Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

LDLR c.89_92dup: a novel frameshift variation in familial hypercholesterolemia

Lipids in Health and Disease volume 23, Article number: 182 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common inherited metabolic disease that causes premature atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease, and even death at a young age. Approximately 95% of FH-causing genetic variants that have been identified are in the LDLR gene. However, only 10% of the FH population worldwide has been diagnosed and adequately treated, due to the existence of numerous unidentified variants, uncertainties in the pathogenicity scoring of many variants, and a substantial number of individuals lacking access to genetic testing.

Objective

The aim of this study was to identify a novel variant in the LDLR gene that causes FH in a Chinese family, thereby expanding the spectrum of FH-causing variants.

Methods

Patients were recruited from Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University. FH diagnosis was made according to the Dutch Lipid Clinical Network (DLCN) criteria. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was conducted to identify the FH-causing variant in the proband, and amplicon sequencing was used to verify the variant in his family members.

Results

A three-generation Chinese family was recruited, and two FH patients were clinically diagnosed, both without known FH-causing variants. These two FH patients and another possible patient carried a novel variant, NC_000019.9(NM_000527.5):c.89_92dup (NP_000518.1:p.Phe32Argfs*21), in the ligand-binding domain of the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor that led to a frameshift. The FH adults in the family showed severe clinical symptoms and statin therapy resistance.

Conclusion

This study identified a novel pathogenic LDLR variant, c.89_92dup, associated with severe FH clinical manifestations and statin therapy resistance.

Background

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant metabolic disorder that is characterized by high serum levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol [1]. The prevalence of FH is approximately 1 in 250 ~ 500 worldwide [2, 3], which is higher than that of most other inherited diseases. In patients carrying heterozygous variants, serum LDL cholesterol levels are typically above 5.0 mmol/L, which is 2 times greater than those in unaffected individuals within the same family [4]. In patients carrying homozygous variants, serum LDL cholesterol levels frequently exceed 13.0 mmol/L [5]. Long-term hypercholesterolemia can manifest as tendon xanthomas and arcus cornealis [1]. When left untreated, FH patients often suffer from premature atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and even death at a very young age [6, 7]. In China, individuals with FH have a 15-fold increased risk of developing CVD compared to those without FH [8].

Known FH-causing variants are found in several genes that are associated with the removal of LDL particles from the circulation by hepatocytes, such as LDL receptor (LDLR, > 95%), apolipoprotein B (APOB, 2–11%), and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9, < 1%) [1, 9]. The LDLR gene is located at 19p13.2 and comprises 18 exons spanning 45 kilobases (kb). It encodes an 860 amino acid protein that consists of five functional domains, including a ligand-binding domain, an epidermal growth factor (EGF) precursor homology domain, an O-linked polysaccharide domain, a transmembrane domain, and an intracellular domain [10]. According to the statistical data from the ClinVar database [11] (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/), more than 40% of FH-causing variants are located in the EGF precursor homology domain, which impairs lipoprotein release and receptor recycling [12]. Another 40% of variants are located in the ligand-binding domain and therefore influence the binding of lipoproteins to LDL and VLDL (very low-density lipoprotein) [13]. No more than 20% of variants are scattered across the other three domains and introns [14].

According to the Familial Hypercholesterolemia Foundation and the World Heart Federation, only 10% of the FH population has been diagnosed and adequately treated [15]. Diagnoses are missed partially due to the existence of numerous unidentified variants, uncertainties in the pathogenicity scoring of many variants, and a substantial number of individuals lacking access to genetic testing. In this study, a three-generation Chinese FH family was diagnosed using the Dutch Lipid Clinical Network (DLCN) criteria [16]. A novel frameshift variant, c.89_92dup, was identified in the ligand-binding domain of the LDLR protein via whole-exome sequencing (WES). This variant broadens the spectrum of FH-causing variants, facilitating the diagnosis of individuals with FH.

Materials and methods

Study subjects

The subjects were recruited from an FH cohort at Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University. The proband was hospitalized and clinically diagnosed with FH according to the DLCN diagnostic criteria. Then, cascade screening was conducted for his family members. Six participants were included in the study, and all the subjects underwent a detailed physical examination. This study has been granted approval by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Anzhen Hospital (2022038X). All participants willingly took part in the research and provided their signatures on informed consent forms.

Isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)

Peripheral blood was collected from the proband and his family members into Vacutainer tubes containing EDTA-2 K and processed for PBMC isolation in a short time. Following plasma extraction by centrifugation (2000 rpm, 10 min), the precipitate was resuspended in an equal volume of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The sample was then layered onto Ficoll-Paque (GE Healthcare, Marlborough, MA, USA) and subsequently processed in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA was extracted from approximately 1 × 106 PBMCs for genetic analysis.

Biochemical analysis

A Roche COBAS 701 analyzer was used to assess the serum total cholesterol (TC), total triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, small dense LDL cholesterol, lipoprotein (a), apolipoprotein A1, and apolipoprotein B levels. The LDL cholesterol level was measured using a direct assay (LDL-Cholesterol Gen.3 (LDLC3), Roche Diagnostics).

WES library preparation and sequencing

A Qiagen DNeasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used to extract genomic DNA from the peripheral blood cells of the proband. After sonication, the DNA fragments were subjected to end repair and were supplemented with adapters at both ends. Following library amplification, the fragments were captured and enriched using an exon array. After washing to remove the nonenriched fragments, the remaining DNA was amplified and subjected to whole-exome sequencing using the Illumina HiSeq 3000 platform in paired-end sequencing mode (analysis performed by the Guangzhou KingMed Center for Clinical Laboratory).

The raw reads were mapped to the reference human genome (hg19) using Bowtie2 [17]. After filtering low-quality nucleotides (quality < 30) and reads with lengths less than 18 bp by Trimmomatic [18], the qualified reads were further processed with SAMtools to call SNPs using mpileup [19]. SNPs detected on all known genes were annotated with ANNOVAR software [20].

Amplicon sequencing

Primers I and II were designed according to the LDLR sequence in the GenBank nucleotide sequence database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide/) and had the following sequences: Primer I, 5′- TTTATTAATGTGCATGGAAGTTCT-3′; and Primer II, 5′- AGACCAGAAATTCAAGACCAGC-3′. With polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology, amplicons containing the variant were amplified from equal amounts of DNA samples. Sanger sequencing was employed to validate the identified variant in other members of the family. Amino acid conservation near the variant position was examined using MEGA 11.0 software.

Open reading frame prediction of the LDLR variant

The NCBI ORF Finder (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/orffinder) was used to identify changes in the open reading frame (ORF) for the NM_000527.5 sequence with the c.89_92dup variant.

Results

Clinical characteristics of the FH family

The proband was a 32-year-old man who was hospitalized for “unstable angina” and clinically diagnosed with FH according to the DLCN criteria (Table 1). The patient showed severe clinical symptoms of FH, including arcus cornealis and tendon xanthoma (Fig. 1). Coronary angiography revealed triple-vessel disease involving the right coronary artery (RCA), left circumflex artery (LCX), and left anterior descending artery (LAD), with complete occlusion in the distal segment of the circumflex artery. The patient was insensitive to statin therapy. Before treatment, his LDL cholesterol level reached 8.12 mmol/L. After two years of treatment with 20 mg atorvastatin plus 10 mg ezetimibe, his LDL cholesterol level remained high at 6.92 mmol/L. Furthermore, he suffered an acute myocardial infarction while on the lipid-lowering regimen. Fortunately, the patient responded well to a PCSK9 inhibitor. After one month of treatment with evinacumab (140 mg every 2 weeks), his LDL cholesterol level decreased to 0.85 mmol/L.

Upon investigation of the proband’s family history, it was discovered that his father (I.1) also met the clinical criteria for FH (Table 1), with an untreated LDL cholesterol level of 6.75 mmol/L. In his forties and again in his fifties, the father underwent arterial stent implantation for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The elder daughter (III.1) of the proband was seven years old and exhibited significantly higher levels of LDL cholesterol (4.29 mmol/L). Neither the proband’s mother (I.2) nor the younger daughter (III.2) exhibited FH-related clinical symptoms. Table 2 shows the family’s lipid profile and clinical manifestations.

Table 1 DLCN scores of participants in the studied family
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Clinical manifestations of the proband. Physical examination revealed corneal arcus (A) and tendon xanthomas (B) in the proband

Full size image
Table 2 Clinical characteristics of the proband and his family members
Full size table

Variant identification in the FH family

In the proband (II.1), a novel variant, c.89_92dup, was identified in exon 2 of the LDLR gene by WES (Fig. 2A). No variants were identified in other FH-causing genes or other exons of the LDLR gene. This duplication variant was located in a phylogenetically conserved region of the ligand-binding domain (Fig. 2B) and produced a frameshift in the coding sequence. The frameshift ORF included an arginine amino acid variant at the 32nd position, which replaced the wild-type phenylalanine, and translation terminated at the 52nd amino acid (Fig. 2C). By predicting potential ORFs longer than 50 codons in the LDLR variant, four other ORFs were discovered to include novel translation start codons (TSCs, Fig. 2C). The longest predicted protein was truncated at the 263rd amino acid and lacked the first five repeats and a portion of the sixth repeat of the ligand-binding domain of LDLR.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Confirmation of the c.89_92dup frameshift variant of LDLR. (A) Sequence chromatogram showing the c.89_92dup variant of LDLR in the proband. The variant was numbered according to GenBank NM_000527.5. (B) Alignment of mammalian LDLR proteins showing that the regions around the variant are highly conserved. The position of the variant is marked by a black triangle. (C) Model showing five domains in the structure of the human LDLR protein. The blue rectangles display the results of ORF prediction. The red arrow indicates the location of the variant carried by the proband

Full size image

Variant segregation analysis

Amplicon sequencing confirmed that the c.89_92dup variant was carried by the proband’s father (I.1) and elder daughter (III.1), while the proband’s mother (I.2) and younger daughter (III.2) had the wild-type LDLR gene. Figure 3 displays the pedigree of this FH family, showing that dyslipidaemia was correlated with the segregation arrangement of the frameshift LDLR variant (Table 1). Therefore, the c.89_92dup variant was determined to be the pathogenic variant for this FH family.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Pedigree of the family showing the segregation of the LDLR variant: ex2: c.89_92dup: p.(Phe32fs).The arrow indicates the proband; circle and square symbols represent women and men, respectively

Full size image

Discussion

This study reported a family in which the proband and his father were clinically diagnosed with FH according to the DLCN criteria, and the proband’s elder daughter exhibited significantly higher levels of LDL cholesterol than her contemporaries. WES and amplicon sequencing confirmed that these three patients were found to carry the same variant, c.89_92dup, which was consistent with autosomal dominant inheritance. This duplication variant was situated within the ligand-binding domain of LDLR, which consists of seven repeats of 40 residues each and contains the binding sites for apoproteins B-100 (apoB-100) and E (apoE) [21, 22]. These apoproteins are essential components of LDL and VLDL particles. Since this frameshift variant is absent from control populations (Genome Aggregation Database, 1000 Genomes Project, and Human Gene Mutation Database) [23,24,25] and segregated with a phenotype in 3 informative meiosis in the proband’s family, the c.89_92dup variant was classified as pathogenic (PVS1, PM2, PP1 and PP4) according to the ACMG guidelines [26, 27].

Five ORFs in the LDLR gene with the c.89_92dup variant were found to be longer than 50 amino acids. Among them, ORF1 had the same TSC as the wild-type LDLR transcript. This ORF potentially encoded a truncated protein consisting of only 32 amino acids at the N-terminus of LDLR, along with 20 novel amino acids from the frameshift. Since dozens of RNA splice sites are located downstream of the premature termination codons (PTCs) in ORF1, the unremoved exon‒exon junction complexes (EJCs) binding to mRNA should trigger nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) to degrade the transcript. ORF2 was predicted to produce an N-terminal truncated protein, adopting an ATG codon at positions 794–796 of the wild-type LDLR coding sequence (CDS) as the TSC. This truncated protein lacked the first five repeats and a portion of the sixth repeat of the ligand-binding domain of LDLR. The fifth repeat is required to bind β-VLDL, and the second, third, and sixth repeats are required for maximal binding of LDL [13]; therefore, the encoded protein produced by ORF2 lacks most of its ligand-binding functions. Additionally, the amino acid sequences encoded by the other three potential ORFs (ORF3-5) do not resemble those of the wild-type LDLR protein. In summary, although the impact of the c.89_92dup variant on LDLR protein sequence and abundance still needs to be verified, this variant may severely impair LDLR function in patients.

Consistent with the ORF analyses, patients with the c.89_92dup variant had more severe clinical symptoms. In the reported FH family, the proband and his father had LDL cholesterol levels of 8.12 mmol/L and 6.75 mmol/L, respectively. These findings were significantly greater than the median level of 5.43 mmol/L (IQR: 4.32–6.72 mmol/L) observed in adults with heterozygous FH who did not use lipid-lowering medications [4]. In addition, the proband suffered an acute myocardial infarction at the early age of 32, while his father had a myocardial infarction in his forties and a recurrent episode of ACS at the age of 55. Both patients met the diagnostic criteria for severe FH [28].

More importantly, patients with the c.89_92dup variant seemed to be insensitive to statin therapy. Here, the proband’s LDL cholesterol level decreased by only 15% after two years of treatment with 20 mg atorvastatin plus 10 mg ezetimibe. This observation further showed that the duplication variant significantly impaired LDLR function, resulting in an ineffective reduction in circulating cholesterol levels despite inhibiting cholesterol synthesis and absorption. However, the proband responded well to a PCSK9 inhibitor. When taken with statins and ezetimibe, coadministration of a PCSK9 inhibitor reduced the patient’s LDL cholesterol level by up to 90%. Because a heterozygous FH individual has the homologous wild-type LDLR gene, a PCSK9 inhibitor increases LDLR abundance on the surface of hepatocytes, thus enhancing its ability to clear LDL cholesterol [29, 30]. Therefore, PCSK9 inhibitors are recommended for lipid-lowering therapy in patients carrying the LDLR c.89_92dup variant at an early stage.

Strengths and limitations of the study

Using WES and variant segregation analysis, a frameshift variant, c.89_92dup, was identified as a novel pathogenic variant for severe FH with a poor response to statin therapy. This finding contributes to the clinical diagnosis and treatment of FH patients. Further molecular testing of the residual activity of this LDLR variant could provide valuable insights into its biological functions.

Conclusions

The current study identified a novel pathogenic LDLR variant, c.89_92dup, associated with severe FH clinical manifestations and statin therapy resistance. This study expands the spectrum of FH-causing variants and provides assistance for disease screening and individualized treatment. For optimal management, FH patients with the c.89_92dup variant should receive PCSK9 inhibitors in a timely manner.

Data availability

The variation data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in the Genome Variation Map in National Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation / Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, under accession number PRJCA023739.

Abbreviations

FH:

familial hypercholesterolemia

DLCN:

Dutch Lipid Clinical Network

LDLR:

low-density lipoprotein receptor

APOB:

apolipoprotein B

PCSK9:

proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9

WES:

whole-exome sequencing

LDL:

low-density lipoprotein

TG:

triglycerides

TC:

total cholesterol

HDL:

high-density lipoprotein

CVD:

cardiovascular disease

EGF:

epidermal growth factor

PBMCs:

peripheral blood mononuclear cells

ORF:

open reading frame

RCA:

right coronary artery

LCX:

left circumflex artery

LAD:

left anterior descending artery

ACS:

acute coronary syndrome

TSC:

translation start codon

APOE:

apolipoprotein E

PTC:

premature termination codon

EJC:

exon junction complex

NMD:

nonsense-mediated mRNA decay

CDS:

coding sequence

References

  1. Defesche JC, Gidding SS, Harada-Shiba M, Hegele RA, Santos RD, Wierzbicki AS. Familial hypercholesterolaemia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17093.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Guirguis-Blake JM, Evans CV, Coppola EL, Redmond N, Perdue LA. Screening for lipid disorders in Children and adolescents: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2023;330(3):261–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. de Ferranti SD, Rodday AM, Mendelson MM, Wong JB, Leslie LK, Sheldrick RC. Prevalence of familial hypercholesterolemia in the 1999 to 2012 United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES). Circulation. 2016;133(11):1067–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Global perspective of. Familial hypercholesterolaemia: a cross-sectional study from the EAS familial hypercholesterolaemia studies collaboration (FHSC). Lancet. 2021;398(10312):1713–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cuchel M, Bruckert E, Ginsberg HN, Raal FJ, Santos RD, Hegele RA, et al. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: new insights and guidance for clinicians to improve detection and clinical management. A position paper from the Consensus Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolaemia of the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(32):2146–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Liyanage KE, Burnett JR, Hooper AJ, van Bockxmeer FM. Familial hypercholesterolemia: epidemiology, neolithic origins and modern geographic distribution. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2011;48(1):1–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nanchen D, Gencer B, Muller O, Auer R, Aghlmandi S, Heg D, et al. Prognosis of patients with familial Hypercholesterolemia after Acute Coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2016;134(10):698–709.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shi Z, Yuan B, Zhao D, Taylor AW, Lin J, Watts GF. Familial hypercholesterolemia in China: prevalence and evidence of underdetection and undertreatment in a community population. Int J Cardiol. 2014;174(3):834–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Benn M, Watts GF, Tybjærg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG. Mutations causative of familial hypercholesterolaemia: screening of 98 098 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study estimated a prevalence of 1 in 217. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(17):1384–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Abifadel M, Boileau C. Genetic and molecular architecture of familial hypercholesterolemia. J Intern Med. 2023;293(2):144–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Benson M, Brown G, Chao C, Chitipiralla S, et al. ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D862–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Galicia-Garcia U, Benito-Vicente A, Uribe KB, Jebari S, Larrea-Sebal A, Alonso-Estrada R, et al. Mutation type classification and pathogenicity assignment of sixteen missense variants located in the EGF-precursor homology domain of the LDLR. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1727.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Esser V, Limbird LE, Brown MS, Goldstein JL, Russell DW. Mutational analysis of the ligand binding domain of the low density lipoprotein receptor. J Biol Chem. 1988;263(26):13282–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Benson M, Brown GR, Chao C, Chitipiralla S, et al. ClinVar: improving access to variant interpretations and supporting evidence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D1062–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilemon KA, Patel J, Aguilar-Salinas C, Ahmed CD, Alkhnifsawi M, Almahmeed W, et al. Reducing the Clinical and Public Health Burden of Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A global call to action. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(2):217–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Umans-Eckenhausen MA, Defesche JC, Sijbrands EJ, Scheerder RL, Kastelein JJ. Review of first 5 years of screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia in the Netherlands. Lancet. 2001;357(9251):165–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9(4):357–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(16):2078–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(16):e164.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Südhof TC, Goldstein JL, Brown MS, Russell DW. The LDL receptor gene: a mosaic of exons shared with different proteins. Science. 1985;228(4701):815–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Yamamoto T, Davis CG, Brown MS, Schneider WJ, Casey ML, Goldstein JL, et al. The human LDL receptor: a cysteine-rich protein with multiple alu sequences in its mRNA. Cell. 1984;39(1):27–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gudmundsson S, Singer-Berk M, Watts NA, Phu W, Goodrich JK, Solomonson M, et al. Variant interpretation using population databases: lessons from gnomAD. Hum Mutat. 2022;43(8):1012–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Abecasis GR, Altshuler D, Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Gibbs RA, et al. A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature. 2010;467(7319):1061–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stenson PD, Mort M, Ball EV, Chapman M, Evans K, Azevedo L, et al. The human gene mutation database (HGMD(®)): optimizing its use in a clinical diagnostic or research setting. Hum Genet. 2020;139(10):1197–207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Chora JR, Iacocca MA, Tichý L, Wand H, Kurtz CL, Zimmermann H, et al. The Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) familial hypercholesterolemia variant Curation Expert Panel consensus guidelines for LDLR variant classification. Genet Med. 2022;24(2):293–306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Santos RD, Gidding SS, Hegele RA, Cuchel MA, Barter PJ, Watts GF, et al. Defining severe familial hypercholesterolaemia and the implications for clinical management: a consensus statement from the International Atherosclerosis Society Severe Familial Hypercholesterolemia Panel. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(10):850–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McKenney JM. Understanding PCSK9 and anti-PCSK9 therapies. J Clin Lipidol. 2015;9(2):170–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dadu RT, Ballantyne CM. Lipid lowering with PCSK9 inhibitors. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11(10):563–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Li C, Tian D, Tang B, Liu X, Teng X, Zhao W, et al. Genome variation map: a worldwide collection of genome variations across multiple species. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D1186–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Database Resources of the National Genomics Data Center. China National Center for Bioinformation in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51(D1):D18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all patients and their families for their trust, understanding, and willingness to participate in this study.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81370443, 31401172), the high-level public health talents(lingjunrencai-02-06), and the Beijing Hospital Authority (DFL20191801).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jialing Deng and Ju Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biomedical Innovation Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100038, China

    Jialing Deng, Ju Zhang, Nan Ding, Yu Hao & Hui Zeng

  2. Beijing Key Laboratory for Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines, Beijing, 100038, China

    Jialing Deng, Ju Zhang, Nan Ding, Yu Hao & Hui Zeng

  3. Queen Mary School, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, China

    Shirui Meng

  4. Department of Atherosclerosis, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China

    Jie Lin

Authors
  1. Jialing Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ju Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shirui Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nan Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yu Hao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hui Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jie Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.D. and J.Z. drafted the manuscript. J.D. and S.M. collected the clinical data. J.Z., N.D. and Y.H. performed the genetic analyses and the bioinformatic analysis. J.L. interpreted the clinical data. H.Z. and J.L. supervised and revised of the manuscript. All authors gave final approval of the submitted version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hui Zeng or Jie Lin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University (2022038X). All subjects voluntarily participated in the study and signed informed consent forms.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deng, J., Zhang, J., Meng, S. et al. LDLR c.89_92dup: a novel frameshift variation in familial hypercholesterolemia. Lipids Health Dis 23, 182 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-024-02173-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-024-02173-2

Keywords

Lipids in Health and Disease

ISSN: 1476-511X