Skip to main content
Download PDF

Concurrent smoking and alcohol consumers had higher triglyceride glucose indices than either only smokers or alcohol consumers: a cross-sectional study in Korea

Lipids in Health and Disease volume 20, Article number: 49 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The triglyceride glucose (TyG) index is a noninsulin-based marker for insulin resistance (IR) in general practice. Although smoking and heavy drinking have been regarded as major risk factors for various chronic diseases, there is limited evidence regarding the combined effects of smoking and alcohol consumption on IR. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the TyG index and smoking and alcohol consumption using two Korean population-based datasets.

Methods

This study included 10,568 adults in the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) and 9586 adults in the Korean Initiatives on Coronary Artery Calcification (KOICA) registry datasets. Multivariate logistic analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between smoking and alcohol consumption and the TyG index. To assess the predictive value of smoking and alcohol consumption on high TyG index, the area under the curve (AUC) were compared and net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) analyses were derived.

Results

The combined effect of smoking and alcohol consumption was an independent risk factor of a higher TyG index in the KNHANES (adjusted odds ratio: 4.33, P < .001) and KOICA (adjusted odds ratio: 1.94, P < .001) datasets. Adding smoking and alcohol consumption to the multivariate logistic models improved the model performance for the TyG index in the KNHANES (AUC: from 0.817 to 0.829, P < .001; NRI: 0.040, P < .001; IDI: 0.017, P < .001) and KOICA (AUC: from 0.822 to 0.826, P < .001; NRI: 0.025, P = .006; IDI: 0.005, P < .001) datasets.

Conclusions

Smoking and alcohol consumption were independently associated with the TyG index. Concurrent smokers and alcohol consumers were more likely to have a TyG index that was ≥8.8 and higher than the TyG indices of non-users and those who exclusively consumed alcohol or smoking tobacco.

Background

Insulin resistance (IR) is defined as a metabolic state in which the responsiveness of the target tissues to insulin concentrations is reduced [1], and IR plays a crucial role in various metabolic diseases [2,3,4]. Therefore, early detection of IR could be instrumental in identifying chronic diseases and establish effective disease management strategies. The hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp (HIEC) is considered the gold standard method for determining IR [5]; however, it is a time-consuming and invasive method with limited applicability to the general population. For this reason, several IR surrogate indices, such as homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), the McAuley index [6], triglyceride (TG): high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol ratio, lipid accumulation product (LAP), and visceral adiposity index (VAI) [7], have been used previously. Recently, the triglyceride glucose (TyG) index has been suggested to be useful for estimating IR risk [4, 8,9,10]; furthermore, it is regarded as a “pan-cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk marker” [4, 10, 11]. The TyG index is a noninsulin-based index and is a simple, fast, and inexpensive surrogate, making it advantageous for use in general practice [8].

Cigarette smoking and heavy alcohol consumption have been demonstrated to be major causes of mortality and morbidity in the past few decades. Additionally, this combination can lead to synergistic adverse effects, particularly in the incidence of metabolic syndrome, neurocognitive disorders, and cancers [12,13,14], and can aggravate the risk of death from CVDs [15]. Smoking and alcohol consumption habits tend to occur concomitantly [16] and the concerns warranted by their synergistic effect on health cannot be overemphasized. The recently growing evidence base suggests that heavy alcohol consumption and smoking impairs insulin action and causes IR [17,18,19,20]. However, inconsistent results have been previously reported [21, 22], and limited evidence is available regarding the relationship between IR and concurrent smoking and alcohol consumption in the general population. Furthermore, no studies have been reported to examine the combined effects of smoking and alcohol on IR using the TyG index as an IR marker.

The primary objective of this study was to determine how the concurrent smoking and alcohol habits affect TyG index in a healthy population. The hypothesis was that co-users of cigarettes and alcohol have a high TyG index (≥8.8) that is greater than the TyG index of non-users and those who exclusively consumed alcohol or smoked. The secondary objective of this study was to find out whether the discrimination ability of TyG index is significantly improved when smoking and alcohol habits are added to the traditional risk factors.

Methods

Aim

The aim of this study was to determine how the concurrence of smoking and alcohol consumption affected the TyG index of a healthy population of Korean adults.

Study design

This research followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guideline [23]. The study had a cross-sectional design and used two Korean population-based datasets.

Study population

This study consisted of two different population-based cohorts: the 2013–2018 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) and the Korean Initiatives on Coronary Artery Calcification (KOICA) registry. The KNHANES is a nationwide cross-sectional survey conducted annually by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC), and participants are hierarchically extracted to represent the population of Korea. Sampling was conducted using a multi-stage clustered probability design based on sex, age, and geographical area [24]. The KOICA registry is a retrospective, multicenter, and observational registry. It consists of self-reported data of asymptomatic patients who received general health examinations at six public healthcare centers in Korea from December 2012 to August 2016 [25]. To be included in the study, subjects had to be 19 years of age or older and have no history of diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Subjects with incomplete data were excluded.

Bias

KNHANES was a nationwide representative cross-sectional survey, whereas the KOICA registry comprised retrospective data obtained from people who had undergone health examination. The sampling strategy of the latter could contribute to a selection bias. Moreover, in the absence of significant covariates, such as cholesterol levels, blood pressure, and glucose, in the data, biases might exist because of their exclusion from the analysis.

Assessment of the TyG index

The TyG index was determined using the following formula: ln (triglycerides [mg/dL] × glucose [mg/dL]/2).

Based on a study that predicted type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) onset after 4 years and used a TyG index of 8.8 as the threshold value [26], those with a TyG index of 8.8 or higher were allocated to the high TyG group, while those with a TyG index less than 8.8 were allocated to the normal TyG group. In this study, the third quantile of the TyG index was 8.54 and 8.58 in the KNHANES and KOICA registry, respectively.

Assessment of smoking and alcohol

Data regarding the participants’ smoking and alcohol consumption habits were collected via self-reported questionnaires. In the KNHANES, depending on the answers to three questions; “Have you ever drank more than one drink in your life?”, “How often do you drink alcohol?”, and “How much alcohol do you drink at one time?”, a participant was considered a heavy drinker if their average alcohol consumption was more than 30 g per day [27]; otherwise, a participant was considered a normal drinker (includes “never drinkers”). In the KOICA registry, depending on the answer to the question “How many times a week do you drink alcohol?”, a participant was considered a heavy drinker if they drank more than three or four times a week; otherwise, they were considered a normal drinker. Current smoking status was classified as “non-smoker” (never smoked cigarettes or smoked < 100 cigarettes during their lifetimes but were currently non-smokers) and “current smoker” (smoked ≥100 cigarettes in their lifetimes and were currently smokers). Depending on their smoking and alcohol consumption, the participants were divided into four groups: those who were both non-smokers and normal drinkers were “non-users,” those who were non-smokers but heavy drinkers were “drinkers,” those who were current smokers but normal drinkers were “smokers,” and those who were both current smokers and heavy drinkers were “co-users.”

Covariates

Household income and final education were only investigated in the KNHANES, with the former presented as quartiles and the latter divided into the categories of elementary school, middle school, high school, and university. Depending on the answer to the question “How much exercise do you usually do per day?”, regular exercise was defined as exercise for more than 20 min at a time and more than three times a week in the KNHANES [28]. In the KOICA registry, depending on the answer to the question “How many times a week do you exercise?”, regular exercise was defined as regular if the participants exercised more than three or four times a week.

Blood pressure (BP) was defined as the average of the last two of the three values measured manually in the KNHANES and was assessed using an automatic manometer after a minimum 5-min rest in the KOICA registry. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the body weight divided by height squared (kg/m2). Waist circumference (WC) was measured at the umbilicus with the patient in the standing position.

Blood samples were obtained from an antecubital vein after a minimum 8-h fasting period in accordance to the relevant guidelines and regulations. Collected samples were tested for fasting glucose, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TGs), HDL cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol.

Hypertension was defined as a systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥90 mmHg, or a previous diagnosis of hypertension [29]. Diabetes was defined as fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL or HbA1c ≥6.5% [30], or a previous diagnosis of diabetes. Dyslipidemia was defined as a previous diagnosis of dyslipidemia, or one of the following four criteria: (1) hypercholesterolemia (serum TC ≥240 mg/dL), (2) hypertriglyceridemia (serum TG ≥200 mg/dL), (3) hyper-LDL cholesterolemia (serum LDL cholesterol ≥160 mg/dL) [31], or (4) hypo-HDL cholesterolemia (serum HDL cholesterol < 40 mg/dL in males, 50 mg/ dL in females) [32].

Statistical analyses

The statistical analyses were performed using R, version 4·0·0 [33]. To compare the demographic and metabolic characteristics, an independent t test, rank sum tests, and a chi-square test were used according to characteristics of the variables. Density plots were used to confirm the distribution of TyG indices according to the four user groups. The differences in the TyG indices according to smoking and alcohol consumption were determined using an analysis of variance, with the demographic and metabolic characteristics values as covariates (ANCOVA). Multivariate analysis was performed to investigate whether smoking and alcohol consumption predicted a high TyG index. ANCOVA and multivariate logistic regression were adjusted for age, sex, final education, SBP, WC, TC, HDL, and regular exercise in the KNHANES, and were adjusted for age, sex, SBP, BMI, TC, HDL, and regular exercise in the KOICA registry. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the predictability of the high TyG index of smoking and alcohol consumption. The overall predictive accuracy was quantified using the area under the ROC curve (AUC), and differences in the AUCs were compared using the Delong method [34]. In addition, net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) analyses were performed to evaluate the predictability of smoking and alcohol consumption [35]. Statistical significance was defined as a P-value <.05.

Results

The participant selection flow chart is shown in Fig. 1. From a total of 47,217 participants in the baseline KNHANES, this study selected 10,568 participants by excluding patients who met the following criteria: (1) 18 years and younger (n = 9794), (2) diagnosed with diabetes, CVD, or cancer (n = 26,771), and (3) had missing data (n = 84). From a total of 93,707 participants in the KOICA registry baseline survey, we selected 9586 participants by excluding patients who met the following criteria: (1) 18 years and younger (n = 12), (2) diagnosed with diabetes, a CVD, or cancer (n = 79,247), and (3) had missing data (n = 6862).

Fig. 1
figure1

Participant selection flow chart. KNHANES, Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; KOICA, Korean Initiatives on Coronary Artery Calcification; DM; diabetes mellitus

Full size image

Participants’ clinical characteristics

In the KNHANES, the mean age of the 10,568 participants was 40.6 ± 14.3 years (19–80 years). A total of 4394 men (41.6%) and 6174 women (58.4%) were included in the analysis. University was the highest education level in 48.6% of the participants, 35.6% were in the fourth income quartile, and 74.8% did not exercise regularly. When the participants were divided into the four smoking and alcohol consumption groups, 78.4% were non-users, 2.8% were drinkers, 15.2% were smokers, and 3.6% were co-users.

In the KOICA registry, the mean age of the 9586 participants was 47.6 ± 9.3 years (19–86 years). A total of 5972 men (62.3%) and 3614 women (37.7%) were included in the analysis. Most participants (59.0%) did not exercise regularly. When the participants were divided into the four smoking and alcohol consumption groups, 63.7% were non-users, 12.1% were drinkers, 16.1% were smokers, and 8.2% were co-users.

The clinical characteristics of the high and normal TyG index groups are shown in Table 1. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, sex, final education, and smoking and alcohol consumption in the KNHANES. In the KOICA registry, statistically significant differences existed between the two groups in terms of sex, regular exercise, and smoking and alcohol consumption.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the high and normal TyG index groups
Full size table

Participants’ metabolic characteristics

The metabolic characteristics of the participants in the high and normal TyG index groups are shown in Table 2. SBP, DBP, BMI, glucose, TC, TG, and LDL levels were significantly higher and the HDL levels were significantly lower in the high TyG group in both the KNHANES and KOICA registry (P < .001).

Table 2 Metabolic characteristics of the high and normal TyG index groups
Full size table

WC as a data variable was only available in the KNHANES, and the high TyG index group had a significantly higher WC compared to the normal TyG index group (P < .001).

TyG index according to smoking and alcohol consumption

The probability density distribution of the TyG index by the smoking and alcohol consumption groups is shown in Fig. 2a and b. In the KNHANES and KOICA registry, the distribution showed a greater shift toward the higher TyG index value in the “co-users” group than in the “non-users,” “drinkers,” and “smokers” groups.

Fig. 2
figure2

Difference of TyG index according to the smoking and alcohol groups. a Density plot of TyG index by group (KNHANES); b Density plot of TyG index by group (KOICA registry); Density plot means the distribution of a TyG index according to the S and A consumption groups. The co-user groups are widely distributed toward the higher TyG index. c Bar graph of TyG index after adjusting the covariates (KNHANES); d) Bar graph of TyG index after adjusting the covariates (KOICA registry); Values are presented as mean assessed by ANCOVA test; KNHANES model: adjusted for age, sex, final education, SBP, WC, TC, HDL, regular exercise, and S and A consumption; KOICA registry model: adjusted for age, sex, SBP, BMI, TC, HDL, regular exercise, and S and A consumption. KNHANES, Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; KOICA, Korean Initiatives on Coronary Artery Calcification; S and A, smoking and alcohol

Full size image

After adjusting for the covariates, the TyG index value of the “co-users” group was significantly different from those of the other groups in both the KNHANES and KOICA registry (Fig. 2c and d).

Risk factors for high TyG index

The results of the multivariate analyses and the predictors of high TyG index levels are presented in Table 3. Older age; male sex; higher SBP, WC, and TC; lower HDL; being in the “drinkers” group; being in the “smokers” group; and being in the “co-users” group were all significantly associated with a greater risk of a high TyG index in the KNHANES.

Table 3 Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk variables associated with a high triglyceride glucose index
Full size table

Male sex; higher SBP, BMI, and TC; lower HDL; no regular exercise; being in the “drinkers” group; being in the “smokers” group; and being in the “co-users” group were all significantly associated with a greater risk of a high TyG index in the KOICA registry.

Compared to the OR (95% CI; P value) for the risk of high TyG index in the “non-users” group, the OR in the “drinkers” group was 2.76 (1.97–3.84; P < .001), in the “smokers” group was 1.56 (1.31–1.86; P < .001), and in the “co-users” group was 4.33 (3.26–5.72; P < .001) after adjusting for age, sex, highest education, SBP, WC, TC, HDL, and regular exercise in the KNHANES. Additionally, compared to the OR (95% CI; P value) for the risk of high TyG index in the “non-users” group, the OR in the “drinkers” group was 1.42 (1.16–1.73; P < .001), in the “smokers” group was 1.33 (1.11–1.59; P = .002), and in the “co-user” group was 1.94 (1.55–2.41; P < .001) after adjusting for age, sex, SBP, BMI, TC, HDL, and regular exercise in the KOICA registry.

Evaluation of the predictive power of smoking and alcohol consumption

The results of the AUC comparisons, the NRI, and the IDI analyses are presented in Table 4. In the KNHANES, the AUC was larger when the smoking and alcohol consumption risk factors were considered together (without smoking and alcohol consumption, 0.817 [95% CI, 0.805–0.829]; with smoking and alcohol consumption, 0.829 [95% CI, 0.818–0.841]). The addition of smoking and alcohol consumption to the model without it significantly increased the AUC by 0.012 (P < .001). The NRI was estimated to be 0.040 and was statistically significant (P < .001). The IDI was estimated to be 0.017 and was statistically significant (P < .001).

Table 4 Evaluation of the predictive power of smoking and alcohol variables on a high TyG index
Full size table

In the KOICA registry, the AUC was larger when smoking and alcohol consumption risk factors were considered together (without smoking and alcohol consumption, 0.822 [95% CI, 0.811–0.834]; with smoking and alcohol consumption, 0.826 [95% CI, 0.815–0.838]). The addition of smoking and alcohol consumption to the model without smoking and alcohol consumption significantly increased the AUC by 0.004 (P < .001). The NRI was estimated to be 0.025 and was statistically significant (P = .006). The IDI was estimated to be 0.005 and was statistically significant (P < .001).

Discussion

This study examined the effects of heavy smoking and alcohol consumption on the TyG index using two Korean population-based datasets. Smoking and alcohol consumption were independently associated with the TyG index after adjusting for confounding covariates. The TyG index mean values were significantly higher in the “co-users” group than in the “non-users,” “drinkers,” and “smokers” groups and were most likely to be ≥8.8. The AUC was also larger when smoking and alcohol consumption were considered together in both the KNHANES and KOICA registry. The estimated NRI and IDI values were statistically significant when smoking and alcohol consumption were considered together in both the KNHANES and KOICA registry.

Many studies have shown that TyG index predicts diabetes or cardiovascular disease. Sánchez-Íñigo et al. found that higher TyG levels were associated with and increased the risk of incident cardiovascular diseases in a Spanish population [4]. They reported that the HR in a group with a TyG index > 8.81 was 2.32 times higher than that in a group with a TyG ≤7.87 after adjusting for covariates [4]. In Korea, longitudinal studies also reported that elevated TyG index increases coronary artery calcification progression, a surrogate of cardiovascular disease [11, 36]. Lee et al. predicted the incidence of diabetes after 4 years through obesity and the TyG index in the Korean population [26]. Apart from the TyG index, LAP, TG:HDL cholesterol, and VAI have also been verified as surrogate markers for IR in previous studies [7, 37]. In KNHNES dataset, it was confirmed that the variables of LAP, VAI, and TG:HDL cholesterol were associated with smoking and alcohol consumption (data not shown). Finding and controlling risk factors for IR using simple IR surrogate indicators will help prevent future IR-related diseases.

Smoking is considered a major risk factor of metabolic diseases and CVDs [38]. Several studies also showed that smoking is associated with IR [17, 39]. Chronic smokers have a high incidence of IR and T2DM [40, 41]. Insulin responses to oral glucose load were significantly higher in smokers than in non-smokers [42], and insulin sensitivity was partially reversible after smoking cessation [43]. In a meta-analysis by Sun et al., which included 13 studies, current smokers had an increased risk of metabolic syndrome [44]. In line with previous studies, this study also found that smoking was independently associated with the TyG index, and the ORs for high TyG index were higher in smokers than in non-smokers. Tobacco extracts and smoke contain a large number of toxic materials that can produce various proinflammatory cytokines [40] that may augment oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and inflammation, which may further contribute to decreased peripheral insulin sensitivity and insulin receptor affinity [17]. Smoking also causes direct impairment of β-cell function [39, 45].

The relationship between alcohol consumption, IR, and T2DM remains controversial and is dependent on the degree of alcohol consumption. Light to moderate alcohol consumption increases insulin sensitivity [21], and this increase is even higher with heavy alcohol consumption [20]. In a Korean cohort study, heavy alcohol consumption (≥30.0 g/day) was associated with a 1.3 times increase in the T2DM risk [46]. A meta-analysis evaluating the link between alcohol consumption and the risk of metabolic syndrome reported that heavy alcohol drinking (≥35.0 g/day) was associated with an increased risk of metabolic syndrome compared with non-drinking [47]. Consistent with findings from other studies, this study found that drinking was independently associated with the TyG indices, and the ORs for high TyG index were higher among heavy drinkers than among normal drinkers. There are a few possible explanations for this relationship. Alcohol abstainers, light drinkers (0.1–19.9 g/day), moderate drinkers (20.0–39.9 g/day), and heavy drinkers (≥40.0 g/day) had lower HOMA-IR levels than never-drinkers, and alcohol consumption was a major risk factor of β-cell dysfunction [48]. In addition, Jang et al. reported that chronic heavy alcohol consumption could potentially contribute to the development of T2DM by inducing β-cell dysfunction [49]. In rat models with chronic alcohol-related steatohepatitis, the histopathologic and ultrastructural abnormalities were associated with persistent hepatic IR, proinflammatory cytokine activation, and dysregulated lipid metabolism [19]. Therefore, chronic heavy drinking may adversely affect pancreatic β-cell function and activate inflammatory cytokines, which in turn may increase the risk of IR and metabolic disease. Further large-scale longitudinal studies are required to determine the effect of the degree of alcohol consumption on IR and T2DM.

Interestingly, this study found that smoking and alcohol consumption co-users had higher mean TyG indices than those who used alcohol or tobacco only. Furthermore, the predictive power of high TyG index was exacerbated when the two were combined. Previous epidemiological studies have demonstrated a high rate of concurrent use of alcohol and tobacco use [50], and health-related outcomes such as cancer, neurocognitive disorders, and increasing mortality were reported to be worse when smoking and alcohol consumption were combined [13,14,15, 51, 52]. Therefore, these results suggest that smoking cessation and control of heavy alcohol consumption could be effective in protecting individuals from IR-related chronic diseases. Moreover, if the results of this study are applied to co-users to emphasize the need for lifestyle correction, the effect of intervention or education will be greater. However, in this study, NRI, IDI, and the difference in AUC had statistical significance when smoking and alcohol consumption data were added but the values were low; therefore, the clinical interpretation of this findings could be considered weak. Further validation studies are required to better understand clinical implications and the pathophysiological of this findings.

In addition to smoking and alcohol consumption habits, male sex; higher SBP, WC, BMI; and lower HDL were risk factors of high TyG index. These results are consistent with those of previous studies on the associated factors of TyG index [26]. Factors associated with high TyG index should be considered in interventions to reduce insulin-related diseases. Notably, age and regular exercise showed inconsistent results between the two datasets. In previous studies, age [26] and regular exercise [36] did not show a unidirectional relationship with the TyG index. This analysis may have a selection bias, because the previous studies [26, 36] and the Korea registry targeted people with diseases or underwent general health examination, whereas the KNHANES was representative of Korean population. Further analysis of national data will be helpful to understand the relationship between TyG index, age, and regular exercise among the general population.

Strengths and limitations

This study has several strengths. First, this study analyzed the data of a large, nationally representative sample of adult healthy Koreans. Second, the reliability of the results was improved by using two datasets. Furthermore, this is the first study to examine the combined effects of smoking and alcohol consumption on the TyG index.

Nevertheless, there were some limitations in this study. First, although data from two population-based studies were included, causal relationships between the exposures and study outcomes could not be established. Second, the information about smoking and alcohol consumption was self-reported, which may have resulted in reporting bias. Furthermore, a dose-dependent association between smoking and alcohol consumption and the TyG index could not be examined. Third, data regarding potential confounders such as dietary information could not be accessed. Fourth, the two datasets used in this study were not registered as clinical trials before the study began. Fifth, the design characteristics of the two datasets differed (e.g., cross-sectional study and retrospective study), and the definition of variables used in the analysis also differed. Sixth, since the missing data was less than 10% [53], the complete case analysis was performed, it was difficult to completely avoid selection bias. Finally, this study’s population was limited to Korean adults; hence, the results may not be generalizable to other ethnicities.

Conclusion

In conclusion, smoking and alcohol consumption habits were independently associated with the TyG index, and co-users of alcohol and tobacco had higher TyG indices than who were non-users or those who exclusively consumed alcohol or smoked tobacco. Designing effective interventions and education programs on smoking cessation and adequate alcohol consumption should be considered to prevent increasing IR. In addition, concurrent users of smoking and high alcohol consumption are a target population that deserves more attention and concern in policy-based intervention for lifestyle modification.

Availability of data and materials

KNHANES data can be obtained from the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (http://www.cdc.go.kr/CDC/eng/main.jsp) after submission and evaluation of an appropriate research proposal. KOICA registry data analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author (H.J.C) on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AUC:

Area under the area

BMI:

Body mass index

BP:

Blood pressure

CI:

Confidence interval

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

DBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

HDL:

High density lipoprotein

HIEC:

Hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp

HOMA-IR:

Homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance

IDI:

Integrated discrimination improvement

IR:

Insulin resistance

KCDC:

Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

KNHANES:

Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

KOICA:

Korean Initiatives on Coronary Artery Calcification

LAP:

Lipid accumulation product

LDL:

Low density lipoprotein

NRI:

Net reclassification improvement

OR:

Odds ratio

QUICKI:

Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

STROBE:

Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology

T2DM:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

TC:

Total cholesterol

TG:

Triglycerides

TyG:

Triglycerides glucose

VAI:

Visceral adiposity index

WC:

Waist circumference

References

  1. 1.

    Ormazabal V, Nair S, Elfeky O, Aguayo C, Salomon C, Zuñiga FA. Association between insulin resistance and the development of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Low S, Khoo KCJ, Irwan B, Sum CF, Subramaniam T, Lim SC, et al. The role of triglyceride glucose index in development of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;143:43–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2018.06.006.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ruijgrok C, Dekker JM, Beulens JW, Brouwer IA, Coupé VMH, Heymans MW, et al. Size and shape of the associations of glucose, HbA (1c), insulin and HOMA-IR with incident type 2 diabetes: the Hoorn study. Diabetologia. 2018;61(1):93–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-017-4452-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sánchez-Íñigo L, Navarro-González D, Fernández-Montero A, Pastrana-Delgado J, Martínez JA. The TyG index may predict the development of cardiovascular events. Eur J Clin Investig. 2016;46(2):189–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12583.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    DeFronzo RA, Tobin JD, Andres R. Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am J Phys. 1979;237:E214–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Singh B, Saxena A. Surrogate markers of insulin resistance: a review. World J Diabetes. 2010;1(2):36–47. https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v1.i2.36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mazidi M, Kengne AP, Katsiki N, Mikhailidis DP, Banach M. Lipid accumulation product and triglycerides/glucose index are useful predictors of insulin resistance. J Diabetes Complicat. 2018;32(3):266–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.10.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Simental-Mendía LE, Rodríguez-Morán M, Guerrero-Romero F. The product of fasting glucose and triglycerides as surrogate for identifying insulin resistance in apparently healthy subjects. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2008;6(4):299–304. https://doi.org/10.1089/met.2008.0034.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Vasques AC, Novaes FS, de Oliveira MS, Souza JR, Yamanaka A, Pareja JC, et al. TyG index performs better than HOMA in a Brazilian population: a hyperglycemic clamp validated study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;93(3):e98–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2011.05.030.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Won KB, Kim YS, Lee BK, Heo R, Han D, Lee JH, et al. The relationship of insulin resistance estimated by triglyceride glucose index and coronary plaque characteristics. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e10726.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Won KB, Park EJ, Han D, Lee JH, Choi SY, Chun EJ, et al. Triglyceride glucose index is an independent predictor for the progression of coronary artery calcification in the absence of heavy coronary artery calcification at baseline. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19(1):34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-020-01008-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Nakashita Y, Nakamura M, Kitamura A, Kiyama M, Ishikawa Y, Mikami H. Relationships of cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption to metabolic syndrome in Japanese men. J Epidemiol. 2010;20(5):391–7. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20100043.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Prabhu A, Obi KO, Rubenstein JH. The synergistic effects of alcohol and tobacco consumption on the risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109(6):822–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2014.71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zhou S, Zhou R, Zhong T, Li R, Tan J, Zhou H. Association of smoking and alcohol drinking with dementia risk among elderly men in China. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2014;11:899–907.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hart CL, Davey Smith G, Gruer L, Watt GC. The combined effect of smoking tobacco and drinking alcohol on cause-specific mortality: a 30 year cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):789. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-789.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Verplaetse TL, McKee SA. An overview of alcohol and tobacco/nicotine interactions in the human laboratory. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2017;43(2):186–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2016.1189927.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Borissova AM, Tankova T, Kirilov G, Dakovska L, Krivoshiev S. The effect of smoking on peripheral insulin sensitivity and plasma endothelin level. Diabetes Metab. 2004;30(2):147–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1262-3636(07)70100-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Li Z, Xu W, Su Y, Gao K, Chen Y, Ma L, et al. Nicotine induces insulin resistance via downregulation of Nrf2 in cardiomyocyte. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2019;495:110507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2019.110507.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ramirez T, Longato L, Dostalek M, Tong M, Wands JR, de la Monte SM. Insulin resistance, ceramide accumulation and endoplasmic reticulum stress in experimental chronic alcohol-induced steatohepatitis. Alcohol Alcohol. 2013;48(1):39–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/ags106.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Tatsumi Y, Morimoto A, Asayama K, Sonoda N, Miyamatsu N, Ohno Y, et al. Association between alcohol consumption and incidence of impaired insulin secretion and insulin resistance in Japanese: the Saku study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;135:11–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2017.10.021.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bonnet F, Disse E, Laville M, Mari A, Hojlund K, Anderwald CH, et al. Moderate alcohol consumption is associated with improved insulin sensitivity, reduced basal insulin secretion rate and lower fasting glucagon concentration in healthy women. Diabetologia. 2012;55(12):3228–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-012-2701-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Daskalopoulou C, Stubbs B, Kralj C, Koukounari A, Prince M, Prina AM. Associations of smoking and alcohol consumption with healthy ageing: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. BMJ Open. 2018;8:1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kweon S, Kim Y, Jang MJ, Kim Y, Kim K, Choi S, et al. Data resource profile: the Korea National Health and nutrition examination survey (KNHANES). Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(1):69–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyt228.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Won KB, Han D, Lee JH, Lee SE, Sung JM, Choi SY, et al. Impact of optimal glycemic control on the progression of coronary artery calcification in asymptomatic patients with diabetes. Int J Cardiol. 2018;266:250–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lee DY, Lee ES, Kim JH, Park SE, Park CY, Oh KW, et al. Predictive value of triglyceride glucose index for the risk of incident diabetes: a 4-year retrospective longitudinal study. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0163465. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163465.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Hong JW, Noh JH, Kim DJ. The prevalence of and factors associated with high-risk alcohol consumption in Korean adults: the 2009–2011 Korea National Health and nutrition examination survey. PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0175299. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175299.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Han E, Lee YH, Kim BK, Park JY, Kim DY, Ahn SH, et al. Sarcopenia is associated with the risk of significant liver fibrosis in metabolically unhealthy subjects with chronic hepatitis B. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;48(3):300–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14843.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, et al. Seventh report of the joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42(6):1206–52. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(Suppl 1):S14–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III). JAMA. 2001;285:2486–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Sirdah MM, Abu Ghali AS, Al Laham NA. The reliability of the National Cholesterol Education Program’s adult treatment panel III (NCEP/ATP III) and the international diabetes federation (IDF) definitions in diagnosing metabolic syndrome (MetS) among Gaza strip Palestinians. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2012;6(1):4–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2012.05.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for statistical Computing; 2021. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 1 Mar 2021

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44(3):837–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/2531595.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB Sr, D'Agostino RB Jr, Vasan RS. Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med. 2008;27(2):157–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Park K, Ahn CW, Lee SB, Kang S, Nam JS, Lee BK, et al. Elevated TyG index predicts progression of coronary artery calcification. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(8):1569–73. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-1920.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Oh SK, Cho AR, Kwon YJ, Lee HS, Lee JW. Derivation and validation of a new visceral adiposity index for predicting visceral obesity and cardiometabolic risk in a Korean population. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0203787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ishizaka N, Ishizaka Y, Toda E, Hashimoto H, Nagai R, Yamakado M. Association between cigarette smoking, metabolic syndrome, and carotid arteriosclerosis in Japanese individuals. Atherosclerosis. 2005;181(2):381–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.01.026.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Morimoto A, Tatsumi Y, Deura K, Mizuno S, Ohno Y, Watanabe S. Impact of cigarette smoking on impaired insulin secretion and insulin resistance in Japanese men: the Saku study. J Diabetes Investig. 2013;4(3):274–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12019.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Mukharjee S, Bank S, Maiti S. Chronic tobacco exposure by smoking develops insulin resistance. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2020;20(6):869–77. https://doi.org/10.2174/1871530320666200217123901.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ng R, Sutradhar R, Yao Z, Wodchis WP, Rosella LC. Smoking, drinking, diet and physical activity—modifiable lifestyle risk factors and their associations with age to first chronic disease. Int J Epidemiol. 2020;49(1):113–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyz078.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Targher G, Alberiche M, Zenere MB, Bonadonna RC, Muggeo M, Bonora E. Cigarette smoking and insulin resistance in patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(11):3619–24. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.82.11.4351.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Rönnemaa T, Rönnemaa EM, Puukka P, Pyörälä K, Laakso M. Smoking is independently associated with high plasma insulin levels in nondiabetic men. Diabetes Care. 1996;19(11):1229–32. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.19.11.1229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Sun K, Liu J, Ning G. Active smoking and risk of metabolic syndrome: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47791. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047791.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Sun Q, Xu H, Xue J, Yang Q, Chen C, Yang P, et al. MALAT1 via microRNA-17 regulation of insulin transcription is involved in the dysfunction of pancreatic β-cells induced by cigarette smoke extract. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233(11):8862–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.26800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Lee DY, Yoo MG, Kim HJ, Jang HB, Kim JH, Lee HJ, et al. Association between alcohol consumption pattern and the incidence risk of type 2 diabetes in Korean men: a 12-years follow-up study. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):7322. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07549-2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Sun K, Ren M, Liu D, Wang C, Yang C, Yan L. Alcohol consumption and risk of metabolic syndrome: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Clin Nutr. 2014;33(4):596–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2013.10.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Yue F, Zhang X, Zhang H, Jiang X, Gao L, Zhao J. Association of alcohol consumption with the impaired β-cell function independent of body mass index among Chinese men. Endocr J. 2012;59(5):425–33. https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.EJ12-0003.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Jang HB, Go MJ, Park SI, Lee HJ, Cho SB. Chronic heavy alcohol consumption influences the association between genetic variants of GCK or INSR and the development of diabetes in men: a 12-year follow-up study. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):20029. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56011-y.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Falk DE, Yi HY, Hiller-Sturmhöfel S. An epidemiologic analysis of co-occurring alcohol and tobacco use and disorders: findings from the National Epidemiologic Survey on alcohol and related conditions. Alcohol Res Health. 2006;29:162–71.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Lugea A, Gerloff A, Su HY, Xu Z, Go A, Hu C, et al. The combination of alcohol and cigarette smoke induces endoplasmic reticulum stress and cell death in pancreatic acinar cells. Gastroenterology. 2017;153(6):1674–86. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.08.036.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Xu M, Zhou Y, Xu B, Sun J, Wang T, Lu J, et al. Associations of smoking and alcohol consumption with impaired β-cell function in Chinese men. J Diabetes. 2016;8(3):434–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.12314.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Bennett DA. How can I deal with missing data in my study? Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001;25(5):464–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2001.tb00294.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Technology Innovation Program (20002781, A Platform for Prediction and Management of Health Risk Based on Personal Big Data and Lifelogging) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE, South Korea) to JW Lee, and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MEST) (NRF-2019R1A2C1010043) to H Lee. Additionally, this work was supported by Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion (IITP) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (2019-31-1293), for autonomous digital companion framework and application to HJ Chang.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific funding from agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Wonhee Baek and Ji-Won Lee should be considered joint first author.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Nursing, Yonsei University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Wonhee Baek & Hyangkyu Lee

  2. Department of Nursing, Kyungnam University College of Health Sciences, Changwon, Republic of Korea

    Wonhee Baek

  3. Department of Family Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Ji-Won Lee

  4. Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Research Affairs, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Hye Sun Lee

  5. Department of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Donghee Han

  6. Division of Cardiology, Seoul National University Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Su-Yeon Choi

  7. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Eun Ju Chun

  8. Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Heartscan Clinic, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Hae-Won Han

  9. Department of Radiology, Gangnam Heartscan Clinic, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Sung Hak Park

  10. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Heart Stroke and Vascular Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Jidong Sung

  11. Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Hae Ok Jung

  12. Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, College of Nursing, Yonsei University, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea

    Hyangkyu Lee

  13. Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Hyuk-Jae Chang

Authors
  1. Wonhee Baek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ji-Won Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hye Sun Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Donghee Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Su-Yeon Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Eun Ju Chun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hae-Won Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sung Hak Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jidong Sung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Hae Ok Jung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Hyangkyu Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Hyuk-Jae Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

W.B. and J.W.L contributed equally and so should be regarded as equal first authors. H.L. and H.J.C. contributed equally and so should be regarded as equal corresponding authors. W.B., J.W.L., H.L., and H.J.C. designed the study. W.B., and H.S.L. performed the statistical analysis. W.B., J.W.L., H.L., and H.J.C. drafted the manuscript. D.H., S.U.C., E.J.C., H.W.H., S.H.P., J.S., H.O.J., and H.J.C. contributed to data acquisition. W.B., J.W.L., H.L., H.J.C., and H.S.L. contributed to the interpretation of data. All authors also gave final approval and agree to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hyangkyu Lee or Hyuk-Jae Chang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Institutional Review Board of Yonsei University Health System, Severance Hospital (2020–1641-001) approved this study.

Consent for publication

All authors read and approved to publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baek, W., Lee, JW., Lee, H.S. et al. Concurrent smoking and alcohol consumers had higher triglyceride glucose indices than either only smokers or alcohol consumers: a cross-sectional study in Korea. Lipids Health Dis 20, 49 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-021-01472-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Alcohol consumption
  • Cross-sectional study
  • Korean
  • Life-style modification
  • Smoking
  • Insulin resistance
  • Triglyceride glucose index

Lipids in Health and Disease

ISSN: 1476-511X