Skip to content

Advertisement

Lipids in Health and Disease

Open Access

Effect of germinated brown rice extracts on pancreatic lipase, adipogenesis and lipolysis in 3T3-L1 adipocytes

  • See Meng Lim1,
  • Yong Meng Goh2,
  • Wen Bin Kuan3 and
  • Su Peng Loh1Email author
Lipids in Health and Disease201413:169

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-13-169

Received: 3 July 2014

Accepted: 24 October 2014

Published: 3 November 2014

Abstract

Background

This study investigated anti-obesity effects of seven different solvent (n-hexane, toluene, dicholoromethane, ethyl acetate, absolute methanol, 80% methanol and deionized water) extracts of germinated brown rice (GBR) on pancreatic lipase activity, adipogenesis and lipolysis in 3T3-L1 adipocytes.

Methods

GBR were extracted separately by employing different solvents with ultrasound-assisted. Pancreatic lipase activity was determined spectrophotometrically by measuring the hydrolysis of p-nitrophenyl butyrate (p-NPB) to p-nitrophenol at 405 nm. Adipogenesis and lipolysis were assayed in fully differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes by using Oil Red O staining and glycerol release measurement.

Results

GBR extract using hexane showed the highest inhibitory effect (13.58 ± 0.860%) at concentration of 200 μg/ml followed by hexane extract at 100 μg/ml (9.98 ± 1.048%) while ethyl acetate extract showed the lowest (2.62 ± 0.677%) at concentration of 200 μg/ml on pancreatic lipase activity. Water extract at 300 μg/ml showed 61.55 ± 3.824% of Oil Red O staining material (OROSM), a marker of adipogenesis. It significantly decrease (p < 0.05) lipid accumulation than control (OROSM = 100%), follow by ethyl acetate extract at 300 μg/ml (OROSM = 65.17 ± 3.131%). All the GBR extracts induced lipolysis with 1.22-1.83 fold of greater glycerol release than control.

Conclusions

GBR extracts especially the least polar and intermediate polar solvent extracts exhibited inhibitory effect on pancreatic lipase, decrease fat accumulation by adipocyte differentiation inhibition, and stimulate lipolysis on adipocytes. Therefore, GBR could be furthered study and developed as a functional food in helping the treatment and/or prevention of obesity.

Keywords

ObesityGerminated brown ricePancreatic lipase3T3-L1 adipocytes

Background

Overweight and obesity are chronic metabolic disorder caused by an imbalance between food intake and energy expenditure[1]. Pancreatic lipase, the key lipid digesting enzyme secreted by the pancreatic acinar cells[2], is responsible for the hydrolysis of about 50-70% of total dietary fats[3]. The digested fat is either use as energy source or absorbed and accumulated into adipocytes. Excessive differentiation in the number (hyperplasia) and/or size (hypertrophy) of adipocytes are the characteristics in obesity[4]. Adipocytes are not only fat storage cells but are active endocrine organs secreting adipokines that regulate multiple metabolic homeostasis[5]. Therapeutics for obesity that targeted on these two approaches are lipase inhibition, adipocytes differentiation inhibition and promote lipid metabolism[6]. Although few anti-obesity drugs that are available in the market are meant for therapeutic approach, most of them have adverse side effects[7]. Orlistat (Xenical™), a specific pancreatic lipase inhibitor clinically approved by Food and Drug Administration could block approximately 30% absorption of dietary fat[8]. However, the uses of orlistat have been reported with some adverse effects which include oily stools, diarrhea, flatulence, bloating, abdominal pain, dyspepsia, and fecal spotting[9, 10]. The existing side effects and failure of drugs to continue to be used in long term management, elucidated the need for efficacious yet safe treatments to help prevent disease progression and protect patients from weight regain[11, 12]. Many novel research works have recently come to the fore in discovering potential anti-obesity effect especially from natural sources with the inhibition of fat absorption and/or fat accumulation in the body by interrupting the lipase and adipocyte activity[1316]. According to Birari et al.,[3], natural products might be an excellent alternative strategy for the development of safe and effective anti-obesity drugs yet much of them are still unexplored.

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a major staple food for more than half of the world’s population especially people in Asia and as the second-most consumed cereal grain[17, 18]. It is a main source of energy and accounts for nearly quarter of global energy intake[19]. Germinated brown rice (GBR) is produced by soaking the whole kernel of brown rice in water until it produced a germ of approximately 1mm long[20]. During the process of germination, the chemical compositions of the rice change drastically. All the dormant enzymes are activated to break down the large molecular substances, generating essential compounds and energy[21, 22]. The amount of nutrients such as γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)[2325], ferulic acid[19], phytic acid[26], dietary fiber[26], tocotrienols[25], some minerals (magnesium, potassium, zinc), γ-oryzanol[27], prolylendopeptidase inhibitor and antioxidants compounds[28] showed significant increased after germination. The palatability and texture of GBR were also noted to have improved after germination[29]. Research that focus on diminishing fat hydrolysis and their absorption in the gastrointestinal tract through the use of GBR could be an alternative prescription in reducing fat digestion and fat deposition.

In recent times, ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) has been extensively applied to extract active compounds from plant materials such as traditional Chinese medicine[30, 31], fruits[32], soy products[33], seed[34], and wheat germ[35]. UAE decrease extraction time and increase extraction yields to minimize problems such as long extraction time and require relatively large quantities of solvent that faced by conventional extraction methods like maceration extraction and soxhlet extraction[30, 36]. In this study, crude extracts of GBR from different polarity solvents with ultrasound-assisted were screened for potential anti-obesity effects by examining their lipase inhibition activity supplemented with their effects on adipogenesis and lipolysis in cultured 3T3-L1 adipocytes.

Results and discussion

Ultrasound-assisted extraction yields

Extraction is the initial step in isolating phytochemicals from plant materials[37]. Polarity of solvent and plant matrix will influence the efficiency of extracting the bioactive compounds from the sample[31, 37]. Thus, selection of the most appropriate solvent for extracting bioactive compounds from sample is a crucial process for investigates any experiments. Usually the least polar solvents are considered to be suitable for the extraction of non-polar fraction[38]. A similar principal is applied to semi-polar and polar fraction. Seven different solvents with a wide range of polarities (n-hexane, toluene, dicholoromethane, ethyl acetate, absolute methanol, 80% methanol and deionized water) were used to extract the bioactive compounds of GBR under the same conditions. UAE had been applied in this present study due to the fact that UAE can reduce the extraction time, reduce solvent consumption and give higher yield of bioactive compounds[30, 36].

The results of extraction yields are summarized in Table 1. Overall, water extract (5.91 ± 0.853%) gave the highest extraction yields, followed by toluene (2.68 ± 0.393%) and ethyl acetate (2.61 ± 0.136%). The findings of this study were similar to the oil extraction yield of rice bran by hot air, microwave, roasting, and steaming which were 5.53%, 4.81%, 4.77% and 3.41%, respectively[39]. The reason for higher yield for water extraction might be longer heating time caused excessive swelling of the material such as starch when only water is used as the solvent[40]. The starch in water forms more floccule that could adsorb the effective compounds extracted[40]. Besides, different polarity and viscosity of the solvent used might influence the extraction efficiency[31]. A few studies reported that the additional of small percentages of water to the extraction solvent can sometime help to increase extraction yield[41, 42]. The extract yield of 80% methanol (1.79 ± 0.292%) showed higher yield than absolute methanol (1.20 ± 0.206%) although they were not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Table 1

Extraction yields of different solvent of GBR extracts with ultrasound-assisted

Type of extracts

Yields (%)

Hexane

2.19 ± 0.657a,b

Toluene

2.68 ± 0.393b

Dichloromethane

1.71 ± 0.066a,b

Ethyl acetate

2.61 ± 0.136b

Absolute methanol

1.20 ± 0.206a

80% Methanol

1.79 ± 0.292a,b

Water

5.91 ± 0.853c

a-bValues with different lower case letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.

Pancreatic lipase inhibition

Pancreatic lipase inhibition is one of the most widely used models to investigate the potential efficacy of natural products as anti-obesity drugs[3]. Therefore, pancreatic lipase in vitro model was used to evaluate the inhibitory effect on pancreatic lipase activity of all the GBR extracts at concentration of 100, 200 and 300 μg/ml by measuring the hydrolysis of p-NPB to p-nitrophenol. The anti-lipase activity was expressed as percentage of inhibition of control at 0% and is presented in Figure 1. Overall, the inhibitions of pancreatic lipase of various solvent extracts of GBR were ranged from 2.62% to 13.58%. All the extracts did not suppress pancreatic lipase activity in a dose-dependent manner in the concentration of 100, 200, and 300 μg/ml. Extracts at concentration of 100 μg/ml exhibited stronger inhibitory effects than extracts at concentration of 200 μg/ml although some of the extracts were not significantly different (p > 0.05). The inhibitory activities of this study were in line to anti-lipase activities of certain natural plant species found in Korea or Asia[15], with inhibition ranged from 2.5% to 38%.
Figure 1

Effect of GBR extracts on pancreatic lipase activity. Results are given as a mean value ± S.D. of six replicate measurements. Bar graphs represent the % of inhibition of various GBR extracts in different concentrations on lipase activity. a-hValues with different lower case letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.

The hexane extract of GBR showed significantly higher (p < 0.05) inhibitory effect on pancreatic lipase (7.11-13.58%) than other extracts. Some non-polar compounds that present in GBR might play an important role in the lipase inhibition. Rice bran oil contains phytosterols that could be present as intermediate products such as cycloartenol and 24-methylene cycloartanol, as well as ferulic acid esters (oryzanol)[43]. According to Zaburuth et al.,[44], phytosterols found in hexane extract of Operculina turpethum leaves, showed 44.26% of inhibition on pancreatic lipase. Orlistat, as a positive control, showed an IC50 of 1.56 μg/ml (y = 10.338ln(x) +45.39, r2 = 0.979) in this study on pancreatic lipase activity but no IC50 was found for all GBR extracts at concentration up to 300 μg/ml. The lower potency than orlistat suggests that GBR extracts per se might not as effective as commercial drug in inhibiting of pancreatic lipase activity. This is probably due to the activity of a crude extract includes both active and non-active constituents which could be lower than that of the active constituent alone[45].

Inhibitors of pancreatic lipase play an important role in the treatment of obesity. Through gastrointestinal mechanisms, interfering of nutrient digestion and absorption in the body may attempt to decrease the digestion of fat to free fatty acid and monoglycerides that will be further synthesize and accumulate in the adipocytes[3]. Previous studies done on rice bran have also been reported to reduce the absorption of indigested fat by inhibiting the pancreatic lipase activity[46, 47]. GBR is rich in bioactive compounds and has inhibitory effect on pancreatic lipase. This is suggesting that it may be a useful alternative to treat obesity by limiting the dietary fat absorption and accumulation of fat in adipocytes since rice is a daily staple food in some of the countries.

Adipocyte cell viability

MTT assay was done to assess the cell viability of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes treated with various concentrations of GBR extracts. The cell viabilities were ranged from 73.58% to 108.31% after 72 hr incubation with the GBR extracts (Table 2). The cell viabilities of extracts at the highest concentration (300 μg/ml) were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than the control (without treatment), but the cell viability of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes treated with GBR water extract did not showed significant differences (p > 0.05) than control. It is because the GBR itself might not toxic to the 3T3-L1 preadipocytes, but the solvents that used during extraction might toxic to the cells. In addition, non-cytotoxicity is defined as viability ≥70% compared to untreated cells[48]. All the extracts in different concentrations included the highest concentration (300 μg/ml) were significant higher (p < 0.001) than 70%. Thus, all the extracts at concentration of 0-300 μg/ml were considered as non-cytotoxic to 3T3-L1 preadipocytes.
Table 2

Effects of GBR extracts on preadipocyte viabilities after 72 hr incubation

Type of extracts

Concentration (μg/ml)

 

0

5

25

50

100

200

300

Hexane

96.30 ± 3.249a

92.47 ± 4.040b

90.22 ± 1.259b

89.76 ± 0.826b

86.12 ± 1.663c

82.48 ± 3.154d

80.60 ± 3.120d

Toluene

91.31 ± 2.122a

88.02 ± 1.777b

81.49 ± 1.547c

80.45 ± 1.189c

77.54 ± 3.144d

76.05 ± 0.585d

75.31 ± 1.231d

Dichloromethane

90.25 ± 2.571a

89.24 ± 1.266a,b

88.00 ± 1.977b

82.69 ± 0.813c

85.76 ± 0.823d

87.33 ± 0.886b,d

78.87 ± 1.883e

Ethyl acetate

90.78 ± 3.005a

89.93 ± 1.068a

88.89 ± 3.095a

88.64 ± 2.193a

88.25 ± 1.471a,b

85.74 ± 1.726b

73.58 ± 1.963c

Absolute methanol

98.88 ± 0.565a

95.69 ± 2.206b

102.83 ± 2.619c

107.94 ± 2.020d

108.31 ± 1.559d

106.22 ± 2.792d

105.30 ± 4.343c,d

80% Methanol

93.96 ± 1.051a,b

91.95 ± 2.077a,c

89.37 ± 2.503c,d

88.94 ± 0.722d

88.96 ± 2.916d

94.15 ± 0.747a,b

95.84 ± 3.754b

Water

91.41 ± 3.032a,b

89.14 ± 1.118b

89.18 ± 3.000b

89.02 ± 0.464b

87.97 ± 2.850b

90.32 ± 2.763a,b

92.88 ± 3.923a

a-eValues within a row followed by different lower case letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.

Oil red O staining for intracellular triglycerides

Adipose tissue plays an important role in maintaining lipid homeostasis and energy balance by storing triglycerides or liberating free fatty acid in response to changes in energy demands[4]. In Figure 2, the inhibition effects of GBR extracts on fat droplet formation in 3T3-L1 cells, through the quantification method of Oil red O staining, are presented. Oil red O staining material (OROSM) was used as a marker of adipogenesis where the higher the OROSM value, the higher the lipid accumulation inside the cells. Basically, most of the GBR extracts significantly reduce (p < 0.05) lipid accumulation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes compared to control (without treatment), except absolute methanol extract at concentration of 100 μg/ml and 200 μg/ml and 80% methanol extract at concentration of 200 μg/ml.
Figure 2

Relative lipid content quantified via Oil Red O staining in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Results are given as a mean value ± S.D. of six replicate measurements. Bar graphs represent the relative amounts of accumulated lipid in cultured 3T3-L1 adipocytes after treated with various GBR extracts in different concentrations. a-nValues with different lower case letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.

This present study showed that GBR extracts at concentration of 300 μg/ml showed the highest inhibition in lipid accumulation while extracts at concentration of 100 μg/ml and 200 μg/ml were not significant between each other (p > 0.05) in reducing lipid accumulation of adipocytes. This implied that although GBR extracts at 100-200 μg/ml were able to reduce the lipid accumulation in the adipocytes, GBR extracts at 300 μg/ml showed better inhibition. The active compounds that were present in the extract might inactivate one/some of the pathways in adipogenesis that lead to the decrease lipid accumulation inside the adipocytes.

Besides, the water extract of GBR at concentration of 300 μg/ml exhibited the lowest OROSM with only 61.55 ± 3.824% and followed by ethyl acetate extract at concentration of 300 μg/ml (OROSM = 65.17 ± 3.131%). Meantime, the OROSM of least and intermediate polar solvent extracts are in the range of 65.17% to 91.64% compared to OROSM of polar solvent extracts with OROSM of 61.55% to 114.07%. Lipophilic constituents such as unsaponifiable fraction (phytosterols, triterpene alcohols, 4-methyl-sterols), less polar components (squalene or tocotrienols and α-tocopherol), and γ-oryzanol[4951] that are present in rice bran might be extracted in the least polar fraction according to their partition coefficient. Alternatively, hydrophilic constituents such as polyphenols, GABA, and reducing sugars are possibly extracted by polar extractant[52, 53]. The active compound(s) in the extract might have inhibitory properties on the adipocytes differentiation.

Interestingly, the OROSM of absolute methanol extract at concentration of 100 μg/ml and 200 μg/ml were higher than the control. The results of the MTT assay also showed that the absolute methanol extract was not only non-cytotoxic to the cell but it increased the cell viability of preadipocytes at these concentrations. This indicated that the compounds extracted by absolute methanol might promote the growth of the adipocytes. These results were contradicted with the study done by Ho et al.,[54] which used methanol extraction on GBR, reported 49% of inhibition in reduces the OROSM. Further studies are needed to investigate and identify compounds that could contribute to this observation.

Glycerol level

Lipolysis is a catabolic process that hydrolyzes stored triglycerides in adipose tissue to release free fatty acid and glycerol. Thus, lipolysis of fat cells can regulate the homeostasis of energy by controlling the release of fatty acids and glycerol into plasma[55]. The lipolytic effect of GBR extracts was investigated through the measurement of glycerol released in culture medium after 24 h incubation, as shown in Figure 3. All the GBR extracts stimulated mild lipolysis by induced 1.22-1.83 fold greater release of glycerol into the culture medium than control. Toluene extract at concentration of 300 μg/ml showed the highest glycerol release content of adipocytes with 1.83 fold of increase and followed by hexane extract at concentration of 200 μg/ml (1.76 fold). Absolute methanol extract at concentration of 200 μg/ml showed the lowest glycerol release content of adipocytes with 1.22 fold of increase than control.
Figure 3

Extent of lipolysis based on the amount of glycerol released across different GBR extracts. Results are given as a mean value ± S.D. of six replicate measurements. Bar graphs represent the relative glycerol release content of 3T3-L1 adipocytes after treated with various GBR extracts in different concentrations. a-dValues with different lower case letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.

Lipolysis in adipocytes is known to be signaled by the activation of intracellular cAMP level, which in turn activates protein kinase A and substrates such as hormone-sensitive lipase and perilipin[56]. Hormone-sensitive lipase is a key enzyme in the mobilization of free fatty acids from adipocytes[56]. According to Ho et al.,[54], hormone-sensitive lipase was found to be up-regulated in mice group that administrated with GBR and hypothesized that vitamin E, oryzanol and GABA were the active compounds that improve lipid metabolism in obese mice. This hypothesis is line with this present study where the least polar solvents extracts showed slightly better lipolytic effect than polar solvent extracts.

Conclusions

In conclusion, GBR extracts especially least polar and intermediate polar solvent extracts showed inhibition on pancreatic lipase, suppress adipogenesis, and stimulate lipolysis in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. This suggested that GBR may have nutraceutical potential in the treatment and/or prevention of obesity. Further study is needed to evaluate the anti-obesity effect of GBR in experimental animals and human study.

Methods

Chemicals and reagents

Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), lipase (Type II; from Porcine pancreas), p-nitrophenyl butyrate (p-NPB), potassium phosphate monobasic (KH2PO4), potassium phosphate dibasic (K2HPO4), orlistat, 3-(4,-dimethy-lthiazol-2-yl)-2,-diphenyl-tetrazoliumbromide (MTT), insulin, dexamethasone, 3-isobutyl-1-methyl-xanthine (IBMX), Oil Red O, and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). n-Hexane, toluene, dicholoromethane, ethyl acetate, methanol, and isopropanol were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), bovine calf serum (BCS), foetal bovine serum (FBS), and penicillin/streptomycin were purchased from GIBCO (BRL Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA). The water was obtained from Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). All chemicals and reagents used in the study were of analytical grade.

Sample preparation

GBR (Oryza sativa L.) was provided by Laboratory of Molecular Biomedicine, Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia (Selangor, Malaysia). The GBR was grounded to fine powder, passed through the 20-mesh sieve, and stored at -20°C in a tightly sealed plastic bag until further analysis.

Ultrasound-assisted extraction

The GBR was extracted according to method by Boonsiripiphat et al.,[57] with modification using a sonicator. GBR (30 g) was mixed with 100 ml of hexane in a ratio of about 1:3 (w/v). The mixture was immersed into the ultrasonic bath (Power Sonic 405, Hwashin Technology, Korea) equipped by a generator with an output of 350W and input of AC 230V and 40 kHz, and kept for sonication for 30 min with water bath temperature maintained at 40°C. The extract was then centrifuged (Rotofix 32A, Hettich Zentrifugen, Germany) at 3500 rpm for 10 min to obtain the supernatant and the rest was re-extracted for another 2 times under the same conditions. The combined filtrate was filtered through Whatman No.1 filter paper (Whatman International, England) and evaporated with a rotary evaporator (Büchi Rotavapor R-200, Büchi Labortechnik AG, Switzerland) below 40°C. The procedures of extraction were repeated in the same manner except different extraction solvents (toluene, dicholoromethane, ethyl acetate, absolute methanol, 80% methanol and deionized water) were used. The extracts were stored at -20°C until analysis. The yield of extraction was calculated as follows:
Yield of extraction % = DWe DWs × 100

where:

DWe = dry weight of sample extract after evaporation of solvent.

DWs = dry weight of the sample powder.

The GBR extracts were dissolved in DMSO at a final concentration of 0.1% prior use.

Pancreatic lipase inhibition assay

The activity of porcine pancreatic lipase (type II) was colorimetrically evaluated through the measurement of the release of p-nitrophenol. The method used for measuring the pancreatic lipase activity was modified from Slanc et al.,[58] and Zheng et al.,[13]. Pancreatic lipase stock solutions (1 mg/ml) were prepared in a 0.1M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) and the solutions were stored at -40°C. A 10 mM solution of p-NPB as a substrate was prepared in acetonitrile. Absolute ethanol was then added to reach a final concentration of 3.33 mM of p-NPB. Briefly, 12 μl of enzyme buffer was added to 162 μl of potassium phosphate buffer (0.1M, pH 7.2, 0.1% Tween 80). Either 16 μl of the extracts or orlistat as a positive control was then mixed into the solution and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. Subsequently, 10 μl of substrate solution was added and the enzymatic reactions were allowed to proceed for another 30 min at 37°C. The amount of p-nitrophenol release in the reaction was measured at 405 nm using a microplate reader (SIRIO S SEAC, Italy). The absorbance reading was compared to the control, which contained same amount of buffer solution, instead of the extract. The inhibitory activity (%) was calculated according to the following formula:
% of inhibition = 100 - A 405 Extract A 405 Control × 100

where:

A 405 Control = absorbance without extract

A 405 Extract = absorbance with extract.

Cell culture and differentiation

3T3-L1 preadipocytes were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). The cells were maintained in DMEM high glucose containing 10% (v/v) BCS and penicillin/streptomycin (100 units/ml, 100 μg/ml, respectively) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. Fresh medium were provided to the cells every 2-3 days till cells were about 80% confluence. As described previously by Ahn et al.,[59], 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were seeded into 24-well plates at a density of 2×104 cells/well to differentiate preadipocytes into adipocytes and grown to confluent in three days. At this point (referred to as day 0), preadipocytes were stimulated for 3 days with a differentiation medium (10% FBS/DMEM medium supplemented with 0.5 mM IBMX, 1.0 μM dexamethasone and 1.0 μg/ml insulin). On day 3, the medium was replaced with maturation medium (10% FBS/DMEM medium and 1.0 μg/ml insulin) for an additional 2 days. On day 5, the culture medium was replaced again with only 10% FBS/DMEM, which were changed every two days until day 9. At this time, the cells exhibited a lipid-filled phenotype, which is characteristic of mature adipocytes.

Treatment of GBR extracts

To investigate the effects of GBR extracts on adipogenic differentiation, differentiating 3T3-L1 cells were treated with GBR extracts at various concentrations with medium changed every times from day 0 to day 7. The control was treated with same medium without GBR extracts.

Adipocyte cell viability assay

MTT assay was performed to investigate the cell viability of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes according to method developed by Mosmann[60]. The cell were seeded into 96-well plate at a density of 1×104 cells/well in DMEM medium and allowed to attach for 24 hr. After that, the culture medium was replaced with 200 μl (0, 5, 25, 50, 100, 200, 300 μg/ml) of GBR extracts in DMEM medium. The cells were incubated for 72 hr and untreated cells served as control. Ten microliters of MTT solution (5 mg/ml) in PBS (pH 7.4) was added to each well. After 3 hr, the unreacted dye was removed and the formed formazan crystals were dissolved in 100 μl/well DMSO. After a few minutes at room temperature to ensure that all crystals were dissolved, the plates were read on FLUOstar Omega plate reader (BMG Labtech, Offenburg, Germany), using a test wavelength of 570 nm, a reference wavelength of 630 nm. The cell viability (%) was expressed as the percentage of cell viability compared to the control and calculated according the following formula:
Cell viability % = A 570 Extract A 570 Control × 100

where:

A 570 Extract = absorbance of tested sample extract.

A 570 Control = absorbance without tested sample extract.

Oil Red O staining for intracellular triglycerides

Intracellular lipid accumulation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes was measured using Oil-red O that previously described by Ramírez-Zacarías et al.,[61]. Briefly, the cells were washed gently twice with ice-cold PBS (pH 7.4) and fixed with 10% formalin at room temperature for at least 30 min to 1 hr in room temperature. After removal of the 10% formalin, wells were washed with 60% isopropyl alcohol for 5 min and then washed exhaustively with PBS. Wells were allowed to dry completely before the addition of filtered Oil Red O solution for 30 min at room temperature. The staining of lipid droplets in 3T3-L1 adipocytes were exhaustively rinsed three times with PBS. Stained oil droplets were extracted with 100% isopropanol for 10 min to quantify intracellular lipids. The extracted dye was then immediately removed by gentle pipetting and its absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically at 520 nm using FLUOstar Omega plate reader (BMG Labtech, Offenburg, Germany). The Oil Red O-stained material (OROSM, %) was compared to control wells containing cell culture medium without the GBR extract and calculated according the following formula:
OROSM % = A 510 Extract A 510 Control × 100

where:

A 510 Extract = absorbance of tested sample extract.

A 510 Control = absorbance without tested sample extract.

Measurement of glycerol

Lipolysis assay was performed to evaluate the possible lipolytic activity of GBR extracts by measuring their ability to release glycerol from differentiated 3T3-L1 cells. 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were induced to adipocytes as described previously. On day 10, cells were washed with filtered Hank’s Balanced Salt solution and then treated with GBR extracts for 24 hr in filtered Hank’s Balanced Salt solution with 2% bovine serum albumin. The glycerol level secreted by adipocytes was determined using enzymatic assay kit from Millipore Cat. No. OB 100 (Bedford, MA, USA). Absorbance was determined at 540 nm in a FLUOstar Omega plate reader (BMG Labtech, Offenburg, Germany). A standard curve was prepared, using a standard solution of glycerol at concentration of 0-104 μg/ml (y = 0.0076x +0.0156, r2 = 0.998). Glycerol release was then expressed as fold increase, as compared to control for comparison purpose.

Statistical analysis

Data analyzed by using software IBM SPSS version 21.0. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Duncan was applied to test for differences between groups. One-Sample T-Test (two tails) was performed to test for cell viability against 70%. Significant differences were taken at p < 0.05.

Abbreviations

BCS: 

Bovine calf serum

DMEM: 

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium

DMSO: 

Dimethyl sulfoxide

FBS: 

Foetal bovine serum

GABA: 

γ-aminobutyric acid

GBR: 

Germinated brown rice

IBMX: 

3-isobutyl-1-methyl-xanthine

K2HPO4

Potassium phosphate dibasic

KH2PO4

Potassium phosphate monobasic

MTT: 

3-(4,-dimethy-lthiazol-2-yl)-2,-diphenyl-tetrazoliumbromide

PBS: 

Phosphate-buffered saline

p-NPB p

-nitrophenyl butyrate

S.D.: 

Standard deviation

UAE: 

Ultrasound-assisted extraction.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Prof. Dr. Maznah Ismail from the Laboratory of Molecular Biomedicine, Institute of Bioscience, UPM for supplying the GBR sample and BERNAS, Malaysia for providing financial assistance (project no. 6372100).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
(2)
Department of Veterinary Pre-Clinical Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
(3)
OrgDivision>Laboratory of Molecular Biomedicine, Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia

References

  1. WHO: Obesity and overweight. [http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/]
  2. Mukherjee M: Human digestive and metabolic lipases: a brief review. J Mol Catal B: Enzym. 2003, 22: 369-376. 10.1016/S1381-1177(03)00052-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Birari RB, Bhutani KK: Pancreatic lipase inhibitors from natural sources: unexplored potential. Drug Discov Today. 2007, 12: 879-889. 10.1016/j.drudis.2007.07.024View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahn JH, Liu Q, Lee C, Ahn MJ, Yoo HS, Hwang BY, Lee MK: A new pancreatic lipase inhibitor from Broussonetia kanzinoki. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2012, 22: 2760-2763. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.02.088View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Greenberg AS, Obin MS: Obesity and the role of adipose tissue in inflammation and metabolism. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006, 83: 461S-465S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Yun JW: Possible anti-obesity therapeutics from nature: a review. Phytochem. 2010, 71: 1625-1641. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.07.011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Bunkrongcheap R, Hutadilok-Towatana N, Noipha K, Wattanapiromsakul C, Inafuku M, Oku H: Ivy gourd (Coccinia grandis L. Voigt) root suppresses adipocyte differentiation in 3T3-L1 cells. Lipids Health Dis. 2014, 13: 88- 10.1186/1476-511X-13-88PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Borgstrom B: Mode of action of tetrahydrolipstatin: a derivative of the naturally occurring lipase inhibitor lipstatin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988, 962: 308-316. 10.1016/0005-2760(88)90260-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Glazer G: Long-term pharmacotherapy of obesity 2000: a review of efficacy and safety. Arch Intern Med. 2001, 161: 1814-1824. 10.1001/archinte.161.15.1814View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Filippatos TD, Derdemezis CS, Gazi IF, Nakou ES, Mikhailidis DP, Elisaf MS: Orlistat-associated adverse effects and drug interactions: a critical review. Drug Saf. 2008, 31: 53-65. 10.2165/00002018-200831010-00005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooke D, Bloom S: The obesity pipeline: current strategies in the development of anti-obesity drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006, 5: 919-931. 10.1038/nrd2136View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rodgers RJ, Tschop MH, Wilding JP: Anti-obesity drugs: past, present and future. Dis Model Mech. 2012, 5: 621-626. 10.1242/dmm.009621PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Zheng CD, Duan YQ, Gao JM, Ruan ZG: Screening for anti-lipase properties of 37 traditional chinese medicinal herbs. J Chin Med Assoc. 2010, 73: 319-324. 10.1016/S1726-4901(10)70068-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Nakai M, Fukui Y, Asami S, Toyoda-Ono Y, Iwashita T, Shibata H, Mitsunaga T, Hashimoto F, Kiso Y: Inhibitory effects of oolong tea polyphenols on pancreatic lipase in vitro. J Agric Food Chem. 2005, 53: 4593-4598. 10.1021/jf047814+View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Roh C, Jung U: Screening of crude plant extracts with anti-obesity activity. Int J Mol Sci. 2012, 13: 1710-1719. 10.3390/ijms13021710PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim YS, Lee YM, Kim H, Kim J, Jang DS, Kim JH, Kim JS: Anti-obesity effect of Morus bombycis root extract: anti-lipase activity and lipolytic effect. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 130: 621-624. 10.1016/j.jep.2010.05.053View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Patil SB, Khan MK: Germinated brown rice as a value added rice product: A review. J Food Sci Technol. 2011, 48: 661-667. 10.1007/s13197-011-0232-4PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fitzgerald MA, McCouch SR, Hall RD: Not just a grain of rice: the quest for quality. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14: 133-139. 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.12.004View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ki O, Suzuki K, Yasui Y, Kasumi T: Bio-functional components in the processed pre-germinated brown rice by a twin-screw extruder. J Food Comp Anal. 2005, 18: 303-316. 10.1016/j.jfca.2004.10.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Latifah SY, Armania N, Tze TH, Azhar Y, Nordiana AH, Norazalina S, Hairuszah I, Saidi M, Maznah I: Germinated brown rice (GBR) reduces the incidence of aberrant crypt foci with the involvement of beta-catenin and COX-2 in azoxymethane-induced colon cancer in rats. Nutr J. 2010, 9: 16- 10.1186/1475-2891-9-16PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Wei Y, Shohag MJI, Ying F, Yang X, Wu C, Wang Y: Effect of ferrous sulfate fortification in germinated brown rice on seed iron concentration and bioavailability. Food Chem. 2013, 138: 1952-1958. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.09.134View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Moongngarm A, Saetung N: Comparison of chemical compositions and bioactive compounds of germinated rough rice and brown rice. Food Chem. 2010, 122: 782-788. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.03.053.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Yao S, Yang T, Zhao L, Xiong S: The variation of γ-aminobutyric acid content in germinated brown rice among different cultivars. Sci Agr Sin. 2008, 41: 3974-3982.Google Scholar
  24. Karladeea D, Suriyonga S: γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) content in different varieties of brown rice during germination. Sci Asia. 2012, 38: 13-17. 10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2012.38.013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ng LT, Huang SH, Chen YT, Su CH: Changes of tocopherols, tocotrienols, gamma-oryzanol, and gamma-aminobutyric acid levels in the germinated brown rice of pigmented and nonpigmented cultivars. J Agric Food Chem. 2013, 61: 12604-12611. 10.1021/jf403703tView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ghavidel RA, Prakash J: The impact of germination and dehulling on nutrients, antinutrients, in vitro iron and calcium bioavailability and in vitro starch and protein digestibility of some legume seeds. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2007, 40: 1292-1299. 10.1016/j.lwt.2006.08.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Kiing C, Yiu PH, Rajan A, Wong SC: Effect of germination on γ-Oryzanol content of selected sarawak rice cultivars. Am J Appl Sci. 2009, 6: 1658-1661.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Fernandez-Orozco R, Frias J, Zielinski H, Piskula MK, Kozlowska H, Vidal-Valverde C: Kinetic study of the antioxidant compounds and antioxidant capacity during germination of Vigna radiata cv. emmerald, Glycinemax cv. jutro and Glycine max cv. merit. Food Chem. 2008, 111: 622-630. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.04.028.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Nakamura S, Satoh H, Ohtsubo K: Palatable and bio-functional wheat/rice products developed from pre-germinated brown rice of super-hard cultivar EM10. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2010, 74: 1164-1172. 10.1271/bbb.90850View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sun Y, Liu Z, Wang J: Ultrasound-assisted extraction of five isoflavones from Iris tectorum Maxim. Sep Purif Technol. 2011, 78: 49-54. 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.01.017.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Sun Y, Bi J, Zhang L, Ye B: Ultrasound-assisted extraction of three bufadienolides from Chinese medicine ChanSu. Ultrason Sonochem. 2012, 19: 1150-1154. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.03.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Boonkird S, Phisalaphong C, Phisalaphong M: Ultrasound-assisted extraction of capsaicinoids from Capsicum frutescens on a lab- and pilot-plant scale. Ultrason Sonochem. 2008, 15: 1075-1079. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2008.04.010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rostagno MA, Palma M, Barroso CG: Ultrasound-assisted extraction of isoflavones from soy beverages blended with fruit juices. Anal Chim Acta. 2007, 597: 265-272. 10.1016/j.aca.2007.07.006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Chen Y, Luo H, Gao A, Zhu M: Ultrasound-assisted extraction of polysaccharides from litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) seed by response surface methodology and their structural characteristics. Innovat Food Sci Emerg Tech. 2011, 12: 305-309. 10.1016/j.ifset.2011.03.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhu KX, Sun XH, Zhou HM: Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of defatted wheat germ proteins by reverse micelles. J Cer Sci. 2009, 50: 266-271. 10.1016/j.jcs.2009.06.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Picó Y: Ultrasound-assisted extraction for food and environmental samples. Trend Anal Chem. 2013, 43: 84-89.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Yang J, Kim JS, Jeong HJ, Kang HH, Cho JC, Yeom HM, Kim MJ: Determination of antioxidant and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities and luteolin contents of Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat extracts. Afr J Biotechnol. 2011, 10: 19197-19202.Google Scholar
  38. Alothman M, Bhat R, Karim AA: Antioxidant capacity and phenolic content of selected tropical fruits from Malaysia, extracted with different solvents. Food Chem. 2009, 115: 785-788. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.12.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Thanonkaew A, Wongyai S, McClements DJ, Decker EA: Effect of stabilization of rice bran by domestic heating on mechanical extraction yield, quality, and antioxidant properties of cold-pressed rice bran oil (Oryza saltiva L.). LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2012, 48: 231-236. 10.1016/j.lwt.2012.03.018.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Guo Z, Jin Q, Fan G, Duan Y, Qin C, Wen M: Microwave-assisted extraction of effective constituents from a Chinese herbal medicine Radix puerariae. Anal Chim Acta. 2001, 436: 41-47. 10.1016/S0003-2670(01)00900-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Spigno G, Tramelli L, De Faveri DM: Effects of extraction time, temperature and solvent on concentration and antioxidant activity of grape marc phenolics. J Food Eng. 2007, 81: 200-208. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.10.021.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Barbero GF, Liazid A, Palma M, Barroso CG: Ultrasound-assisted extraction of capsaicinoids from peppers. Talanta. 2008, 75: 1332-1337. 10.1016/j.talanta.2008.01.046View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Rukmini C, Raghuram TC: Nutritional and biochemical aspects of the hypolipidemic action of rice bran oil: a review. J Am Coll Nutr. 1991, 10: 593-601. 10.1080/07315724.1991.10718181View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Zaburuth Nisha S, Jayshree N: Anti-pancreatic lipase activity of leaves of Operculina turpethum. Int J Inst Pharm Life Sci. 2014, 4: 59-64.Google Scholar
  45. Kim HY, Kang MH: Screening of Korean medicinal plants for lipase inhibitory activity. Phytother Res. 2005, 19: 359-361. 10.1002/ptr.1592View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Takahashi H: U.S. patent 5, 503, 831. Lipase inhibitor derived from a defatted rice germ. 1996, 347-Google Scholar
  47. Tsutsumi K, Kawauchi Y, Kondo Y, Inoue Y, Koshitani O, Kohri H: Water Extract of Defatted Rice Bran Suppresses Visceral Fat Accumulation in Rats. J Agric Food Chem. 2000, 48: 1653-1656. 10.1021/jf991008zView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. ISO 10993-5: Biological evaluation of medical devices. Part 5: Tests for cytotoxicity: In vitro methods. Biological evaluation of medical devices. 2009, Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization,Google Scholar
  49. Nicolosi RJ, Rogers EJ, Ausman LM, Orthoefer FT: Rice bran oil and its health benefits. Rice Science and Technology. Edited by: Marshall WE, Wadsworth JI. 1994, 421-437. New York: Marcel Dekker,Google Scholar
  50. Sayre B, Saunders R: Rice bran and rice bran oil. Lipid Tech. 1990, 2: 72-76.Google Scholar
  51. Xu Z, Godber JS: Purification and Identification of Components of γ-Oryzanol in Rice Bran Oil. J Agric Food Chem. 1999, 47: 2724-2728. 10.1021/jf981175jView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Jang S, Xu Z: Lipophilic and hydrophilic antioxidants and their antioxidant activities in purple rice bran. J Agric Food Chem. 2009, 57: 858-862. 10.1021/jf803113cView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wu F, Yang N, Toure A, Jin Z, Xu X: Germinated brown rice and its role in human health. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2013, 53: 451-463. 10.1080/10408398.2010.542259View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Ho J-N, Son M-E, Lim W-C, Lim S-T, Cho H-Y: Anti-obesity effects of germinated brown rice extract through down-regulation of lipogenic genes in high fat diet-induced obese mice. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2012, 76: 1068-1074.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Kim J, Jang DS, Kim H, Kim JS: Anti-lipase and lipolytic activities of ursolic acid isolated from the roots of Actinidia arguta. Arch Pharm Res. 2009, 32: 983-987. 10.1007/s12272-009-1702-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Holm C: Molecular mechanisms regulating hormone-sensitive lipase and lipolysis. Biochem Soc Technol. 2003, 31: 1120-1124. 10.1042/BST0311120.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Boonsiripiphat K, Theerakulkait C: Extraction of rice bran extract and some factors affecting its inhibition of polyphenol oxidase activity and browning in potato. Prep Biochem Biotechnol. 2009, 39: 147-158. 10.1080/10826060902800817View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Slanc P, Doljak B, Kreft S, Lunder M, Janes D, Strukelj B: Screening of selected food and medicinal plant extracts for pancreatic lipase inhibition. Phytother Res. 2009, 23: 874-877. 10.1002/ptr.2718View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Ahn J, Lee H, Kim S, Ha T: Curcumin-induced suppression of adipogenic differentiation is accompanied by activation of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Am J Physiol-Cell Physiol. 2010, 298: C1510-C1516. 10.1152/ajpcell.00369.2009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Mosmann T: Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983, 65: 55-63. 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Ramírez-Zacarías JL, Castro-Muñozledo F, Kuri-Harcuch W: Quantitation of adipose conversion and triglycerides by staining intracytoplasmic lipids with oil red O. Histochemistry. 1992, 97: 493-497. 10.1007/BF00316069View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement