accumulated surfactant and is effective in most patients[8]. The criteria for therapeutic lung lavage in this study were as follow[9]: (1) presence of persistent or progressive respiratory failure; (2) absence of respiratory difficulty at rest, but presence of exercise desaturation; (3) a significant limitation in daily or sport activities. Patients were examined with lipid levels and arterial blood gas analysis after one week of WLL.

Statistical analysis

Statistics were performed with SPSS version 11.0. Paired data comparisons were performed using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. The nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test was used when data were not normally distributed. The correlations between variables were determined by Spearman rank correlation coefficients. P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

It is indicated that the median age at diagnosis was 41 years(table 1). 22 of 25 patients are men, and 76% have a history of smoking. Nine patients had a occupational history of contact with dust, metal, silica, etc. the duration of occupational exposure ranged from 2 to 17 years. Most patients had comorbidity: pneumonia, tuberculosis, and fatty liver were the most common. 7 of 25 patients(28%) suffered from varying degrees of fatty liver diagnosed by B Type Ultrasonography. On pulmonary function testing, the most common pattern seen is that of a restrictive defect, with a disproportionate reduction in diffusing capacity. Arterial blood gas analysis showed hypoxemia with 41% pressure of oxygen (PaO2) below 60 mmHg, While arterial carbon dioxide pressure(PaCO2) was not significantly changed.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patients

Characteristics

N

mean ± SD

Gender (M/F)

22/3

 

Age(years)

25

41 ± 8.7

Smoking

19

 

Dust exposure

9

 

Pulmonary function

  

FEV1(L)

21

2.73 ± 0.5

FEV1/FVC(%)

21

88.89 ± 5.47

TLC (L)

21

4.03 ± 1.06

DLCO(mmol/min/kpa)

21

4.66 ± 1.82

Blood gas analysis

  

PaO2 (mmHg)

17

65 ± 14

PaCO2 (mmHg)

17

39 ± 3

PA-aO2 (mmHg)

17

36 ± 15

Serology

  

TC(mmol/L)

25

5.01 ± 1.08

TG(mmol/L)

25

1.7 ± 1.06

HDL-C(mmol/L)

25

1.11 ± 0.27

LDL-C(mmol/L)

25

3.07 ± 1.07

Apo-A1(mmol/L)

25

1.16 ± 0.38

Apo-B(mmol/L)

25

0.94 ± 0.28

Lipoprotein(a) (mg/L)

25

172 ± 63.6

LDH(U/L)

25

239 ± 78

Comorbidity

  

Pneumonia

5

 

Tuberculosis

4

 

Fatty Liver

7

 
The serum lipid levels of patients with iPAP were compared with those of the healthy volunteers(HA), as shown in Figure 1. Except for HDL-C, patients with iPAP had higher levels of TC, TG, LDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C, and lipoprotein(a) than did healthy controls. However, there were no significant differences in TG between the two groups(p > 0.05). In patients and healthy subjects, the LDL-C/HDL-C ratios were 2.94 ± 1.21 and 1.60 ± 0.70, respectively (p < 0.001), HDL-C were 1.11 ± 0.27 and 1.71 ± 0.71 respectively (p < 0.001), LDL-C were 3.07 ± 1.07 and 2.43 ± 0.95 respectively(p < 0.05), and Lipoprotein(a) were 172 ± 64 and 153 ± 85 respectively (p < 0.05).
Figure 1

Comparison of lipid levels between iPAP and HA.

Clinically, serum LDH level, PaO2, and alveolararterial PA-aO2 have commonly been used to indicate the severity of iPAP[1, 10]. The relations between these severity markers and serum lipid levels were analyzed, and the results are summarized in table 2. The values of LDL-C correlated significantly with those of PaO2 and PA-aO2 (r = -0.685, p = 0.003, and r = 0.688, p = 0.003, respectively). A similar pattern was seen with LDL-C/HDL-C ratios correlated negatively with PaO2 levels (r = -0.698, p = 0.003) and positively with PA-aO2 (r = 0.653, p = 0.006). Apo-A1 was highly correlated with LDH and PaO2, and lipoprotein(a) was highly correlated with PaO2(table 2), whereas levels of TC, TG, HDL-C and Apo-B did not show a correlation with any of the severity markers.
Table 2

Relation between lipid levels and severity markers in patients with iPAP

 

LDH

 

PaO2

 

P(A-a)O2

 

Correlation

coefficient

P value

Correlation

coefficient

P value

Correlation

coefficient

P value

TC

-0.264

0.213

-0.222

0.427

0.334

0.223

TG

-0.152

0.468

0.297

0.264

-0.262

0.327

HDL-C

-0.270

0.192

0.496

0.051

-0.452

0.079

LDL-C

0.153

0.465

-0.685

0.003

0.688

0.003

LDL-C/HDL-C

0.197

0.345

-0.698

0.003

0.653

0.006

apoA1

-0.535

0.006

0.514

0.042

-0.370

0.159

apoB

0.099

0.637

-0.041

0.880

0.056

0.837

Lipoprotein(a)

0.367

0.078

-0.546

0.016

0.441

0.058

Serial changes in lipid levels and severity markers for iPAP in two patients are shown in Figure 2. Two patients had a different clinical course. In the patient whose condition rapidly worsened (Figure 2A), the aggravations in serum LDH, PA-aO2 and PaO2 were associated with increase of LDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C and lipoprotein(a), although LDL-C and lipoprotein(a) were somewhat unparalleled to severity markers at a time. In the patient with three cycles of WLL(Figure 2B), the changes of LDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C and lipoprotein(a) measured before each cycle of WLL were relatively parallel to severity markers.
Figure 2

Serial data of lipid level and severity markers in two iPAP patients with a different clinical course: (A) a patient who progressivesly deteriorated and (B) a patient who required three cycles of therapeutic lung lavage. In (B), all the data were obtained before each cycle of therapeutic lung lavage.

Whole lung lavage was performed in 19 patients (76%), of whom 2 patients underwent repeated lavage. We analyzed oxygenation and serum lipid levels before and after whole lung lavage(Figure 3). After lavage, substantial improvement is often noted, particularly in dyspnea. hypoxemia was corrected in eighty percent of the patients for whom data were available. P(A-a)O2 and LDH were also improved after lung lavage(additional file 1). serum lipid levels before and after whole lung lavage were available for 16 patients. Eleven patients experienced a decline in TC levels following whole lung lavage, the median decline was 0.71 mmol/L(p < 0.009), A similar pattern was seen with LDL-C in thirteen patients, the median decline was 0.47 mmol/L(p < 0.003). LDL-C/HDL-C, TG, HDL-C or lipoprotein(a) showed a slight reduction after lavage, but the difference before and after lavage was not significant.
Figure 3

Paired prelavage and postlavage lipids data from patients with iPAP.

Discussion

A growing body of literature suggests that abnormal lipid metabolism was associated with a variety of pulmonary diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [11, 12]and lung cancer[13, 14]. Few previous data describe the lipid profile associated with PAP. This is the first study that has specifically evaluated the clinical value of serum lipid levels in iPAP. We demonstrated that the levels of serum LDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C were significantly correlated with those of serum PaO2 and P(A-a)O2. These findings indicate that the serum lipid levels, especially the levels of LDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C, may reflect the severity of the disease in iPAP patients. Patients with iPAP exhibited elevated lipid levels that were reduced significantly after whole lung lavage. In addition, the present study supports the view that impaired lipid metabolism could be present in iPAP[1, 6]. These findings may expand the role of serum lipid levels in iPAP.

Several studies have indicated that circulating lipoprotein levels would be changed in iPAP[1, 5, 6]. Elevated cholesterol levels have been described in 19% of the PAP patients, however, sample size and characteristics were not available[1]. Tian et al.[6] reported that iPAP associated with high triglyceride and low HDL-C levels in the serum. Our results are in consistent with the above findings, the high serum lipid levels did associate with iPAP. Furthermore, twenty-eight percent of the patients in this study suffered from varying degrees of fatty liver which was resulted from hyperlipemia. It was reported that the serum LDL-C/HDL-C ratios could only reflect the severity of the disease[6]. In addition to LDL-C/HDL-C ratios, LDL-C and lipoprotein(a) could also serve as severity indicators in our present study. Furthermore, whether the disease was improve or worsen, the changes in serum LDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C and lipoprotein(a) were relatively parallel to those of the severity markers in our study. However, this need large cases to conformed.

The mechanisms responsible for dyslipoproteinemia in iPAP are unknown, several observations could support a link between iPAP pathophysiology and abnormal lipid metabolism. The inflammatory cell most implicated in both processes is the macrophage. Macrophages produce phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP) which is predominately found in the lungs[15]. PLTP are involved in HDL-C metabolism and removing cholesterol from the circulation[16]. Furthmore, PLTP can modulate cholesterol deposition in macrophages through its role on oxidative status inside the cells[17]. Alveolar macrophages in PAP patients or murine models were found to exhibit a reduced ability to degrade the surfactant, impaired cell adhesion, ineffective phagocytosis and bacterial killing[18, 19]. These features were similar to those of the immature macrophages which had obvious PLTP deficiency[20]. PLTP may be one of the mechanisms explaining dyslipoproteinemia in iPAP. It is unlikely, however, that PLTP is the only factor involved in lipid abnormalities in iPAP. Current thinking indicates that iPAP is an autoimmune disorder characterized by circulating anti-granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) antibodies and dysfunction in GM-CSF signaling[21]. GM-CSF, which has been verified to involve in the pathophysiological procedure of PAP, could also regulate serum protein and lipid catabolism[22, 23]. Further studies are required to clarify these issues.

We further examined the effect of WLL on serum lipid levels, findings demonstrated that the high lipid levels observed prior to WLL would decline with WLL. The effect of WLL in this study was somewhat counter-intuitive. Local lavage can unexpectedly influence the systemic lipid level. the reasonable explanation may be that surfactant proteins produced locally in the lung leak into the circulation. The alveolocapillary membrane, a barrier, can be partitioning the proteins of the pulmonary epithelial lining fluid, but there is some leakage[24]. A range of surfactant proteins has been shown to leak into the circulation. Moreover, accumulated data have shown alveolocapillary membrane permeability was markedly increased in PAP patients[2426].

There are several limitations of this study. This is a retrospective and single center study, represents a highly selected group of subjects with very severe PAP, and does not allow determination of mechanism. A prospective and comprehensive study to validate clinical significance of lipid metabolism in iPAP would be required. However, the results could be of clinical relevance since all studied subjects came from the same institute, avoiding the inherent bias caused in multicentre studies. In addition, the cases studied were limited because iPAP is a rare disease. Further studies with larger samples of PAP patients are required.

Conclusions

In summary, we recommend that serum lipid levels would provide valuable clinical information to assess and monitor disease progression and predict the therapeutic effect of WLL. Furthermore, descending hyperlipemia may have potential value to clinical treatment of iPAP.

List of Abbreviations

PAP: 

pulmonary alveolar proteinosis

WLL: 

whole lung lavage

GM-CSF: 

granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor

LDH: 

lactate dehydrogenase

TLCO: 

carbon monoxide lung transfer factor

TC: 

total cholesterol

TG: 

triglyceride

LDL-C: 

low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

HDL-C: 

high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

Apo-A1: 

apolipoprotein-A1

Apo-B: 

apolipoprotein-B.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Xu Jian and Wu Jing for their efforts to offer the data of Control groups

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Nine department of Respiratory Medicine, Nanjing Chest Hospital

References

  1. Seymour JF, Presneill JJ: Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis Progress in the First 44 Years. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002, 166: 215-235. 10.1164/rccm.2109105View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Antoniu SA: GM-CSF pathway correction in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010, 10 (9): 1357-1365. 10.1517/14712598.2010.510507View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Greenhill SR, Kotton DN: Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis: a bench-to-bedside story of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor dysfunction. Chest. 2009, 136 (2): 571-577. 10.1378/chest.08-2943PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Veldhuizen R, Nag K, Orgeig S, Possmayer F: The role of lipids in pulmonary surfactant. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998, 1408: (2-3):90-108.Google Scholar
  5. Steve Meaney, Bonfield TL, Hansson M, Babiker A, Kavuru MS, Thomassen MJ: Serum cholestenoic acid as a potential marker of pulmonary cholesterol homeostasis: increased levels in patients with pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. J Lipid Res. 2004, 45: 2354-2360. 10.1194/jlr.M400302-JLR200View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Tian X, Luo J, Xu KF, Wang L, Zhou J, Feng R, Gui Y, Wang J, Xu W, Xiao Y: Impaired lipid metabolism in idiopathic pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Lipids Health Dis. 2011, 10: 54- 10.1186/1476-511X-10-54PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kavuru MS, Sullivan EJ, Piccin R, Thomassen MJ, Stoller JK: Exogenous granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor administration for pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000, 161 (4 Pt 1): 1143-1148.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Michaud G, Reddy C, Ernst A: Whole-lung lavage for pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Chest. 2009, 136 (6): 1678-1681. 10.1378/chest.09-2295View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Luisetti M, Kadija Z, Mariani F, Rodi G, Campo I, Trapnell BC: Therapy options in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2010, 4 (4): 239-248. 10.1177/1753465810378023View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Shah PL, Hansell D, Lawson PR, Reid KB, Morgan C: Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis: clinical aspects and current concepts on pathogenesis. Thorax. 2000, 55 (1): 67-77. 10.1136/thorax.55.1.67PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Reed RM, Hashmi S, Eberlein M, Iacono A, Netzer G, Defilippis A, Girgis RE, Toth PP, Scharf S, Jones S: Impact of lung transplantation on serum lipids in COPD. Respir Med. 2011Google Scholar
  12. Cui H, Wei ZM, Cai JF, Li Y, Fan L, Hu YX, Liu L, Zhang M, Liu AM: [Prevalence of hypertension and glucose/lipid metabolism disorders in 4960 inpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during 2000-2010]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2011, 31 (9): 1498-1503.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Anandakumar P, Jagan S, Kamaraj S, Ramakrishnan G, Clara JB, Pathitha D, Kavitha T, Devaki T: Ameliorating effect of capsaicin on alterations in lipid metabolism during mice lung carcinoma. Arch Pharm Res. 2009, 32 (2): 229-234. 10.1007/s12272-009-1140-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gallego-Ortega D, Ramirez de Molina A, Ramos MA, Valdes-Mora F, Barderas MG, Sarmentero-Estrada J, Lacal JC: Differential role of human choline kinase alpha and beta enzymes in lipid metabolism: implications in cancer onset and treatment. PLoS One. 2009, 4 (11): e7819- 10.1371/journal.pone.0007819PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Vikstedt R, Ye D, Metso J, Hildebrand RB, Van Berkel TJ, Ehnholm C, Jauhiainen M, Van Eck M: Macrophage phospholipid transfer protein contributes significantly to total plasma phospholipid transfer activity and its deficiency leads to diminished atherosclerotic lesion development. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007, 27 (3): 578-586. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000254815.49414.beView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Yazdanyar A, Yeang C, Jiang XC: Role of phospholipid transfer protein in high-density lipoprotein- mediated reverse cholesterol transport. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2011, 13 (3): 242-248. 10.1007/s11883-011-0172-5PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ogier N, Klein A, Deckert V, Athias A, Bessede G, Le Guern N, Lagrost L, Desrumaux C: Cholesterol accumulation is increased in macrophages of phospholipid transfer protein-deficient mice: normalization by dietary alpha-tocopherol supplementation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007, 27 (11): 2407-2412. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.151753View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Shimizu Y, Matsuzaki S, Dobashi K, Yanagitani N, Satoh T, Koka M, Yokoyama A, Ohkubo T, Ishii Y, Kamiya T: Elemental analysis of lung tissue particles and intracellular iron content of alveolar macrophages in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Respir Res. 2011, 12: 88- 10.1186/1465-9921-12-88PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Trapnell BC, Carey BC, Uchida K, Suzuki T: Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, a primary immunodeficiency of impaired GM-CSF stimulation of macrophages. Curr Opin Immunol. 2009, 21 (5): 514-521. 10.1016/j.coi.2009.09.004PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Trapnell BC, Whitsett JA: Gm-CSF regulates pulmonary surfactant homeostasis and alveolar macrophage-mediated innate host defense. Annu Rev Physiol. 2002, 64: 775-802. 10.1146/annurev.physiol.64.090601.113847View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Venkateshiah SB, Yan TD, Bonfield TL, Thomassen MJ, Meziane M, Czich C, Kavuru MS: An open-label trial of granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor therapy for moderate symptomatic pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Chest. 2006, 130 (1): 227-237. 10.1378/chest.130.1.227View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ishibashi T, Yokoyama K, Shindo J, Hamazaki Y, Endo Y, Sato T, Takahashi S, Kawarabayasi Y, Shiomi M, Yamamoto T: Potent cholesterol-lowering effect by human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in rabbits. Possible implications of enhancement of macrophage functions and an increase in mRNA for VLDL receptor. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994, 14 (10): 1534-1541. 10.1161/01.ATV.14.10.1534View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Yoshida M, Ikegami M, Reed JA, Chroneos ZC, Whitsett JA: GM-CSF regulates protein and lipid catabolism by alveolar macrophages. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2001, 280 (3): L379-386.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Seymour JF, Doyle IR, Nakata K, Presneill JJ, Schoch OD, Hamano E, Uchida K, Fisher R, Dunn AR: Relationship of anti-GM-CSF antibody concentration, surfactant protein A and B levels, and serum LDH to pulmonary parameters and response to GM-CSF therapy in patients with idiopathic alveolar proteinosis. Thorax. 2003, 58 (3): 252-257. 10.1136/thorax.58.3.252PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kobayashi M, Takeuchi T, Ohtsuki Y: Differences in the immunolocalization of surfactant protein (SP)-A, SP-D, and KL-6 in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Pathol Int. 2008, 58 (3): 203-207. 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2007.02212.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuzmenko AI, Wu H, Wan S, McCormack FX: Surfactant protein A is a principal and oxidation-sensitive microbial permeabilizing factor in the alveolar lining fluid. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280 (27): 25913-25919. 10.1074/jbc.M411344200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Fang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.