Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

The association between adiponectin, HDL-cholesterol and α1-antitrypsin-LDL in female subjects without metabolic syndrome

Lipids in Health and Disease20109:147

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-9-147

  • Received: 17 November 2010
  • Accepted: 30 December 2010
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Oxidized low-density lipoprotein (LDL) may act as an atheroprotective (anti-atherosclerotic) agent under some conditions. While the α1-antitrypsin (AT)-LDL complex is considered a type of oxidized LDL, its clinical relevance remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between AT-LDL and anti-atherosclerotic variables such as HDL-cholesterol and adiponectin in subjects with and without metabolic syndrome (MetS).

Methods

In asymptomatic females (n = 194; mean age, 54 years) who were divided into non-MetS (n = 108) and MetS groups (n = 86), the fasting levels of serum AT-LDL, adiponectin and glucose/lipid panels were measured, in addition to body mass index (BMI) and blood pressure.

Results

The MetS group showed significantly higher BMI, blood pressure, glucose and triglyceride levels as well as significantly lower levels of HDL-cholesterol and adiponectin than the non-MetS group. A multivariate-adjusted analysis revealed that in the non-MetS group, AT-LDL was significantly, independently and positively correlated with adiponectin (β = 0.297, P < 0.05), along with HDL-cholesterol (β = 0.217, P < 0.05). In the MetS group, AT-LDL was significantly, independently and positively correlated with LDL-cholesterol only (β = 0.342, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

These data suggest that AT-LDL may exert anti-atherosclerotic effects in female subjects without MetS. More studies are required to clarify the clinical roles of AT-LDL in relation to the pathophysiology of MetS.

Keywords

  • Fasting Plasma Glucose
  • Reverse Cholesterol Transport
  • National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel
  • Increase Cholesterol Efflux
  • Atherosclerotic State

Background

Atherosclerosis is an important health concern, because it leads to cardiovascular disease [1]. Oxidation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) is involved in the atherosclerotic processes, and oxidized LDL (oxLDL) can exhibit atherogenic properties [2, 3]. Recent research has shown that various types of oxLDL exist both in atherosclerotic lesions and in the circulation, and the circulating oxLDL is presently thought to be a useful marker reflecting one's atherosclerotic state [46]. On the other hand, it is becoming increasingly clear that oxLDL exerts dual effects on atherosclerosis [715]. Namely, low levels (small amounts) of oxLDL can exert an atheroprotective (anti-atherosclerotic) effect. However, the clinical data about this phenomenon are limited, and more clinical investigations are needed.

While α1-antitrypsin (AT), a serine-proteinase inhibitor, protects tissues from damage caused by excess activities of proteinases [16], when AT is oxidized, it loses its inhibitory activity and activates monocytes [17]. Oxidized AT has been shown to form a complex with LDL in atherosclerotic lesions, and the circulating AT-LDL complex seems to reflect the atherosclerotic state, although the precise mechanisms underlying the formation of the AT-LDL complex remain undetermined [18]. Importantly, the clinical significance of AT-LDL, as an oxLDL marker, in atherosclerosis is unknown. In our previous study of a specific atherosclerosis-prone population with obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS), we did not find any significant role for AT-LDL [19]. However, in agreement with the original report that developed the AT-LDL measurement system [18], we have also noted that the circulating levels of AT-LDL were very low in these patients [19].

This prompted us to investigate the association between circulating AT-LDL and anti-atherosclerotic variables, such as high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and adiponectin [20]. The levels of these variables generally differ between subjects with and without MetS (in particular, adiponectin has recently attracted much attention because of its association with MetS) [20]. The clinical relationship between AT-LDL and these variables should be examined with regard to a potential role in MetS. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to determine whether there was a correlation between AT-LDL and atherosclerotic variables, including HDL-cholesterol and adiponectin, in subjects with and without MetS.

Subjects and Methods

A total of 194 non-medicated and asymptomatic female participants, ranging from 35-70 years of age, were recruited during routine check-ups in the health education classes and outpatient clinics. The study population was composed of subjects without MetS (n = 108) and with MetS (n = 86) (Table 1). The eligible subjects had no histories of cardiovascular, thyroid, hematological, kidney or liver diseases. The existence of 3 out of 5 of the following criteria constituted a diagnosis of MetS according to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP-ATP) III recommendations [21]: 1) obesity identified by a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25.0 kg/m2 as a surrogate for Japanese subjects [22], 2) elevated blood pressure (BP) identified by systolic BP (SBP) ≥ 130 mmHg and/or diastolic BP (DBP) ≥ 85 mmHg, 3) hypertriglyceridemia identified by serum triglyceride (TG) ≥ 1.69 mmol/L, 4) decreased HDL-cholesterol identified by serum HDL-cholesterol <1.29 mmol/L, and 5) elevated glucose status identified by a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 6.1 mmol/L. The study was approved by the Jichi Medical University ethics committee, and all subjects gave their informed consent.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics in subjects with and without MetS

Variable

Non-MetS

(n = 108)

MetS

(n = 86)

P value

Age, years

54.1 ± 9.6

53.4 ± 9.5

0.618

Current smoking, %

9.3

10.5

0.779

Body mass index, kg/m2

26.0 ± 2.5

27.5 ± 1.7

<0.0001**

Systolic blood pressure, mmHg

130 ± 17

146 ± 17

<0.0001**

Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg

79 ± 11

87 ± 10

<0.0001**

Fasting plasma glucose, mmol/L

5.85 ± 2.30

7.42 ± 3.10

<0.0001**

LDL-cholesterol, mmol/L

3.32 ± 0.80

3.38 ± 0.77

0.628

Triglyceride, mmol/L

1.15 (0.88-1.47)

1.88 (1.36-2.47)

<0.0001**

HDL-cholesterol, mmol/L

1.71 ± 0.33

1.48 ± 0.38

<0.0001**

Adiponectin, μg/mL

8.95 (5.53-12.2)

7.80 (4.80-10.9)

0.050*

AT-LDL, μg/mL

3.27 ± 1.02

3.00 ± 0.98

0.071

MetS: metabolic syndrome, LDL: low-density lipoprotein, HDL: high-density lipoprotein, α1-AT-LDL: α1-antitrypsin-low-density lipoprotein. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation, the median (interquartile range) or the percentage in each subject group. Significance level (subjects without MetS vs. those with MetS; unpaired t-test [triglyceride and adiponectin were log-transformed] or χ2 test): * P ≤ 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01.

Current smoking was defined as the presence of current smoking habits via a self-report and professional interview. In addition to the BMI, the SBP and DBP levels were determined in the seated subject's right-arm with a mercury sphygmomanometer after 5 minutes of rest. During an overnight fast, the serum TG and FPG levels were measured using enzymatic methods, and the serum LDL-cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol levels were measured using homogeneous methods. The serum adiponectin levels were measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Serum AT-LDL levels were determined according to an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method, as described previously [18, 19]. Briefly, fresh serum samples (50 L/well) were incubated overnight at 4°C with the anti-human AT-specific antibody (DAKO Denmark A/S, Glostrup, Denmark: AT-LDL, clone No.27) coated onto a microtiter plate. After washing, a biotinylated Fab' anti-human apo-B antibody was added as the capture antibody (100 L/well), and reacted for 2 hours at room temperature. The activity was measured in terms of the difference in optical absorbance between 450 and 620 nm after adding a peroxidase substrate, when the reaction was terminated by adding phosphoric acid. The intraassay coefficients of variation at low and high concentrations of AT-LDL were 1.8% and 1.6%, respectively. The interassay coefficients of variation at low and high concentrations of AT-LDL were 5.9% and 5.4%, respectively. All samples were assayed in duplicate and in random order.

The data were expressed as the means ± standard deviation (SD) or the median plus interquartile range. The data between the subject groups were compared using an unpaired t-test. A simple and multivariate-adjusted linear regression model was utilized to observe the correlation between AT-LDL and other atherosclerotic variables. All of the measured variables, except for DBP (because of its close collinearity to SBP: correlation coefficient >0.6), were entered into the multivariate-adjusted analysis model. The levels of TG and adiponectin were log-transformed for all of the analyses because of their skewed distributions. A P value ≤0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

With regard to the clinical characteristics of the subject groups with and without MetS (Table 1), subjects with MetS had significantly higher BMI, SBP, DBP, FPG and TG levels than those without MetS. The subjects with MetS showed significantly lower levels of HDL-cholesterol and adiponectin than those without MetS. There were no significant differences in AT-LDL levels between the two subject groups.

In the simple linear regression analysis (Table 2), AT-LDL was significantly and positively correlated with LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and adiponectin in the subjects without MetS. In the group with MetS, AT-LDL was significantly and positively correlated with LDL-cholesterol only. In a subsequent multivariate-adjusted analysis (Table 2) in the subject group without MetS, the AT-LDL was significantly, independently and positively correlated with adiponectin, as well as HDL-cholesterol. In the group with MetS, AT-LDL remained significantly, independently and positively correlated with LDL-cholesterol only.
Table 2

Correlations of AT-LDL with other atherosclerotic variables

 

Non-MetS

MetS

Variable

γ (P value)

β (P value)

γ (P value)

β (P value)

Age, years

-0.025 (0.8001)

-0.127 (0.229)

-0.125 (0.251)

-0.197 (0.086)

Current smoking, %

-0.008 (0.934)

0.033 (0.734)

0.101 (0.356)

0.116 (0.287)

Body mass index, kg/m2

-0.073 (0.452)

0.081 (0.447)

-0.161 (0.138)

-0.104 (0.346)

Systolic blood pressure, mmHg

0.104 (0.285)

0.008 (0.950)

0.017 (0.875)

0.104 (0.337)

Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg

0.107 (0.269)

-

-0.131 (0.229)

-

Fasting plasma glucose, mmol/L

-0.017 (0.863)

0.081 (0.413)

-0.040 (0.771)

0.080 (0.464)

LDL-cholesterol, mmol/L

0.206 (0.033)*

0.144 (0.128)

0.349 (0.001)**

0.342 (0.002)**

Triglyceride, mmol/L

-0.022 (0.819)

0.016 (0.860)

0.204 (0.061)

0.167 (0.120)

HDL-cholesterol, mmol/L

0.303 (0.001)**

0.217 (0.048)*

-0.030 (0.784)

-0.006 (0.965)

Adiponectin, μg/mL

0.330 (<0.0001)**

0.297 (0.010)**

-0.041 (0.706)

-0.045 (0.693)

AT-LDL: α1-antitrypsin-low-density lipoprotein, MetS: metabolic syndrome, LDL: low-density lipoprotein, HDL: high-density lipoprotein. r: simple linear regression coefficient between α1-AT-LDL and another variable, β: multiple linear regression coefficient in a multivariate analysis for α1-AT-LDL after controlling for all the listed variables except for diastolic blood pressure. Triglyceride and adiponectin were log-transformed for analyses. Significance level: * P ≤ 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01.

Discussion

The present study is the first demonstration that AT-LDL had a significantly positive correlation with HDL-cholesterol and adiponectin in subjects without MetS, but not in those with MetS. In this study, subjects with MetS were more predisposed to be atherosclerotic, based on their BMI, BP, glucose/lipid panels and adiponectin, compared to those without MetS, which is in agreement with previous reports [20]. In addition, the finding of a significant correlation between AT-LDL and LDL-cholesterol in subjects with MetS was similarly observed in a previous study [19].

The present study provided two new findings. The first is the atheroprotective relevance of oxLDL. Earlier studies reported a significant inverse correlation between adiponectin and oxLDL in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease [23] and in patients with chronic heart failure [24]. The significant inverse correlation between HDL-cholesterol and oxLDL was also reported in patients with coronary artery disease [25]. Our present results showing the significant positive correlation between adiponectin or HDL-C and AT-LDL would not have been expected from these reports [2325], although the examined populations and oxLDL markers were different between the prior work and our current study. However, since relatively low levels of oxLDL can be atheroprotective [715], it is important to note the possibility that AT-LDL may exert anti-atherosclerotic effects in subjects without MetS. This might be an important case showing an atheroprotective aspect of oxLDL in the clinical setting.

Based on the current study alone, we cannot completely determine whether the significant relationship between adiponectin, HDL-cholestreol and AT-LDL is a simple (non-causative) correlation or a positive pathological link. However, we have considered the possible biological mechanisms of such a relationship. Oxidized LDL, as anti-atherosclerotic agent, acts through its cytoprotection, the modulation of immunological system and the activation of reverse cholesterol transport, as was well-documented in Yu's study [13]. The cytoprotective mechanism of oxLDL involves the regulation by the electrophile response element, including heme oxygenase-1 [9, 26]. The atheroprotective effects of the immunity to oxLDL are known to be induced, for instance, by the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-10 [11, 13]. There is a growing appreciation that heme oxygenase-1 plays a crucial anti-inflammatory role in chronic inflammatory pathologies induced by various factors (i.e., oxidative stress and cytokines) and is a mediator of interleukin-10 expression [27, 28]. While adiponectin induction by oxLDL remains to be established, the key molecules (such as heme oxygenase-1) can show a positive association with adiponectin [29]. Thus, the adiponectin/interleukin-10/heme oxygenase-1 pathway may, at least in part, explain the positive relationship between adiponectin and oxLDL. Furthermore, a report demonstrating that low levels of oxLDL increased cholesterol efflux in adipocytes has suggested that oxLDL has an atheroprotective role by enhancing the reverse cholesterol transport, thereby increasing HDL-cholesterol [13, 14]. This may partly account for the positive relationship between HDL-cholesterol and oxLDL.

The second major finding of our present study is the differences in associations of oxLDL with anti-atherosclerotic variables in subjects with and without MetS. The present results showing a diminished correlation between adiponectin or HDL-cholesterol and AT-LDL in subjects with MetS are interesting, and suggest that the metabolic dysregulation and homeostatic shifts specifically found in MetS subjects (i.e., lower adiponectin or HDL-cholesterol concentrations [20]) may eliminate the significant link between them found in those without MetS. Whether the pathophysiology of MetS could specifically affect the correlation pattern of atherosclerotic variables to AT-LDL remains to be explored.

The present study had a few limitations. The cross-sectional design did not allow for a strict cause-and-effect conclusion to be drawn. The study was conducted in female subjects, and we did not obtain any data on males. There are also ethnic differences in some influences of atherosclerotic variables, including adiponectin and cholesterol, on atherosclerotic states [30]. Therefore, more studies with various populations and prospective designs are called for when carrying out future studies.

Conclusions

In summary, the present study showed that AT-LDL was significantly, independently and positively correlated with adiponectin and HDL-cholesterol in female subjects without MetS, but not in those with MetS. These data suggest that AT-LDL may exert anti-atherosclerotic effects in subjects without MetS. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings and their relevance in the clinical and basic settings.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for the Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (K.K) and the Charitable Trust Laboratory Medicine Research Foundation of Japan (K.K).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan

References

  1. Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ: Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet. 2006, 367: 1747-1757. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68770-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Witztum JL, Steinberg D: Role of oxidized low density lipoprotein in atherogenesis. J Clin Invest. 1991, 88: 1785-1792. 10.1172/JCI115499PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Sawamura T, Kume N, Aoyama T, Moriwaki H, Hoshikawa H, Aiba Y, Tanaka T, Miwa S, Katsura Y, Kita T, Masaki T: An endothelial receptor for oxidized low-density lipoprotein. Nature. 1997, 386: 73-77. 10.1038/386073a0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Fraley AE, Tsimikas S: Clinical applications of circulating oxidized low-density lipoprotein biomarkers in cardiovascular disease. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2006, 17: 502-509. 10.1097/01.mol.0000245255.40634.b5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Itabe H, Ueda M: Measurement of plasma oxidized low-density lipoprotein and its clinical implications. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2007, 14: 1-11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kotani K, Satoh N, Yamada T, Gugliucci A: The potential of serum amyloid A--LDL as a novel biomarker for cardiovascular disease risk. Clin Lipidol. 2010, 5: 489-495. 10.2217/clp.10.42. 10.2217/clp.10.42View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Freigang S, Hörkkö S, Miller E, Witztum JL, Palinski W: Immunization of LDL receptor-deficient mice with homologous malondialdehyde-modified and native LDL reduces progression of atherosclerosis by mechanisms other than induction of high titers of antibodies to oxidative neoepitopes. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998, 18: 1972-1982.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Moellering DR, Levonen AL, Go YM, Patel RP, Dickinson DA, Forman HJ, Darley-Usmar VM: Induction of glutathione synthesis by oxidized low-density lipoprotein and 1-palmitoyl-2-arachidonyl phosphatidylcholine: protection against quinone-mediated oxidative stress. Biochem J. 2002, 362: 51-59. 10.1042/0264-6021:3620051PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bea F, Hudson FN, Chait A, Kavanagh TJ, Rosenfeld ME: Induction of glutathione synthesis in macrophages by oxidized low-density lipoproteins is mediated by consensus antioxidant response elements. Circ Res. 2003, 92: 386-393. 10.1161/01.RES.0000059561.65545.16View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Robbesyn F, Salvayre R, Negre-Salvayre A: Dual role of oxidized LDL on the NF-kappaB signaling pathway. Free Radic Res. 2004, 38: 541-551. 10.1080/10715760410001665244View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Shah PK, Chyu KY, Fredrikson GN, Nilsson J: Immunomodulation of atherosclerosis with a vaccine. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2005, 2: 639-646. 10.1038/ncpcardio0372View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. van Puijvelde GH, Hauer AD, de Vos P, van den Heuvel R, van Herwijnen MJ, van der Zee R, van Eden W, van Berkel TJ, Kuiper J: Induction of oral tolerance to oxidized low-density lipoprotein ameliorates atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2006, 114: 1968-1976. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.615609View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Yu BL, Zhao SP, Huang XS: Oxidized low-density lipoprotein: a double-edged sword on atherosclerosis. Med Hypotheses. 2007, 69: 553-556. 10.1016/j.mehy.2007.01.043View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhao SP, Yu BL, Xie XZ, Dong SZ, Dong J: Dual effects of oxidized low-density lipoprotein on LXR-ABCA1-apoA-I pathway in 3T3-L1 cells. Int J Cardiol. 2008, 128: 42-47. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.05.017View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Nilsson J, Fredrikson GN, Björkbacka H, Chyu KY, Shah PK: Vaccines modulating lipoprotein autoimmunity as a possible future therapy for cardiovascular disease. J Intern Med. 2009, 266: 221-231. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2009.02150.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Knoell DL, Ralston DR, Coulter KR, Wewers MD: Alpha 1-antitrypsin and protease complexation is induced by lipopolysaccharide, interleukin-1beta, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in monocytes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998, 157: 246-255.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Moraga F, Janciauskiene S: Activation of primary human monocytes by the oxidized form of alpha1-antitrypsin. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 7693-7700. 10.1074/jbc.275.11.7693View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mashiba S, Wada Y, Takeya M, Sugiyama A, Hamakubo T, Nakamura A, Noguchi N, Niki E, Izumi A, Kobayashi M, Uchida K, Kodama T: In vivo complex formation of oxidized alpha(1)-antitrypsin and LDL. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001, 21: 1801-1808. 10.1161/hq1101.098232View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kotani K, Satoh N, Kato Y, Araki R, Koyama K, Okajima T, Tanabe M, Oishi M, Yamakage H, Yamada K, Hattori M, Shimatsu A: A novel oxidized low-density lipoprotein marker, serum amyloid A-LDL, is associated with obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Atherosclerosis. 2009, 204: 526-531. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.09.017View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nishida M, Funahashi T, Shimomura I: Pathophysiological significance of adiponectin. Med Mol Morphol. 2007, 40: 55-67. 10.1007/s00795-007-0366-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. , : Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001, 285: 2486-2497. 10.1001/jama.285.19.2486View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Examination Committee of Criteria for 'Obesity Disease' in Japan; Japan Society for the Study of Obesity. Circ J. 2002, 66: 987-992.Google Scholar
  23. Lautamäki R, Rönnemaa T, Huupponen R, Lehtimäki T, Iozzo P, Airaksinen KE, Knuuti J, Nuutila P: Low serum adiponectin is associated with high circulating oxidized low-density lipoprotein in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease. Metabolism. 2007, 56: 881-886. 10.1016/j.metabol.2007.01.018View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Tanaka T, Tsutamoto T, Nishiyama K, Sakai H, Fujii M, Yamamoto T, Horie M: Impact of oxidative stress on plasma adiponectin in patients with chronic heart failure. Circ J. 2008, 72: 563-568. 10.1253/circj.72.563View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Miyazaki T, Shimada K, Sato O, Kotani K, Kume A, Sumiyoshi K, Sato Y, Ohmura H, Watanabe Y, Mokuno H, Daida H: Circulating malondialdehyde-modified LDL and atherogenic lipoprotein profiles measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in patients with coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis. 2005, 179: 139-145. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2004.09.013View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoekstra KA, Godin DV, Cheng KM: Protective role of heme oxygenase in the blood vessel wall during atherogenesis. Biochem Cell Biol. 2004, 82: 351-359. 10.1139/o04-006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Otterbein LE, Soares MP, Yamashita K, Bach FH: Heme oxygenase-1: unleashing the protective properties of heme. Trends Immunol. 2003, 24: 449-455. 10.1016/S1471-4906(03)00181-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. O'Shea JJ, Murray PJ: Cytokine signaling modules in inflammatory responses. Immunity. 2008, 28: 477-487. 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.03.002PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. L'Abbate A, Neglia D, Vecoli C, Novelli M, Ottaviano V, Baldi S, Barsacchi R, Paolicchi A, Masiello P, Drummond GS, McClung JA, Abraham NG: Beneficial effect of heme oxygenase-1 expression on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion involves an increase in adiponectin in mildly diabetic rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007, 293: H3532-3541. 10.1152/ajpheart.00826.2007View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Forouhi NG, Sattar N: CVD risk factors and ethnicity - a homogeneous relationship?. Atheroscler Suppl. 2006, 7: 11-19. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosissup.2006.01.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kotani et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement