Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Targeting PCSK9 as a key player in lipid metabolism: exploiting the therapeutic and biosensing potential of aptamers

Lipids in Health and Disease volume 23, Article number: 156 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

The degradation of low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) is induced by proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), resulting in elevated plasma concentrations of LDL cholesterol. Therefore, inhibiting the interactions between PCSK9 and LDLR is a desirable therapeutic goal for managing hypercholesterolemia. Aptamers, which are RNA or single-stranded DNA sequences, can recognize their targets based on their secondary structure. Aptamers exhibit high selectivity and affinity for binding to target molecules. The systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX), a combination of biological approaches, is used to screen most aptamers in vitro. Due to their unique advantages, aptamers have garnered significant interest since their discovery and have found extensive applications in various fields. Aptamers have been increasingly utilized in the development of biosensors for sensitive detection of pathogens, analytes, toxins, drug residues, and malignant cells. Furthermore, similar to monoclonal antibodies, aptamers can serve as therapeutic tools. Unlike certain protein therapeutics, aptamers do not elicit antibody responses, and their modified sugars at the 2’-positions generally prevent toll-like receptor-mediated innate immune responses. The focus of this review is on aptamer-based targeting of PCSK9 and the application of aptamers both as biosensors and therapeutic agents.

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one of the most prevalent illnesses in industrialized nations and accounts for a considerable rate of annual deaths [1, 2]. Atherosclerosis is a primary cause of CVD, and elevated plasma concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) play a pivotal role in CVD development and progression. People with familial hypercholesterolemia, a genetic disease characterized by a reduction in plasma clearance of LDL, develop premature atherosclerosis [3, 4] and have a greater risk of mortality than does the general population. Additionally, there is a causal correlation between plasma LDL-C concentrations and the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD): a 0.8 mmol/L (30 mg/dL) increase in plasma LDL-C results in a 30% increase in CHD risk [5, 6]. Therefore, reducing plasma LDL-C levels can help prevent atherosclerosis and lower CVD risk [7].

Statin therapy is commonly used to treat hypercholesterolemia by inhibiting hepatic cholesterol production, increasing the expression of LDL receptors (LDLRs) and enhancing LDL clearance from plasma, thereby reducing CVD risk. In addition, statins have many pleiotropic effects [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18], particularly anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects [19,20,21,22,23,24]. However, many individuals using statins fail to achieve the proposed LDL-C goals [25], and a considerable number of patients may not tolerate these drugs [26]. This has led to the introduction of several classes of newer LDL-lowering agents [27,28,29,30]. The potential of statins to lower plasma LDL-C levels is limited by the fact that statin therapy paradoxically increases both circulating plasma proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) and hepatic LDLR expression [31]. To address the issues associated with statin-based hypercholesterolemia therapy, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting PCSK9, such as evolocumab and alirocumab, have been developed. In combination with statins, PCSK9-targeting mAbs effectively reduce LDL-C and consequent morbidity and mortality in patients with CVD [32]. However, mAbs have certain limitations, including high manufacturing costs and oral unavailability, which restrict their widespread use [33].

PCSK9

PCSK9, primarily released by the small intestine, liver, and kidney, plays a role in LDL-C catabolism by interacting with hepatic LDLRs, which transport LDL-C from the plasma into hepatocytes (Fig. 1). PCSK9 consists of a 30-amino-acid signaling peptide, a catalytic domain, a 14-kDa prodomain, and a C-terminal histidine/cysteine-rich domain [34]. The catabolism of LDL by PCSK9 involves several processes (Fig. 1): (i) PCSK9 is synthesized as a precursor protein via ribosomal protein synthesis in the cytosol; (ii) in the endoplasmic reticulum, PCSK9 undergoes autocatalytic cleavage, producing the prodomain; (iii) the catalytic domain’s active site is tightly bound by the prodomain, rendering it catalytically inactive; (iv) after maturation and various posttranslational modifications, the liver secretes PCSK9; and (v) the interaction between PCSK9 and LDLRs leads to the degradation of LDLRs in the lysosome, resulting in reduced LDLR expression on the hepatocyte surface and consequently elevated plasma LDL-C [35, 36]. Gain-of-function variants in PCSK9 lead to increased plasma LDL-C concentrations and hypercholesterolemia, while loss-of-function variants are associated with reduced plasma LDL-C and decreased CHD risk. Therefore, PCSK9 represents a therapeutic target for managing hypercholesterolemia [37]. In addition, recent evidence has revealed numerous extrahepatic functions for PCSK9 [38,39,40].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic representation of the role of PCSK9 inhibitor therapeutics in LDL catabolism. After transcription of the PCSK9 gene in the nucleus, PCSK9 is produced via translation in the cytosol. Inclisiran, AZD8233, and MiR-552-3p bind to PCSK9 mRNA and inhibit its translation. The liver secretes PCSK9 after it has matured and undergoes several posttranslational changes. PCSK9 binds to LDLR, and LDLR is degraded in the lysosome as a result of the PCSK9-LDLR interaction, which increases plasma LDL-C levels while lowering hepatic LDLR expression. Alirocumab, evolocumab, BMS-962,476, Annexin A2, Pep2-8, and 7030B-C5 bind to PCSK9 and prevent the PCSK9-LDLR interaction. L-IFPTA as a vaccine induces functional antibody production [41]

Full size image

A number of gain-of-function variants in PCSK9, which play a crucial role in maintaining cholesterol homeostasis, result in hypercholesterolemia [42]. Individuals with the severe form of FH have been found to overexpress the PCSK9 D374Y mutant, which exhibits a greater affinity for LDLRs than does wild-type PCSK9 [43]. FH affects approximately 1 in 300 people worldwide, making it the most common inherited metabolic disorder. However, it is often underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population, which exacerbates its clinical severity [44].

The limitations of statins in effectively reducing LDL-C levels in certain patients, such as those with FH, have prompted research efforts to discover new therapeutics with different mechanisms of action for managing cholesterol. One therapeutic approach for cholesterol regulation that has been clinically validated is the development of PCSK9 inhibitors (Fig. 1). Monoclonal antibody (mAb) inhibitors, including alirocumab and evolocumab, have received FDA approval for the treatment of high-risk individuals with hypercholesterolemia [37], including FH [45, 46]. Peptides/proteins, such as small molecules such as BMS-962,476, act as inhibitors by preventing the binding of PCSK9 to LDLR. Nucleic acids, such as siRNAs such as inclisiran [47], miRNAs, and antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), can bind to PCSK9 mRNA and inhibit its translation. Vaccines, such as liposomal immunogenic-fused PCSK9-Tetanus plus alum adjuvant (L-IFPTA), stimulate the production of functional endogenous antibodies [41]. Several natural products with PCSK9-inhibiting activity have also been identified [48].

Aptamers

Aptamers have recently emerged as analytical tools with the potential to replace antibodies in conjunction with immunoassays, flow cytometry, imaging, and mass spectrometry (MS). They have even been suggested for use in cancer treatment. These molecules are typically selected from a pool of random sequences using a general technique termed systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) [49]. Aptamers possess a nucleotide sequence and tertiary structure that enable them to selectively and strongly bind to specific molecules of interest. Several studies have used modified methods for screening aptamers to improve their efficacy [50]. These molecules can have various conformations and encompass a wide range of targets, including cells, tissues, proteins, nucleic acids, and small molecules [51,52,53,54].

Aptamers differ significantly from antibodies, as they exhibit higher selectivity and often possess greater affinities. Aptamers, such as mAbs, can be used for therapeutic purposes. However, unlike traditional methods for producing mABs, the in vitro selection of oligonucleotides does not require the use of organisms. This approach offers numerous advantages in manipulating the process of directed evolution. Furthermore, aptamers do not elicit an antibody response due to their nonimmunogenic nature, and their 2′-modified sugar content helps mitigate toll-like receptor-mediated innate immune responses [51, 54, 55].

Unlike antibodies, aptamers are synthetic, which potentially makes them more cost-effective to produce, more scalable with faster lead times, and less prone to batch-to-batch variability. Their nonimmunogenicity, ease of synthesis, stability, high affinity, and target selectivity make them highly suitable for therapeutic applications. In recent years, research on the medicinal applications of aptamers has rapidly expanded. Since their discovery, the therapeutic potential of aptamers for treating illnesses such as hepatitis, cancer, and HIV has been extensively studied [56,57,58].

Through combinatorial chemical techniques, numerous aptamers have been discovered in the laboratory, and an increasing number of such materials are now found in nature. While these aptamers often exhibit affinities and activities comparable to those of antibodies, only a few have entered clinical research, in contrast to the vast and growing number of therapeutic antibodies. Macugen (Pegaptanib), an aptamer targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), is the only aptamer that has reached the market as a therapeutic agent. However, three others, Fovista (targeting PDGF) and Pegnivacogin (targeting coagulation factor IXa), have reached phase III clinical trials, and Zimura (targeting complement factor C5) has been approved by the FDA [59, 60].

Aptamers also hold potential as high-affinity reagents for MS. Furthermore, it has been recently demonstrated that plasma measurement of PCSK9 is achievable using immunoaffinity enrichment liquid chromatography‒mass spectrometry (LC‒MS) with a SOMAmer containing a single modified nucleotide [61].

From a diagnostic perspective, aptamer-based biosensors, known as aptasensors, utilize aptamers as biorecognition elements. Aptamers exhibit resistance to degradation or denaturation, are easily labeled without loss of function, are small in size, and enable homogeneous assays, facilitating quick and simple testing platforms. Over the past decade, aptamers have been employed in numerous diagnostic platforms for the detection of various analytes, ranging from small molecules to more complex targets [62,63,64].

Aptamers for targeting PCSK9

Recently, aptamers have been utilized in several studies for targeting PCSK9 in therapeutic or biosensor applications, as described below (Fig. 2). The properties and sequences of these aptamers are listed in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Additionally, the secondary structures of these aptamers are depicted in Fig. 3.

Fig. 2
figure 2

PCSK9 aptamers used for biosensors and targeted therapy. A For therapeutics, PCSK9 aptamers such as PBR, AP-1, AP-2, and SL1063 bind to PCSK9 and prevent LDLR-PCSK9 interactions. B For biosensor application, labeled PCSK9 aptamers specifically detect the PCSK9 molecules. Binding to PCSK9 causes alterations in the structure of the aptamer, which changes the fluorescence intensity

Full size image
Table 1 Properties of PCSK9 aptamers for therapeutics
Full size table
Table 2 Sequence of the PCSK9 aptamers
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Secondary structure of PCSK9 Aptamers created with the Mfold web server

Full size image

Therapeutic methods utilizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to block the PCSK9-LDLR interaction have been established [41]. However, protein-based antagonists such as mAbs have high manufacturing costs due to their large size. Alternatively, strategies focused on reducing PCSK9 expression through lowering its messenger RNA levels using small interfering RNA or antisense oligonucleotides or by introducing loss-of-function mutations into the PCSK9 gene through genome editing using the CRISPR/CRISPR-associated protein system have emerged as alternative approaches to inhibit PCSK9 function. Although these methods have lower manufacturing costs than mAbs, they have certain limitations, including potential off-target effects and the risk of inducing immunity due to the use of a virus vector as a delivery vehicle [67]. Aptamers exhibit significant advantages relative to conventional therapeutics, including their relatively small physical size, flexible structure, quick chemical production, versatile chemical modification, high stability, and lack of immunogenicity [68].

Ando et al. [65] used in vitro aptamer selection (SELEX) to target human PCSK9 and identified a novel PCSK9-binding RNA (PBR) aptamer. They demonstrated that the RNA aptamer exhibits a greater affinity for PCSK9 than for LDLR and effectively inhibits the interaction between PCSK9 and LDLR. Cellular LDL uptake experiments revealed that the RNA aptamer acts as an anti-PCSK9 antagonist by restoring the decrease in LDL uptake caused by PCSK9 in the presence of the PCSK9-binding RNA aptamer. To generate an RNA library, a synthetic DNA library encoding random sequences was subjected to run-off in vitro transcription. The RNA library was then subjected to pull-down assays using PCSK9-nonimmobilized beads followed by human PCSK9-immobilized beads to isolate only the RNAs that bind to PCSK9. The specific binding of the RNA aptamer to PCSK9 was assessed using HRP-based chemiluminescence detection. The chemiluminescence signal was stronger on the PCSK9-immobilized beads than on the control beads, confirming the selective binding of the RNA aptamer to PCSK9. Subsequently, the RNA aptamer was named PBR (PCSK9-Binding RNA). An LDLR pull-down study was conducted to evaluate the inhibitory effect of PBR on the PCSK9-LDLR interaction. The chemiluminescence intensity of LDLR-immobilized beads treated with both PCSK9 and PBR was significantly lower than that of LDLR-immobilized beads incubated with only PCSK9, indicating that PBR impedes the PCSK9-LDLR interaction. PBR exhibited an IC50 value of 120 nM for suppressing PCSK9 binding to LDLR, and at a concentration of 10,000 nM, it almost completely blocked the PCSK9-LDLR interaction. The binding of PBR to PCSK9 was also examined in the presence of Pep2-8, a peptide known to block the PCSK9-LDLR interaction. The qRT‒PCR results indicated that PBR competes with Pep2–8 for binding to PCSK9, as the recovery rate of PBR decreased in the presence of 50 mM Pep2–8. To understand the mechanism of action of PBR against PCSK9, an experiment called “LDLR-dependent cellular LDL uptake” was performed using HepG2 cells. The fluorescence-based LDL uptake assay demonstrated that PCSK9 treatment reduced LDL receptor levels in HepG2 cells, resulting in lower fluorescently tagged LDL uptake. However, when HepG2 cells were pretreated with PBR and then exposed to PCSK9, the fluorescence intensity was comparable to that of cells treated with only PCSK9, indicating that PBR prevents the binding of PCSK9-LDLR in live cells and restores LDL uptake. Furthermore, PBR exhibited significantly lower affinity than did PCSK9-targeting monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), such as evolocumab (KD = 16 pM) [65].

Sattari et al. employed capillary electrophoresis evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (CE-SELEX) to separate and select aptamers with high affinity for PCSK9. Initially, a randomly selected ssDNA library containing sequences ranging from 1012 to 1016 was incubated with a low concentration of PCSK9 and subsequently separated using CE. The nonspecific and unbound ssDNA sequences were isolated, while the specific bound ssDNA sequences were retained. The selected precise and bonded sequences were then subjected to PCR amplification. In this study, three rounds of CE-SELEX screening were performed to identify specific aptamers that exhibit strong binding affinity for the PCSK9 protein. Aptamers-1 (AP-1) and − 2 (AP-2) displayed greater thermodynamic stability in their structures than did the other eight aptamers. AP-1 exhibited the greatest binding affinity for PCSK9, with a KD of 294 nM and an exceptionally low IC50 of 325 nM. Similarly, AP-2 demonstrated KD and IC50 values of 323 nM and 327 nM, respectively [66].

Efforts have been made to expand the functional diversity of nucleic acids, either through alterations in the sugar-phosphate backbone or modified nucleobases. One strategy involves introducing an additional base pair with a distinctive hydrogen bonding arrangement to the four-element genetic code [69, 70]. Recent advancements in directed evolution or enzyme engineering techniques have led to the discovery of new polymerases that can generate artificial genetic polymers or xeno nucleic acids with different backbone chemistries not found in natural nucleic acids [71]. These and other ribose modifications, such as L-enantiomer RNA (L-RNA) [72], locked nucleic acids (LNAs) [73], and 2’-amino, 2’-fluoro, and 2’-O-methyl modifications [74, 75], have gained significant attention and application due to their increased resistance to nuclease degradation. Gawande et al. investigated the advantages of enhancing physicochemical diversity by selecting modified DNA aptamers with modifications resembling amino acid side chain changes on both pyrimidine bases for targeting PCSK9 [61]. They explored specific pairs of modifications that could enhance the specificity, blocking efficacy, and metabolic stability of aptamers compared to those with only a single modification. Two modifications were tested on deoxycytidine (dC), namely, Pp and Nap, with unmodified dC serving as a control. Additionally, five alterations were made to deoxyuridine (dU), including Thr, Pp, Moe, Nap, and Tyr, with the original dT serving as a control. A range of hydrophobic aromatic side chains on dC and dU, which are among the most significant single modifications of deoxyuridine, as well as stronger hydrophilic side chains on dU, were tested to identify the optimal combinations for selecting high-affinity ligands. The libraries with two alterations, particularly a hydrophobic modification on dC combined with Tyr-dU (Pp-dC/Tyr-dU and Nap-dC/Tyr-dU), yielded the most promising affinity ligands. Furthermore, the use of a slow off-rate modified aptamer (SOMAmer) with two modifications resulted in improved epitope coverage. The authors evaluated the limits of quantification, precision, accuracy, and linear relationship of plasma dilution to establish a SOMAmer sandwich assay for determining plasma PCSK9 concentrations in human clinical samples. They also determined the plasma concentrations of PCSK9 in clinical specimens and assessed the levels of PCSK9 in HepG2 cells overexpressing PCSK9 in cell-free supernatants. From the Pp-dC/Nap-dU library, an aptamer named SL1063 was discovered that inhibited the entry of fluorescent-tagged LDL into human PCSK9 wild-type and D374Y mutant cells. SL1063 exhibited strong affinity for PCSK9 in rhesus monkeys, mice, and rats. In a fluorescent-tagged LDL uptake reversal assay, this aptamer prevented PCSK9 activity and preserved LDL-R integrity in HepG2 cells treated with wild-type PCSK9. Furthermore, it increased LDL-R expression in a concentration-dependent manner [61].

Ample evidence has demonstrated that PCSK9 can elevate plasma LDL-C levels, contributing to the progression and development of atherosclerosis. Studies have revealed that increased levels of PCSK9 are associated with a greater fraction of necrotic cores in coronary atherosclerosis, independent of LDL-C variation [76]. Furthermore, the measurement of PCSK9 levels has shown promise as a prognostic biomarker for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The baseline serum PCSK9 concentration has been shown to predict the incidence of ASCVD events over a 15-year follow-up period [77]. Additionally, PCSK9 levels have proven to be accurate in predicting acute coronary syndrome (ACS) at a 24-month follow-up in patients with severe carotid artery atherosclerosis undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Specifically, PCSK9 concentrations greater than 431.3 ng/mL have been correlated with a greater risk of ACS occurrence [78]. In patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), baseline PCSK9 levels during a 28.4-month follow-up were associated with MACE and mortality [79]. Consistent with this evidence, among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing PCI, those with high PCSK9 levels and diabetes mellitus exhibited the lowest cumulative event-free survival rate [80].

Therefore, the development of accurate methods to detect serum PCSK9 is crucial for monitoring and diagnosing cardiovascular diseases. Advances in biosensor technology have enabled the detection of diseases and tracking of the body’s response to treatment. Notably, nanobiosensors based on aptamers are being extensively investigated as potent analytical tools in clinical analysis [81]. These biosensors offer high sensitivity, rapid response, specificity, portability, simplicity, and reduced cost compared to conventional methods for detecting PCSK9. The use of nanomaterials in the development of aptamer-based biosensors has greatly facilitated the discovery of important and versatile diagnostic devices. Due to their small size, ease of use, nontoxicity, and disposability, aptamer-based biosensors are particularly appealing for clinical analysis [82,83,84,85].

Steffen et al. utilized a DNA aptamer-based array to measure the plasma concentrations of various proteins, including PCSK9, in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study [83]. In another study, Lynch et al. employed an aptamer-based proteomic method to assess plasma proteins, including PCSK9, in newborns at risk of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). They discovered a correlation between clinically severe ROP and plasma PCSK9 levels [84].

Gupta et al. employed magnetic beads along with a biotinylated 56-mer anti-PCSK9 aptamer and a monoclonal antibody to accurately measure the concentration of PCSK9 in plasma. The anti-PCSK9 aptamer was chemically modified with nucleotides (NapdU) that mimic amino acid side chains, leading to enhanced and more specific interactions between nucleic acids and proteins. This modified anti-PCSK9 aptamer was developed as an affinity capture tool for an immunoaffinity-liquid chromatography‒mass spectrometry (IA-LC‒MS) system. A comparative analysis was conducted to assess the effectiveness of the anti-PCSK9 aptamer in comparison to that of a PCSK9 mAb for IA-LC‒MS. Equivalent concentrations of the aptamer and antibody were utilized, and efforts were made to maintain similar sample preparation workflows for both techniques. It was found that comparable molar concentrations of the anti-PCSK9 aptamer were needed to achieve recovery rates similar to those of the monoclonal antibody, underscoring the usefulness of the aptamer reagent in IA-LC‒MS. Notably, due to the use of aptamers consisting of nucleotides rather than amino acids, the trypsin digestion of the eluent resulted in significantly fewer peptides in the LC chromatogram background following immunoaffinity enrichment with the aptamer compared to the mAb [85].

Conclusion and future perspectives

Inhibition of the PCSK9-LDLR interaction offers a potential approach to mitigate LDLR degradation and reduce plasma LDL-C concentrations. Over the past decade, therapeutic methods utilizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to block the PCSK9-LDLR interaction have been established [41]. However, mAbs have high manufacturing costs due to their large size. Moreover, the use of small interfering RNA or antisense oligonucleotides or the introduction of loss-of-function mutations into the PCSK9 gene through genome editing using the CRISPR/CRISPR-associated protein has certain limitations, including potential off-target effects and the risk of inducing immunity due to the use of a viral vector as a delivery vehicle [67].

Potentially, an alternative approach to these methods involves suppressing the PCSK9-LDLR interaction using RNA aptamers [55, 86]. However, the effectiveness of RNA aptamers may be impacted by nuclease-mediated degradation and renal filtration. Renal filtration can be minimized through a process called PEGylation, which has been utilized in the clinical use of the anti-VEGF RNA aptamer pegaptanib. To protect RNA aptamers from nuclease breakdown, various artificial chemical modifications, such as altering the sugar, base, and phosphate with substances such as 2’-deoxy-2’-fluoro, phosphorothioate, locked nucleic acid, and 3’ and 5’-terminal capping, can be employed [87, 88]. For instance, chemically modifying the sugar of an RNA aptamer with 2’-deoxy-2’-fluoropyrimidine extends its half-life in serum-containing conditions compared to the unmodified aptamer.

Compared with the discovered aptamers, PCSK9-targeting mAbs such as evolocumab exhibit significantly greater affinity. Affinity maturation, a technique commonly used in in vitro selection, can be employed to modify the sequence of aptamers and enhance their effectiveness as antagonists. By combining natural four-base elements with artificial base pairs that are functional during in vitro selection, high-affinity PCSK9-binding RNA aptamers can be developed. Additionally, the use of unnatural bases enables the identification of DNA aptamers with remarkably high affinity for PCSK9 [65, 66]. Aptamers have also been employed as research reagents in protein analysis methods such as flow cytometry, immunoprecipitation, and immunofluorescence. For example, in a mass spectrometry and immunoprecipitation study, an anti-PCSK9 DNA aptamer demonstrated an equivalent detection capability to that of an antibody [67].

The chemical diversity of DNA and RNA aptamers is considerably lower than that of protein-based ligands, which limits their adaptability. Although the addition of unique functional groups to a single base in improved aptamers has significantly improved the success rate of finding nucleic acid ligands for protein targets, the limited chemical diversity of nucleic acid libraries poses challenges in utilizing aptamers for research, diagnosis, and treatment. Natural nucleic acids have fewer building blocks (four bases compared to 20 amino acids) and a polyanionic backbone with more hydrophilic character than protein-based ligands such as antibodies. Moreover, they have a narrow range of functional groups available for target recognition. However, the extensive number of random libraries available for screening partially compensates for this limitation.

Additionally, libraries with two modified nucleotides had a greater number of altered nucleotides, which facilitated the truncation of sequences. Importantly, this increased affinity and improved the encoding of binding domains without compromising specificity. Libraries with two modified nucleotides offer enhanced epitope coverage by identifying ligands that cross-react with PCSK9 from different species and exhibit higher frequency and performance in sandwich pairs [61]. These properties, including specificity, ligand efficiency, high affinity, and species cross-reactivity, are highly desirable for therapeutic development.

To meet the growing demand for medical purposes, further advancements are required in diagnostic tests. The aptamer-based approach holds the potential to become a valuable tool for disease diagnosis, biosensors, and treatment strategies, enabling us to tackle challenges that conventional technologies struggle with. The stability of aptamers in blood and other biological fluids after administration is crucial for their clinical effectiveness. Additionally, the limited ability of aptamers to accumulate intracellularly near the target site restricts their general usage. While aptamers have demonstrated success in in vitro settings, their application in human systems requires careful consideration. Encapsulating aptamers is one approach to protect them from nuclease activity in biological fluids. A reduction in LDL-C is fundamental for the prevention of atherosclerosis and CVD. PCSK9 is a therapeutic target for this purpose, and aptamers may constitute an alternative to available therapies; however, further efforts are still needed to prove this feasibility.

Availability of data and materials

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Zhang L, McCabe T, Condra JH, Ni YG, Peterson LB, Wang W, et al. An anti-PCSK9 antibody reduces LDL-cholesterol on top of a statin and suppresses hepatocyte SREBP-regulated genes. Int J Biol Sci. 2012;8(3):310–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Duff CJ, Scott MJ, Kirby IT, Hutchinson SE, Martin SL, Hooper NM. Antibody-mediated disruption of the interaction between PCSK9 and the low-density lipoprotein receptor. Biochem J. 2009;419(3):577–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Trinder M, Li X, DeCastro Maria L, Cermakova L, Sadananda S, Jackson Linda M, et al. Risk of premature atherosclerotic disease in patients with monogenic Versus Polygenic Familial Hypercholesterolemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(4):512–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hedegaard Berit S, Bork Christian S, Kaltoft M, Klausen Ib C, Schmidt Erik B, Kamstrup Pia R, et al. Equivalent Impact of Elevated Lipoprotein(a) and familial hypercholesterolemia in patients with atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80(21):1998–2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McCormack T, Dent R, Blagden M. Very low LDL-C levels may safely provide additional clinical cardiovascular benefit: the evidence to date. Int J Clin Pract. 2016;70(11):886–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Soran H, Dent R, Durrington P. Evidence-based goals in LDL-C reduction. Clin Res Cardiol. 2017;106(4):237–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Banach M, Reiner Z, Cicero AFG, Sabouret P, Viigimaa M, Sahebkar A et al. 2022: The year in cardiovascular disease – the year of upfront lipid lowering combination therapy. Archives of Medical Science. 2022;18(6):1429–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bahrami A, Bo S, Jamialahmadi T, Sahebkar A. Effects of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors on ageing: Molecular mechanisms. Ageing Res Rev. 2020;58:101024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bland AR, Payne FM, Ashton JC, Jamialahmadi T, Sahebkar A. The cardioprotective actions of statins in targeting mitochondrial dysfunction associated with myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Pharmacol Res. 2022;175:105986.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chruściel P, Sahebkar A, Rembek-Wieliczko M, Serban MC, Ursoniu S, Mikhailidis DP, et al. Impact of statin therapy on plasma adiponectin concentrations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 43 randomized controlled trial arms. Atherosclerosis. 2016;253:194–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gorabi AM, Kiaie N, Pirro M, Bianconi V, Jamialahmadi T, Sahebkar A. Effects of statins on the biological features of mesenchymal stem cells and therapeutic implications. Heart Fail Rev. 2021;26(5):1259–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sahebkar A, Kotani K, Serban C, Ursoniu S, Mikhailidis DP, Jones SR, et al. Statin therapy reduces plasma endothelin-1 concentrations: a meta-analysis of 15 randomized controlled trials. Atherosclerosis. 2015;241(2):433–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Serban C, Sahebkar A, Ursoniu S, Mikhailidis DP, Rizzo M, Lip GYH et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of statins on plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine concentrations. Sci Rep. 2015;9902. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sohrevardi SM, Nasab FS, Mirjalili MR, Bagherniya M, Tafti AD, Jarrahzadeh MH, et al. Effect of atorvastatin on delirium status of patients in the intensive care unit: a randomized controlled trial. Archives Med Sci. 2021;17(5):1423.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vahedian-Azimi A, Mohammadi SM, Banach M, Beni FH, Guest PC, Al-Rasadi K, et al. Improved COVID-19 Outcomes following Statin Therapy: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. BioMed Research International. 2021;2021:1901772.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sahebkar A, Chew GT, Watts GF. Recent advances in pharmacotherapy for hypertriglyceridemia. Prog Lipid Res. 2014;56(1):47–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mollazadeh H, Tavana E, Fanni G, Bo S, Banach M, Pirro M, et al. Effects of statins on mitochondrial pathways. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021;12(2):237–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Chamani S, Liberale L, Mobasheri L, Montecucco F, Al-Rasadi K, Jamialahmadi T et al. The role of statins in the differentiation and function of bone cells. Eur J Clin Invest. 2021;51(7).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bahrami A, Parsamanesh N, Atkin SL, Banach M, Sahebkar A. Effect of statins on toll-like receptors: a new insight to pleiotropic effects. Pharmacol Res. 2018;135:230–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ferretti G, Bacchetti T, Sahebkar A. Effect of statin therapy on paraoxonase-1 status: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 25 clinical trials. Prog Lipid Res. 2015;60:50–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kandelouei T, Abbasifard M, Imani D, Aslani S, Razi B, Fasihi M, et al. Effect of Statins on Serum level of hs-CRP and CRP in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Mediators Inflamm. 2022;2022:8732360.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Parizadeh SMR, Azarpazhooh MR, Moohebati M, Nematy M, Ghayour-Mobarhan M, Tavallaie S, et al. Simvastatin therapy reduces prooxidant-antioxidant balance: results of a placebo-controlled cross-over trial. Lipids. 2011;46(4):333–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kouhpeikar H, Delbari Z, Sathyapalan T, Simental-Mendía LE, Jamialahmadi T, Sahebkar A. The Effect of Statins through Mast Cells in the Pathophysiology of Atherosclerosis: a Review. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2020;22(5):19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sahebkar A, Kiaie N, Gorabi AM, Mannarino MR, Bainaconi V, Jamialahmadi T, et al. A comprehensive review on the lipid and pleiotropic effects of pitavastatin. Prog Lipid Res. 2021;84:101127.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Laufs U, Banach M, Mancini GBJ, Gaudet D, Bloedon LT, Sterling LR, et al. Efficacy and safety of Bempedoic Acid in patients with hypercholesterolemia and statin intolerance. J Am Heart Association. 2019;8(7):e011662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bytyçi I, Penson PE, Mikhailidis DP, Wong ND, Hernandez AV, Sahebkar A, et al. Prevalence of statin intolerance: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(34):3213–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Sahebkar A, Watts GF. New LDL-cholesterol lowering therapies: Pharmacology, clinical trials, and relevance to acute coronary syndromes. Clin Ther. 2013;35(8):1082–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sahebkar A, Watts GF. New therapies targeting apoB metabolism for high-risk patients with inherited dyslipidaemias: what can the clinician expect? Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2013;27(6):559–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kosmas CE, Pantou D, Sourlas A, Papakonstantinou EJ, Echavarria Uceta R, Guzman E. New and emerging lipid-modifying drugs to lower LDL cholesterol. Drugs Context. 2021;10:2021-8-3.

  30. Michaeli DT, Michaeli JC, Albers S, Boch T, Michaeli T. Established and emerging lipid-lowering drugs for primary and secondary Cardiovascular Prevention. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2023;23(5):477–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Pang J, Chan DC, Watts GF. The knowns and unknowns of Contemporary Statin Therapy for Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2020;22(11):64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Brandts J, Dharmayat KI, Vallejo-Vaz AJ, Azar Sharabiani MT, Jones R, Kastelein JJP, et al. A meta-analysis of medications directed against PCSK9 in familial hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis. 2021;325:46–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hasan MM, Laws M, Jin P, Rahman KM. Factors influencing the choice of monoclonal antibodies for antibody–drug conjugates. Drug Discovery Today. 2022;27(1):354–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Guo Y, Yan B, Gui Y, Tang Z, Tai S, Zhou S, et al. Physiology and role of PCSK9 in vascular disease: potential impact of localized PCSK9 in vascular wall. J Cell Physiol. 2021;236(4):2333–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Horton JD, Cohen JC, Hobbs HH. Molecular biology of PCSK9: its role in LDL metabolism. Trends Biochem Sci. 2007;32(2):71–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Barale C, Melchionda E, Morotti A, Russo I. PCSK9 Biology and Its Role in Atherothrombosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(11):5880.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Tombling BJ, Zhang Y, Huang Y-H, Craik DJ, Wang CK. The emerging landscape of peptide-based inhibitors of PCSK9. Atherosclerosis. 2021;330:52–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bell AS, Wagner J, Rosoff DB, Lohoff FW. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) in the central nervous system. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023;149:105155.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sener YZ, Tokgozoglu L. Pleiotropy of PCSK9: functions in extrahepatic tissues. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023;25(9):979–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Momtazi-Borojeni AA, Sabouri-Rad S, Gotto AM, Pirro M, Banach M, Awan Z, et al. PCSK9 and inflammation: a review of experimental and clinical evidence. Eur Heart J - Cardiovasc Pharmacotherapy. 2019;5(4):237–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Liu C, Chen J, Chen H, Zhang T, He D, Luo Q, et al. PCSK9 inhibition: from current advances to Evolving Future. Cells. 2022;11(19):2972.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Abifadel M, Varret M, Rabès J-P, Allard D, Ouguerram K, Devillers M, et al. Mutations in PCSK9 cause autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia. Nat Genet. 2003;34(2):154–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sun XM, Eden ER, Tosi I, Neuwirth CK, Wile D, Naoumova RP, et al. Evidence for effect of mutant PCSK9 on apolipoprotein B secretion as the cause of unusually severe dominant hypercholesterolaemia. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14(9):1161–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hu P, Dharmayat KI, Stevens CAT, Sharabiani MTA, Jones RS, Watts GF, et al. Prevalence of familial hypercholesterolemia among the General Population and patients with atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Circulation. 2020;141(22):1742–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Santos RD, Stein EA, Hovingh GK, Blom DJ, Soran H, Watts GF, et al. Long-term evolocumab in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(6):565–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Santos RD, Ruzza A, Hovingh GK, Wiegman A, Mach F, Kurtz CE, et al. Evolocumab in Pediatric heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(14):1317–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Santos RD, Rocha VZ. Cholesterol lowering with inclisiran: a new chapter in the PCSK9 story book. Eur Heart J. 2022;44(2):139–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Momtazi AA, Banach M, Pirro M, Katsiki N, Sahebkar A. Regulation of PCSK9 by nutraceuticals. Pharmacol Res. 2017;120:157–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Jia W, Lu Z, Yang H, Li H, Xu D. Elimination terminal fixed region screening and high-throughput kinetic determination of aptamer for lipocalin-1 by surface plasmon resonance imaging. Anal Chim Acta. 2018;1043:158–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Jia W, Wang Z, Lu Z, Ding B, Li Z, Xu D. The discovery of lactoferrin dual aptamers through surface plasmon resonance imaging combined with a bioinformation analysis. Analyst. 2020;145(19):6298–306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Li L, Xu S, Yan H, Li X, Yazd HS, Li X, et al. Nucleic acid aptamers for Molecular Diagnostics and therapeutics: advances and perspectives. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2021;60(5):2221–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Mironov GG, Bouzekri A, Watson J, Loboda O, Ornatsky O, Berezovski MV. Aptamer-facilitated mass cytometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018;410(13):3047–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Meyer M, Scheper T, Walter J-G. Aptamers: versatile probes for flow cytometry. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97(16):7097–109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Levy-Nissenbaum E, Radovic-Moreno AF, Wang AZ, Langer R, Farokhzad OC. Nanotechnology and aptamers: applications in drug delivery. Trends Biotechnol. 2008;26(8):442–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Keefe AD, Pai S, Ellington A. Aptamers as therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2010;9(7):537–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Liu M, Wang L, Lo Y, Shiu SC-C, Kinghorn AB, Tanner JA. Aptamer-enabled nanomaterials for therapeutics, Drug Targeting and Imaging. Cells. 2022;11(1):159.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Aljohani MM, Cialla-May D, Popp J, Chinnappan R, Al-Kattan K, Zourob M. Aptamers: potential Diagnostic and Therapeutic agents for Blood diseases. Molecules. 2022;27(2):383.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Moosavian SA, Sahebkar A. Aptamer-functionalized liposomes for targeted cancer therapy. Cancer Lett. 2019;448:144–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Esawi E, Nsairat H, Mahmoud IS, Lafi Z, Al-Kadash A, Al-Ragheb BA, et al. In: Kesharwani P, editor. 20 - clinical use and future perspective of aptamers. Aptamers engineered nanocarriers for cancer therapy. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2023. p. 481–520.

  60. Nimjee SM, Sullenger BA. Therapeutic aptamers: evolving to find their clinical niche. Curr Med Chem. 2020;27(25):4181–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Gawande BN, Rohloff JC, Carter JD, von Carlowitz I, Zhang C, Schneider DJ, et al. Selection of DNA aptamers with two modified bases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(11):2898–903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Gordón J, Arruza L, Ibáñez MD, Moreno-Guzmán M, López M, Escarpa A. On the move-sensitive fluorescent aptassay on Board Catalytic micromotors for the determination of Interleukin-6 in Ultra-low serum volumes for neonatal Sepsis Diagnostics. ACS Sens. 2022;7(10):3144–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Orozco J, Campuzano S, Kagan D, Zhou M, Gao W, Wang J. Dynamic isolation and unloading of target proteins by aptamer-modified microtransporters. Anal Chem. 2011;83(20):7962–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Kaur H, Bruno JG, Kumar A, Sharma TK. Aptamers in the therapeutics and Diagnostics Pipelines. Theranostics. 2018;8(15):4016–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Ando T, Yamamoto M, Yokoyama T, Horiuchi D, Kawakami T. Vitro selection generates RNA aptamer that antagonizes PCSK9-LDLR interaction and recovers cellular LDL uptake. J Biosci Bioeng. 2021;131(3):326–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Sattari R, Palizban A, Khanahmad H, Single-Strand DNA-L. Oligonucleotide Aptamer against Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin 9 using CE-SELEX: PCSK9 targeting selection. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2020;34(4):475–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Katzmann JL, Cupido AJ, Laufs U. Gene Therapy Targeting PCSK9. Metabolites. 2022;12(1).

  68. Razlansari M, Jafarinejad S, Rahdar A, Shirvaliloo M, Arshad R, Fathi-Karkan S, et al. Development and classification of RNA aptamers for therapeutic purposes: an updated review with emphasis on cancer. Mol Cell Biochem. 2023;478(7):1573–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Sefah K, Yang Z, Bradley KM, Hoshika S, Jiménez E, Zhang L, et al. In vitro selection with artificial expanded genetic information systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(4):1449–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Kimoto M, Yamashige R, Matsunaga K, Yokoyama S, Hirao I. Generation of high-affinity DNA aptamers using an expanded genetic alphabet. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(5):453–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Pinheiro VB, Taylor AI, Cozens C, Abramov M, Renders M, Zhang S, et al. Synthetic genetic polymers capable of heredity and evolution. Science. 2012;336(6079):341–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Olea C Jr., Weidmann J, Dawson PE, Joyce GF. An L-RNA aptamer that binds and inhibits RNase. Chem Biol. 2015;22(11):1437–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Crouzier L, Dubois C, Edwards SL, Lauridsen LH, Wengel J, Veedu RN. Efficient reverse transcription using locked nucleic acid nucleotides towards the evolution of nuclease resistant RNA aptamers. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(4):e35990.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Chen T, Hongdilokkul N, Liu Z, Adhikary R, Tsuen SS, Romesberg FE. Evolution of thermophilic DNA polymerases for the recognition and amplification of C2’-modified DNA. Nat Chem. 2016;8(6):556–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Rohloff JC, Gelinas AD, Jarvis TC, Ochsner UA, Schneider DJ, Gold L, et al. Nucleic acid ligands with protein-like side chains: modified aptamers and their Use as Diagnostic and Therapeutic agents. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2014;3(10):e201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Cheng JM, Oemrawsingh RM, Garcia-Garcia HM, Boersma E, van Geuns R-J, Serruys PW, et al. PCSK9 in relation to coronary plaque inflammation: results of the ATHEROREMO-IVUS study. Atherosclerosis. 2016;248:117–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Leander K, Mälarstig A, van’t Hooft FM, Hyde C, Hellénius M-L, Troutt JS, et al. Circulating proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) predicts future risk of cardiovascular events independently of established risk factors. Circulation. 2016;133(13):1230–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Liberale L, Carbone F, Bertolotto M, Bonaventura A, Vecchié A, Mach F, et al. Serum PCSK9 levels predict the occurrence of acute coronary syndromes in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis. Int J Cardiol. 2018;263:138–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Choi IJ, Lim S, Lee D, Lee WJ, Lee KY, Kim M-J, et al. Relation of proprotein convertase subtilisin/Kexin type 9 to cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2020;133:54–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Song L, Zhao X, Chen R, Li J, Zhou J, Liu C, et al. Association of PCSK9 with inflammation and platelet activation markers and recurrent cardiovascular risks in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI with or without diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21(1):80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Hong P, Li W, Li J. Applications of aptasensors in clinical diagnostics. Sens (Basel). 2012;12(2):1181–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Hanif A, Farooq R, Rehman MU, Khan R, Majid S, Ganaie MA. Aptamer based nanobiosensors: promising healthcare devices. Saudi Pharm J. 2019;27(3):312–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Steffen BT, Pankow JS, Norby FL, Lutsey PL, Demmer RT, Guan W, et al. Proteomics Analysis of Genetic Liability of abdominal aortic aneurysm identifies plasma neogenin and kit ligand: the ARIC Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2023;43(2):367–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Lynch AM, Wagner BD, Mandava N, Palestine AG, Mourani PM, McCourt EA, et al. The relationship of Novel plasma proteins in the early neonatal period with retinopathy of Prematurity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(11):5076–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Gupta V, Lassman ME, McAvoy T, Lee AY, Chappell DL, Laterza OF. An evaluation of an aptamer for use as an affinity reagent with MS: PCSK9 as an example protein. Bioanalysis. 2016;8(15):1557–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Flamme M, McKenzie LK, Sarac I, Hollenstein M. Chemical methods for the modification of RNA. Methods. 2019;161:64–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Meyer C, Berg K, Eydeler-Haeder K, Lorenzen I, Grötzinger J, Rose-John S, et al. Stabilized Interleukin-6 receptor binding RNA aptamers. RNA Biol. 2014;11(1):57–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Wilson C, Keefe AD. Building oligonucleotide therapeutics using non-natural chemistries. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2006;10(6):607–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biotechnology Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

    Maryam Mahjoubin-Tehran & Amirhossein Sahebkar

  2. Department of Medical Biotechnology and Nanotechnology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

    Samaneh Rezaei

  3. Lipid Clinic Heart Institute (Incor), University of São Paulo, Medical School Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil

    Raul D. Santos

  4. Pharmaceutical Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

    Tannaz Jamialahmadi

  5. Medical Toxicology Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

    Tannaz Jamialahmadi

  6. Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

    Wael Almahmeed

  7. Applied Biomedical Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

    Amirhossein Sahebkar

Authors
  1. Maryam Mahjoubin-Tehran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Samaneh Rezaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Raul D. Santos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tannaz Jamialahmadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wael Almahmeed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Amirhossein Sahebkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: AS Writing-original draft: MMT Writing-review and editing: SR, RDS, TJ, WA, AS Approval of the final version: All authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amirhossein Sahebkar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahjoubin-Tehran, M., Rezaei, S., Santos, R.D. et al. Targeting PCSK9 as a key player in lipid metabolism: exploiting the therapeutic and biosensing potential of aptamers. Lipids Health Dis 23, 156 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-024-02151-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-024-02151-8

Keywords

Lipids in Health and Disease

ISSN: 1476-511X