Skip to main content

Effects of fish oil supplementation on glucose control and lipid levels among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials



Previous studies have yielded inconsistent findings on the role of fish oil in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We systematically summarized the available evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCT) and aimed to investigate the effects of fish oil supplementation on glucose control and lipid levels among patients with T2DM.


A comprehensive literature search was performed in electronic databases (PubMed, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang) to identify all relevant RCTs which were published up to May 31st, 2019. We used Modified Jadad Score system to evaluate the quality of each included RCT. The pooled effects were estimated using random-effects model and presented as standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals.


A total of 12 RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in glucose control outcomes comparing fish oil supplementation to placebo. The effect size of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was 0.13 (95% CI: − 0.03 to 0.28, p > 0.05). No marked change was observed in fasting insulin (FINS), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and HOMA of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) levels. Fish oil supplementation was associated with a decrease of triglyceride (TG) level by − 0.40 (95%CI: − 0.53 to − 0.28, p < 0.05), and an increase of high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level by 0.21 (95%CI: 0.05 to 0.37, p < 0.05). In subgroup analysis, HDL cholesterol level was higher among Asian and low-dose(< 2 g/d n-3 PUFA) subgroups compared to their counterparts (p < 0.05). TG level was lower in mid and long duration groups, along with an inconspicuous difference in short duration group.


This meta-analysis shows that among patients with T2DM, fish oil supplementation leads to a favorable blood lipids profile but does not improve glucose control.


Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a long-term metabolic disorder which is characterized by high blood glucose in conditions of insulin resistance and/or insufficient insulin secretion [1]. It is one of the most common chronic diseases in the world, which is also a major risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD), blindness, kidney failure, and all types of cancer [2]. The global prevalence of diabetes was 422 million at 2014, and it was the seventh leading cause of death in 2016, along with tremendous economic and public health burdens [3]. It has been stated that most of T2DM can be partly prevented by proper diets and healthy lifestyles, which triggered the investigation of specific dietary interventions.

Mainly found in fish oils, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) are marine n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) involved in human physiology; received increasing attention in recent years due to its wide range of biological activities. Some studies showed that n-3 PUFAs may reduce the risk of CHD, ischemic stroke, alleviate inflammation and promote healthier cognitive aging [4,5,6,7,8,9]. For the past few years, animal and cell culture studies have demonstrated that n-3 PUFAs also have beneficial effects on prevention of T2DM through multiple mechanisms including insulin signaling, anti-inflammatory actions, altering cell membrane function, and control the expression of glucose metabolism genes [10]. However, results from human intervention studies have been inconsistent [6, 11,12,13,14,15], which might be attributed to mixed subjects and various intervention measures [16, 17]. Thus, it is imperative to comprehensively evaluate the effects of fish oil supplementation on T2DM patients to inform clinical guidelines [18].

Decrease of triglyceride levels by fish oil supplementation has been confirmed by previous studies [19], but other indicators of blood lipid and glucose control remain inconclusive [20,21,22]. For instance, a meta-analysis [21] reported that fasting plasma glucose level in type 2 diabetic Asians was increased by 0.42 mmol/L with n-3 PUFAs supplementation, while no change was identified in the whole type 2 diabetic population. However, some aspects included in this study were varied. Supplementation ranged from fish oil, purified omega-3 fatty acids and EPA-E whereas subjects with impaired glucose tolerance subjects were also included. In another study [23], fish oil was associated with lower risk of insulin resistance among metabolic syndrome (MS) participants, but no effect was observed in T2DM patients or healthy people. Although fish oil is one of the most common complementary forms of n-3, complete meta data is still lacking in the ralationship between fish oil and type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, several RCTs have come up with richer conclusions, which could further contribute to the pooled data and allow further investigation into any association between fish oil consumption and T2DM. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the effect of fish oil supplementation on blood glucose control and lipid levels among patients with T2DM.


Literature search

We searched databases of Pubmed, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang from the beginning until May 31st 2019. Our comprehensive search was performed using the following key words in combination as both MeSH terms and text words: [fish oil or omega-3 fatty acids or n-3 PUFA or Docosahexaenoic Acids (DHA) or Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA)] and [TG or TC or HDL cholesterol or LDL cholesterol or fasting plasma glucose (FPG) or fasting plasma insulin (FINS) or glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) or HOMA of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)] and [Type 2 diabetes mellitus or T2MD] and [Randomized Controlled Trials or RCT]..

Search selection

Two separate investigators examined both titles and abstracts to determine the relevance of RCTs. Full articles were retrieved for further assessment following the inclusion criteria: 1) human RCTs (either parallel or crossover design) with fish oil supplementation intervention; 2) the study population was T2DM patients; 3) the control group received placebos without n-3 fatty acid elements. 4) the study reported outcomes including TG, TC, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting plasma insulin (FINS), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), HOMA of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) at baseline and the end of trial. Interventions with fish diet, pure n-3 fatty acids or other multifactorial intervention were excluded. Articles with incomplete information, poor quality and repeated populations were also excluded. RCTs with serious complications of type 2 diabetes were also removed. In addition, crossover design studies without data of the first period of intervention were excluded. When there were disagreements about the study inclusion, we consulted a third author.

Data extraction and quality evaluation

Two investigators (C.G and Y.L) conducted a data extraction form respectively to collect the information, which included the first author’s name, year of publication, study design, sample size, participants’ characteristics, intervention details (dosage, type, frequency, and duration), placebo, outcomes index. Sample size (n), mean and standard deviation (SD) were extracted from both intervention group and control group at baseline and the end of trial. When data were reported as standard errors (SEs), interquartile range (IQR), or 95%CI, SDs were calculated by equations \( SD= SE\times \sqrt{\mathrm{n}} \), SD = IQR ÷ 1.35, \( SD=\sqrt{n}\times \left( upper- lower\right)/2\times t \), respectively (The value 't' is the degree of freedom). If a study reported outcome index at two sections or two doses, we regarded them as two independent studies. When some data were not directly reported in the article, the original author was contacted to obtain the relevant information. The methodology quality of RCTs was graded by Modified Jadad Score system. Studies with a score of 1–3 were considered as low quality whereas a score of 4–7 as high quality.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed by STATA 12.0 statistical software. The pooled effects were estimated in a meta-analysis using random-effects model and presented as standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 tests with significance value set at p < 0.05. Risk of publication bias was evaluated by the Egger’s and Begg’s tests with p < 0.05 as significant bias. Influence analysis method was used to perform the sensitivity test. To analyze the potential sources of heterogeneity, subgroup analyses were undertaken according to race (Asian, America and European), intervention duration (≤1 month, 1-3 months, > 3 months), and dose of n-3 PUFA existed in fish oil (< 2 g/d for low dose, ≥2 g/d for high dose). P value< 0.05 were set to be statistically significant.


Study identification

We retrieved 2131 potentially eligible papers from electronic database searching. After removing duplicates and improper designs by screening title and abstracts, 569 papers remained. We then excluded studies which were not conducted in T2DM participants, did not use fish oil intervention, not relevant to the topic, and not in English or Chinese through full-text reading. Among the 22 remaining articles, 8 studies had no specific outcomes data, one study was regarded as low quality and 2 studies were conducted with the same population. For the two articles based on the same population, the one with more data was chosen. Finally, 12 RCTs met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The details are shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Flow chart on the articles selection process

Study characteristics

The main characteristics of the studies included are shown in Table 1. The 12 RCTs included 2 single-blind RCTs and 10 double-blind RCTs which were published between Jan 1st 1990 and May 31st 2019. There were 820 adult participants involved and they were all diagnosed as T2DM patients. Among these RCTs, 6 studies were from Asia, 3 studies were from Europe, the other 3 articles were from North America and Brazil. Duration of the interventions varied from 3 weeks to 6 months. The doses of n-3 PUFA existed in fish oil are ranged from 0.3 g/d to 10.08 g/d.

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies

Quality assessment

As Table 2 shown, results from Modified Jadad Score system revealed that 6 of the included trials were low quality, while the other 6 trials were high quality.

Table 2 Modified Jadad Score form


Among the included studies, 13 studies reported data on FPG, 8 reported data on FINS, 10 reported data on HbA1c and 8 reported data on HOMA-IR. Meanwhile, 15 studies reported data on lipid parameters. The pooled analysis showed that there was no significant difference in glucose control outcomes comparing fish oil supplementation to placebo. However, compared to placebo, fish oil supplementation significantly decreased TG level by − 0.40 (95%CI: − 0.53 to-0.28, I2 = 0%, p < 0.05), and increased HDL cholesterol level by 0.21 (95%CI: 0.05 to 0.37, I2 = 37.1%, p < 0.05). There were no significant changes in TC or LDL cholesterol level (Figs. 2 and 3).

Fig. 2

Effects of fish oil on FPG(a), FINS(b), HbA1c(c), HOMA-IR(d)

Fig. 3

Effects of fish oil on TG(e), TC(f), HDL cholesterol(g), LDL(h) cholesterol

Subgroup analyses

We undertook subgroup analyses according to race, intervention duration and dose of n-3 PUFA existed in fish oil supplementation. Table 3 showed the data from trails with Asian and US/European subjects. No marked differences were identified in glycemic parameters. Data of TG levels displayed protective effects on both populations, but this change was more obvious in US/European population (SMD: -0.58, 95%CI: − 0.81 to − 0.34, p < 0.05). We also found that fish oil supplementation increased HDL cholesterol level in the Asian subgroup (SMD: 0.26, 95%CI: 0.10 to 0.43, p < 0.05) whereas the above was not observed in US/European subjects. Non-significant results were observed for the other lipid parameters assessed.

Table 3 Subgroup analysis of fish oil supplementation and placebo by race

Table 4 presented the data according to the different terms (short-term duration (≤1 month), mid-term duration (1–3 months), and long-term duration (> 3 months)) of intervention. Variations of TG level only appeared in mid-term (SMD: -0.40, 95%CI: − 0.56 to − 0.23, p < 0.05) and long-term (SMD: -0.43, 95%CI: − 0.68 to − 0.17, p < 0.05) subgroups, indicating that the duration of intervention played a dramatic role in the change in TG levels. While short-term intervention of less than 1 month might not make sense. No statistic differences were discovered for other outcomes.

Table 4 Subgroup analysis of fish oil supplementation and placebo by intervention duration

Table 5 showed the data of subgroup analysis with low-dose (< 2 g/d) and high-dose (≥2 g/d) of n-3 PUFA existed in fish oil supplementation. A significant reduction of TG level was observed in both low-dose (SMD: -0.36, 95%CI: − 0.57 to − 0.15, p < 0.05) and high dose (SMD: -0.45, 95%CI: − 0.62 to − 0.29, p < 0.05) subgroups. The results also demonstrated that HDL level was increased only in the low-dose subgroup (SMD: 0.27, 95%CI: 0.08 to 0.45, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in glycemic index followed by this subgroup analysis.

Table 5 Subgroup analysis of fish oil supplementation and placebo by dose of n-3 PUFA

Sensitivity analysis and publication bias

The sensitivity analysis plot of each observed indicators presented no effect size being out of the 95%CI and the combined 95%CI, which indicated that our results were stable and reliable. Results of the publication bias tests stated that there was no potential publication bias, with P-value of Egger’s test for each parameter was 0.217 (TG), 0.182 (TC), 0.487 (HDL cholesterol), 0.852 (LDL cholesterol), 0.666 (FPG), 0.578 (FINS), 0.920 (HbA1c), 0.960 (HOMA-IR), respectively. The funnel plot, Egger’s and Begg’s values were shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Funnel plots assessing publication bias. Publication bias and small-study effects were assessed using Egger’s and Begg’s test and presented as P values


This meta-analysis of 12 RCTs on T2DM patients found that TG level decreased significantly with fish oil supplementation. Fish oil intervention was also effective in elevating HDL cholesterol level. Previous studies have shown that a reduced TG level and elevated HDL cholesterol level are associated with lower risk of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease [18]. In the subgroup analysis, a more obvious decrease in TG level was observed in US/European subjects compared to Asians subjects. On the other hand, HDL cholesterol level in Asians presented a statistical increase but was not shown in US/European subjects. The above indicated a non-negligible role of racial difference which suggest further exploration on genomics. With respect to potential mechanisms of action, fish oil was associated with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR). Genetic variants at PPARG associated with T2DM were only found in GWAS of Europeans but not in East Asians [35]. The effects of n-3 PUFA on blood lipids in type 2 diabetic patients may vary according to the genetic variations of CD36, NOS3 and PPAR-gamma genes, and personalized dietary recommendations based on certain genetic components to improve blood lipid profile may be extremely effective for n-3 PUFA intake [36].

We also found that changes in TG level appeared only when the intervention period was above 1 month. This result was consistent with a previous study which reported that 4 weeks were needed for serum PUFA levels to reach equilibrium [37]. It is worth mentioning that the results may also be due to the relatively small number of short-term intervention trials included in this paper. Besides that, the n-3 PUFA showed resultful effects on both TG and HDL cholesterol level in low dose group. However, when the intake is above 2 g/d, n-3 PUFA had a more significant effect on TG level, which did not seen in HDL cholesterol level. Since there are few literature studies on the relationship between n-3 PUFA intake and HDL cholesterol level, and in the limited trials included in this meta-analysis, the intake of n-3 PUFA even reached more than 10 g, more in-depth studies are still needed in this regard. In Ree’s study [38], the necessary dose of eicosapentaenoic acid to achieve an anti-inflammatory was reported to be at least 2 g/d, which can provide reference for future research.

Although there was no significant association between fish oil supplementation and blood glucose control levels in our study, conflicting results have emerged in other studies. For example, a previous meta-analysis of 20 RCTs using omega-3 fatty acids as supplementation in T2DM patients discovered an increase in FPG level by 0.42 mmol/L (95%CI: 0.058 to 0.781 mmol/L, p < 0.05) in Asians whilst no change was observed in the whole T2DM population [21]. Conversely, another meta-analysis of 24 observational cohort studies [39] showed that marine omega-3 fatty acids could significantly reduce T2DM risk in Asians (RR: 0.87, 95%CI: 0.79 to 0.96). One possible reason mentioned in the previous article is that most of the RCT intervention lasted less than 12 weeks which may cause null effect on glucose control [21]. However, according to our subgroup analysis, no significant effect was observed even when intervention was more than three months. Another possible explanation is that the high differentiation of gene loci in different race of T2DM patients affects the incidence of T2DM [39, 40]. Studies have shown that differences in T2DM loci in East Asian and European populations directly lead to different responses to n-3 PUFA exposure in relation to T2DM incidence [35]. This finding is consistent with the results of many prospective studies, which reported a negative correlation between n-3 PUFA and the risk of T2DM in Chinese, but was not found in the US and Europe populations [41, 42]. The Asian subgroup in this study included not only East Asians but also Middle Eastern countries such as Iran, which may explain the different conclusions arised; more data on different ethnic groups are needed.

Our study did not show any change in insulin sensitivity and insulin resistance with fish oil supplementation among T2DM patients. Delicately, there was a meta-analysis [23] reported that fish oil had a positive effect on insulin sensitivity in people with metabolic disorders rather than healthy individuals and patients with clinically overt T2DM groups. Thus, fish oil supplementation may have a beneficial effect on patients with metabolic disorders or early diabetes rather than those with overt T2DM.

The major strength of this meta-analysis lies in the inclusion of only RCTs, which represent the gold study design to establish causality. Although some previous studies reported the association of fish oil and T2DM in observational studies, they cannot establish causality and they may be subject to confounding. The rigorous methodology we followed in this study also ensured high quality data. Some limitations should be acknowledged. Firstly, in the included RCTs, the ratio of EPA/DHA concentration in fish oil tended to be similar (i.e., around 3/2), so the study cannot assess whether different ratio of EPA/DHA can bring out discrepant results. Secondly, we considered to explore the variation trend of inflammatory factors related to T2DM with fish oil supplementation, which has been reported that fish oil has beneficial effects on T2DM through anti-inflammatory actions [10]. However, those data were available in few studies included in the meta-analysis.


In conclusion, among patients with T2DM, fish oil supplementation leads to a favorable blood lipids profile (i.e., reduced TG levels and elevated HDL cholesterol levels), but does not improve glucose levels. Further investigation is needed to determine long term effects of fish oil supplementation and to understand the mechanisms (e.g., genomic variations) of heterogenous findings across populations.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.



Confidence intervals


Docosahexaenoic acid


Eicosapentaenoic acid


Fast insulin


Fast plasma glucose


Glycosylated hemoglobin

HDL cholesterol:

High density lipoprotein cholesterol


HOMA of insulin resistance

LDL cholesterol:

Low density lipoprotein cholesterol


Randomized controlled trials


Standard mean difference


Type 2 diabetes mellitus


Total cholesterol




  1. 1.

    Chatterjee S, Khunti K, Davies MJ. Type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2017;389(10085):2239–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Zheng Y, Ley SH, Hu FB. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(2):88–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    World Health Organization. World Health Organization (2016) Global Report on Diabetes. 2016. p. 20–31.

  4. 4.

    Afshin A, Sur PJ, Fay KA, Cornaby L, Ferrara G, Salama JS, Mullany EC, Abate KH, Abbafati C, Abebe Z, et al. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet. 2019;393(10184):1958–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Veno SK, Bork CS, Jakobsen MU, Lundbye-Christensen S, McLennan PL, Bach FW, Overvad K, Schmidt EB. Marine n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and the risk of ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2019;50(2):274–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Manson JE, Cook NR, Lee IM, Christen W, Bassuk SS, Mora S, Gibson H, Albert CM, Gordon D, Copeland T, et al. Marine n-3 fatty acids and prevention of cardiovascular disease and Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(1):23–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Rimm EB, Appel LJ, Chiuve SE, Djousse L, Engler MB, Kris-Etherton PM, Mozaffarian D, Siscovick DS, Lichtenstein AH. Seafood long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and cardiovascular disease: a science advisory from the American Heart Association. Circ. 2018;138(1):e35–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Aung T, Halsey J, Kromhout D, Gerstein HC, Marchioli R, Tavazzi L, Geleijnse JM, Rauch B, Ness A, Galan P, et al. Associations of Omega-3 fatty acid supplement use with cardiovascular disease risks: Meta-analysis of 10 trials involving 77917 individuals. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3(3):225–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lai HT, de Oliveira OM, Lemaitre RN, McKnight B, Song X, King IB, Chaves PH, Odden MC, Newman AB, Siscovick DS, et al. Serial circulating omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and healthy ageing among older adults in the cardiovascular health study: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2018;363:k4067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Oh DY, Talukdar S, Bae EJ, Imamura T, Morinaga H, Fan W, Li P, Lu WJ, Watkins SM, Olefsky JM. GPR120 is an omega-3 fatty acid receptor mediating potent anti-inflammatory and insulin-sensitizing effects. Cell. 2010;142(5):687–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Lasota AN, Gronholdt MM, Bork CS, Lundbye-Christensen S, Overvad K, Schmidt EB. Marine n-3 fatty acids and the risk of peripheral arterial disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(14):1576–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Li D, Wahlqvist ML, Sinclair AJ. Advances in n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid nutrition. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2019;28(1):1–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bowman L, Mafham M, Wallendszus K, Stevens W, Buck G, Barton J, Murphy K, Aung T, Haynes R, Cox J, et al. Effects of n-3 fatty acid supplements in diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(16):1540–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jacobo-Cejudo MG, Valdes-Ramos R, Guadarrama-Lopez AL, Pardo-Morales RV, Martinez-Carrillo BE, Harbige LS. Effect of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation on metabolic and inflammatory biomarkers in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Nutrients. 2017;9(6):573.

  15. 15.

    Poreba M, Mostowik M, Siniarski A, Golebiowska-Wiatrak R, Malinowski KP, Haberka M, Konduracka E, Nessler J, Undas A, Gajos G. Treatment with high-dose n-3 PUFAs has no effect on platelet function, coagulation, metabolic status or inflammation in patients with atherosclerosis and type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017;16(1):50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Abdul-Ghani M, DeFronzo RA, Del PS, Chilton R, Singh R, Ryder R. Cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes: has the Dawn of a new era arrived? Diabetes Care. 2017;40(7):813–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Del GL, Imamura F, Aslibekyan S, Marklund M, Virtanen JK, Wennberg M, Yakoob MY, Chiuve SE, Dela CL F-w AC, et al. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid biomarkers and coronary heart disease: pooling project of 19 cohort studies. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(8):1155–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Abdelhamid AS, Brown TJ, Brainard JS, Biswas P, Thorpe GC, Moore HJ, Deane KH, AlAbdulghafoor FK, Summerbell CD, Worthington HV, et al. Omega-3 fatty acids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;11:D3177.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    O'Mahoney LL, Matu J, Price OJ, Birch KM, Ajjan RA, Farrar D, Tapp R, West DJ, Deighton K, Campbell MD. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids favourably modulate cardiometabolic biomarkers in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17(1):98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wu JH, Micha R, Imamura F, Pan A, Biggs ML, Ajaz O, Djousse L, Hu FB, Mozaffarian D. Omega-3 fatty acids and incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr. 2012;107(Suppl 2):S214–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Chen C, Yu X, Shao S. Effects of Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on glucose control and lipid levels in type 2 diabetes: a Meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e139565.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Pizzini A, Lunger L, Demetz E, Hilbe R, Weiss G, Ebenbichler C, Tancevski I. The role of omega-3 fatty acids in reverse cholesterol transport: a review. Nutrients. 2017;9(10):1099.

  23. 23.

    Gao H, Geng T, Huang T, Zhao Q. Fish oil supplementation and insulin sensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lipids Health Dis. 2017;16(1):131.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    WFYX WANG Y-y. Effect of deep sea fish oil on glucose and lipid metabolism in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus:a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Acta Nutrimenta Sinica. 2017;02:127–33.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Gao X, Jin Y, Li D, Li J, Gao R, Li D, Chen W, Fang L. Effect of ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation on lipid and inflammatory biomarkers in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Food Nutr China. 2017;01:69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Mansoori A, Sotoudeh G, Djalali M, Eshraghian MR, Keramatipour M, NasliEsfahani E, Shidfar F, Alvandi E, Toupchian O, Koohdani F. Effect of DHA-rich fish oil on PPARgamma target genes related to lipid metabolism in type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Clin Lipidol. 2015;9(6):770–7.

  27. 27.

    Zheng J. Association of dietary n-3 fatty acids with type 2 diabetes and other chronic diseases and related mechanisms. Zhejiang University; 2014. p. 131–9.

  28. 28.

    Crochemore IC, Souza AF, de Souza AC, Rosado EL. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation does not influence body composition, insulin resistance, and lipemia in women with type 2 diabetes and obesity. Nutr Clin Pract. 2012;27(4):553–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Fakhrzadeh H, Ghaderpanahi M, Sharifi F, Mirarefin M, Badamchizade Z, Kamrani AA, Larijani B. The effects of low dose n-3 fatty acids on serum lipid profiles and insulin resistance of the elderly: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2010;80(2):107–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wong CY, Yiu KH, Li SW, Lee S, Tam S, Lau CP, Tse HF. Fish-oil supplement has neutral effects on vascular and metabolic function but improves renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2010;27(1):54–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kabir M, Skurnik G, Naour N, Pechtner V, Meugnier E, Rome S, Quignard-Boulange A, Vidal H, Slama G, Clement K, et al. Treatment for 2 mo with n 3 polyunsaturated fatty acids reduces adiposity and some atherogenic factors but does not improve insulin sensitivity in women with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86(6):1670–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Morgan WA, Raskin P, Rosenstock J. A comparison of fish oil or corn oil supplements in hyperlipidemic subjects with NIDDM. Diabetes Care. 1995;18(1):83–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Pelikanova T, Kohout M, Valek J, Kazdova L, Base J. Metabolic effects of omega-3 fatty acids in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993;683:272–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hendra TJ, Britton ME, Roper DR, Wagaine-Twabwe D, Jeremy JY, Dandona P, Haines AP, Yudkin JS. Effects of fish oil supplements in NIDDM subjects. Controlled study. Diabetes Care. 1990;13(8):821–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Hindorff LA, Sethupathy P, Junkins HA, Ramos EM, Mehta JP, Collins FS, Manolio TA. Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(23):9362–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zheng JS, Chen J, Wang L, Yang H, Fang L, Yu Y, Yuan L, Feng J, Li K, Tang J, et al. Replication of a gene-diet interaction at CD36, NOS3 and PPARG in response to Omega-3 fatty acid supplements on blood lipids: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. EBIOMedicine. 2018;31:150–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kondo K, Morino K, Nishio Y, Kondo M, Nakao K, Nakagawa F, Ishikado A, Sekine O, Yoshizaki T, Kashiwagi A, et al. A fish-based diet intervention improves endothelial function in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized crossover trial. Metabolism. 2014;63(7):930–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Rees D, Miles EA, Banerjee T, Wells SJ, Roynette CE, Wahle KW, Calder PC. Dose-related effects of eicosapentaenoic acid on innate immune function in healthy humans: a comparison of young and older men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83(2):331–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Zheng JS, Huang T, Yang J, Fu YQ, Li D. Marine N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids are inversely associated with risk of type 2 diabetes in Asians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44525.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Brayner B, Kaur G, Keske MA, Livingstone KM. FADS Polymorphism, Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Diabetes Risk: A Systematic Review. Nutrients. 2018;10(6).

  41. 41.

    Huang T, Wahlqvist ML, Xu T, Xu A, Zhang A, Li D. Increased plasma n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid is associated with improved insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes in China. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2010;54(Suppl 1):S112–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    van Dam RM, Willett WC, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Hu FB. Dietary fat and meat intake in relation to risk of type 2 diabetes in men. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(3):417–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This work was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81602858), Young elite scientists sponsorship program by CAST (No.YESS20160164, 2016QNRC001) and 2015 Chinese Nutrition Society (CNS) Nutrition Research Foundation—DSM Research Fund (CNS2015067B) .

Author information




C.G. and Y.L. contributed equally to this work. C.G. and Y.Y. designed and initiated the project. C.G., Y.L. and Y.G. collected and analyzed data. C.G., Y.L., X.P., Q.X. and H.G. interpreted the results and commented the manuscript. C.G. and Y.L. wrote the manuscript. Y.Y., Z.W., L.L., W.B. and J.L. revised the manuscript. Y.Y., Z.W. and L.L. supervised all aspects of the project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuexin Yang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, C., Liu, Y., Gan, Y. et al. Effects of fish oil supplementation on glucose control and lipid levels among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lipids Health Dis 19, 87 (2020).

Download citation


  • Fish oil
  • Omega-3 fatty acids
  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Randomized clinical trials
  • Meta-analysis