Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Association of the triglyceride-glucose index and its related parameters with frailty

Lipids in Health and Disease volume 23, Article number: 150 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Frailty is a dynamic geriatric condition. Limited studies have examined the association of the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index and its related indicators [TyG index, triglyceride glucose-waist to height ratio (TyG-WHtR), triglyceride glucose-waist circumference (TyG-WC), and triglyceride glucose-body mass index (TyG-BMI)] with frailty, and the potential links among them remain unclear. On the basis of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), this study investigated the potential relationships of the TyG index and its related indices with frailty.

Methods

This research included 7,965 participants from NHANES 2003–2018. The relationship of the TyG index and its related indices with frailty was investigated with binary logistic regression analyses, restricted cubic spline (RCS), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Potential influences were further investigated through stratified analyses and interaction tests.

Results

The prevalence of frailty in the participants of this study was 25.59%, with a average frailty index of 0.16 (0.00). In the three regression analysis models, the continuous TyG index and its associated indices were positively associated with frailty. In addition, quartiles of TyG, TyG-WC, TyG-WHtR, and TyG-BMI were significantly associated with increased frailty prevalence in the fully adjusted models (TyG Q4 vs. Q1, OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.19, 2.09, P = 0.002; TyG-WC Q4 vs. Q1, OR = 2.40, 95% CI: 1.90, 3.04, P < 0.001; TyG-WHtR Q4 vs. Q1, OR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.82, 2.81, P < 0.001; TyG- BMI Q4 vs. Q1, OR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.76, 2.64, P < 0.001). According to RCS analysis, TyG, TyG-WC, TyG-WHtR, and TyG-BMI were linearly and positively associated with frailty. ROC curves revealed that TyG-WHtR (AUC: 0.654) had greater diagnostic value for frailty than TyG (AUC: 0.604), TyG-BMI (AUC: 0.621), and TyG-WC (AUC: 0.629). All of the stratified analyses and interaction tests showed similar results.

Conclusions

Elevated TyG and its associaed indices are associated with an increased prevalence of frailty. Reasonable control of blood glucose and blood lipids, and avoidance of obesity, may aid in reducing the occurrence of frailty in middle-aged and older adults.

Introduction

Frailty, a dynamic syndrome characterized by impaired functioning of physiological reserves and decreased vulnerability to external stresses, often occurs in older people [1]. Frailty affects 7–24% of older people and is notably associated with both diminished muscle mass and the occurrence of chronic illness [2, 3]. Frailty not only increases the risks of falls, disability, and hospitalization in older people, but also increases all-cause mortality, thus posing a major threat to public health [4,5,6]. Fortunately, frailty is not irreversible and can be partially alleviated by the treatment of chronic diseases [7]. The prevention and management of frailty in older people in an aging society continue to warrant the utmost attention.

Insulin resistance (IR), characterized by diminished sensitivity or responsiveness to insulin, is implicated in the etiology of numerous disorders, including non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), diabetes mellitus (DM), cardiovascular disease (CVD), and cognitive impairment [8,9,10]. The classic hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp can accurately diagnose IR, but is expensive and cumbersome to perform, and therefore is inappropriate for widespread clinical application [11]. Consequently, researchers developed the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) for clinical studies; however, this model is susceptible to exogenous insulin therapy and is not suitable for patients with β-cell incompetence [11, 12]. In addition, the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index is easier to obtain than the HOMA-IR. The TyG index, which is based on fasting triglycerides and fasting glucose, has gained widespread acceptance as a reliable substitute indicator of IR in recent years for predicting CVD, DM, hypertension, stroke, and mortality [13,14,15,16]. Numerous studies have suggested that the diagnostic value of TyG for disease and IR is superior to that of the traditional indicator HOMA-IR [17,18,19]. In addition, the TyG index has been reported to be significantly correlated with declines in muscle mass and strength in older people [20, 21].

Both frailty and IR are closely associated with increasing age [22]. Given that comorbidities such as CVD, cognitive dysfunction, and loss of muscle mass are all critical determinants of frailty, the relationship between surrogate indicators of IR and frailty has received attention from researchers. Previous studies have shown that HOMA-IR is positively associated with frailty, suggesting that IR may be involved in the pathologic process of frailty [23, 24]. However, limited studies have examined the relationship between the TyG index and frailty. Recently, a prospective cohort study from China has suggested that an elevated TyG index is a potential risk factor for frailty, particularly in populations with high body mass index (BMI) [25]. Nevertheless, it is unclear if this conclusion applies to Americans. Obesity is prevalent worldwide and is more likely to occur in older than younger people [22]. Obesity increases the risk of CVD and cancer, and has also been reported to be associated with sarcopenia [26,27,28]. Waist circumference (WC), BMI, and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) are considered reliable anthropometric measures for assessing obesity. Compared with the TyG index alone, a combination of obesity metrics with TyG has been demonstrated to increase the diagnostic value and relevance to diseases such as CVD, NAFLD, and DM [29,30,31]. Obesity is also an important factor influencing frailty [32, 33]. However, there are no studies exploring the association between TyG-related metrics [triglyceride glucose-waist to height ratio (TyG-WHtR), triglyceride glucose-waist circumference (TyG-WC), and triglyceride glucose-body mass index (TyG-BMI)] and frailty. And it is uncertain whether the diagnostic value of these indicators for frailty is superior to that of the TyG index. Therefore, we hypothesized that TyG and its related indices are associated with frailty and that TyG-related indicators may be more beneficial than the TyG index in the diagnosis of frailty.

Consequently, this study was aimed at performing what is, to our knowledge, the first investigation of the relationships of various TyG-related parameters with frailty, and to provide valuable insights into the association between IR and frailty.

Methods

Study design

The 80,312 participants in this study were from the 2003–2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a national study designed to investigate the physical and nutritional health of noninstitutionalized American residents through a complex probability sampling design. NHANES participants provided informed consent, and the study received United States National Center for Health Statistics Research Ethics Board approval, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Because frailty is prevalent in older people, this study was designed to investigate the middle-aged and older population above 50 years of age (n = 22,205). After exclusion of part of the population according to the following criteria, 7,965 individuals were available for inclusion in this study [none of these participants were missing the frailty index (FI)]. First, 489 individuals who consumed aberrant amounts of energy (< 500 kcal/day or ≥ 3500 kcal/day for women, or < 800 kcal/day or ≥ 4200 kcal/day for men) were excluded. Second, 13,368 participants with missing TyG and parameters of physical obesity measurements were excluded. Finally, 383 participants missing outcome variables and covariables were also excluded. Notably, because many participants had missing poverty income ratio (PIR), alcohol consumption, and physical activity (PA) (7.04%, 6.02%, and 26.25%, respectively) data, these participants were identified as the “unknown” group for the analyses (procedure in Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of the participants exclusion process

Full size image

Frailty index and frailty

Two methods are frequently used to assess frailty: FI and the frailty phenotype. Given the higher sensitivity of the FI in diagnosing frailty, for diagnosis, we used the FI developed by Rockwood et al., which is also the most common diagnostic method [34]. On the basis of previous NHANES studies, the FI involved 49 items regarding health deficits (covering eight dimensions of cognition, dependence, depression, comorbidity, anthropometry, laboratory tests, hospital utilization, and health status). FI is calculated as the number of actual defective items divided by the total number of defects, with a reference range of 0–1. A higher FI indicated greater frailty severity, and FI > 0.21 was considered to meet the diagnostic criteria for frailty [34,35,36]. Supplementary Table 1 shows the specific health deficit items and scores in detail.

TyG and its related indicators

We collected data on height, weight, WC, fasting glucose, and fasting triglycerides for the calculation of TyG and its related indexes with the following formulas: WHtR = WC (cm)/height (cm); BMI = weight (kg)/height (m)2; TyG = ln (fasting triglyceride [mg/dl] * fasting glucose [mg/dl]/2); TyG-WC = TyG * WC (cm); TyG-BMI = TyG * BMI(kg/m2); and TyG-WHtR = TyG * WHtR. Measurements of fasting triglycerides and blood glucose required participants to remain fasting for more than 8 h.

Covariables

This study included indicators that might potentially influence the associations of TyG and its related indicators with frailty, according to previous research. Demographic factors included sex, age, race, and education level. PIR was divided into < 1.3, 1.3–3.5, ≥ 3.5, and unknown. BMI was classified into three categories: <25 kg/m2, 25–30 kg/m2, and ≥ 30 kg/m2. Laboratory indicators included fasting total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). In addition, the mean energy intake from two 24-hour dietary recall questionnaires were included in the study.

Smoking was classified into three categories: never smoking, former smoking, and current smoking. Alcohol consumption status consisted of never drinking, previous drinking, current drinking (light, moderate, and heavy), and unknown. PA was represented by metabolic equivalents (MET), which were divided into ≤ 700 MET-min/week, 700-2400 MET-min/week, > 2400 MET-min/week, and unknown. Finally, data on use of hypoglycemic or hypolipidemic agents were collected from questionnaires. The Healthy Eating Index (HEI) developed by the US Department of Agriculture was used to assess dietary health; specifically, the HEI was assessed across 13 components, including 9 adequate and 4 appropriate components. This study was assessed using the mean of dietary components recorded from two 24-hour dietary recall interviews. Higher scores indicated healthier diets.

Statistical analysis

To provide a comprehensive representation of the national sample of non-institutionalized residents, NHANES uses a complex multi-stage stratified probability survey design and recommends the use of appropriate weights for statistical analyses. Accordingly, all samples were weighted for this study. The ANOVA analysis and Kruskal-Wallis rank test was used for comparing continuous values, which are reported as mean (standard error). Categorical variables are represented by sample sizes (percentages), and the chi-square test was used for comparisons between groups. First, participants were grouped by the occurrence of frailty and quartiles of TyG and its related indices to compare baseline characteristics. Subsequently, three multifactorial regression analysis models were used to explore the association between TyG and its related indices and frailty. Multicollinearity of covariables in multifactorial regression analyses was assessed using the generalized variance-inflation factor (GVIF) function in the “car” package. Covariables with GVIF^(1/(2*df)) < 2 were considered to have less collinearity and were used in the final analyses. Model 1 was crude adjustment model; model 2 was adjusted for sex, race, and age; model 3 was adjusted for sex (male, female), age (continuous), race (non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White, American Mexican, others), education level (below high school, high school graduate, college or above), PIR (< 1.3, 1.3–3.5, ≥ 3.5, and unknown), BMI (< 25 kg/m2, 25–30 kg/m2, and ≥ 30 kg/m2), PA (≤ 700 MET-min/week, 700-2400 MET-min/week, > 2,400 MET-min/week, and unknown), smoking status (never, former, and current), drinking status (never, previous, current (light, moderate, and heavy), and unknown), energy intake (continuous), HEI (continuous), TC (continuous), HDL-C (continuous), year (continuous), use of hypoglycemic agents (no, yes), and use of hypolipidemic agents (no, yes). To avoid covariance, TyG-WC, TyG-BMI, and TyG-WHtR was not adjusted for BMI in model 3. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was used to illustrate the relationships among frailty and TyG, TyG-WC, TyG-BMI, and TyG-WHtR after all covariables had been adjusted for. In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic value of TyG and its associated indices for frailty. Finally, stratified analyses and interaction tests were used to further explore the links of TyG, TyG-WC, TyG-WHtR, and TyG-BMI with frailty. This study performed a logarithmic transformation of the high values of TyG-WC and TyG-BMI during the multifactorial regression analysis, the stratified analysis and the examination of interactions. R4.3.2 software was used for all statistical analyses in this work, and P < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.

Results

Baseline features of individuals

A total of 7,965 samples were included in this study. The percentages of men and women was 46.03% and 53.97%, respectively, the average age was 63.09 (0.16) years, and the average FI was 0.16 (0.00). Furthermore, 25.59% of participants were diagnosed with frailty.

The participants’ baseline characteristics were compared in accordance with the quartile groupings of TyG, TyG-WC, TyG-WHtR, and TyG-BMI; the results are displayed in Table 1 and the supplementary files (Table S2, Table S3, Table S4). The participants with higher TyG index and its related indices had lower HDL-C, PA, PIR, and education levels; also, obese, with frailty people, and individuals taking hypoglycemic or hypolipidemic medications had higher TyG index and its related metrics.

Table 1 Comparison of weighted baseline characteristics of participants according to quartiles of the TyG index
Full size table

When grouped by frailty, the results showed that frail participants had higher age, TyG, TyG-BMI, TyG-WC, and TyG-WHR, while education level, PIR, PA, HEI, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, and energy intake were typically lower compared to non-frail participants. In addition, the frail participants were more likely to be female, never drinkers, current smokers, obese individuals, individuals taking hypoglycemic or hypolipidemic agents (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison of weighted baseline characteristics of participants according to frailty
Full size table

Association of TyG and its related metrics with frailty

LDL-C was not included in the adjustment model owing to the presence of collinearity (GVIF^(1/(2*df)) > 2). As is shown in the Table 3, higher TyG, TyG-WC, TyG-WHtR, and TyG-BMI were significantly associated with a higher prevalence of frailty in all three multifactorial regression models. In the fully adjusted model, participants in the fourth quartile of TyG, TyG-WC, TyG-WHtR, and TyG-BMI were significantly more likely to develop frailty compared with participants in the first quartile (TyG Q4 vs. Q1, OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.19, 2.09, P = 0.002; TyG-WC Q4 vs. Q1, OR = 2.40, 95% CI: 1.90, 3.04, P < 0.001; TyG-WHtR Q4 vs. Q1, OR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.82, 2.81, P < 0.001; TyG- BMI Q4 vs. Q1, OR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.76, 2.64, P < 0.001). After adjustment for all covariables, the RCS indicated linear positive associations of TyG, TyG-WC, TyG-WHtR, and TyG-BMI with frailty (Fig. 2). Furthermore, ROC curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic value of TyG and its relevant metrics for frailty. TyG-WHtR had the highest diagnostic value for frailty, and was followed by TyG-WC and TyG-BMI, whereas the TyG index had the lowest diagnostic value (AUC = 0.654, 0.629, 0.621, and 0.604, respectively) (Fig. 3).

Table 3 Association between TyG and related indicators with frailty
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Restricted cubic spline fitting for the association between TyG and its associated indices and frailty in model 3

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

ROC curves of the TyG index and its indices in relation to frailty

Full size image

Stratified analyses

Stratified analyses and interaction tests were used to further explore the association of TyG and its related indexes with frailty (Fig. 4). After stratification by sex, age, and race, no significant interactions were observed in all strata.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Subgroup analysis and interaction test of the association between TyG and its associated indices and frailty

Full size image

Discussion

This large cross-sectional study provides the first insights into the links of TyG and its related indices with frailty. In this study, 25.59% of participants were diagnosed with frailty. After adjustment for all confounders, higher TyG, TyG-WC, TyG-WHtR, and TyG-BMI were all associated with a higher prevalence of frailty; this positive relationship was further validated in RSC. Further subgroup analyses suggested that this positive relationship remained stable across all subgroups. ROC curves showed that TyG-WHtR and TyG-WC had the highest diagnostic value for frailty.

The current findings indicated that the TyG index was positively associated with the prevalence of frailty. IR implies diminished sensitivity of the body to insulin and elevated plasma glucose levels, as well as a diminished ability of the liver to process glucose, thus resulting in the conversion of excess glucose into triglycerides. Therefore, the TyG index is considered a credible indicator of pancreatic β-cell function and is not influenced by the state of glucose metabolism [37]. The TyG index has been shown to have favorable specificity and sensitivity in the diagnosis and prediction of many diseases, particularly CVD [38,39,40]. In agreement with our findings, a recent two-way cohort study in China has indicated that an elevated TyG index and steady trajectory of the TyG index are beneficial regarding the development of frailty [25]. To our knowledge, that study has provided the only exploration of the relationship between the TyG index and frailty, although it is limited to Chinese individuals. Despite the scarcity of reports on the relationship between the TyG index and frailty, considerably strong evidence supports a positive association between them. The loss of muscle mass or strength and the development of chronic diseases, such as CVD and cognitive impairment, are the main contributors to frailty in older people. The TyG index has been reported to be positively related to sarcopenia, in populations with hypertension or without DM, as well as in adolescents or older people [21, 41,42,43]. Moreover, an elevated TyG index has been suggested to lead to elevated risk of CVD and mortality in cross-sectional or prospective studies [44,45,46]. Furthermore, cognitive impairment, an important factor in the evaluation of FI, has also been demonstrated to be positively associated with TyG [47,48,49,50]. A meta-analysis has revealed that an elevated TyG index is related to the frequency of cognitive impairment and dementia [47]. Importantly, prospective cohort studies have shown that HOMA-IR is positively associated with the risk of frailty in non-diabetic patients, suggesting that IR may be an important risk factor for frailty [23].

The potential mechanism underlying the relationship between the TyG index and frailty is unclear but may involve the following aspects: (1) Physiologically, insulin regulates glucose metabolism primarily in skeletal muscle [51]. Increasing age is often accompanied by declining hormone levels, decreased PA, and diminished skeletal muscle mass and ability to process glucose, thereby leading to a decrease in sensitivity to insulin [52]. Simultaneously, IR leads to increased breakdown of muscle proteins, thus creating a vicious cycle that ultimately induces frailty [53]. (2) With increasing age, the ability to process senescent organelles and misfolded proteins declines [54], and the levels of chronic inflammation and oxidative stress increase [55, 56], thus leading to IR and senescent disorders such as sarcopenia, CVD, cognitive disorders, and cancer [57,58,59,60]. Ultimately, the ability to resist external attacks is weakened.

This study performed the first investigation of the associations of TyG-WC, TyG-WHtR, and TyG-BMI with frailty. Interestingly, the diagnostic value of TyG-WC, TyG-WHtR, and TyG-BMI with frailty were stronger than those of the TyG index. BMI, WC, and WHtR are the most commonly used body measurements to assess obesity. The novel index constructed by TyG in combination with body measurements, compared with TyG alone, has shown better diagnostic value for multiple diseases [61, 62]. In addition, TyG in combination with body measurements is more accurate in evaluating IR than TyG alone [63,64,65,66]. Although studies exploring the connection between TyG-associated indices and frailty are limited, a relationship between them appears reasonable. The high prevalence of obesity threatens health among older people. Obesity induces skeletal muscle immune cell infiltration and the secretion of inflammatory factors from visceral adipose tissue, thereby inducing skeletal muscle inflammation, inhibiting myocyte metabolism, and leading to IR and ultimately multiple adverse outcomes [67]. A large cohort study has emphasized the importance of overweight or obesity in the relationship between the TyG index and frailty [25]. A Japanese study has suggested that obesity is beneficial regarding frailty in middle-aged and older adults, and appropriate weight loss can effectively decrease the prevalence of frailty in overweight and obese patients with diabetes [32].In addition, another cohort study has emphasized that decreasing abdominal obesity is a crucial measure for preventing frailty [33]. Furthermore, obesity is involved in the pathological mechanisms of diseases such as sarcopenia, CVD, and cognitive disorders, which are considered important components of frailty.

Notably, in our study, TyG-WHtR and TyG-WC had the highest diagnostic value for frailty. Body measurements representing abdominal obesity (WC and WHtR) have been demonstrated to be superior to BMI in the diagnosis of frailty [68,69,70]. These findings may be associated with the age-associated accumulation of abdominal fat causing increased levels of oxidative stress and chronic inflammation, both of which are detrimental to muscle anabolism and motor neuron repair, thus further aggravating dynapenia [71,72,73,74]. The best association between TyG-WC and CVD has also been reported, and TyG-WHtR has been found to be the best predictor of CVD mortality [44]. Therefore, the body adiposity distribution may be potentially related to frailty and its components.

Strengths and limitations

This study has several strengths. First, this large study used the NHANES database, which is representative of the health conditions of the entire American population. Additionally, subgroup analyses and ROC curves were applied to further assess associations and diagnostic value of TyG and its associated indices. Importantly, this study is not only the first to explore the potential association between the TyG index and the prevalence of frailty in Americans, but also the first to investigate the relationship of TyG-associated indices with frailty. However, this study has several limitations. First, causality between TyG and its obesity-associated indices and frailty could not be determined, because this was a cross-sectional study. Second, this study was retrospective, and the possibility of remnant confounders cannot be completely excluded. Finally, this study population was limited to Americans, and the conclusions might not apply to other populations.

Conclusions

This study suggests that elevated TyG index and its associated indices are associated with an increased prevalence of frailty. However, TyG-associated indicators, particularly TyG-WHtR and TyG-WC, performed best in the diagnosis of frailty. Consequently, we advocate for active glycemic and lipid control in middle-aged and older adults, as well as paying close attention to physical obesity, particularly abdominal obesity, may contribute to reducing the prevalence of frailty.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

TyG:

Triglyceride-glucose

NHANES:

The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

RCS:

Restricted cubic spline

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

TyG-WC:

Triglyceride glucose-waist circumference

TyG-WHtR:

Triglyceride glucose-waist to height ratio

TyG-BMI:

Triglyceride glucose-body mass index

IR:

Insulin resistance

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

NAFLD:

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

HOMA-IR:

Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance

BMI:

Body mass index

WC:

Waist circumference

WHtR:

Waist-to-height ratio

FI:

Frailty index

PIR:

Poverty income ratio

TC:

Total cholesterol

HDL-C:

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

LDL-C:

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

PA:

Physical activity

MET:

Metabolic equivalents

HEI:

Healthy Eating Index

GVIF:

Generalized variance-inflation factor

References

  1. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013;381:752–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Caoimh R, Sezgin D, O’Donovan MR, Molloy DW, Clegg A, Rockwood K, Liew A. Prevalence of frailty in 62 countries across the world: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level studies. Age Ageing. 2021;50:96–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou F, Zhou W, Wang W, Fan C, Chen W, Ling L. Associations between Frailty and ambient temperature in Winter: findings from a Population-based study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022, 20.

  4. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M146–156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Qin YN, Zheng XP. Association of frailty index with congestive heart failure, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among individuals with type 2 diabetes: a study from National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES), 1999–2018. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2023;15:210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hanlon P, Nicholl BI, Jani BD, Lee D, McQueenie R, Mair FS. Frailty and pre-frailty in middle-aged and older adults and its association with multimorbidity and mortality: a prospective analysis of 493 737 UK Biobank participants. Lancet Public Health. 2018;3:e323–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Puts MTE, Toubasi S, Andrew MK, Ashe MC, Ploeg J, Atkinson E, Ayala AP, Roy A, Rodriguez Monforte M, Bergman H, McGilton K. Interventions to prevent or reduce the level of frailty in community-dwelling older adults: a scoping review of the literature and international policies. Age Ageing. 2017;46:383–92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Faerch K, Vaag A, Holst JJ, Hansen T, Jorgensen T, Borch-Johnsen K. Natural history of insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion in the progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired fasting glycemia and impaired glucose tolerance: the Inter99 study. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:439–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. DeFronzo RA, Ferrannini E, Groop L, Henry RR, Herman WH, Holst JJ, Hu FB, Kahn CR, Raz I, Shulman GI, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015;1:15019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hill MA, Yang Y, Zhang L, Sun Z, Jia G, Parrish AR, Sowers JR. Insulin resistance, cardiovascular stiffening and cardiovascular disease. Metabolism. 2021;119:154766.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Minh HV, Tien HA, Sinh CT, Thang DC, Chen CH, Tay JC, Siddique S, Wang TD, Sogunuru GP, Chia YC, Kario K. Assessment of preferred methods to measure insulin resistance in Asian patients with hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2021;23:529–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tao LC, Xu JN, Wang TT, Hua F, Li JJ. Triglyceride-glucose index as a marker in cardiovascular diseases: landscape and limitations. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21:68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen J, Wu K, Lin Y, Huang M, Xie S. Association of triglyceride glucose index with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the general population. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023;22:320.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ahn N, Baumeister SE, Amann U, Rathmann W, Peters A, Huth C, Thorand B, Meisinger C. Visceral adiposity index (VAI), lipid accumulation product (LAP), and product of triglycerides and glucose (TyG) to discriminate prediabetes and diabetes. Sci Rep. 2019;9:9693.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang Y, Huang X, Wang Y, Leng L, Xu J, Feng L, Jiang S, Wang J, Yang Y, Pan G, et al. The impact of triglyceride-glucose index on ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023;22:2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Che B, Zhong C, Zhang R, Pu L, Zhao T, Zhang Y, Han L. Triglyceride-glucose index and triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio as potential cardiovascular disease risk factors: an analysis of UK biobank data. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023;22:34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Simental-Mendia LE, Rodriguez-Moran M, Guerrero-Romero F. The product of fasting glucose and triglycerides as surrogate for identifying insulin resistance in apparently healthy subjects. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2008;6:299–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Son DH, Lee HS, Lee YJ, Lee JH, Han JH. Comparison of triglyceride-glucose index and HOMA-IR for predicting prevalence and incidence of metabolic syndrome. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2022;32:596–604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Luo P, Cao Y, Li P, Li W, Song Z, Fu Z, Zhou H, Yi X, Zhu L, Zhu S. TyG Index performs Better Than HOMA-IR in Chinese type 2 diabetes Mellitus with a BMI < 35 kg/m2: a hyperglycemic clamp validated study. Med (Kaunas) 2022, 58.

  20. Zheng J, Zhang L, Jiang M. Lower handgrip strength levels probably precede triglyceride glucose index and associated with diabetes in men not in women. J Diabetes Investig. 2022;13:148–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim JA, Hwang SY, Yu JH, Roh E, Hong SH, Lee YB, Kim NH, Yoo HJ, Seo JA, Kim NH, et al. Association of the triglyceride and glucose index with low muscle mass: KNHANES 2008–2011. Sci Rep. 2021;11:450.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Jura M, Kozak LP. Obesity and related consequences to ageing. Age (Dordr). 2016;38:23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Perez-Tasigchana RF, Leon-Munoz LM, Lopez-Garcia E, Gutierrez-Fisac JL, Laclaustra M, Rodriguez-Artalejo F, Guallar-Castillon P. Metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance are associated with frailty in older adults: a prospective cohort study. Age Ageing. 2017;46:807–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Peng PS, Kao TW, Chang PK, Chen WL, Peng PJ, Wu LW. Association between HOMA-IR and Frailty among U.S. Middle-aged and Elderly Population. Sci Rep. 2019;9:4238.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Yuan Y, Chen S, Lin C, Huang X, Lin S, Huang F, Zhu P. Association of triglyceride-glucose index trajectory and frailty in urban older residents: evidence from the 10-year follow-up in a cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023;22:264.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Safar ME, Czernichow S, Blacher J. Obesity, arterial stiffness, and cardiovascular risk. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:S109–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Avgerinos KI, Spyrou N, Mantzoros CS, Dalamaga M. Obesity and cancer risk: emerging biological mechanisms and perspectives. Metabolism. 2019;92:121–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Batsis JA, Villareal DT. Sarcopenic obesity in older adults: aetiology, epidemiology and treatment strategies. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14:513–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang Y, Zhang X, Li Y, Gui J, Mei Y, Yang X, Liu H, Guo LL, Li J, Lei Y, et al. Obesity- and lipid-related indices as a predictor of type 2 diabetes in a national cohort study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1331739.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Park HM, Han T, Heo SJ, Kwon YJ. Effectiveness of the triglyceride-glucose index and triglyceride-glucose-related indices in predicting cardiovascular disease in middle-aged and older adults: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Lipidol 2023.

  31. Xue Y, Xu J, Li M, Gao Y. Potential screening indicators for early diagnosis of NAFLD/MAFLD and liver fibrosis: triglyceride glucose index-related parameters. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:951689.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nishida Y, Yamada Y, Sasaki S, Kanda E, Kanno Y, Anzai T, Takahashi K, Yamauchi K, Katsukawa F. Effect of overweight/obesity and metabolic syndrome on frailty in middle-aged and older Japanese adults. Obes Sci Pract. 2024;10:e714.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sun B, Wang J, Wang Y, Xiao W, Liu Y, Wang Y, Chen Y, Lu W. Associations of Dynapenic Abdominal Obesity and Frailty Progression: evidence from two nationwide cohorts. Nutrients 2024, 16.

  34. Blodgett J, Theou O, Kirkland S, Andreou P, Rockwood K. Frailty in NHANES: comparing the frailty index and phenotype. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015;60:464–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pang S, Miao G, Zhou Y, Duan M, Bai L, Zhao X. Association between coffee intake and frailty among older American adults: a population-based cross-sectional study. Front Nutr. 2023;10:1075817.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Jiang Z, Wang J, Cai X, Wang P, Liu S. L-shaped association of serum alpha-klotho and frailty among the middle-aged and older adults: results from NHANES 2007–2016. BMC Geriatr. 2023;23:716.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen Z, Wen J. Elevated triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index predicts impaired islet beta-cell function: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:973655.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Peng H, Pan L, Ran S, Wang M, Huang S, Zhao M, Cao Z, Yao Z, Xu L, Yang Q, Lv W. Prediction of MAFLD and NAFLD using different screening indexes: a cross-sectional study in U.S. adults. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1083032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tao S, Yu L, Li J, Huang L, Huang X, Zhang W, Xie Z, Tan Y, Yang D. Association between the triglyceride-glucose index and 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease and hypertension. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023;22:305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Wei B, Dong Q, Ma J, Zhang A. The association between triglyceride-glucose index and cognitive function in nondiabetic elderly: NHANES 2011–2014. Lipids Health Dis. 2023;22:188.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Ahn SH, Lee JH, Lee JW. Inverse association between triglyceride glucose index and muscle mass in Korean adults: 2008–2011 KNHANES. Lipids Health Dis. 2020;19:243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhou J, Bai L, Tong L, Jia L, Ding W. Association of the triglyceride-glucose index with weight-adjusted appendicular lean mass in Chinese adolescents aged 12–18 years old. Sci Rep. 2022;12:11160.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Li Z, Tong X, Ma Y, Bao T, Yue J. Association between the triglyceride glucose index and low skeletal muscle mass: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2024;14:e077484.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Dang K, Wang X, Hu J, Zhang Y, Cheng L, Qi X, Liu L, Ming Z, Tao X, Li Y. The association between triglyceride-glucose index and its combination with obesity indicators and cardiovascular disease: NHANES 2003–2018. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024;23:8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang Y, Chen X, Shi J, Du M, Li S, Pang J, Qiao J, Zhao Y, Chen Q, Guo Y, et al. Relationship between triglyceride-glucose index baselines and trajectories with incident cardiovascular diseases in the elderly population. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024;23:6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Alavi Tabatabaei G, Mohammadifard N, Rafiee H, Nouri F, Maghami Mehr A, Najafian J, Sadeghi M, Boshtam M, Roohafza H, Haghighatdoost F, et al. Association of the triglyceride glucose index with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a general population of Iranian adults. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024;23:66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang H, Ling Q, Wu Y, Zhang M. Association between the triglyceride glucose index and cognitive impairment and dementia: a meta-analysis. Front Aging Neurosci. 2023;15:1278730.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Li SQ, Deng X, Zhang YM. The triglyceride-glucose index is Associated with Longitudinal Cognitive decline in a Middle-aged to Elderly Population: a Cohort Study. J Clin Med 2022, 11.

  49. Teng Z, Feng J, Dong Y, Xu J, Jiang X, Chen H, Qi Q, Li R, Chen W, Lv P. Triglyceride glucose index is associated with cerebral small vessel disease burden and cognitive impairment in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:970122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ma Y, Wei S, Dang L, Gao L, Shang S, Hu N, Peng W, Zhao Y, Yuan Y, Zhou R et al. Association between the triglyceride-glucose index and cognitive impairment in China: a community population-based cross-sectional study. Nutr Neurosci 2023:1–11.

  51. Consitt LA, Dudley C, Saxena G. Impact of endurance and resistance training on skeletal muscle glucose metabolism in older adults. Nutrients 2019, 11.

  52. Consitt LA, Clark BC. The vicious cycle of Myostatin Signaling in Sarcopenic obesity: myostatin role in skeletal muscle growth, insulin signaling and implications for clinical trials. J Frailty Aging. 2018;7:21–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Siew ED, Pupim LB, Majchrzak KM, Shintani A, Flakoll PJ, Ikizler TA. Insulin resistance is associated with skeletal muscle protein breakdown in non-diabetic chronic hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2007;71:146–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Franceschi C, Garagnani P, Vitale G, Capri M, Salvioli S. Inflammaging and ‘Garb-aging’. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2017;28:199–212.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Cohen HJ, Pieper CF, Harris T, Rao KM, Currie MS. The association of plasma IL-6 levels with functional disability in community-dwelling elderly. J Gerontol Biol Sci Med Sci. 1997;52:M201–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Ferrucci L, Semba RD, Guralnik JM, Ershler WB, Bandinelli S, Patel KV, Sun K, Woodman RC, Andrews NC, Cotter RJ, et al. Proinflammatory state, hepcidin, and anemia in older persons. Blood. 2010;115:3810–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Rubio-Ruiz ME, Guarner-Lans V, Perez-Torres I, Soto ME. Mechanisms underlying metabolic syndrome-related Sarcopenia and possible therapeutic measures. Int J Mol Sci 2019, 20.

  58. Ruparelia N, Chai JT, Fisher EA, Choudhury RP. Inflammatory processes in cardiovascular disease: a route to targeted therapies. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017;14:133–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Leonardi GC, Accardi G, Monastero R, Nicoletti F, Libra M. Ageing: from inflammation to cancer. Immun Ageing. 2018;15:1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Gorelick PB. Role of inflammation in cognitive impairment: results of observational epidemiological studies and clinical trials. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1207:155–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Miao H, Zhou Z, Yang S, Zhang Y. The association of triglyceride-glucose index and related parameters with hypertension and cardiovascular risk: a cross-sectional study. Hypertens Res 2023.

  62. Xiao D, Sun H, Chen L, Li X, Huo H, Zhou G, Zhang M, He B. Assessment of six surrogate insulin resistance indexes for predicting cardiometabolic multimorbidity incidence in Chinese middle-aged and older populations: insights from the China health and retirement longitudinal study. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024;40:e3764.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Yan S, Wang D, Jia Y. Comparison of insulin resistance-associated parameters in US adults: a cross-sectional study. Horm (Athens). 2023;22:331–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Lee J, Kim B, Kim W, Ahn C, Choi HY, Kim JG, Kim J, Shin H, Kang JG, Moon S. Lipid indices as simple and clinically useful surrogate markers for insulin resistance in the U.S. population. Sci Rep. 2021;11:2366.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Er LK, Wu S, Chou HH, Hsu LA, Teng MS, Sun YC, Ko YL. Triglyceride glucose-body Mass Index is a simple and clinically useful surrogate marker for insulin resistance in nondiabetic individuals. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0149731.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Lim J, Kim J, Koo SH, Kwon GC. Comparison of triglyceride glucose index, and related parameters to predict insulin resistance in Korean adults: an analysis of the 2007–2010 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0212963.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Wu H, Ballantyne CM. Skeletal muscle inflammation and insulin resistance in obesity. J Clin Invest. 2017;127:43–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Afonso C, Sousa-Santos AR, Santos A, Borges N, Padrao P, Moreira P, Amaral TF. Frailty status is related to general and abdominal obesity in older adults. Nutr Res. 2021;85:21–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Crow RS, Lohman MC, Titus AJ, Cook SB, Bruce ML, Mackenzie TA, Bartels SJ, Batsis JA. Association of Obesity and Frailty in older adults: NHANES 1999–2004. J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23:138–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Liao Q, Zheng Z, Xiu S, Chan P. Waist circumference is a better predictor of risk for frailty than BMI in the community-dwelling elderly in Beijing. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018;30:1319–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Schrager MA, Metter EJ, Simonsick E, Ble A, Bandinelli S, Lauretani F, Ferrucci L. Sarcopenic obesity and inflammation in the InCHIANTI study. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007;102:919–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Panagiotakos DB, Pitsavos C, Yannakoulia M, Chrysohoou C, Stefanadis C. The implication of obesity and central fat on markers of chronic inflammation: the ATTICA study. Atherosclerosis. 2005;183:308–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. de Carvalho DHT, Scholes S, Santos JLF, de Oliveira C, Alexandre TDS. Does abdominal obesity accelerate muscle strength decline in older adults? Evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. J Gerontol Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019;74:1105–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. de Oliveira Maximo R, de Oliveira DC, Ramirez PC, Luiz MM, de Souza AF, Delinocente MLB, Steptoe A, de Oliveira C. Da Silva Alexandre T: Dynapenia, abdominal obesity or both: which accelerates the gait speed decline most? Age Ageing. 2021;50:1616–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for providing the data. We thank International Science Editing ( http://www.internationalscienceediting.com ) for editing this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Guangxi Natural Science Foundation project(2022JJA141036).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Huangyi Yin and Liuqing Guo contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China

    Huangyi Yin, Liuqing Guo, Wei Zhu, Weishan Li & Wenyun Wei

  2. Department of Geriatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No. 6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China

    Yubo Zhou & Min Liang

Authors
  1. Huangyi Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Liuqing Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wei Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Weishan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yubo Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wenyun Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Min Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Yin H and Guo L were responsible for the study design, analyzed the data, wrote the original manuscript, and were primarily responsible for the final content. Li W, Zhou Y, Wei W and Zhu W were involved in preparing and visualization of the results. Liang M carefully reviewed and approved the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Liang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yin, H., Guo, L., Zhu, W. et al. Association of the triglyceride-glucose index and its related parameters with frailty. Lipids Health Dis 23, 150 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-024-02147-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-024-02147-4

Keywords

Lipids in Health and Disease

ISSN: 1476-511X